NCAA Football 09 Patch #1 Available

[RAZRr1275]

Quote: Originally Posted by bucs41

So you watch every game for every team? I say this because although you may be right, the teams you don't edit or adjust are hurt by the ones that you do know and edit. In my opinion, EA is pretty good with ratings. So, I basically don't agree with either of you since I don't believe you're qualified to edit now or when the season starts.... it takes a whole team to determine ratings. In any case, that's your business.... just an opinion.

No I don't watch every game for every team. I don't have enough time or money to do that. How are teams that I don't edit hurt by the teams that I do? I don't have time to touch every single team.

[dmacgreg37]

Quote: Originally Posted by RAZRr1275

No I don't watch every game for every team. I don't have enough time or money to do that. How are teams that I don't edit hurt by the teams that I do? I don't have time to touch every single team.

I think he's saying that you probably edit teams that you are familiar with, or players that you recognize as really good. It's human nature, we're all more likely to mess with the players we know/hear of. However, the simple response is that if people don't want ratings edits they don't have to d/l your roster. Problem solved.

Also, when are you expecting to be releasing this file? Via EA Locker? Thank you very much for your work, as I've named the players manually before, and it sucks.

[threefortywest]

since this has become a discussion about ratings... i will throw my opinion out, the ratings for ncaa are traditionally out of control, the good teams are to good and the bad teams aren't bad enough, when small conference starting OT is rated an 83, and top 25 teams starting OT is rated an 89, there is not a big enough gap. the fact that ohio state and georgia are both a 99 is a joke, thats basically saying that both of those teams are the two best teams in college football history and cannot possibly be any better, this is untrue. IMO, the best team in the game, be it whoever you decide, but should be oklahoma, ohio state, georgia or florida, but honestly, none of those teams should be above a 94, and even that might be a little high, those are all good teams, but they all have weaknesses, which are impossible to exploit when playing these teams because every starter is above a 90. You can't convince me that Todd Boeckman is that good, because he's not.

when there are a bunch of overall 99 players in the game, which there shouldn't be, i can think of one player over the past couple years who would be a 99, and thats it... that player being Adrian Peterson. This is all just my opinion, but i think the good teams are too good, and the players on the good teams are WAY too good.

[stoncold32]

The only rating on this game that matters is SPEED, and that only matters if it's an offensive player.

Am I lying?

[threefortywest]

Quote: Originally Posted by stoncold32

The only rating on this game that matters is SPEED, and that only matters if it's an offensive player. Am I lying?

qb accuracy as well, at least for me, but thats about it

[cornstarch]

Quote: Originally Posted by threefortywest

since this has become a discussion about ratings... i will throw my opinion out, the ratings for ncaa are traditionally out of control, the good teams are to good and the bad teams aren't bad enough, when small conference starting OT is rated an 83, and top 25 teams starting OT is rated an 89, there is not a big enough gap. the fact that ohio state and georgia are both a 99 is a joke, thats basically saying that both of those teams are the two best teams in college football history and cannot possibly be any better, this is untrue. IMO, the best team in the game, be it whoever you decide, but should be oklahoma, ohio state, georgia or florida, but honestly, none of those teams should be above a 94, and even that might be a little high, those are all good teams, but they all have weaknesses, which are impossible to exploit when playing these teams because every starter is above a 90. You can't convince me that Todd Boeckman is that good, because he's not. when there are a bunch of overall 99 players in the game, which there shouldn't be, i can think of one player over the past couple years who would be a 99, and thats it... that player being Adrian Peterson. This is all just my opinion, but i think the good teams are too good, and the players on the good teams are WAY too good.

That is exactly what I'm saying, man. I actually made a thread about this same thing at MaddenPlanet. It's ridiculous, it's like they are afraid to give a team lower than a 90...or else it will hurt their feelings.

[cdj]

Quote: Originally Posted by OMT

Good work, Chris.

I agree 100%, Andy.

Quote: Originally Posted by irishfan1993

Nice job guys getting it out finally....now just gotta wait until a final roster gets put out there.

Right now a file with names only (no edits) can be found in the ncaaStrategies locker.

[imuntouchable352]

so can anyone help us people who are getting f'ed over and are told that high speed internet is not available in their area, even though their neighbor has it, thus not being able to connect their PS3 to internet to download the patch out? I have heard that its not possible which would really suck. anyone know?