01-16-2005, 06:45 PM | #1 | ||
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York
|
Yep. The Colts. Sure. Uh huh...
Am I the only one here who is laughing my ass off? The best thing for Peyton Manning's career would be to tear the roof off the RCA Dump right now and allow him to get used to playing outdoors in the real world. So he only throws for 45 TD's... Aww, too bad. Maybe he wins a championship though...
__________________
In the immortal words of a great alcoholic, "Can't we all just get along?" |
||
01-16-2005, 06:46 PM | #2 |
Greatly Missed. (7/11/84-06/12/05)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Palo Alto, CA
|
Dan Marino incarnate
|
01-16-2005, 06:48 PM | #3 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kansas City, Mo
|
Man, whats up with your hatred of peyton manning? did he impregnate your sister or something?
|
01-16-2005, 06:52 PM | #4 | |
Bounty Hunter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
Quote:
He probably just exposed himself to her.
__________________
No, I am not Batman, and I will not repair your food processor. |
|
01-16-2005, 06:53 PM | #5 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kansas City, Mo
|
Quote:
Woh there rocky top |
|
01-16-2005, 07:00 PM | #6 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Troy, Mo
|
He didn't lose this game for the Colts.
Todd |
01-16-2005, 07:02 PM | #7 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Somerville, MA
|
Quote:
he didn't win it for them either |
|
01-16-2005, 07:04 PM | #8 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Troy, Mo
|
Quote:
Maybe that's why it's a team game? I saw so many dropped passes today, the weather was definitly a factor for the Colts, although it didn't seem to affect the Patriots. Todd |
|
01-16-2005, 07:09 PM | #9 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York
|
Quote:
Hmmm... Could that have had something to do with my original statement?
__________________
In the immortal words of a great alcoholic, "Can't we all just get along?" |
|
01-16-2005, 07:12 PM | #10 |
College Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Out of Grad School Hell :)
|
He's an accountant, and Peyton picked Tommy as his favorite, not BigJohn.
Last edited by cougarfreak : 01-16-2005 at 07:12 PM. |
01-16-2005, 07:17 PM | #11 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kansas City, Mo
|
Lets go Insurance adjusters, lets go!
|
01-16-2005, 07:51 PM | #12 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
|
One word: C-H-O-K-E!
|
01-16-2005, 07:53 PM | #13 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Here and There
|
Quote:
Did anyone else catch Boomer Esiason's comment about Manning being the new Marino and then trying to explain it? I would rank that as most uncomfortable NFL Today moment of the year. |
|
01-16-2005, 07:59 PM | #14 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Seven miles up
|
Quote:
Yeah, but he didn't choke. He played an average game. His recievers dropped balls and his defense was on the field way, way to long. That and they can't run the ball, so you really can't say it was on his shoulders for the loss. Well you can, but I don't see that as being realistic.
__________________
He's just like if Snow White was competitive, horny, and capable of beating the shit out of anyone that called her Pops. Like Steam? Join the FOFC Steam group here: http://steamcommunity.com/groups/FOFConSteam |
|
01-16-2005, 08:20 PM | #15 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Troy, Mo
|
Quote:
Pretty much my thoughts. In no way do I want to take anything away from the Patriots, they played their asses off and deserved the W. I hope they kick the crap out of the Steelers next week. Todd |
|
01-16-2005, 08:28 PM | #16 | ||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
Mine too. Which is why my immediate & opposite reaction to something else you said really jumped out at me: Quote:
Whereas I hope the Steelers beat them by 100 points. Go figure.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
||
01-16-2005, 08:35 PM | #17 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Keene, NH
|
Personally, I think we were all seeing one of the greatest QBs in NFL history today in Foxboro.
He wears #12.
__________________
Mile High Hockey |
01-16-2005, 08:45 PM | #18 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Seven miles up
|
Quote:
I have been saying that since he led them to the playoffs last season. I think that he is the next John Elway type of clutch superstar.
__________________
He's just like if Snow White was competitive, horny, and capable of beating the shit out of anyone that called her Pops. Like Steam? Join the FOFC Steam group here: http://steamcommunity.com/groups/FOFConSteam |
|
01-16-2005, 08:57 PM | #19 |
College Prospect
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Flower Mound, TX
|
I think he's more Joe Montana than John Elway.
|
01-16-2005, 09:09 PM | #20 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Not Delaware - hurray!
|
Didn't Elway have nothing to show for until very late in his career?
__________________
She loves you, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah! She loves you, yeah! how do you know? how do you know? |
01-16-2005, 09:12 PM | #21 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Seven miles up
|
Quote:
Yeah, but in the clutch, when you needed it, I would take Elway over any other QB in the NFL.
__________________
He's just like if Snow White was competitive, horny, and capable of beating the shit out of anyone that called her Pops. Like Steam? Join the FOFC Steam group here: http://steamcommunity.com/groups/FOFConSteam |
|
01-16-2005, 09:24 PM | #22 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
|
Quote:
|
|
01-16-2005, 09:26 PM | #23 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Manning -> Marino: Great Talent, Great Ability, but for some reason can't win the big one.
Brady -> Montana: Not flashy, but all he does is win. |
01-16-2005, 09:31 PM | #24 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
Florida in the Swamp all over again.....
|
01-16-2005, 09:37 PM | #25 | |
College Prospect
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
|
Quote:
Didn't Esiason quarterback the Bengals in the '89 Super Bowl? |
|
01-16-2005, 09:40 PM | #26 |
Mascot
Join Date: Nov 2002
|
It sure wasn't all Manning's fault that the Colts lost, but the Colts never even threatened in this game. Even when it was 6-0 it felt like they were getting creamed. I can't believe they couldn't get even big play on any side of the ball.
|
01-16-2005, 09:54 PM | #27 | |
College Prospect
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Flower Mound, TX
|
Quote:
You can have Elway as long as I can have Montana. |
|
01-16-2005, 09:56 PM | #28 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York
|
Quote:
This is exactly what I am talking about. The Rams a few years back were a rarity. Their championship win is the ONLY time a team that plays in a dome has won a title. The "Dirty Bird" Falcons were the 1st dome team to get to the big dance. Dome teams are at an extreme disadvantage when forced to play outside in the elements. The traction that they're used to is not there. The ball is affected ever so slightly by little things like barometric pressure, heat, cold , humidity, rain, snow, and sleet. Last year the Colts were fortunate to play in almost perfect weather in Kansas City. The past few playoff games they have played in New England are proof that a team that is as dangerous as the Colts are can be thrown off by palying in conditions they are not used to. If they played in an outdoor venue the entire team would be used to playing in weather and would be more likely to play better when playing outdoors on the road. It is likely that if Peyton Manning makes it to a Super Bowl while playing in a dome it is if they play all of thier playoff games in domes. This game proves that the odds are heavily stacked in the favor of a home team playing outdoors, when facing a dome team...
__________________
In the immortal words of a great alcoholic, "Can't we all just get along?" |
|
01-16-2005, 10:07 PM | #29 | |
H.S. Freshman Team
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Indianapolis
|
Quote:
Yes, although he did not have a particularly good game. 11-25 144 TD 0 INT 1 |
|
01-16-2005, 10:10 PM | #30 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
The following is not directed at anyone in particular, more at the legions of commentators/fans/etc. that always seem to have excuses... Jeezus...the Patriots played 60 minutes of AMAZING football. They almost completly shutout the 5th highest scoring offense in NFL history. Can we stop crediting that to the weather and start giving credit to the players who damn sure deserve it!! Last edited by DaddyTorgo : 01-16-2005 at 10:12 PM. |
|
01-16-2005, 10:19 PM | #31 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MA
|
When was the last time the Patriots got credit for any win. I don't think it will ever happen.
When they lose I'm sure plenty of credit will be given to the opposing team though. |
01-16-2005, 10:25 PM | #32 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
Quote:
It is also funny to me that people continually point out that only two dome teams have ever made it to the superbowl. They always talk about it like it is some sort of proof that Dome teams just don't have what it takes. However they never bring up the fact that as right now there are only 8 teams that play in a dome. A little history on the Domes: Colts - Didn't start playing in the RCA Dome until 1984 Falcons - Didn't start playing in the Georgia Dome until 1993 Rams - Didn;t start playing in the Ed Jones Dome until 1996 Vikings - Didn't start playing in the Metrodome until 1982 Saints - Didn't start playing in the Superdomw until 1975 So until 1975 there were no dome teams. That means the first 8 superbowls couldn't have included a dome team. And until the Flacons moved into the Georgia dome in 1993 we had 26 superbowls with only 3 dome teams in the league. It ceratinly seems to me that the sheer lack of dome teams may have contributed to the absence of dome teams in the superbowl quite a bit more than their ability to play in the elements. Edit: I forgot to mention the Lions in there, but my point remains the same. Last edited by primelord : 01-16-2005 at 10:26 PM. |
|
01-16-2005, 10:32 PM | #33 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
|
Quote:
|
|
01-16-2005, 11:13 PM | #34 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York
|
Fine. Build domes for every team. Call pass interference whenever a defensive player comes near a receiver. Eliminate tackling. Let's make every team an indoor, touch football team wearing purple, black & teal.
Weather has no effect whatsoever on games... Whatever. PS. Where did the Oilers play? (Maybe if the AstroDOME was an outdoor venue with a grass field Earl Campbell hould still have knees and be able to walk like he wasn't 95 years old.)
__________________
In the immortal words of a great alcoholic, "Can't we all just get along?" |
01-16-2005, 11:27 PM | #35 |
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jun 2001
|
I hope the Steelers crush the Patriots again. Their fans are becoming very annoying.
|
01-16-2005, 11:28 PM | #36 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
Quote:
I wasn't syaing I prefer domes. I just was saying I think it is silly when people keep bringing up the fact that only two dome teams have made the super bowl. The inference is always that dome teams are soft. That may even be the case, but the fact that only two teams have made it probably has far more to do with the fact that there are so few dometeams than anything else. And as far as the Colts go, 20 straihgt times teams have failed to beat the Pats at Foxboro. So again it is hard to say that the fcat the Colts play in a dome had anything to do with the loss. With that being said I prefer outdoor football on grass too. |
|
01-16-2005, 11:36 PM | #37 | |
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
Quote:
Agreed. I guess fans of any team become annoying asses when they have sustained success though. |
|
01-16-2005, 11:37 PM | #38 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
|
Quote:
And while the Steelers may beat the Pats, it won't be a blowout. Last time we ran the ball the fewest times in 71 years, and were down 21-3 7 minutes or so in after 2 big defensive plays, and the final still only ended up being a 2 TD win. With a healthy Dillon, plus, IMO, Bill Cowher teams constantly underperforming in the playoffs I'm leaning toward the Pats, but I'm a homer. |
|
01-16-2005, 11:45 PM | #39 |
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jun 2001
|
Oh, I agree. I think the Pats have a great chance of winning it all again this year. I just really, REALLY hope they don't. Like cthomer said, any team's fans become unbearable with too much success.
I'd rather see a new team experience a Super Bowl win. Preferably the Steelers. |
01-17-2005, 01:13 AM | #40 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York
|
Quote:
Close... I'm a Lions fan. When the Lions were building a new stadium downtown (which I love that the Detroit Lions actually play in DETROIT!) they had an opportunity to show that they care about winning. When Pittsburgh built a new stadium, they built outdoors. Philly did the same. New England, Cleveland, Baltimore, Cincinnati, Chicago... all teams that talk about winning. All teams that play outdoors. Even the teams that have built or are planning on building new stadiums with roofs on them are going with retractable roofs. The last dome that was built for a team was the Georgia dome, then the new era of staiums swept thru the league. What do the Lions build? A dome. Why? Because they want the facility to compete for other events during the offseason, and for the comfort of their fans. The second part is complete BS. The first... well, it just shows that the possibility of a few dollars from the occasional rock concert or tractor pull is more important than the football team. Could you immagine the Steelers Dome or the Patriot Dome? Nope. But those are teams that know what football is all about...
__________________
In the immortal words of a great alcoholic, "Can't we all just get along?" |
|
01-17-2005, 01:16 AM | #41 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
I was really hoping that Manning would pull this game out, so that next week would be his Waterloo 2k5. Its *really* fucking cold in PA right now, and i believe expected to get colder.
|
01-17-2005, 01:17 AM | #42 | |
High School JV
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Mesa, AZ
|
Quote:
I'm gonna go out on a limb here, but I don't think I'm the only one who has read this thread that thinks you need to calm down and maybe not watch anymore football this season, or maybe next season either. |
|
01-17-2005, 01:57 AM | #43 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York
|
Quote:
LOL!!! Sorry if i seem a bit like I'm out on a ledge threatening to jump if another dome is built! I just split with my girlfriend a month ago... Guess I'm taking out frustration on things that annoy me in the game rather than the "old fashiond way." Funny how it's hard to rant when there's a naked woman in close proximity... I need to get laid.
__________________
In the immortal words of a great alcoholic, "Can't we all just get along?" |
|
01-17-2005, 02:20 AM | #44 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Here and There
|
Quote:
I don't think domes have anything to do with it. What I do think is a factor is the inability of "warm weather" teams to consistently win in the elements. Dome teams qualify as warm weather teams. Tampa Bay was notorious for that until they won the Super Bowl. I remember some stat where they had never won in their entire team history, playoff or otherwise, when the temperature was below 42 degrees. See the Dolphins in Foxboro in December every year, which is why they switched the games up. Anyone who ever played any kind of sport in adverse conditions, peewee football or whatever, knows that you adapt to your environment. Last edited by Desnudo : 01-17-2005 at 02:21 AM. |
|
01-17-2005, 02:24 AM | #45 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Here and There
|
Quote:
What Patriots fan have you seen being an annoying ass on this board after the Colts game? If anything it was notable around here for the lack of taunting or any other kind of arrogance. Maybe you are mixing up desired perception with reality? (and possibly still resentful about the Angels?) Last edited by Desnudo : 01-17-2005 at 02:25 AM. |
|
01-17-2005, 07:01 AM | #46 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
|
Quote:
I smell a Yankees fan. |
|
01-17-2005, 07:03 AM | #47 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
|
Quote:
What the steelers got like 5 Super Bowls, not this group of players. I would rather see the Eagles or even the Falcons. |
|
01-17-2005, 07:28 AM | #48 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mass.
|
Quote:
Falcons please! In my entire life of football I have only gotten one super bowl experience to show for being a life long Falcons fan.. and that game is one that I half want to forget. After Saturday's game, I really feel better about this Falcons team, but the Eagles are tough with or without T.O. in there.. I don't know if the Falcons will pull this off or not, but I am definitly rooting for them.. Unfortunatly I have a feeling even if they got to the superbowl they won't have a great shot of winning. I think the Patriots or Steelers defenses both could shut down the Falcons (if the Eagles defense doesnt before hand). Here's to hoping though! |
|
01-17-2005, 07:38 AM | #49 | |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Foxboro,MA
|
Quote:
or possibly teams having sustained success tend to gather a bunch of "bandwagon" fans who act like jerks giving fans of oppossing teams plenty of fodder for bashing the general fanbase? -Pats fan since '77 (Would be earlier but I don't count years where diapers were involved. ) |
|
01-17-2005, 08:22 AM | #50 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|