Backbreaker Video: Developer Diary #2 - Euphoria (Gamespot)

[ChubbyBanana]

Quote: Originally Posted by Americas Team1

Why not this isnt the Madden forum...

Quoted from this site's Terms of Service you agreed to when signing up for these forums:

Quote:

System/Game Wars There are to be no "wars" between systems and games. This means if you are in a games forums, do not bring the other game in there unless you are using it constructively. "Game A sucks, it should be like Game B" is an example of how NOT to be constructive. "Game A's feature should have this part of Game B's feature because it would have (insert effect)" is a better example of what we expect of you when comparing games.

[Americas Team1]

Quote: Originally Posted by ChubbyBanana

Quoted from this site's Terms of Service you agreed to when signing up for these forums:

Well could you re-open t11's thread since someone's trolling got it closed?

[Glorious Arc]

OS has tried to build itself as a community that has constructive arguments and conversions. Simply stating something without bringing anything to the table for an idea of how to fix it(unless it is the first time people have seen it then its typically should be placed in the IMPRESSION thread instead of starting a new thread) is considered trolling/bashing/ect ect

Things that could be locked carded or banned ect ect whatever
"Madden sucks"(trolling)
"Franchise sucks"(trolling)

They are just broad general statements that dont even narrow down your complaint. They come across as someone who merely has an "agenda" or is trolling.

If the poster were to say, "Madden sucks because the passing game is to easy on offense and the robo QB is still alive and well. Maybe they should look into making the QB accuracy and awareness ratings mean more for the CPU because currently Russel still feels a lot like Manning." Is an example of "bashing" madden in a constructive way. They dont need the forums cluttered up with people just saying sucks because it does only one thing...adds more clutter and prevents easy access to good ideas about how to try and fix the problem.

There are players who would consider lowering the ratings of players and then testing the results in a thread like the above mentioned. This then provides the community with a viable option to alter their game and improve their gaming experience without the devs doing anything. Hopefully the devs take notice and use some of our ideas and make the game better if not at least there is a clean and easy way to open dialogue about how us players can try and fix our issues.

[ChubbyBanana]

Quote: Originally Posted by Americas Team1

Well could you re-open t11's thread since someone's trolling got it closed?

No.

But I will advise everyone here that we should get this thread back on topic. Let's talk about the Developer Diary rather than OS Policies.

If you want to discuss our rules, feel free to post in Steve's Forum or PM a site Moderator/Admin.

[Americas Team1]

Quote: Originally Posted by ChubbyBanana

No. But I will advise everyone here that we should get this thread back on topic. Let's talk about the Developer Diary rather than OS Policies. If you want to discuss our rules, feel free to post in Steve's Forum or PM a site Moderator/Admin.

well alright then.

[Phobia]

Quote: Originally Posted by Glorious Arc

OS has tried to build itself as a community that has constructive arguments and conversions. Simply stating something without bringing anything to the table for an idea of how to fix it(unless it is the first time people have seen it then its typically should be placed in the IMPRESSION thread instead of starting a new thread) is considered trolling/bashing/ect ect Things that could be locked carded or banned ect ect whatever "Madden sucks"(trolling) "Franchise sucks"(trolling) They are just broad general statements that dont even narrow down your complaint. They come across as someone who merely has an "agenda" or is trolling. If the poster were to say, "Madden sucks because the passing game is to easy on offense and the robo QB is still alive and well. Maybe they should look into making the QB accuracy and awareness ratings mean more for the CPU because currently Russel still feels a lot like Manning." Is an example of "bashing" madden in a constructive way. They dont need the forums cluttered up with people just saying sucks because it does only one thing...adds more clutter and prevents easy access to good ideas about how to try and fix the problem. There are players who would consider lowering the ratings of players and then testing the results in a thread like the above mentioned. This then provides the community with a viable option to alter their game and improve their gaming experience without the devs doing anything. Hopefully the devs take notice and use some of our ideas and make the game better if not at least there is a clean and easy way to open dialogue about how us players can try and fix our issues.

Great post Glorious

Back on topic: I think BB is going to bring alot to the world of sports gaming. I still feel it will fail in the football realm only because of lack of licensing and the fact that EA is a powerhouse. Weather you agree with how madden plays or not. You have to account for them and they WILL sell 5-10 times as many Madden 11's as BB will sell. Just the nature of the industry.

But with that said, I think NM will survive because they control a tech that is huge. I would say the biggest tech since the Unreal engine. It can/will revolutionize sports gaming.

[Hova57]

one really good commercial and this game will take off. they need to show its a good game. one action packed blitz -like commercial it will have problems. it has to come off as a fun, but realistic game. for people to buy.

plus the thing with tech you can only hold on to it for so long. if PhysX figure out something similar to what Euphoria is EA will get it in an update. but this game looks hot so far.

[t11]

Quote: Originally Posted by ChubbyBanana

No. But I will advise everyone here that we should get this thread back on topic. Let's talk about the Developer Diary rather than OS Policies. If you want to discuss our rules, feel free to post in Steve's Forum or PM a site Moderator/Admin.

HAHA, shut down.

Anyway, I'm still super impressed by the gang tackles. The look more fluid and dynamic than Pro-Tak. But almost more important than the gang tackles, is how they start. and thats with a stale mate of power and strength. It really looks amazing to see the BC try to power through a tackle only to be hit again and again by other players/