NCAA Football 09 Hands-On Preview: Part one: Pasta Padre

[thelasthurtknee]

maddens getting all the camera angles so we can only hope that they might make into ncaa. at least classic view. it's the only one worth a damn. why? would you use a view that you cant see your outside recievers as the default view tiburon?

[KG]

Quote: Originally Posted by countryboy

I don't feel as though the game moved to quick. It may be faster than what we are used to but with all things that are new, you will eventually get the feel for it. In my opinion, the game moved no faster than the LG games.

Ditto. I don't really care too much as long as there is a noticeable dif between WRs and DT's. Last years was pretty good at stuff like that not happening.

[countryboy]

Quote: Originally Posted by TheGamingChef

This always happens; just like I take great previews with a grain of salt, I take all the Debbie Downers with a grain of salt too. I've loved games that others have hated, and I've hated ones that others have loved. I think Online Dynasty by itself will have me loving this game. Let's all wait and see.

good point.

[NBA2k8 CHAMP]

Quote: Originally Posted by stewaat

Not gonna lie...I really want the classic camera angle back!!! I like to see the entire field!

x2! That's the main one i want

[babyfat9]

We need a wide wide view to see the outside receiver....i thought EA would be smart enuff by now to incorporate a view like that.....how many times do i have to throw to the flat not being able to see my receiver and there's a DB sitting right there !!!!!!

[rudyjuly2]

Quote: Originally Posted by thelasthurtknee

maddens getting all the camera angles so we can only hope that they might make into ncaa. at least classic view. it's the only one worth a damn. why? would you use a view that you cant see your outside recievers as the default view tiburon?

What?! Madden is getting extra cameras and NCAA isn't? That stinks but if true, I'm sure NCAA will add them next year.

[ODogg]

Quote: Originally Posted by rudyjuly2

Are you crazy?! Last year's game was played in quicksand. I'll take crazy fast any day over that and I don't think its too fast anyways. It looks fun. I really can't believe some of the super negativity these initial reports have caused. The guys that wrote them said they had a good time playing the game but there are a couple issues that need work AND they still have time to fix them. That's why they were invited early in the first place. Granted, hearing that there are too many picks and that the cpu still might not go deep enough are big concerns but we really don't know much yet. Don't get so down ODogg. Just have patience until May 2nd and then these guys like Pasta and Chris will be back to answer all our questions. Right now they can't say anything to verify/deny the good or bad. Their lips are sealed by the NDA.

You are right I shouldn't get so down yet, I just get this feeling of omg it's bad when now even the previews have quite a bunch of negatives. In the past the previews were the omg-this-game-is-so-gonna-rock!

As for the speed I honestly didn't think it looked too fast from the videos, I agree that the past NCAA next-gen games were a bit slow (dunno if i'd say quicksand though) so the vids don't look to terribly fast to me. However I ask because quite a few people have commented they thought it looked way too fast.

[Altimus]

Quote: Originally Posted by ODogg

You are right I shouldn't get so down yet, I just get this feeling of omg it's bad when now even the previews have quite a bunch of negatives. In the past the previews were the omg-this-game-is-so-gonna-rock! As for the speed I honestly didn't think it looked too fast from the videos, I agree that the past NCAA next-gen games were a bit slow (dunno if i'd say quicksand though) so the vids don't look to terribly fast to me. However I ask because quite a few people have commented they thought it looked way too fast.

Well the PS3 version was quicksand since it was 30 FPS. So seeing this, is exciting for PS3 owners.