NCAA Football 10 Video: Online Dynasty

[I Peench]

Quote: Originally Posted by OMT

Its a little different than that. You are actually decreasing that prospect's interest in the school you are recruiting against. It is basically the opposite of the normal pitching process.

I hope the CPU does this as well. Recruiting against the CPU was waayyyyyyyyy too easy in 09. Really hope we don't see classes with 10+ 5* guys...

[Derrville]

i LOVE those player profile pics!! I hope madden has that.

[Derrville]

Those QBs dont throw many incompletions. Tebows is 75%. A little high?

[Lava]

I really wish the players had their helmets on, I like checking out their gear while I recruit them.

Oh well.

[Rivers17ncsu]

Quote: Originally Posted by Derrville

Those QBs dont throw many incompletions. Tebows is 75%. A little high?

yea possibly, there was only 3 QB's with completion ratings in the 70's last year. Colt McCoy was 76.7%, Chase Daniel was 72.9% and Graham Harrell was 70.6%

[Atomic Martian]

Quote: Originally Posted by gofresno

teambuilder? , new road to glory?, season showdown?? all in the menu, any ideas? guessing teambuilder is cas

nice to see im not the only fresno state fan here on the boards.

The new menu looks sweet cant wait for more info well worth the wait

[J-Unit40]

Quote: Originally Posted by Porters55

Alright, taking a look at the improved statistics: There are 7 QBs shown in the stats screen. A quick rundown: Avg. QB Rating of Top 7 QBs: 184.4 Overall Completion % of Top 7 QBs: 68.7% Yards per attempt of Top 7 QBs: 10.04 Touchdown rate: 10.0% And, for comparison, the actual Top 7 QBs in 2008: Avg. QB Rating: 171.6 Completion %: 67.6% Yards per attempt: 9.26 Touchdown rate: 9.4% The QBS are still a little too jacked up but it doesn't seem quite as bad as I recall in the past. The completion % and TD % aren't that far off, but the QB ratings are too high (probably too few INTs, which we can't see) and that yards per completion figure is pretty far out of whack. Still, they're not totally insane numbers, although it would sort of depend on how many games they have played in that dynasty at that point for the overall yardage and TD figures.

I honestly hope the INTs are toned down in the sim engine (and also on the field). The high ratings are probably due to the high yards per completion like you mentioned. I want to see some guys in the low to mid 50% completion range too. It's been about 4 years since we've seen that (NCAA 05).

[floridagatorfan]

I just do not get how FSU could possibly be an A+ team or even an A-. They haven't been A worthy for the last few years. This just leads me to believe that ratings will be inflated again like they have been for the past years. I was hoping they would follow in Madden's footsteps in lowering player ratings so that only elite players are in the 90s while solid, dependable starters are in the 80s.

For me this is something that has always annoyed me because when you start giving out lots of 90+ ratings there is nothing to differentiate the elite players from the good players. It is like in a dunk contest when judges give out a perfect 50 for a solid above average dunk and then the next player goes and does something spectacular that completely crushes the previous dunk yet they get the same score because you have all ready inflated what a 50 should be.

I wish Madden and NCAA worked more together because I really like the direction that Ian is taking Madden and wish that he was also doing this for NCAA. Instead I feel like NCAA is just the step child and is being overlooked. This is disappointing as I prefer college football over pro football by far.