Madden NFL 11 Hints From EA (IGN)

[joejccva71]

Honestly I think it's time EA focused more on offline franchise for this year. Last year they focused on online franchise so lets give some love to the offline guys.

[KBLover]

Basically, making football a rock-paper-scissors type RTS counter system?

I don't know if I like that.

The only "counter system" I want in Madden or any football game is one that is like real life - i.e. zone coverages work against some routes, but weaker against others, blitzes challenge certain gaps and are "countered" with certain protection schemes, etc along with having to work with physical matchups, and so on.

Not Play A counters Play B so that play A almost never works - never mind if in the real game or what Play B's scheme is really would "counter" Play A so successfully.

Also where would personnel fit in a "play counter" system? Would weak players in a play that "counters" the offenses play suddenly be super good? Would that be "sim" play?

As far as TSB goes, having played it again, I think it's too feast or famine. You pick the play, it has nearly 100% chance of failing. Otherwise, it has a very high chance of success. For example, I pick a pass play and the AI picked a different pass play - my defenders are clueless. They leave 2 WR out of 3 uncovered and typically struggle to put pressure simply because I didn't pick the exact play? I know Tecmo isn't going for super-realism so I'm not bashing it, but I don't know if I want a similar kind of system in a game that's supposedly looking for realism.

Now if Madden is just Tecmo with 3-D graphics, well I'll just go play Tecmo

[BezO]

Quote: Originally Posted by Tyrant8RDFL

I definitely agree with the 3 replies above. My bigest concern is the areas they are focusing on. The reason why many online players seem to use a small handfull of plays is simply because of how Madden's A.I is not up to par. Let me explain. Gamers will use a play over and over that has a good success rate, and that is becuase madden has not done a good job in giving us plays that combat those plays. Thus making the decision for many to use the same plays over and over easy with no regrets.

I agree with the reasons, but not the remedy, especially for defense. We don't need counte "plays". We need the ability to scheme... AKA tiered play calling.

[ANDROMADA 1]

Nice post CK, I especially agree about the PA being overdone, considering most guys don't even bother establishing the run first. I mean who is that play fooling? There should be a legit counter to everything. Including milking the clock. As it is now the "hurry" up offense is only good for about 3 plays then your players are toast. I hope they tune the "hurry up" as well for M11.

[Rashad19]

Quote: Originally Posted by BezO

I agree with the reasons, but not the remedy, especially for defense. We don't need counte "plays". We need the ability to scheme... AKA tiered play calling.

Bezo not trying to be smart here but exactly how would tiered play calling allow us to scheme better than what we currently have available to us in Madden 10?

[Critical Kills]

Rocky - I meant grow the market internally...in other words, I'm not saying bring other non-sports gamers into sports gaming online, that's never going to happen. I'm saying that there's a huge amount of offline sports games players that should be able to be brought into online gaming. A lot of folks don't want to play online because of the way others play, but that's also a problem for FPS as well. Companies that make sports games should study FPS to see how that aspect can be minimized.

[oneamongthefence]

Last year Ian stated that he hopes that a football coach who has never played madden and someone who has played madden for years can compete and have a close game. If they continue to work towards that goal things can only go upwards from there. Where basic football logic and strategy can shutdown someone who has stick skills or has a predictable
Offense.

[BezO]

Quote: Originally Posted by Rashad19

Bezo not trying to be smart here but exactly how would tiered play calling allow us to scheme better than what we currently have available to us in Madden 10?

Just in case, let me reiterate how I want it tiered. We should be able to call a front, then call a stunt/blitz package(either seperately or together, then call the coverage.

This would allow for almost unlimited combinations. So instead of searching for what you want and likely not finding it, you put it together. You want a 4-3, weakside DE/DT loop, WOLB blitz, cover 1? Just put it together.

My experience has been that I have defensive ideas in my head, but can never find the "play" in the playbook. Depending on what I'm trying to stop that play, the coverage or the stunts/blitzes may be more important. So I pick a play with something close and settle for whatever else EA packaged with it. I shouldn't have to use EA's blitz/stunt package just because I want to play cover 1 free. And I shouldn't have to use a certain coverage because it's packaged with the blitz I want.

IRL, defensive coordinators are not limited by a set of plays. They have fronts, stunts, blitzes & coverages that they can combine in any way they want. That's what we should have.

Now, no disrespect to you, nor anyone that may have learned this way, but many folks learned about football through Madden. Many of those folks may not know how it should work. But they do know it's limiting, so they use the position audibles(forget what they're called) to get the defense they really want not realizing there's a tried and true way the NFL, college, HS & little leagues have been using since the beginning of (football)time.