Home

UFC 2010 Undisputed Overall Ratings Revealed

This is a discussion on UFC 2010 Undisputed Overall Ratings Revealed within the MMA Forum forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Combat Sports > MMA Forum
A New Patch Creates That Urge to Start Fresh
NBA 2K25 MyNBA: How to Avoid Too Many Free Agents Staying Unsigned
College Football 25 Guide: What Goes Into a 'Best Playbook' and How to Find Your Own
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-05-2010, 04:07 PM   #25
Livin' the dream
 
Stumbleweed's Arena
 
OVR: 39
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 6,280
Blog Entries: 1
Re: UFC 2010 Undisputed Overall Ratings Revealed

If they have the best fighters in the game set to 79, I highly doubt you could make a CAF higher than that unless you got extra points or something beyond the initial creation allocation. No way they allow CAFs online rated higher than the best real fighters... Plus, I assume that ranked matches won't accept CAFs regardless, so I don't think we'd see a ton of them online anyway except in custom matches.

But yeah, hopefully these overalls don't mean all that much and the fighters are well-differentiated by their skillsets and move lists. I just really don't want guys like Anthony Johnson reversing good ground fighters at-will just because the timing on the flick was right. I've been able to reverse Shogun/Machida with Rampage a few times, but it was rare and required perfect timing... hope that's the case in the full game.
Stumbleweed is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 05-05-2010, 05:03 PM   #26
Banned
 
OVR: 28
Join Date: Oct 2009
Blog Entries: 48
wow no 80's?,no 90's?
gamer23 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2010, 05:21 PM   #27
The buzz is palpable now!
 
sportznut02's Arena
 
OVR: 32
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,068
Blog Entries: 8
Re: UFC 2010 Undisputed Overall Ratings Revealed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumbleweed
If they have the best fighters in the game set to 79, I highly doubt you could make a CAF higher than that unless you got extra points or something beyond the initial creation allocation. No way they allow CAFs online rated higher than the best real fighters... Plus, I assume that ranked matches won't accept CAFs regardless, so I don't think we'd see a ton of them online anyway except in custom matches.

But yeah, hopefully these overalls don't mean all that much and the fighters are well-differentiated by their skillsets and move lists. I just really don't want guys like Anthony Johnson reversing good ground fighters at-will just because the timing on the flick was right. I've been able to reverse Shogun/Machida with Rampage a few times, but it was rare and required perfect timing... hope that's the case in the full game.
Interesting ratings to say they least but agree with everything you just said.
sportznut02 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2010, 05:27 PM   #28
Rookie
 
OVR: 5
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL
If this is what it seems like, where overall plays in very little and specific skills decide more... EA needs to take notes for their football series...
EHSheadhunter09 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2010, 08:36 PM   #29
All Star
 
mikenoob's Arena
 
OVR: 21
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mass
Posts: 5,545
Re: UFC 2010 Undisputed Overall Ratings Revealed

Why does it matter, does it make them any better to have an 90 overall rating? If they decided to put say GSP at 90, they would scale everyone up to 80+. You end up with the same situation where the range of ratings are +/- 10. Does it really matter? Overall rating is just a number.
mikenoob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2010, 09:10 PM   #30
Banned
 
feedthehorse28's Arena
 
OVR: 5
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma
Re: UFC 2010 Undisputed Overall Ratings Revealed

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikenoob
Why does it matter, does it make them any better to have an 90 overall rating? If they decided to put say GSP at 90, they would scale everyone up to 80+. You end up with the same situation where the range of ratings are +/- 10. Does it really matter? Overall rating is just a number.
yeah but that number affects the gameplay. i also dont have a problem with the top fighters topping out at 79 but when the worst fighter on the game is only a 69, thats just not a big enough disparity for me. im afraid a guy like GSP or anderson silva arent gonna be as dominate as they are in real life. and if we can max out our CAFs at 100, then online is gonna go to ****.
feedthehorse28 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2010, 09:16 PM   #31
All Star
 
mikenoob's Arena
 
OVR: 21
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mass
Posts: 5,545
Re: UFC 2010 Undisputed Overall Ratings Revealed

A fighter is only as good as the user. Also, who said Silva can't dominate a guy in the upper 60's? Look at NBA Live, their ratings are pretty low with not much guys in the 90s or 80s. A 79 rated player is MUCH better than using a guy at like 69. Their scale isn't as small as UFC so that must mean the top end fighters with the higher overall number will fight much better than the lower numbers.
mikenoob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 05-05-2010, 09:48 PM   #32
Live your life
 
Gotmadskillzson's Arena
 
OVR: 49
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vermont
Posts: 23,197
Blog Entries: 91
Re: UFC 2010 Undisputed Overall Ratings Revealed

maybe their goal was to have people to really get to know the fighters and actually play with them to determine who was clearly the best. It is a lot harder to determine that if everybody is separated by a handful of points.

So in a way it could be looked at a good marketing strategy by THQ. Because you know casuals will always flock to the highest numbered person anyway. They do that with every sports game. So being the highest is only a 79 which is GSP and BJ Penn, and they only one number higher then a dozen other fighters, it will force in a way for even the casuals to truly learn the in's and out's of each fighter.

Because even though GSP for example is 79 over all, his striking might only be average, wrestling superior but BJJ average as well. So therefore instead of over all mattering the most, individual skill set ratings matter the most.
Gotmadskillzson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Combat Sports > MMA Forum »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:19 PM.
Top -