Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-18-2005, 09:24 PM   #1
Flasch186
Coordinator
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
POL - Kudos to Bush!!!

I back this decision 100%!!


McClellan: Bush Nixed Iraq Election Funds

25 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - The White House considered funding candidates in
Iraq's January election, but
President Bush decided against it, his press secretary said Monday.


While publicly the Bush administration was saying the United States would live with whatever government was elected in free and fair elections, U.S. officials were concerned about Iranian support for pro-Iranian Shiite parties.

"We did have concerns that outsiders might try to influence the election, including
Iran," press secretary Scott McClellan said. "That raised concerns about whether there might be a need to level the playing field for the elections, and it presented us with some difficult issues about what action to take, if any, in response to those concerns.

"And in the final analysis, the president made the decision that our policy would be not to try to influence the outcome of the election by covertly helping individual candidates for office."

The election resulted in the United Iraqi Alliance, a Shiite-dominated party, winning a majority of seats in the National Assembly.
__________________
Jacksonville-florida-homes-for-sale

Putting a New Spin on Real Estate!



-----------------------------------------------------------

Commissioner of the USFL
USFL

Flasch186 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2005, 09:37 PM   #2
MrBigglesworth
College Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Rock
"N--- always want credit for some s--- they're supposed to do. They'll brag about stuff a normal man just does. They'll say something like, “Yeah, well I take care of my kids.” You're supposed to, you dumb f---. “I ain't never been to jail.” Whaddya want? A cookie? You're not supposed to go to jail, you low-expectation-having m---f---!"
When your latest rationale is bringing democracy to Iraq, you're supposed to let them have free elections without outside interference. It's a great decision, but is the bar really that low?
MrBigglesworth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2005, 09:42 PM   #3
Buccaneer
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
Again, it's really funny to see how niave some people are. Do you actually believe that it was truly a free election? Even the US doesn't have that.
Buccaneer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2005, 11:01 PM   #4
Flasch186
Coordinator
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
regardless, the decision was the "right" one.
__________________
Jacksonville-florida-homes-for-sale

Putting a New Spin on Real Estate!



-----------------------------------------------------------

Commissioner of the USFL
USFL
Flasch186 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2005, 11:43 PM   #5
MrBigglesworth
College Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buccaneer
Again, it's really funny to see how niave some people are. Do you actually believe that it was truly a free election? Even the US doesn't have that.
Your bag seems to be to interject strawmen into the argument and comment on how stupid someone is to believe your strawman that you invented.

No election is free from corruption, but it doesn't make sense to purposefully add to the corruption.
MrBigglesworth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2005, 01:47 AM   #6
andy m
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: norwich, UK
The White House considered fucking candidates in
Iraq's January election, but President Bush decided against it, his press secretary said Monday.
__________________
mostly harmless
FOFL 2009 champs - Norwich Quagmire
andy m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2005, 09:02 AM   #7
Buccaneer
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
You don't think our covert as well as observation presence there did not influence (or interfere with) anything? Some would argue that it was for the good of not making the election any more in favor of the Iranians and to get some pro-Allies candidates more influence than they would otherwise have. All of a sudden people are now believing sound bites and over-generalized short quips coming out of DC???
Buccaneer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2005, 09:26 AM   #8
Arles
Grey Dog Software
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ by way of Belleville, IL
There was no need to fund one side. As Buc says, our presence there was enough to provide the influence to make sure the extremists ended up on the outside looking in.

Last edited by Arles : 07-19-2005 at 09:26 AM.
Arles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2005, 10:19 AM   #9
Blackadar
Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fantasyland
Quote:
Originally Posted by andy m
The White House considered overtly fucking candidates in Iraq's January election, but President Bush decided against it, his press secretary said Monday.

Fixed that for you.
Blackadar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.