Team Prestige in NCAA Football 10

[sportzbro]

@ilukeisamazing

Its a culmination of their past & present accomplishments & failures.. They have a meeting to decide the prestige ratings.. I dont think there is a formula or anything for establishing the initial ratings.

[jsquigg]

Quote: Originally Posted by BBkobe87

Iowa and MSU should be 4 stars. Not seeing Maryland at 4 star though trapstar, sorry. 3 seems good for them

Really not trying to stir it up, but based on the big picture, I think a 3 is about right for MSU. UM had a horrible season last year, so don't think you can get out of a thought through response with using that as an insult, but I think it says a lot about MSU's season when they lose 4 games including a bowl, and think it's a good season. I know you finally beat Michigan, but other than that, it was kind of a mediocre year. Outside of the fact that all MSU fans will probably flame me now, I'd like to know how they think this year and the future will go for their program. As it is now, I think a 3 is about right.

[sportzbro]

Quote: Originally Posted by Krioniq

As such, I do think that the next logical step for Dynasty mode is a deeper prestige rating system that factors in the coach's ability to recruit, develop talent at particular position groups, get the most out of that talent on gameday. In addition, coach progression and regression in these attributes, and these coaches' various coordinators developing and going from school to school, and older coaches retiring, etc. should also be included. The current prestige ranking should remain and have some effect, but the differences between good and bad coaches, as well as coaches on the same tier with different strengths and weaknesses, needs to have an impact in the game as well. End ramble. Flame away.

I think my idea for AD mode, combined with some type of point system to gain additional pretige stars would be the solution. It could work like the prestige rankings in COD or KillZone 2 kind of.

[deucepoppi17]

Quote: Originally Posted by Krioniq

Open ramble, be warned. ; in particular over the last three years we've had (by my count) four first-round draft picks (Ferguson, Long, Albert, Monroe) and we have had many other players have been drafted. End ramble. Flame away.

HA! U just named all OL....maybe if UVA put out playmakers as first round talent then i could understand, but come on now.....

[utahman19]

Quote: Originally Posted by BORN4CORN

If they really wanted to stir up some controversy, they would have put Utah at 6*...which might have been OK imo.

Dude.... not even I will say Utah is a 6-star program. Of course, a down year for Utah has been 8-5, a down year for Penn State is 3-9.

I will also say I don't think Bama is a 6-star program... yet. See what Saban does in the next two years and then we can talk. Prestige is more than just history and tradition, it's also what have you done lately. I feel good saying Utah and Boise (and TCU, too) have been just as good if not better in the last decade than Penn State and several other BCS schools.

Combining the history and the here-and-now into the prestige rating is why I am fine with Utah and Boise being on equal prestige footing as Penn State, Nebraska, Tennessee, and others.

[sportzbro]

Quote: Originally Posted by jsquigg

Really not trying to stir it up, but based on the big picture, I think a 3 is about right for MSU. UM had a horrible season last year, so don't think you can get out of a thought through response with using that as an insult, but I think it says a lot about MSU's season when they lose 4 games including a bowl, and think it's a good season. I know you finally beat Michigan, but other than that, it was kind of a mediocre year. Outside of the fact that all MSU fans will probably flame me now, I'd like to know how they think this year and the future will go for their program. As it is now, I think a 3 is about right.

What is your opinion on Iowa?

[utahman19]

Quote: Originally Posted by shmoeco

There is no way MSU should be a 3, they should be a 4 for sure. i think boise state and utah are both to high. they wouldnt have such good records if they played in a real conference.

Says the Chippewa fan.

Tell that to Nick Saban. He had similar thoughts.

[pistonchamps04]

Quote: Originally Posted by jsquigg

Really not trying to stir it up, but based on the big picture, I think a 3 is about right for MSU. UM had a horrible season last year, so don't think you can get out of a thought through response with using that as an insult, but I think it says a lot about MSU's season when they lose 4 games including a bowl, and think it's a good season. I know you finally beat Michigan, but other than that, it was kind of a mediocre year. Outside of the fact that all MSU fans will probably flame me now, I'd like to know how they think this year and the future will go for their program. As it is now, I think a 3 is about right.

10 wins this year
even better in the upcoming years now that we've actually recruited some talent and we are taking over the state in recruiting
and we'll beat scUM every year that DickRod is there