01-06-2015, 11:18 AM | #1 | ||
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Northern Suburbs of ATL
|
2015 Baseball HOF Voting
Some very interesting developments in the HOF voting. Here are a couple links that show some early results...
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...Xc&output=html and http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/...llecting_gizmo Last edited by Breeze : 01-06-2015 at 11:18 AM. |
||
01-06-2015, 11:22 AM | #2 |
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Flatlands of America
|
Interesting take on why Mike Berardino didn't vote for Pedro + Randy...
Voter leaves Randy Johnson off Baseball Hall of Fame ballot for 'strategic' reasons | syracuse.com
__________________
Post Count: Eleventy Billion - so deal with it! |
01-06-2015, 11:23 AM | #3 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
I'd bet people who publicly reveal their ballots are more likely to have voted for more people. I have nothing to back this up.
But, if this voting holds up, it's be the biggest voted-in class since...I'm not sure, but probably the 80s, right? I can't find another 4-person inductee class, but when I go back further the names are a little fuzzier and I can't immediately tell who was voted by the writers and who got in through the veteran's committee. Edit: I would love to here Jim Alexander's HOF case for Troy Percival. Last edited by molson : 01-06-2015 at 11:26 AM. |
01-06-2015, 11:42 AM | #4 | ||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
From an SFGate article Quote:
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
||
01-06-2015, 11:48 AM | #5 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Burke, VA
|
Quote:
I had this very conversation over twitter with a HOF voter - I maintained the shoo-ins should be left off the ballot by the writers who want to vote for more than 10 guys, since leaving Johnson or Martinez off of a few ballots won't make a difference, but a few extra votes for Tim Raines for example may mean the difference between the HOF or dropping off the ballot for others. Too many writers are stuck with the "How can xyz not go into the HOF unanimously?" mentality and wouldn't even consider not voting for someone they feel is a lock even if it means losing a guy off the ballot who deserves consideration. |
|
01-06-2015, 11:48 AM | #6 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
There's no group of people more loathsome than HOF voters. ISIS is close, but still second.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
01-06-2015, 11:55 AM | #7 |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
|
01-06-2015, 11:57 AM | #8 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
Eh, just the ones that vote for Bonds & his ilk.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
|
01-06-2015, 12:04 PM | #9 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
Quote:
Interesting but not surprising findings from this data: - 100% of those who voted for Sosa also voted for Bonds and Clemens - 99% of those who voted for Clemens voted for Bonds - 98% of those who voted for Bonds voted for Clemens Hmmm, what mystery reason could be causing this strong correlation?
__________________
... |
|
01-06-2015, 12:46 PM | #10 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
|
When is the vote for removing the many undeserving players in the Hall?
|
01-06-2015, 12:48 PM | #11 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
|
Piazza is going to end up falling a few percent short and I'll be pissed again.
|
01-06-2015, 12:52 PM | #12 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
|
Quote:
Pretty smart and I give him credit for thinking outside the box and sharing his stance publicly. |
|
01-06-2015, 01:12 PM | #13 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
|
Pedro, Johnson, Smoltz, and Biggio in.
Piazza closest at 69.9%. |
01-06-2015, 01:14 PM | #14 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
|
I don't agree that was smart. There are only three deserving candidates this year and anyone voting for marginal players like trammel or walker and others to fill up a ballot, should not boast about it.
That's why there should be a culling out because there are many players similar to the mediocre ones already in (esp from the 60s/70s vet committee) that one can make the fallacious argument that if X is in, so should Y. My argument is to remove X from the equation and thus Y is not relevant. |
01-06-2015, 01:16 PM | #15 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
|
I can also go along with Biggio.
|
01-06-2015, 01:25 PM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Here
|
I think Piazza deserves it and will almost certainly be in next year. But like I heard someone say the other day, it took like 8 years for Gary Carter to get it, so it's not like the Hall has been overly welcome to catchers.
|
01-06-2015, 01:29 PM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Here
|
Also, is this the last time an Expo makes the hall of fame, since Raines and Walker almost certainly won't get in?
|
01-06-2015, 01:31 PM | #18 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
|
Quote:
Nor, third basemen. The standards for third base seems insanely high. Like they expect third basemen to be better than they really are. I'm glad to see Raines get a nice jump after last year. Two guys that it amazes me went off on their first ballot were Whitaker and Lofton. I'm not really sure they belong in the HOF (Whitaker probably, Lofton probably not) but they sure as heck should have been talked about a lot more than they were compared to being a one and done. |
|
01-06-2015, 01:31 PM | #19 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
|
|
01-06-2015, 01:36 PM | #20 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
|
The reason I hate the HoF in baseball is how much of the argument comes down to milestones. X reached 3000 hits, he is a HoFer because he got to 3000 hits!
Y is one because he is the only player to hit 250 HRs, 300 2Bs, 2 3Bs, and 900 SFs. Plus, he got 200 SBs. It takes a different skill set to play catcher, 2B, OF, etc., so why do we always judge players by their batting stats? |
01-06-2015, 04:30 PM | #21 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
The milestones are automatic benchmarks. If you get 3,000 hits or 300 wins, it's a litmus test that you you are a no-doubt hall of famer regardless of position.
But here's the current position distribution of he HOF: Catcher: 16 First base: 21 Second base: 20 Third base: 16 Shortstop: 24 Left field: 21 Center field: 23 Right field: 24 DH: 1 Pitcher: 74 That's a pretty remarkably even distribution. Third base does stand out, because there have been so many great third basemen over the years that maybe they are held to a higher standard. Catcher might be just as difficult to get in because it's almost impossible for catchers to put up the benchmarks for automatically get in. I actually think it's easier to get in to the hall from 2nd or SS because the expectation is that you can't hit. So if you can play for 20 years at SS and hit .260, you're in. Do that at 3B, and you're not getting in unless you have Brooks Robinson's glove. |
01-06-2015, 04:31 PM | #22 |
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The Dirty
|
Does anyone care that Piazza was a bad catcher?
__________________
Commish of the United Baseball League (OOTP 6.5) |
01-06-2015, 04:45 PM | #23 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
|
I actually think it's easier to get in to the hall from 2nd or SS because the expectation is that you can't hit. So if you can play for 20 years at SS and hit .260, you're in. Do that at 3B, and you're not getting in unless you have Brooks Robinson's glove
Tell that to Whitaker. Last edited by rowech : 01-06-2015 at 04:46 PM. |
01-06-2015, 05:30 PM | #24 |
College Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SE
|
Doubtful it's too important.....
__________________
GM RayCo Raiders-est. 2004-2012 Charter member of the IHOF-RayCo GM GM Tennessee Titans PFL 2011-2014 GM Tennessee Titans FOWL 2020-2025 |
01-06-2015, 07:15 PM | #25 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
|
|
01-06-2015, 09:38 PM | #26 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Green Bay, WI
|
People who voted for Randy Johnson and not Roger Clemens make me chuckle.
Johnson enjoying his peak in his late 30s is totally reasonable and not at all suspicious, right? |
01-06-2015, 09:43 PM | #27 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
|
|
01-07-2015, 01:37 AM | #28 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
Now, maybe he used PED's to battle health issues (or somehow forestall them). He had a back issue that would flare up from time to time and was the big reason the M's decided he was risky enough that they were wary about a big-money contract extension in his early 30's and were willing to trade him. We've certainly learned enough to know that no player from the early '90's on up is immune from suspicion, and his back issues might make him a bit of a red flag, but I'd still say his likelihood of being a PED user is relatively low. His career was dissimilar to Clemens in that once he figured things out, there was no decline along the way other than one year of injury issues in '96. Clemens was awesome, then started a moderately slow decline, then all of a sudden was awesome again after the Red Sox discarded him. |
|
01-07-2015, 02:12 AM | #29 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
I wonder if we'll start seeing larger classes based on the fact that many of these players played during an era of cable TV and ultimately the internet. 30-40 years ago you would never have seen some of these guys ever play. Just have to go by box scores in the local paper.
|
01-07-2015, 03:32 AM | #30 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere More Familiar
|
Quote:
I think we will see larger classes. While the advent of TV/internet will play a role in that, I think a larger role will be that the committee has really started to bottleneck the ability for people to get in. With the steroid talk and such, many guys are going to be pushed back until their latter years of eligibility, and then you're going to have guys who 'don't deserve' first few ballot status, but are suddenly running out of time to get in. |
|
01-07-2015, 09:38 AM | #31 | ||
Grey Dog Software
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ by way of Belleville, IL
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.billjamesonline.com/shoul...hall_of_fame_/ I'm still trying to figure out why Biggio is "clean" and Piazza is not: Biggio - HR per year when under age 35: 12.3 (13 seasons) HR per year when over age 35: 18.8 (7 seasons) Piazza - HR per year when under age 35: 34.6 (10 seasons) HR per year when over age 35: 16 (5 seasons) |
||
01-07-2015, 09:56 AM | #32 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Where Hip Hop lives
|
I think it's ridiculous that Piazza is not in the Hall.
__________________
. . I would rather be wrong...Than live in the shadows of your song...My mind is open wide...And now I'm ready to start...You're not sure...You open the door...And step out into the dark...Now I'm ready. |
01-07-2015, 10:03 AM | #33 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
|
|
01-07-2015, 10:07 AM | #34 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Green Bay, WI
|
Quote:
Again, Johnson peaked in his mid-late 30s. He won 4 straight Cy Young Awards from his age 35 through age 38 seasons. Three other pitchers have even won three in a four-year span in the National League: Koufax, Maddux and Kershaw. I'm not arguing that that means that Johnson used. What I'm saying is that for people to vote against Clemens, or otherwise play PED gatekeeper to the Hall, but to vote Johnson in with 98% or whatever of the vote is to ignore that elephant in the room. You talk about Johnson's velocity, size and release point being key to his success, but velocity is one of the things people point to as being a PED benefit for pitchers. If he used, it might have been to recover from injury more quickly, but it might also have been to sustain his velocity into his late 30s. How many pitchers throw 98 at 38? Clemens' post-Boston career was phenomenal with Toronto; he was a very good, but not elite, pitcher for the Yankees. Their contribution to his Hall of Fame narrative was mostly run support allowing him to rack up gaudy win totals despite the fact that none of his seasons with them were even among his ten best for ERA+, and only once did he significantly underperform his FIP (in 2002, possibly his "worst" season as a Yankee). He rebounded to elite performances after going to Houston. Again, my point with all of this is not to make the case for "Randy Johnson, undetected PED user," but rather to suggest that voting him in that overwhelmingly on the first ballot while continuing to vote against Bonds and Clemens may not be the principled stand for purity that the voters think it is. We have one guy who was on a bit of a performance yo-yo, going from looking like he was finished to winning four more Cy Youngs, but having periods of dominance and pedestrian performance during that time, and another guy who enjoyed the best 4 1/2 years of his career after switching leagues, during the latter half of his 30s. That's not normal, and to say "this guy was just a freak of nature and there's no way he used so let's vote him in, but THAT guy..." is disingenuous, particularly in light of the fact that rumor has been enough to keep out guys like Bagwell and Piazza so far. Piazza isn't in because ~25% of voters think he may have used based on hearsay and rumor, but Johnson was near-unanimous? Really? Last edited by SackAttack : 01-07-2015 at 10:19 AM. |
|
01-07-2015, 10:22 AM | #35 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
|
I thought all the Clemens stuff was because he was indicted for lying to Congress and all the McNamee accusations.
|
01-07-2015, 10:32 AM | #36 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Ya, it's clear that the writers for whom this is a factor aren't just trying to guess at who was on steroids, they're choosing not to vote for people they perceived to have been huge public embarrassments to the game. Clemens, Bonds, Sosa, McGwire. Johnson wasn't even in the Mitchell report, was he?
I still blame the players. They fought against drug testing for years and in terms of HOF voting - they left it to the writers to sort it out. That was their choice. And obviously, writers are going to have different opinions in sorting it out. When you need 75% to get in, those kinds of disagreements mean guys aren't getting in. It does seem like every year the general mood is that more guys should have gotten in, which tells me the HOF is working exactly as it intends. When a super-majority needs to think someone is HOF-worthy, you should always have that kind of disappointment. The majority of writers think Tim Raines, Jeff Bagwell, and Mark Piazza should be in. But that's not enough. |
01-07-2015, 10:32 AM | #37 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Here
|
I'm pretty sure Bonds and Clemens aren't in the Hall mainly because they were giant dicks to the media their entire career. The PED use is just a useful explanation so they don't have to say they're so petty.
Johnson was pretty surly to the media, but wasn't universally despised like the other two. |
01-07-2015, 10:42 AM | #38 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Piazza not being in as a complete joke. Arguably the best offensive player ever at the position, and if not a close #2. This guilt by association is absurd. If they don't let Piazza in then just shut it down from 1997-2010 and don't let anyone who compiled numbers in that era in.
|
01-07-2015, 12:16 PM | #39 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SF
|
Quote:
Weren't Biggio's last 7 seasons at Enron? I always thought Piazza wouldn't get in because he is gay. |
|
01-07-2015, 12:33 PM | #40 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
|
01-07-2015, 12:41 PM | #41 |
Grey Dog Software
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ by way of Belleville, IL
|
Enron/Minute Maid park opened in 2000, Biggio hit 8 HR that season. From 2001 through 2005, he hit 55 HR at home and 45 on the road - not a huge difference to explain his power surge. Plus, it's not like power was sparse in the decade of the 90s when he was averaging 13 HR a season.
|
01-07-2015, 12:42 PM | #42 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
Sure, PED use might have been a way for him to maintain velocity in his mid to late 30's. Except that's not what happened - his velocity declined as he aged as you would expect. That he was so tall and had a release point closer to the plate than just about any other pitcher allowed his fastball to always appear faster than it actually was, and his ability to repeat his delivery and develop remarkable command of his pitches, combined with pitching in an era of ever increasing batter strikeouts and moving to the NL where he faced pitchers instead of DHs allowed his numbers to look superficially better with Arizona, but the only thing he did better there than in Seattle was rack up more innings. Now, his durability and avoidance of injuries after being traded from Seattle could be an indicator of PED use. But unlike Clemens (and other known/strongly suspected users), you can't point to any point in Randy's career that looks like a clear jump in his performance. It's easy to look at Clemens and think "A-ha, sure looks like he started using in '97"; there aren't any such stark delineations in Johnson's career. But the biggest reason for the voter attitudes is that we have significant evidence Clemens used, while all we have with Johnson is just the taint of his era and the resulting skepticism. |
|
01-07-2015, 12:58 PM | #43 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Green Bay, WI
|
Quote:
How about Johnson's quote from SI in 2010 or so to the effect that he took all kinds of stuff from GNC and if there had been testing "back then," who knows but he might have gotten popped for PED use? I mean, that's from the horse's mouth. Do we know specifically what he used? No, of course not. Is there reason to believe, based on things he's said and on his performance record, that it's a possibility? Absolutely. Does that make it hypocritical as shit for him to get 98% of the ballots cast while Clemens, Bonds, etc remain on the outside? Without question. You cannot cherry-pick on this if you're a voter. Trying to exclude the ones who admit to any kind of use or who got caught while letting others in because, well, we can't PROVE anything just makes it more likely that sooner or later you're going to have egg on your face. Let them in and let the Hall of Fame do the dirty work of explaining their achievements in the context of the era. |
|
01-07-2015, 01:03 PM | #44 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
It's a possibility for every single player over the era. Here's where we disagree at a fundamental level Quote:
I'd argue that it's the responsibility of the voters to do just that: apply their best judgment -- since we are, after all, asking them to pass judgment on the career of these players -- and vote accordingly.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
|
01-07-2015, 01:07 PM | #45 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
I don't think those voters would claim to have "proof" of anything. And they certainly can't make definitive determinations about who was using and who wasn't, the players union made sure of that. So some users obviously didn't get caught, didn't get attention from the federal government, didn't become public villains. Good for them, they took a risk and it paid off, they cheated their way to the hall of fame. Lots people get away with stuff in all facets of life. I don't see why that means writers are morally obligated to ignore the cheating of Clemens and Bonds. It's not hypocritical to punish the person you're sure is guilty and not punish the one where there's some doubt in your mind. It's going to be an inexact science, and there's going to be differences opinion, but that's the bed the players made, and that's why the HOF wants human voters and not a statistical performance formula. These things matter, and you have to convince a super-majority of this group that you're worthy to get in their little club, you have no entitlement to it. Last edited by molson : 01-07-2015 at 01:10 PM. |
|
01-07-2015, 01:11 PM | #46 | |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Quote:
I wouldnt say they are morally obligated to ignore anything, however, I do think they are morally obligated to make their own judgements if someone used when there is zero evidence they did. |
|
01-07-2015, 01:22 PM | #47 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
Well, Piazza did he get almost 70% of the vote, and there's a great chance he still gets in, and that he gets in faster than Gary Carter did. Plenty of people are voting for him and not Bonds or Clemens. (And that's how I would vote). We're talking about a pretty small number of people making the difference on him. You talked about basically shutting out hitters from that era if Piazza can't get in, and maybe a small number of voters have actually done that. But the vast majority of them agree with you that he's a HOFer. But that's how elite this is - you have to have very broad support, even amongst a group that includes the most passionate steroid-haters. And that's a relevant and significant sub-group. It looks like Piazza will have that support, but not until next year. Last edited by molson : 01-07-2015 at 01:25 PM. |
|
01-07-2015, 01:30 PM | #48 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Amarillo, TX
|
Quote:
Pretty damn sparse in the Astrodome, where his '90s split was more like 60/100 home/road. In a neutral stadium, Biggio could easily hit five more home runs a year at home. |
|
01-07-2015, 02:05 PM | #49 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
As far as his performance record, again - point to a place in his career that looks like a likely starting spot for PED use. Sure, maybe he started off slowly with such use and as he found it effective, increased his usage such that you can't really see a demarcation line. I'll grant that this is possible. But it doesn't have anywhere near the smoking gun status of a Roger Clemens situation. |
|
01-07-2015, 02:33 PM | #50 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Here
|
Quote:
Where's the smoking gun year for Clemens? He was all-star/Cy Young level through 92, He was down in '93 but outstanding in '94. He was down in '95 and still Cy Young level from 96-98, then was pretty much around all-star level the rest of his career. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|