Madden NFL 11 Team Ratings Revealed

[iBlievN5]

Quote: Originally Posted by NYYanks26

And Rodgers and Ryan were proven prior to 2 seasons ago? Kolb started 2 games last season and played terrific. I know one of those games was against the Chiefs but the other was against the Super Bowl Champions. The defense will be much improved only b/c it can't be worse than last year. But basically you are saying the Eagles have one of the worst offensive teams in the NFC? Huh? Falcons & Cowboys will score more points? The only thing missing is McNabb but we upgraded there.. And Westbrook wasn't healthy for 3 seasons but McCoy did more than fill in last year.

you're being ignorant. no they hadn't played much either, but ryan was supported by a top 3 RB and was mediocre (16 TDs) anyway. Aaron Rodgers was a phenom, but either way, it's ignorant to assume that Kolb will come in and be better than those guys right off the bat or worlds better than McNabb was last year (3500, 22 TDs in 14 games). The defense last year finished in the top 15 (12th I think) there's A LOT of room for decline. I'm not saying they have one of the worse, but talent wise there's no reason to think they'll be better (Cowboys - romo, witten, austin, barber, jones, choice, and bryant) and the falcons with turner, gonzalez, white, and ryan with turner being the key. McCoy was average at best last year. I didn't see anything great from him.

[cubsball899]

Quote: Originally Posted by Beasts Inc

All the haters like to conveniently leave out the 27 TDs to make him look bad, as bad as he was at times, he still had good moments. As bad as the INTs were, he still had more TDs (albeit by one, my point remains. You might want to check those stats again, he had a down 08 season I agree, but he did better in 07 than the Super Bowl appearance year, or is 20 tackles really worth more than more sacks, picks, and PDs? I'm not arguing that the Bears won't struggle at times this year, especially the offense trying to learn a complicated system, but Martz is a stickler for the little things and as you know, a good chunk of Cutler's INTs can be blamed on his mechanics regressing, recievers running the wrong route, and running for his life. The former 2 I guarantee will be improved by Sept 12, if Tice can make the O-line into something stable, I don't see how the team won't finish around 10 wins.

i don't care about stats, i've got my two eyes. jay cutler has never had a winning season... i don't know why you think i'm commiting a crime by saying they will be average lol. its not their year this year if they win 10 games they will have outperformed themselves and i will be ecstatic. if they finish with 6 wins they will have underperformed. thats the definition of the middle of the pack NFL team. and as of now the bears are the 3rd best team in their own division. mark my words 7-9 wins this season.

[king525]

Quote: Originally Posted by Beasts Inc

All the haters like to conveniently leave out the 27 TDs to make him look bad, as bad as he was at times, he still had good moments. As bad as the INTs were, he still had more TDs (albeit by one, my point remains.

He did have more TD and could had even more but he throw half his ints in the Redzone that's the most in two years, and if your gonna blame the team around him know that the lions went 0-16 and still had less giveaways in the redzone as a team then cutler's did throwing ints.

I do thing this year he will have a better year but i don't see him excelling until Chicago adds a wr that can produce on consistent basis.

[Bolt4Life]

Quote: Originally Posted by NYYanks26

Not a joke.. Great reply too.

I've noticed he doesn't add anything to football conversation. Maybe that is why it says he is banned. Acts more like a troll than discussing football and reasons behind team ratings.

[will12203]

Go Bills I am not worried about our 69 overall rating. Last year on Madden 10 I made it to a level 30 online playing 98% of the time with my beloved Bills. That was w/o a spiller type back. I never used T.O. anyway. So I will not bitch and moan over these preseason ratings.

[Patriots1996]

The Colts should be rated higher than the Saints. The only reason NO is higher is because the coverboy is from them. Colts are the best in the NFL. Saints wont win 12 games next year.

[jmood88]

Quote: Originally Posted by Patriots1996

The Colts should be rated higher than the Saints. The only reason NO is higher is because the coverboy is from them. Colts are the best in the NFL. Saints wont win 12 games next year.

You seem to have forgotten that the Saints beat the Colts by double digits in the only meeting between the teams last year.

[Exonerated]

Quote: Originally Posted by jmood88

You seem to have forgotten that the Saints beat the Colts by double digits in the only meeting between the teams last year.

H2H means nothing.

Also. Colts shud be #1. They are favourites for the superbowl this year ... again.