NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

[rdfowler]

Quote: Originally Posted by RamblinWreck21

Georgia Tech's defense is 89? What the? I would have given them like a 74....90 on offense seems about right losing Thomas and Dwyer, but we got lucky on D. I'll take it though.

seriously dude it wasnt really the defense, it was scheme and bad coaching ratings are based off talent of the players not the output shown in real life.(example UGA in ncaa 2009 prob over rated but was still one of the top talented teams in the nation that year) our offense does neeed to be higher because our ratings do no reflect a ranking of 12 as its shown on the game and i do believe in real life that tech is a #10 - #15 kind of team

[jmik58]

Quote: Originally Posted by Bamafan3723

We have more than one returning starter on defense.

I'll give you credit for three returning starters with Hightower, Barron, and Green. Two corner positions and two linebacker positions aren't even clear yet who will start.

Hardly worthy of a 99 rating on D.

[jolson88]

Okay, I'm an Oregon/Oregon State guy and I'm a little bit surprised about a #4 rating for the Ducks. But that may just be me.

Also, sweet, with an overall of 60 (tied for lowest with Eastern Michigan), it looks like Western Kentucky in the Sunbelt will be my rebuild project this year . Though UL Monroe at 64 could be fun as well. Too bad it looks like stadium expansions won't be in this year though . I don't want to be stuck in smaller stadiums after I'm a powerhouse program :/.

[Michgantown]

Cal - 3*
Central Michigan - 3*
What?

[slingblade73]

Quote: Originally Posted by jmik58

I'll give you credit for three returning starters with Hightower, Barron, and Green. Two corner positions and two linebacker positions aren't even clear yet who will start. Hardly worthy of a 99 rating on D.

Obviously you have not been paying attention to our recruiting. Re-load....

[jmik58]

Quote: Originally Posted by notoriouzwun

I think its about even. Offensively you all ar superior to us. Defensively we are superior to you. Special teams wise, return wise you guys are better, kicking and punting we are better. You are the "evil twin". Now that Olson is gone as our O-Coordinator and Danny Suckyvan is gone, our offense should be much improved.

I'm just speaking from the perspective of an outsider who has done research on both teams. I assume you're talking as an ASU fan, but I definitely disagree on them being even. ASU had a very good defense last year but only four guys return so that will likely fall off. The offense returns three for an offense that was 8th in the PAC 10.

Arizona on the other hand returns seven on offense and should improve on their 5th in the PAC-10 scoring numbers. Defensively they will struggle a little, especially at linebacker.

ASU needs their defense to be competitive, and only won 4 games with it last year. The D is gone this year, so it could be worse.

Arizona is easily two scores better in a head to head matchup.

[moylan1234]

western kentucky's roster here i come!

[jmik58]

Quote: Originally Posted by slingblade73

Obviously you have not been paying attention to our recruiting. Re-load....

How much attention have you paid to any other team's recruiting other than Alabama's over this same period of time? Everyone else is "re-loading" as well in their own way. If a good recruiting class is all it takes to compensate for losing 7 or 8 starters then why do average recruiting teams win a lot of games, and why do teams with lots of talent lose?

Too many other factors involved to just say you're worthy of a 99 rating or that your defense is going to be the best just because of recruiting.