NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)

[Coach Bryant]

Good thing we can edit the rosters.

[peteykirch]

Rutgers looked to be 84's across the board.

[countryboy]

Louisville's defense didn't have a rating, it just said....

Louisville defense: haha

[AuburnAlumni]

Quote: Originally Posted by countryboy

Louisville's defense didn't have a rating, it just said.... Louisville defense: haha

I found it...

Louisville
Offense: 89
Defense: -23

[countryboy]

Quote: Originally Posted by AuburnAlumni

I found it... Louisville Offense: 89 Defense: -23

Our defense is improving.

[bjf1377]

Quote: Originally Posted by coogrfan

Good eye, sir. Rice Stadium: yea or nay?

Its harder to tell on that one, but I'm gonna say yea just cause of the position of the scoreboard. I'm gonna keep an eye on the MAC schools when I watch it again just to see how much progress they've made (doesn't look like they have Ohio U in there yet tho)

EDIT: Nevermind, it looks like KSU is generic after all......Ball State = Good, Kent State = Generic, Buffalo = Good, Bowling Green = Generic, Central Michigan = Generic, Eastern Michigan = Good

[therizing02]

The ratings argument could go on forever. I will give EA credit for FINALLY not overrating Notre Dame.

[davin]

Quote: Originally Posted by therizing02

The ratings argument could go on forever. I will give EA credit for FINALLY not overrating Notre Dame.

Interestingly enough in my game last year, the first couple years Notre Dame went off the map (before I did roster edits). I started to wonder why ND completely fell out of power (this was before the season).