Three Things MVP 05 Still Does Better

[jpup]

the article is nonsense and should not be posted in this forum. We can't discuss 2k in this forum and you guys should not post an article about MVP 05. Post it in the MVP forum where it belongs. There is simply no comparison between MVP and The Show. It's not even fair to MVP. The Show has been better for 3 years.

The discussion of the mechanics of hitting in the article is laughable.

[ComfortablyLomb]

royal rooter, not ruler.

They were the Royal Rooters.

[ComfortablyLomb]

I wish I could edit the first post... I've got both and I think MVP 05 is superior. Of course I've got it on PC and the mods take it to another level. The batting system and unpolished fielding in The Show just bother me too much to really take a liking to the game. It's a quality product and the devs obviously are very talented but it's just not for me.

[mike8813]

Quote: Originally Posted by jpup

the article is nonsense and should not be posted in this forum. We can't discuss 2k in this forum and you guys should not post an article about MVP 05. Post it in the MVP forum where it belongs. There is simply no comparison between MVP and The Show. It's not even fair to MVP. The Show has been better for 3 years. The discussion of the mechanics of hitting in the article is laughable.

Quote: Originally Posted by mike8813

I don't understand the writer's logic in dismissing the Show's hitting mechanic. To say that you can't bring your hands in to pull a ball or extend to go oppo is wrong. To pull an inside pitch: have your PCI inside, swing early. DONE. To hit an outside pitch the opposite way: have your PCI outside, wait the extra split second, swing late. DONE. Average those out and you hit it up the middle. Am I missing something here?

I'm glad I'm not the only one baffled by these false knocks against the Show's hitting mechanics. (The SCEA representative also agrees with our logic)

The ability to use the left stick to influence which side of the field you hit to was evident all the way back in the '06 version. Anybody remember the "King of the Diamond" mini-game?

[bsb13]

The Show is overall a better game than MVP 2005 was, and it should be by now.....but if MVP never bit the dust and we had a MVP 2009 MLB version, I'm pretty confident thats the game I would be playing right now.

As a matter of fact...if we had HH 2009 or maybe even ASB 2009, I would probably be playing any of those games over The Show right now. Back in the day when we had all those games available, I always thought The Show was the weakest of the bunch. But naturally after 3 or 4 years have passed, the show has finally surpassed all of those titles.

[teampunjabi]

Personally I think its nonsense to say the hitting in MLB 09 is a gamebreaker. And the pitching is superior to MVP. The baserunning can be adapted to and once you get the hang of it, it works great. This game has a DEEP learning curve, and I think that is why people get frustrated with this game.

[thdudeabides]

Quote: Originally Posted by slickdtc

I think I've played enough of MLB 09 The Show to form an opinion on this. God knows I've played way past my share of MVP Baseball 2005 (just on the XBOX). I'll break it down into categories: Pitching - Lots of different opinions on this regarding MLB 09. Personally, I went with Classic interface. I didn't like that the Meter pitching in MLB 09 didn't determine where the pitch was going. I understand it shouldn't always be perfect when you hit it in the sweet spot, but it always felt like it was just a dummy interface, like my input didn't matter. I'd rather have it go fully off ratings and sliders using the Classic interface. They do a good job of showing that you don't always have control over where the ball is going. Though I'd like to see some guys be able to spot pitches most of the time, pitchers that are notorious for their control. Obviously, MVP 05 let you spot your pitch pretty much all the time. Hardly ever gave up any walks. I guess I learned to deal with this, but as a simulation, yes, it should have been changed. I'll give the nod to MLB 09 here. Batting - I like both the systems, to be honest. I think MVP was a bit too easy to influence where the ball was going. However, I loved the hit variety in MVP. I don't feel like I have as much control with it in MLB 09. Which maybe, that's how it should be. Neither is bad by any means though. I guess we'll take a split here. I think they both do a good job. Fielding - I just don't like MLB 09's fielding at all. The fielders don't have a sense of urgency some times, the throwing meter means nothing, balls go through your guy. It's just not good and something they definitely need to look at next year. MVP, on the other hand, is one of the few games that really pulled off fielding well. Best fielding in a baseball game I've ever played. Animations were good, throwing meter actually worked, I liked the diving controls. I guess you'd see a ball go through a guy every now and then, but I don't know... it just didn't happen to me as much as it does in MLB 09. Definitely give the edge here to MVP 05. Baserunning - You know, at first I didn't like MLB 09's controls. But as I play more, I'm really getting used to them. The "New" controls are basically opposite of how MVP's were (using left analog stick to select runner instead of the face button... then of course, face buttons were to tell where to go instead of the D-pad like in MVP). I saw that the "Classic" controls were what MVP had but I had actually grown accustomed to "New" that I was having trouble going back. Imagine that. So after practice, it's become pretty natural to me. Of course, I loved MVP's as well. I'm sure they took practice when I first started playing that game. They were flawless once I got used to them. But the actual baserunning in the game, specifically stealing, is way different. MLB's poor, there's no two ways about it. You have to be an expert to steal successfully on a pitcher using the "go early" method. And the other method, hitting L2, is a complete crapshoot. Also, you get picked off the base wayyy too much. Even with the slider all the way down. MVP, I feel, did a great job with stealing. And the sliders really worked for the stealing. You'd get picked off, but not nearly as much as you do in MLB. MVP gets the nod here because of the stealing. So that's 2 wins for MVP, 1 for MLB, and 1 wash. But I think they're pretty even... both battles between pitching and batter were great. MVP did the fielding better, though that can be rectified with Auto fielding in MLB. But it's the stealing that really sets MVP apart from MLB 09. It really does take a big part of the game and that's what's holding MLB 09 back for me.

I second most of this, but I'll add hitting that I thought hitting in MVP was better then anything The Show has done. When you hit a home run in MVP you knew it was gone immediately. Same if you hit a weak ground ball.

In The Show you can never tell how good you hit the ball until the animation kicks in. A homerun "feels" no different then a ground ball back to the pitcher in The Show. They just haven't been able to recreate that feel.

[jpup]

Quote: Originally Posted by thdudeabides

I second most of this, but I'll add hitting that I thought hitting in MVP was better then anything The Show has done. When you hit a home run in MVP you knew it was gone immediately. Same if you hit a weak ground ball. In The Show you can never tell how good you hit the ball until the animation kicks in. A homerun "feels" no different then a ground ball back to the pitcher in The Show. They just haven't been able to recreate that feel.

That's just not true.