MLB '10: The Show - Player Potential Fix Coming in Next Roster Update

[mrbean5277]

David Wright an F ?

Hanley Ramirez a C ? Best player in baseball a C potential. Interesting.

Also, hopefully the generic made up starting pitchers and players who are an A potential will be fixed as well.

[Domlin]

Quote: Originally Posted by mrbean5277

David Wright an F ? Just cause he had a disappointing year in 09, he is still one of the top players in the game. Should be an A. Hanley Ramirez a C ? Best player in baseball a C potential. interesting.

Potential was just annouced as a bug, read the thread!

[SpacemanSpiff]

Quote: Originally Posted by mrbean5277

David Wright an F ? Just cause he had a disappointing year in 09, he is still one of the top players in the game. Should be an A. Hanley Ramirez a C ? Best player in baseball a C potential. interesting.

Quote: Originally Posted by Russell_SCEA

Ok guys its a bug and it will be fixed on the next roster update

It's a bug, not intentionally like that.

[wahoo138]

Quote: Originally Posted by Russell_SCEA

Ok guys its a bug and it will be fixed on the next roster update

Nice. Way to be on it.

[mhagf4]

Maybe my perception is off on this, but I feel like SCEA does a much much better job of listening to, and reaching out to the customer base, when compared to the others out there (EA, 2K, etc)

they heard some gripes, asked some questions, and will fix it quickly.

I work for a software (commercial B2B) company and know how hard it is to catch everything before a release. It is the ability to fix the things that a user notices in a prompt manner that make a company great.

Kudos guys.

[Stunna2006]

was never too worried about this because it will be fixed, which has now been verified. also, i think their next fix will be the waivers, just give em some time, and the flaws will be corrected and the spectacular gameplay will shine.

[VitaminKG21]

Quote: Originally Posted by mhagf4

Maybe my perception is off on this, but I feel like SCEA does a much much better job of listening to, and reaching out to the customer base, when compared to the others out there (EA, 2K, etc) they heard some gripes, asked some questions, and will fix it quickly. I work for a software (commercial B2B) company and know how hard it is to catch everything before a release. It is the ability to fix the things that a user notices in a prompt manner that make a company great. Kudos guys.

+10

[ThirdDegree5803]

Quote: Originally Posted by KJWILLIAMS1

I love the Reds, but I disagree with all these posted. None of these guys are any good. They are average/below average players at best. There are good Reds prospects that need to have the great potential ratings like: Francisco, Alonzo, Heisey, Chapman, Wood, Frazier, and Leake. Dont get these guys above more credit than they deserve. I watch every game being a Reds fan, but you have to be able to distinquish from what your favorites teams guys are talent wise vs. what your perception/wishes their talent was. Guys everywhere do this far too often. I am not ripping you at all, but you have to take the approach of watching all guys and comparing them to the league around them. None of the guys you mentioned are rising stars or even rising. Come on now, the guys I mentioned above are the Reds "rising stars." Thanks.

thanks? thanks for what? if you weren't ripping on me it sounded awful close...

Dickerson isn't a B? okay C...I'll I'm saying is he was a B last year...
Paul Janish? he was a C last year w/ S...he had a .991 fielding percentage good for best in the majors among SS and you think he's an F?
Matt Maloney was a C last season and made his first appearance in the majors...how can you say he doesn't deserve at least a B? he's 26...maybe a homer, but I do know my stuff and I know the Reds minor league system man...
Wilkin Castillo was a C last year, I'm not trying to make him any better than he is man...they said its a bug...
Lehr, Fisher, Herrara were all C's last season, Herrara is 24! really? he isn't a B?

thanks?