01-08-2005, 09:16 PM | #1 | |||||
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Where the system is screwed
|
Ron Turner is the new OC for the Bears.
Well, this sucks.
http://www.chicagobears.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=6094 Quote:
I don't think Turner should have even been interviewd. The guy has proved nothing. Quote:
Thats not very good at all. In fact, I did some research on his stats. It's not overly indepth but it shows you how good he isn't. I mean, does Jerry Angelo even want to win? Why Turner, what has he proved...... For those who do not remember who Ron Turner is, he was the Bears Offensive Coordinator for four years ('93, '94' 95 '96). Although he produced one good year (1995), he failed to reach the top 20 in total team offense 3 of his 4 years here at Chicago. His Bio is listed below; http://fightingillini.collegesports.com/sp...rner_ron00.html Bears History in the Bio; Quote:
Ron Turner Chicago Bear stats by year, by rank; 1993 Bears W/L Record 7-9 236 points scored on offense (24th in the NFL out of 28 Teams) =14.6 points per game (0.22 points per game better than 2004 @ 14.4) Ranked 28th in passing yards with 2,270 Ranked 19th in rushing yards with 1,677 Ranked 28th in total Team Offense (Which was last place. The NFL only had 28 teams in 1993) 1994 Bears W/L Record 9-7 271 points scored on offense (24th in the NFL out of 28 Teams) =16.93 points per game (2.53 points per game better than 2004 @ 14.4) Ranked 23rd in passing yards with 3,230 Ranked 15th in rushing yards with 1,588 Ranked 26th in total Team Offense (out of 28 teams) 1995 Bears W/L Record 9-7 392 points scored on offense (8th in the NFL out of 30 Teams) =24.5 points per game (10.1 points per game better than 2004 @ 14.4 *NOTE: The Bears have not scored more than 392 points in a season since 1995. This is also thier highest ranking offense since that time.) Ranked 13th in passing yards with 3,838 Ranked 9th in rushing yards with 1,930 Ranked 10th in total Team Offense (out of 30 teams) 1996 (Turners' Final Year) Bears W/L Record 7-9 283 points scored on offense (26th in the NFL out of 30 teams) =17.68 points per game (3.28 points per game better than 2004 @ 14.4) Ranked 19th in passing yards with 3,350 Ranked 16th in rushing yards with 1,720 Ranked 22nd in total Team Offense (out of 30 teams) Counter Production: As you can see, the Bears offense dropped from 10th(1995) in the League to 22nd(1996). Season Points Scored dropped 109 points from 1995(392) to 1996(283). From 1995 to 1996, PPG (points per game) went down by nearly 7 points (from 24.5 > 17.68) |
|||||
01-08-2005, 09:17 PM | #2 |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO
|
Wow. That's bad.
__________________
Go STL Sports! |
01-08-2005, 09:35 PM | #3 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Illinois
|
Those cheers you hear are coming from north of the border. I told them to be sympathetic and try to keep it quiet, but they couldn't help themselves.
<-------Packers fan. |
01-08-2005, 09:48 PM | #4 |
H.S. Freshman Team
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Indianapolis
|
He did a ALOT for the Illini offense.
|
01-08-2005, 09:49 PM | #5 |
H.S. Freshman Team
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Indianapolis
|
Anyway, maybe they were in the red and had limited hiring choices.
|
01-08-2005, 09:51 PM | #6 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Edinburg,TX
|
WB Ron. Can they bring back Dave now too?
__________________
You Stole Fizzy Lifting drinks! You bumped into the ceiling which now has to be washed and steralized, so you get NOTHING! You lose! |
01-08-2005, 10:31 PM | #7 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: usually sunny SoCal
|
goodlord...
another horrendous year of bears games shoved down my throat. |
01-08-2005, 11:59 PM | #8 |
Mascot
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Bill Walsh could be coming in as the OC and it wouldn't make a huge difference. The Bear's have no offensive line, and no receiving threats. Unless they both improve the offense will suck next year.
|
01-09-2005, 12:09 AM | #9 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Colorado Springs
|
Just shoot me. I wept when I heard they were considering Turner as OC. And now I think I need to go stab myself in the face.
Figure 2 more years of woeful Bears offense under the Turner Show, fire him, and we're right back here again. |
01-09-2005, 01:15 PM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Where the system is screwed
|
I just don't understand what Jerry Angelo is thinking. It's like the Bears management always settle for mediocrity and the Turner hiring is no different imo. The word is the Bears believe they only need an average OC because the defense will be able to overcome an average offense. HUH!
The only posivtve thing I did hear was that there were a few NFL teams that were extremely interested in Turner. Appearently that helped Angelos' decision to hire Turner. Anyways, has anyone heard the extent of Turners contract? |
01-09-2005, 01:19 PM | #11 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
|
Angelo's record isnt exactly brilliant...
|
01-09-2005, 01:23 PM | #12 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Where the system is screwed
|
Quote:
Here's a great site. Check it out, it's pretty good. http://www.firejerryangelo.com/default.asp A list of blunders by Angelo. Quote:
Last edited by maximus : 01-09-2005 at 01:31 PM. |
||
01-09-2005, 01:29 PM | #13 | |
Mascot
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
I heard it was for 3 years at 500K per...that's a lot of money. However, that money is taken out of the Illini's buyout for him, so that is a plus from my point of view. |
|
01-09-2005, 01:32 PM | #14 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Where the system is screwed
|
Quote:
Thanks. I know that Shea is still getting $500k for the next two years as well. |
|
01-09-2005, 02:52 PM | #15 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Wow, I knew Jerry Angelo was an idiot, but that's some list. Honestly, if that's the standard, I could be GM and do better. Could you imagine what Quiksand could do?
Anyway, it looks like I won't have to continue my "defense-only" dynasty using the Chicago Bears since it's effectively happening in real life. :o Last edited by flere-imsaho : 01-09-2005 at 02:52 PM. |
01-10-2005, 02:21 AM | #16 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Colorado Springs
|
Reflecting the Bears' off-season emphasis, Turner balanced the promise of more big plays with the reintroduction of power football.
"We're going to want to run the football; that's where it all starts,'' Turner said. "It'll revolve a lot around high-percentage passes that we did here before. In other words. The Dink and Dunk is back in Chicago. God help us. But hey. At least I know the play when it's 3rd and 18. Quick out! Last edited by Coffee Warlord : 01-10-2005 at 02:23 AM. |
01-10-2005, 08:43 AM | #17 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
I'm all for a power-rushing attack, provided they're going to go out and buy the Offensive Line for it, but do I hear anything about that? Noooooooooooooooooooo....
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|