NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

[Gosens6]

Jesus could that guy be scrolling any faster?

[Swat_21]

So much butthurt ITT. It's so funny.

[bama4111]

bama only lost 1 crucial player on offense and that was Colin Peek. Other than that we lost 2 Oline and a WR that didnt play much at all. We have a smart QB, 2 of the best backs in college football, Potentially a great WR in Jones if he can get his catching straight and 3 returning starters on the oline, and a couple of TE's that have game experience so bama should be up in the high 90's on offense

[NEOPARADIGM]

Big Michigan fan here, but them still being six-stars after the last two seasons is, um, noteworthy. I was really expecting a drop down to five. Not that I don't still consider them a top-flight program, obviously they are, but in the game if you start with a six-star team and go 3-9 and 5-7, you're not still six stars that third season, are you?

And Notre Dame? Six stars again? Same logic as above: yeah, Notre Dame's Notre Dame, but they haven't been "NOTRE DAME" in like 15 years.

Chalk up another vote for more customization: would be cool if we could manually set team prestige before starting a Dynasty.

[Nbanflguy]

How is Minnesota a 85? I love my team, but there is no way we are only 1 overall worse than notre dame.
And we are an 87 on offense when we had the last offense in the Big 10 last year and lost Eric Decker!

[o 99 PROBL3MS o]

Quote: Originally Posted by bama4111

bama only lost 1 crucial player on offense and that was Colin Peek. Other than that we lost 2 Oline and a WR that didnt play much at all. We have a smart QB, 2 of the best backs in college football, Potentially a great WR in Jones if he can get his catching straight and 3 returning starters on the oline, and a couple of TE's that have game experience so bama should be up in the high 90's on offense

Come on man are you really trying to make a case for Bama as the best offense in college football? Colin Peek was Bama's best WR in my opinion. You think Bama's offense should be rated higher than Arkansas' in the game?

QB- ARK
RB- Bama
OL- Split (Bama has better run blockers and Ark has better pass blockers)
WR- ARK
TE- ARK

[Tovarich]

LOL @ the Central Florida homerism. 3 stars, 83 overall. That's equal prestige to Arkansas, Cal, South Florida, Texas Tech, etc. Could they at least pretend they're not homers? Yikes. That's a solid 2 star program, who are 26-25 in a bad conference over the last 4 years. But that's the same level as Cal? Laughable.

Cal being 3 stars is pretty bad. They're a 4.

99 on offense, and defense? Come on now. That's not a 99 offense. Defense...eh, maybe.

TCU's numbers seem reversed. They're not a 96 on O and an 88 on D. Their D is among the best in the country just about every year. The offense is decent. Reverse those numbers and it's right on.

As usual, the ratings and the rankings are completely out of sync. Got an unranked team rated a 90. Got a ranked team at 80. This is part of why the rankings system has always been bad in the dynasty.

These are predictably bad, and need to be massively re-edited before a dynasty can be played.

[Spear]

San Jose State, here I come.

Love rebuilding projects.