Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-17-2003, 09:42 AM   #1
mckerney
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Guaranteed - Kyle Boller will be a star

In the last week or so Mel Kiper has started saying that Kyle Boller is overrated and that he will be a bust, all but assuring that he will be a star quarterback in the NFL.

mckerney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 09:47 AM   #2
scooper
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cinn City
Yes, his less than 50% completion percentage tell you you're right.
scooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 09:50 AM   #3
bamcgee
High School JV
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: San Francisco, CA
anyone taking Boller over Leftwich shouldn't be an NFL GM.
bamcgee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 09:52 AM   #4
WSUCougar
Rider Of Rohan
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Port Angeles, WA or Helm's Deep
I betcha he goes to Jacksonville.
__________________
It's not the years...it's the mileage.
WSUCougar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 10:57 AM   #5
samifan24
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NC
This week's Sports Weekly talks about how he'd fit into Baltimore's scheme.
__________________
"You spend a good piece of your life gripping a baseball...and in the end it turns out that it was the other way around all the time." -Jim Bouton
samifan24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 11:45 AM   #6
MrBug708
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Whittier
Boller has a very poor stat line. His first three years at Cal were marred by a poor team, poor coaching, and numerous sacks. THink David Carr like hits for 3 years. He finally got a decent cast around him, a good coach, and was able to stay healthy long enough to do something
MrBug708 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 12:03 PM   #7
moriarty
College Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: A negative place
I totally agree. He has the physical skills, but he needs to have a very solid QB coach.

His first three years at Cal, the team was terribly unorganized (and I don't know about the QB coach, but the overall coaching was poor). I would look at him like he's only had one year of college QB ... i.e. he'll need some skills work (not ready out of the box), but he's got the phsical attributes to make it work.
moriarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 12:06 PM   #8
scooper
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cinn City
It's funny how Palmer gets the one year wonder label, but Boller is excused due to coaching deficiencies.
scooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 12:12 PM   #9
QuikSand
lolzcat
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
There are an awful lot of people who invest a great deal of time evaluating college footbal talent with an eye toward pro potential, and are paid to do so. Very, very few of them dare use words like "guaranteed" in their analyses, particularly at the quarterback position. There is a reason for this.
QuikSand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 12:14 PM   #10
RendeR
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
Palmer had good coaching and did nothing under it until last season. hence he is still a one year wonder. I'm still undecided on wether my piss poor bengals should take him...I think we trade down to 2 or even lower say 5-6 maybe, pick up our cornerback there then worry about a QB in the second round.
RendeR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 12:18 PM   #11
scooper
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cinn City
Palmer didn't have good coaching until two years ago. In fact, he went through four Offensive coordinators, meaning four different systems. Under the last one, Norm Chow's, he did well. He did so in his second year in the system.

I'm a Bengals fan as well, and I would be happy with Palmer, but I would also like Newman or Leftwich. I think they would like to trade down just like you say, but they can't force teams to do it. At the moment, nobody wants to move up.
scooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 12:19 PM   #12
moriarty
College Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: A negative place
Quote:
Originally posted by scooper
It's funny how Palmer gets the one year wonder label, but Boller is excused due to coaching deficiencies.


Well Palmer only gets the 'one year wonder label' because he won the heisman, and he's projected a the first pick in the draft. He'll still go well ahead of Boller despite any 'labels', so don't feel too bad for him.

I think the Boller has alot more potential upside, but is clearly a more risky bet than Palmer. Boller was called the next John Elway in high school, so his physical skills have alway been there, and he has a decent excuse IMO for his late blooming. Whether he continues to improve or not, I don't know. I definitely wouldn't waste a top 10 pick on him to find out though.
moriarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 12:21 PM   #13
Anrhydeddu
Resident Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Quote:
There are an awful lot of people who invest a great deal of time evaluating college footbal talent with an eye toward pro potential, and are paid to do so.

..but much better evaluators than Mel Kiper, which was the original point, I believe.
Anrhydeddu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 12:23 PM   #14
cthomer5000
Strategy Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
Quote:
Originally posted by Anrhydeddu
..but much better evaluators than Mel Kiper, which was the original point, I believe.


I dunno, it's basically impossible to know how good he is or isn't. Scouts for teams are working from the persepective of how a player will work for their system/team, while he's trying to generalize a player's ability. He does at times breakdown how he thinks a player would do in a particular system, but not too often.

I would guess he's probably on par with the average NFL "talent evaluator."
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by albionmoonlight View Post
This is like watching a car wreck. But one where, every so often, someone walks over and punches the driver in the face as he struggles to free himself from the wreckage.
cthomer5000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 12:23 PM   #15
MylesKnight
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Neptune Beach, Florida
Quote:
Originally posted by WSUCougar
I betcha he goes to Jacksonville.

Let's not say this Coug.

Grossman 4 Jags!
__________________
IT'S ALL ABOUT THE BLACK & GOLD!!
MylesKnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 12:25 PM   #16
cthomer5000
Strategy Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
Re: Guaranteed - Kyle Boller will be a star

Quote:
Originally posted by mckerney
In the last week or so Mel Kiper has started saying that Kyle Boller is overrated and that he will be a bust, all but assuring that he will be a star quarterback in the NFL.


by the way, wher have you heard or read this? I listen to all his audio chats and he has basically only said that he is being over-hyped right now. He maintains that Lewftwich is better, and thinks Boller won't go as high as people think on draft day.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by albionmoonlight View Post
This is like watching a car wreck. But one where, every so often, someone walks over and punches the driver in the face as he struggles to free himself from the wreckage.
cthomer5000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 12:28 PM   #17
ice4277
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkley, MI: The Hotbed of FOFC!
I think the top 3 or 4 QB's in this draft will all be busts.
ice4277 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 12:33 PM   #18
rexalllsc
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Quote:
Originally posted by scooper
Yes, his less than 50% completion percentage tell you you're right.


http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/teamstats?teamId=25

He completed 53% this year...28 TDs, 10 INTs
rexalllsc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 12:34 PM   #19
scooper
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cinn City
Quote:
Originally posted by ice4277
I think the top 3 or 4 QB's in this draft will all be busts.


As will the top dope-smoking, girlfriend stabbing, 5 on the wonderlic scoring WR.
scooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 12:39 PM   #20
QuikSand
lolzcat
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Quote:
Originally posted by Anrhydeddu
..but much better evaluators than Mel Kiper, which was the original point, I believe.


Of course, the original "point" suggests that Mel Kiper has never made an accurate prediction about any player, and therefore his analyses are a perfectly reliable counterindicator. Statements of certainty aren't too wise in this business.
QuikSand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 03:28 PM   #21
sterlingice
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
The best thing about being a draft analyst is short term job security. It's really easy to say "so-and-so won't be a star" and have it not come true in the first couple of years.

SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out!

Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!"
Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!"


sterlingice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 04:30 PM   #22
daedalus
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Re: Re: Guaranteed - Kyle Boller will be a star

Quote:
Originally posted by cthomer5000
by the way, wher have you heard or read this? I listen to all his audio chats and he has basically only said that he is being over-hyped right now. He maintains that Lewftwich is better, and thinks Boller won't go as high as people think on draft day.

It's one of the ESPN Insider article - I don't have it so I haven't read it yet, I've been curious about it, though. Boller heads Kiper's list of "Overrated Prospect".

I haven't seen too many places where Palmer has been considered a "one year wonder". A lot of the articles I've seen have listed Palmer as the most "sure thing" of this year's QB crop, which was why the article looked interesting to me since I thought their career followed a similar path [keep in mind that I followed neither very closely]. They both went to college with a lot of hype and neither seemed to have done very much until their senior year.

I don't understand, though, why Leftwich is getting so little love.
daedalus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 04:58 PM   #23
mckerney
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
I saw one article in support of Leftwich that the NFL (and I quote) screwed up because fellow Marshall QB Chad Pennington didn't go higher than 18 the draft.

Looking at the draft in '99, I don't see where a team would have made a good moving taking him in the top 17 picks, plus he hasn't been great yet.
mckerney is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:49 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.