|
View Poll Results: Would you support showing ratings over 100? | |||
Yes, strongly support it | 5 | 55.56% | |
Yes, but fine if it stays the same | 3 | 33.33% | |
No, but fine if we show them | 1 | 11.11% | |
No, strongly want to keep it as is. | 0 | 0% | |
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
01-20-2009, 08:03 PM | #1 | ||
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: JBLM, WA
|
Ratings Over 100 / Player Talent
So, I took a better look at the player today and noticed that players are again complete studs. Did we change something with the PCM's as it seemed that they were starting to go back down to a normal level before we simmed ahead? Anyways, the real reason I started this thread is to suggest to the BoD that they think about turning ratings over 100 on, if we are going to continue getting superstar players. Most potential categories go into the second page for players and when it comes to Control potential it slides into the 6th page of players! It is one thing if he have a dozen or so players over 100, but we have almost 150 pitchers that have over 100 for control potential. I have included a poll to see if I am alone in this thought.
__________________
I killed a wolf and I liked it. Last edited by Commo_Soldier : 01-20-2009 at 08:13 PM. |
||
01-20-2009, 08:11 PM | #2 |
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
We'd probably be smart just to go to 1-10 ratings. That'd make everything a lot simpler, I think. I've tested it in the other league when it still existed.
|
01-21-2009, 12:44 PM | #3 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Baltimore MD
|
I liked it better when you could see over 100, but thats just me
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|