Brits and Helicoptors dont work well together

CAsterling · 03-22-2003, 08:32 AM

Just read about the two british helicoptors collision.

Thats 3 so far in this conflict where helicoptors crashes have caused loss of life.
Is there some kind of curse on the Brits and helicoptors, it happened during the Falklands where we lost a large contingent of SAS, and seems to be happening again this time.

Not good.

ACStrider · 03-22-2003, 09:18 AM

That would be both sad and amazing to see if the plurality/majority of lives lost in this conflict are due to helicopter accidents. I guess that would be a good sign all things considered, though.

Alf · 03-22-2003, 09:35 AM

That's sad anyway. Losing guys when no one is shooting at them...

sabotai · 03-22-2003, 11:17 AM

DUring GUlf One, didn't we lose more guys to mechanical problems and accidents than we did to enemy fire? Looks like the same might be happening here.

Fritz · 03-22-2003, 12:07 PM

Non-combat airlosses are always a problem. Of the 57,000 deaths in Vietnam, over 10,000 were non combat. Most of those were due to non-combat aircraft loss.

For istance, the US Army suffered 4,666 losses due to aircraft (over ground) loss. 2,182 of those losses were nonhostile in nature.

In fact, more USARMY helicopter passengers died due to nonhostile air accidents than died in combat (734 to 682).

(Stanton, Vietnam Order of Battle)

I think the peacetime loss rate for aircraft and crew is reasonably high.

03-22-2003, 09:18 AM	#2
ACStrider High School JV Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Austin, TX	That would be both sad and amazing to see if the plurality/majority of lives lost in this conflict are due to helicopter accidents. I guess that would be a good sign all things considered, though. __________________ "I'm evil." "Oh you are not!" "Oh I am too." -- Brak

03-22-2003, 09:35 AM	#3
Alf Pro Starter Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Rennes, France	That's sad anyway. Losing guys when no one is shooting at them... __________________ FOFL - GML - IHOF - FranceStats

03-22-2003, 12:07 PM	#5
Fritz Lethargic Hooligan Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: hello kitty found my wallet at a big tent revival and returned it with all the cash missing	Non-combat airlosses are always a problem. Of the 57,000 deaths in Vietnam, over 10,000 were non combat. Most of those were due to non-combat aircraft loss. For istance, the US Army suffered 4,666 losses due to aircraft (over ground) loss. 2,182 of those losses were nonhostile in nature. In fact, more USARMY helicopter passengers died due to nonhostile air accidents than died in combat (734 to 682). (Stanton, Vietnam Order of Battle) I think the peacetime loss rate for aircraft and crew is reasonably high. __________________ donkey, donkey, walk a little faster

03-22-2003, 11:17 AM	#4
sabotai General Manager Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: The Satellite of Love	DUring GUlf One, didn't we lose more guys to mechanical problems and accidents than we did to enemy fire? Looks like the same might be happening here.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)