Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

View Poll Results: Pick the format!
Option 1: 16 teams advance 5 14.29%
Option 2: 32 teams advance 30 85.71%
Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-18-2003, 01:04 AM   #1
HornedFrog Purple
Hattrick Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Fort Worthless, Tx
Talking The Officialish FOFC Cup III format voting booth

Ok, the absolute final number of teams is 78. So here are the choices for the format:


Option 1:

13 groups X 6 per group = 5 games = 5 weeks

Winner of each group(13) + top-3 second place finishers(3) go to single-elimination 16 team tournament = 4 weeks
________________________________

Total = 9 weeks



Option 2:

13 groups X 6 per group = 5 games = 5 weeks

Winner of each group(13) + 2nd place in each group(13) + 6 top 3rd place finishers(6) go to single elimination 32-team tournament = 5 weeks
_________________________________

Total:= 10 weeks


What this really amounts to is how many teams you all want to advance to single-elimination between 16 teams and 32. The difference is one week of play.

The tiebreakers for 2nd and 3rd place (if need be) qualifiers are as follows:

1. Total points. 3 for win, 1 for tie (like in hattrick)
2. Goal differential
3. Total offensive goals
4. Offensive road goals (I hope it doesn't come down to this hehehe)
5. Beats me... bribes a possibility


So anyways vote on what you guys want!
__________________
King of All FOFC Media!!!
IHOF: Fort Worthless Fury- 2004 AOC Deep South Champions (not acknowledged via conspiracy)


Last edited by HornedFrog Purple : 04-18-2003 at 01:06 AM.
HornedFrog Purple is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2003, 06:45 AM   #2
Brillig
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Mountain View, California
I don't think you can use offensive road goals as a tie-breaker, HFP - not when the number of road games per team is different. Maybe after #3 we should just use the original seeding as a tie-breaker. Or a coin toss?
Brillig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2003, 08:35 AM   #3
dacman
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: speak to the trout
Possible tie-breakers:

1- Head-to-head (works well within a group!)
1- Goal difference
2- Goals scored
3- Higher seed
__________________
No signatures allowed.
dacman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2003, 08:39 AM   #4
dacman
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: speak to the trout
Dola....11 groups of 7 would've worked better schedule-wise. Everyone would've had 3 home and 3 away games in group play. Ah well.

Higher seeds should get 3 home/2 away with the exception that we should probably guarantee our foriegn entrants 3 home games. Higher seed hosts in elimination rounds???

If option 1 wins, maybe we could do a 2-leg final?

Just some ideas.

edit: Also, we should start no later than Hattrick date May 6/7 games.
__________________
No signatures allowed.

Last edited by dacman : 04-18-2003 at 08:45 AM.
dacman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2003, 09:09 AM   #5
FrogMan
Hattrick Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Pintendre, Qc, Canada
Gotta say that what dacman says makes a lot of sense, if we want to have 3 home/3 away...

HornedFrog: I volunteer to help out in stats keeping. I have already set up some sort of excel spreadsheet that could be used to easily make a webpage. I could also host a cup page on my webspace. I will PM you in a few...

FrogMan
__________________
A Black Belt is a White Belt who refused to give up...
follow my story: The real life story of a running frog...
FrogMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2003, 10:51 AM   #6
DataKing
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago
Just an FYI, for those who may not have thought of this...

The Hattrick season, including off-season, is 16 weeks long. So the 10 week option works so long as no one advances beyond round 6 of their national cup.

I voted for Option 2. The more the merrier.
__________________
Current Games
Diablo III (BattleTag: DataKing#1685)
Allegiances:
Chicago Bears - Detroit Red Wings - Kansas Jayhawks
Awards:
2011 Golden Scribe - Other Sports Category (The Straight(away) and Narrow - A Forza Motorsport 3 Dynasty)
DataKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2003, 10:56 AM   #7
HornedFrog Purple
Hattrick Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Fort Worthless, Tx
Quote:
I don't think you can use offensive road goals as a tie-breaker, HFP - not when the number of road games per team is different. Maybe after #3 we should just use the original seeding as a tie-breaker. Or a coin toss?

Understood. Original seeding would probably be better, then a coin toss.

Quote:
Possible tie-breakers:

1- Head-to-head (works well within a group!)
1- Goal difference
2- Goals scored
3- Higher seed

Head-to-Head is fine if its determining 2nd and 3rd place within a group, but if it is 3 3rd place teams competing for one spot to advance it does not come into play.

Quote:
Dola....11 groups of 7 would've worked better schedule-wise. Everyone would've had 3 home and 3 away games in group play. Ah well.

Higher seeds should get 3 home/2 away with the exception that we should probably guarantee our foriegn entrants 3 home games. Higher seed hosts in elimination rounds???

If option 1 wins, maybe we could do a 2-leg final?

That is possibly true, but it adds 1 more week to either option, I would have to kick myself out again for the third time as we have 78 teams not 77.

That said if everyone getting an equal amount of home games is a concern, I could add a crossover game between each group (Group A vs Group B, Group C vs Group D etc.) where 3 hosts 6, 4 hosts 2, 5 hosts 1. That would give everyone 3 home/away. That would also add a week to the proceedings.
__________________
King of All FOFC Media!!!
IHOF: Fort Worthless Fury- 2004 AOC Deep South Champions (not acknowledged via conspiracy)
HornedFrog Purple is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2003, 11:25 AM   #8
Brillig
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Mountain View, California
Actually, groups of 7 is kind of difficult, as you need a 7 week schedule to work out all the games - that'd add 2 weeks to the tourney.
Brillig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2003, 11:56 AM   #9
dacman
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: speak to the trout
Quote:
Originally posted by Brillig
Actually, groups of 7 is kind of difficult, as you need a 7 week schedule to work out all the games - that'd add 2 weeks to the tourney.


Right -- that is the drawback -- plus having a bye week in there. If you went this route, 16 teams advancing to elimination rounds is probably a must.
__________________
No signatures allowed.
dacman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.