Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-21-2003, 08:19 AM   #1
BucDawg40
H.S. Freshman Team
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Tampa, FL
RB Speed

It seems that there aren't many speedy running backs in FOF2K4's game-generated rookie classes. In fact, I'm seeing quite a few guys in the 4.7-4.8 range. Due to the crash issue with importing drafts, I can't make a comparison with the RBs coming in from TCY.

Who else has noticed this? Could this have something to do with ypc being so low? Also, with the default rosters, their are very few RBs with any elusiveness. Maybe this has something to do with it, too.

BucDawg40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2003, 08:25 AM   #2
Huckleberry
College Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Maybe elusiveness, but there are probably a good number of running backs in the NFL with "true" 4.7-4.8 speed.
Huckleberry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2003, 08:32 AM   #3
QuikSand
lolzcat
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
I'm not sure that there's a particularly strong connection between "elusiveness" in FOF and pure speed. The game translates elusiveness as "ability to occasionally break long runs at the expense of sometimes getting caught begind the line of scrimmage." In my mind, that might be a little more connected to agility and tackle-breaking than flat-out speed.
QuikSand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2003, 08:38 AM   #4
henry296
College Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Quiksand,

In other words Elusiveness is "Barry Sanders" ability.

Todd
__________________
"It's a great day for hockey" - "Badger" Bob Johnson
henry296 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2003, 08:39 AM   #5
Honolulu_Blue
Hockey Boy
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Quote:
Originally posted by QuikSand
I'm not sure that there's a particularly strong connection between "elusiveness" in FOF and pure speed. The game translates elusiveness as "ability to occasionally break long runs at the expense of sometimes getting caught begind the line of scrimmage." In my mind, that might be a little more connected to agility and tackle-breaking than flat-out speed.


Agreed. Elusiveness sounds more like Barry Sanders. If anyone would have an 100 elusiveness it would have been him.

Flat-out speed is more along the lines of Michael Bennett.
Honolulu_Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2003, 08:51 AM   #6
BucDawg40
H.S. Freshman Team
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Tampa, FL
Quote:
Originally posted by QuikSand
I'm not sure that there's a particularly strong connection between "elusiveness" in FOF and pure speed.


Well, maybe I wasn't clear enough. I wasn't trying to correlate elusiveness and speed. I was just pointing out what I perceive to be a lack of speed among draftees and a lack of elusiveness among stock RBs. Maybe these are among the reasons why rushing stats are so low.
BucDawg40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2003, 09:46 AM   #7
mckerney
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Quote:
Originally posted by QuikSand
I'm not sure that there's a particularly strong connection between "elusiveness" in FOF and pure speed. The game translates elusiveness as "ability to occasionally break long runs at the expense of sometimes getting caught begind the line of scrimmage." In my mind, that might be a little more connected to agility and tackle-breaking than flat-out speed.


I don't think so. My back who has ellusiveness of 36 runs a 4.32.
mckerney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2003, 10:05 AM   #8
primelord
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Quote:
Originally posted by mckerney
I don't think so. My back who has ellusiveness of 36 runs a 4.32.


I am confused. How does that not fit with what Quik said?
primelord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2003, 11:56 AM   #9
mckerney
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Quote:
Originally posted by primelord
I am confused. How does that not fit with what Quik said?


Hmm... I'm pretty sure I'd meant to quote Huckleberry but clicked the wrong button.
mckerney is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.