NCAA Football 09 Beta Team Rating Screenshots

[Critical Kills]

Quote: Originally Posted by SteelerSpartan

All I got to say is Thank God for DKrause1971!!....He's the man and will have this clusterF**** that EA puts out in order

Normally i'd say "that won't help for those of us who enjoy online play" but since we can use whatever roster file we want for online dynasty it WILL help for online play...WOOT!!

[superjames1992]

West Virginia only gets an 84 rating while Missouri gets a 96?!?!

[gil92h]

Why is auburn always given a lot less credit than they deserve, they are only an 87 on defense, yet they had the #5 scoring defense in 2007-08, #4 least yards given up, and the #5 in pass yrds given up per game.

[Saber]

Quote: Originally Posted by superjames1992

West Virginia only gets an 84 rating while Missouri gets a 96?!?!

Yeah, our defense at an 80 is garbage, but we did lose a sizeable amount of players on defense including 6 of our top 7 defensive backs, but our defense will be rated top 25 nationally at the end of next season, no doubt.

[kneebon5]

Looks like it will be awhile before i get the Vandals up and running with the rest of the NCAA. (60 overall) And no player with an 80 rating or higher. Should be a fun season in the Kibbie Dome. (want to see some shots of that too)

[RockyTop1]

88 on O and 92 on D. Guess I can't complain? Secondary should be pretty stout with Morley and God aka Eric Berry back there.

[AuburnAlumni]

Quote: Originally Posted by RockyTop1

88 on O and 92 on D. Guess I can't complain? Secondary should be pretty stout with Morley and God aka Eric Berry back there.

I guess all those bottles of scotch and godiva chocolates you sent to the EA Sports Development team paid off eh Bates?

[Gibbz]

UNT's defense rating should be lower, and offense rating should be higher. Not really a big deal, though.