FBCB: Ratings Scales

RPI-Fan · 01-16-2004, 08:41 PM

Which rating scale do you use, and why?

I've always used to the A-F scale, if nothing else because I liked the way it worked out in FBB. But I think it's time for a change, as I'm starting a new career soon.. what do you all recommend?

I'm currently leaning 1-20, for that CM feel, but I'm curious as to the experiences others have had.

~rpi-fan

The_herd · 01-16-2004, 08:49 PM

I use the 1-100 scale. Just seems natural to me for some reason. I always get more of a feel for my players using that as opposed to the A-F or 1-10 scale.

If I had to choose another though, it would definately be the 1-20 ratings.

Groundhog · 01-16-2004, 08:54 PM

I like 1-10. It leaves some guess work in, as if you have two guys with similiar ratings, you really have to watch their performance to judge the better player.

Balldog · 01-16-2004, 09:14 PM

I am using 1-20 now, I was using 1-100. I think I like 1-20 better though.

sabotai · 01-16-2004, 09:34 PM

I use the 1-20 scale. Gives me enough info on the player, but not too accurate.

hollmt · 01-16-2004, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Groundhog

I like 1-10. It leaves some guess work in, as if you have two guys with similiar ratings, you really have to watch their performance to judge the better player.

i use the 1-100 but i kinda like your idea here. leaves a bit of guess work to find the better player if 2 are fairly equal at a position.

Neuqua · 01-16-2004, 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sabotai

I use the 1-20 scale. Gives me enough info on the player, but not too accurate.

what he said.

Godzilla Blitz · 01-16-2004, 11:42 PM

I've only played one game, and I'm using 1-100. Not sure why I picked it. So far I'm satisfied, but I think 1-20 or 1-10 might be easier for me to quickly assess players visually, so I might go with that next time.

View Poll Results: Which rating scale do you use for FBCB?
A-F	6	25.00%
1-100	11	45.83%
1-20	3	12.50%
1-10	3	12.50%
What's FBCB?	1	4.17%
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll

01-16-2004, 08:49 PM	#2
The_herd College Starter Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Fort Lackland, Texas (San Antonio)	I use the 1-100 scale. Just seems natural to me for some reason. I always get more of a feel for my players using that as opposed to the A-F or 1-10 scale. If I had to choose another though, it would definately be the 1-20 ratings. __________________ Oakland Raiders: HFL's 1970 AC West Champs

01-16-2004, 08:54 PM	#3
Groundhog Coordinator Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Sydney, Australia	I like 1-10. It leaves some guess work in, as if you have two guys with similiar ratings, you really have to watch their performance to judge the better player. __________________ Politics, n. Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. --Ambrose Bierce

01-16-2004, 09:14 PM	#4
Balldog Pro Rookie Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Macomb, MI	I am using 1-20 now, I was using 1-100. I think I like 1-20 better though.

01-16-2004, 09:34 PM	#5
sabotai General Manager Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: The Satellite of Love	I use the 1-20 scale. Gives me enough info on the player, but not too accurate.

01-16-2004, 11:42 PM	#8
Godzilla Blitz College Starter Join Date: Oct 2000	I've only played one game, and I'm using 1-100. Not sure why I picked it. So far I'm satisfied, but I think 1-20 or 1-10 might be easier for me to quickly assess players visually, so I might go with that next time.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)