Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   FOFC Archive (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   Moderation (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=33129)

Subby 12-13-2004 08:55 AM

We should rename this place Front Office I Have Sand in My Vagina.

JonInMiddleGA 12-13-2004 08:56 AM

I had a nice long post mentally composed ... and realized (luckily before typing it) that doing so would actually have contradicted what I was going to say.

That kinda sucks.

Suicane75 12-13-2004 09:53 AM

Ben,
I was very happy this morning to wake up and see what I saw from you in this thread, and i'm not surprised it was here because i truly, no matter what was happening, thought you were a fair and good person who was just a bit stubborn, I think i can say the same for 90% of the people on this board, especially when things get heated. But people get more vitriolic over you because you're the Mod, which i realize is not a fun thing to be sometimes and as I said in our conversation yesterday, i agree with what you do an overwhelming portion of the time.

Saturday night was something that i'm sure everyone involved wishes we could go back and do things differently, maybe more level headed, you, me, cringer, sov, all of us. I'm leaving Shorty out because he was genuinly upset that I was leaving (I think he has a man crush on me or something).

Sunday wasn't pleasant for me at all as there was alot of venom aimed at you which didn't make happy, even if i did feel your decision was wrong. I thought our conversation Sunday morning was a very good in which you sincerely listened to what I had to say and I you, I probably ended it too early as I decided to go watch the Ravens/Giants game (you should probably ban me just for that :) ) but I felt like as angry as I was at you I didn't let that invade our conversation and as pissed off as you probably were at me you didn't let it affect us having a solid, yet honest discussion.

My intention was never to grandstand, although in posting the goodbye thread i'm sure part of it was to let people know exactly what Sovs initial suspension was for, something I knew you didn't want done. Perhaps taking it to another board would of been best, it just seemed like a ridiculous notion at the time to say goodbye to FOFC on the HFL board.

I'm glad this is over and I have more respect for you now than when this started because it does take a big man to admit that his decision was wrong. I love this place, i've been a lurker/poster on FOFC for years, in fact I lurked for so long because the community here was so knowledgable/funny/witty/entertaining that for a few years I never felt that need to post, as just reading the threads was entertainment enough for me thruought my day, that's how special I think this group is.

You're a good dude in an unenviable position who has to make decisions that sometimes will polarize the community, that you can also be talked to and questioned and in turn reverse a decision that you made for the better says alot about your character to me.

I hope this can all be put behind us and we can move on, I love this place and I like the people here, even the ones I think are nuts :D

Suicane

WSUCougar 12-13-2004 09:56 AM

Bravo, Suicane.

Glengoyne 12-13-2004 10:36 AM

Nicely done Ben. This saves me a PM, expressing my disappointment.

I believe you are one hell of a moderator SD, as you typically only step in when things/posters go too far and/or level personal attacks. I do believe that you have learned that you can't censor or control the discussion here. That is not why everyone around here has entrusted you with your responsibility. Over the couple of years I have been around here you have earned my respect and support. I haven't agreed with everything you have done, but certianly believe you got the lion's, or in your case the H.N.I.C.'s, share correct. I'm writing this off to a drunken binge on the weekend that impaired your otherwise good judgement. Now that you have sobered up, and learned your lesson, don't do it again. If you manage that you will continue to be the exceptional moderator and essentially the leader of this community.

Good Luck

daedalus 12-13-2004 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samdari
Ben should not be dictating to members what topics they comment on, period.

Honestly, as far as what people think and post, I agree with you. When it comes to "please don't try to stir shit up for the sake of it" which was what I got from I found, I'm not.

MIJB#19 12-13-2004 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daedalus
Locking up kingjerkoff's thread, I have no problem with since, unlike Matthijs, I have no positive impression of him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIJB#19 over at a place where he shouldn't have written about the issue
[HA]'s been assholish most of the time against me

Old sentiments towards SD boiled up. From negative came positive and this whole issue cleared that up for me, the response from SD makes old issues finally closed.

On HA having a positive impression, that's more because I'm a moron in thinking that everyone has something good in him. I've experienced positive things with HA to feel he's not only bad influence. Or maybe I'm just a pathetic guy who tries to be friends with everyone. :o But then, Hornsmaniac never won me over, so that can't be it...

Icy 12-13-2004 10:44 AM

Great post Suicane!!! i'm really glad to see all you talking this way now.

Eaglesfan27 12-13-2004 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
Look, there is nothing sinister going on here. All I wanted was to keep from setting Fido off again, because I want an updated version of FOF Reporter. The ONLY reason that I didn't want the matter discussed publicly afterward because I know that he lurks here from time to time. Based on his past behavior, I have a pretty good idea that seeing such a discussion would have brought back up the thread in which he was criticized, and bringing back up said thread was/is a surefire way to pretty much assure that FOF Reporter is dead. I had a very specific standard for which posts I deleted and thread that I locked: if this continues, will it lead back to Fido discussion? There were some things that I let stay in the locked threads; that's why. Ultimately, I don't mind civilized discussion of my decisions, as was said above, but in this case, even civilized discussion would have brought back up the Fido drama--the very thing I was trying to prevent. That's why I did what I did. Nothing more. Nothing less. I just wanted the damn utility. I figured that, like any other of the "drama" situtions that have shown up, this one would die out once the weekend was over, get pushed to the bottom, and Fido would never have to see it.

Obviously, I was incorrect in that assessment.

It is now clear that this isn't going to die, because I went too far this time. My bad. I had tunnel vision on this one, and didn't see the bigger picture. I shouldn't have valued Fido's utility over the rest of the community. My deepest, most sincere apologies all around, and I highly doubt something like this will happen again, as I've learned much from it.

All accounts have been restored to their pre-Friday status, with the exception of sovereignstar. The fact remains that he posted while under suspension. Due to mitigating circumstances, I've reduced his punishment from banning to an extra 12 hours, and that time will expire at 7:00AM EST today.

I'm sorry. :(

--Ben

(EDITED FOR TWO MINOR TYPOS)



I haven't read the rest of this thread, yet. However, I just wanted to say I admire your decision to post this. We all make mistakes. It takes a real adult to admit them and rectify them if possible.

Eaglesfan27 12-13-2004 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suicane75
Ben,
I was very happy this morning to wake up and see what I saw from you in this thread, and i'm not surprised it was here because i truly, no matter what was happening, thought you were a fair and good person who was just a bit stubborn, I think i can say the same for 90% of the people on this board, especially when things get heated. But people get more vitriolic over you because you're the Mod, which i realize is not a fun thing to be sometimes and as I said in our conversation yesterday, i agree with what you do an overwhelming portion of the time.

Saturday night was something that i'm sure everyone involved wishes we could go back and do things differently, maybe more level headed, you, me, cringer, sov, all of us. I'm leaving Shorty out because he was genuinly upset that I was leaving (I think he has a man crush on me or something).

Sunday wasn't pleasant for me at all as there was alot of venom aimed at you which didn't make happy, even if i did feel your decision was wrong. I thought our conversation Sunday morning was a very good in which you sincerely listened to what I had to say and I you, I probably ended it too early as I decided to go watch the Ravens/Giants game (you should probably ban me just for that :) ) but I felt like as angry as I was at you I didn't let that invade our conversation and as pissed off as you probably were at me you didn't let it affect us having a solid, yet honest discussion.

My intention was never to grandstand, although in posting the goodbye thread i'm sure part of it was to let people know exactly what Sovs initial suspension was for, something I knew you didn't want done. Perhaps taking it to another board would of been best, it just seemed like a ridiculous notion at the time to say goodbye to FOFC on the HFL board.

I'm glad this is over and I have more respect for you now than when this started because it does take a big man to admit that his decision was wrong. I love this place, i've been a lurker/poster on FOFC for years, in fact I lurked for so long because the community here was so knowledgable/funny/witty/entertaining that for a few years I never felt that need to post, as just reading the threads was entertainment enough for me thruought my day, that's how special I think this group is.

You're a good dude in an unenviable position who has to make decisions that sometimes will polarize the community, that you can also be talked to and questioned and in turn reverse a decision that you made for the better says alot about your character to me.

I hope this can all be put behind us and we can move on, I love this place and I like the people here, even the ones I think are nuts :D

Suicane


Very nice post. My admiration for you just went up too :)

Franklinnoble 12-13-2004 11:46 AM

Man. I KNEW I should have spent more time around here this weekend. :D

Nice move, Ben. Well done.

GrantDawg 12-13-2004 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186
Thats ok, but then it would be on them and not becuase of an issue. Like Ben said, he learned from this, not is coalescing to demands, but actually sees that perhaps he didnt handle this the best way possible. Thats what is wonderful about being an adult, being able to learn from your mistakes and move forward with new knowledge.

If some people hold a grudge than that is their own fault. Forgiveness must be given before it can be gotten. I think it is a beautiful thing and will make our communtiy stronger....utilities shmootilities, its us that make the FOFC this huge (i guess there is a game out there to that some of us like but...) its us that make it big.

We can come in here and tell stories about our lives with abbreviations, its us that can post pictures of our shaved heads in support of our father, its us who can post pictures of ourselves in our undies, its us who say prayers for eachother when something terrible happened or might, its FOFC that can smack eachother around a bit when we get drunk and start fights, its FOFC that can tell us how long to wait before calling the girl, its FOFC that can tell us what parts we need to make our new computer, its FOFC that can tell us why our political views are wrong, its FOFC that can let us trade games, and finally its FOFC that can bring all people of shapes sizes religions ages together. That is what the FOFC is about.....in essence we have transcended utilities and, no offense Jim, a game.....were a family. This was just simply, our Holiday squabble.


That was the best post Flasch ever posted on this board. I can read it and understand it. He even used paragraphs! Nicely done.

cuervo72 12-13-2004 11:54 AM

Oh, Sov is gone too? In that case, Jeeber, I think it would be acceptable for you to PM some certain pics then. I don't think that could hurt anything, right?

daedalus 12-13-2004 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIJB#19
On HA having a positive impression, that's more because I'm a moron in thinking that everyone has something good in him. I've experienced positive things with HA to feel he's not only bad influence. Or maybe I'm just a pathetic guy who tries to be friends with everyone. :o But then, Hornsmaniac never won me over, so that can't be it...

Sorry, Matthijs, that comment wasn't meant as a knock against you. For what it's worth, I don't think you're a moron as I consider you to be a very positive person toward everyone (at least based on what I have seen here). I simply don't share your positive sentiment toward Hell Atlantic.

sachmo71 12-13-2004 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
That was the best post Flasch ever posted on this board. I can read it and understand it. He even used paragraphs! Nicely done.



That should be enough to get him off of the ignore list!

ISiddiqui 12-13-2004 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
It is now clear that this isn't going to die, because I went too far this time. My bad. I had tunnel vision on this one, and didn't see the bigger picture. I shouldn't have valued Fido's utility over the rest of the community. My deepest, most sincere apologies all around, and I highly doubt something like this will happen again, as I've learned much from it.

All accounts have been restored to their pre-Friday status, with the exception of sovereignstar. The fact remains that he posted while under suspension. Due to mitigating circumstances, I've reduced his punishment from banning to an extra 12 hours, and that time will expire at 7:00AM EST today.


Here, Here! I applaud the decision and the post.

Oh, and before I forget... GROUP HUG! ;)

GrantDawg 12-13-2004 12:18 PM

Nice post Skydog and Suicane. Classy moves on both of your parts. I think people need to understand that a mod on any board is going to have to act as a dictator in one way or another. Some just are more oppresive than others. If you don't believe that, just try it. Open a board and get some members there (not always and easy thing). Then give them no limits on speech. See how long the board last. It would take no time to become another "YOU SUCK DUDZ" message board that no one would enjoy visiting. The best a moderator can do is be as gentle as he can, and no when to pour on the heavy hand.

In this case, Ben messed up. He went heavy handed to soon (though I can sort of understand why. What kind of juvenile idiots get so worked up about someone not releasing a FREE program in the time frame they want? Just goes to show, no good deed goes unpunished). I never doubted, though, Ben would be man enough to right any real wrongs. There aren't many mods out there (or people in general) that would, but I know Ben is one of them.

As for those who have "left." I'm sorry to see you go. But if it were between them leaving and Ben losing his mod position, it is a complete no brainer. Bye guys, nice knowing ya. Ben may not be perfect, but he is the only man for this job. As much as I respect many on this board, I can't think of anyone that has a better temperment to handle this job. I'm glad Ben is here, I'm glad this board is here, and I look forward to getting all this behind us so we can continue annoying each other in other ways.

Franklinnoble 12-13-2004 12:20 PM

Hey, Ben... since you're feeling so magnanimous about your (relatively few) mistakes as a moderator, don't you think now would be a good time to spread a little holiday cheer, and return the QOTM?

Pretty please?







(Hey, I have to try...)

dawgfan 12-13-2004 12:33 PM

Ben, thank you for reconsidering your decisions and allowing this discussion to happen, and thank you for your apology. You 'da man...

GrantDawg 12-13-2004 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franklinnoble
Hey, Ben... since you're feeling so magnanimous about your (relatively few) mistakes as a moderator, don't you think now would be a good time to spread a little holiday cheer, and return the QOTM?

Pretty please?







(Hey, I have to try...)


Why? He is fixing mistakes, not reversing the best desicion he ever made.

Franklinnoble 12-13-2004 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
Why? He is fixing mistakes, not reversing the best desicion he ever made.


Hater.

I think the QOTM should be an optional component. So, if you don't like it, you don't have to see it.

Cringer 12-13-2004 12:57 PM

SkyDog, I thought of doing this via PM but then again that would be rather hypocritical of me since I made this public in the first place. I know you disagreed with my methods, and thought of it as more of an attention grabbing tactic. It was not done for that reason to me, I thought of it as the more effective way in this case. Some may agree, some may disagree with me on this point, but that is going to happen with many things and I am fine with that part of it.

I am happy to read your decision, and first and foremost I hope there are no hard feelings between us. As I said earlier in this thread, I have never much looked at you as The Man, but just one of the top posters here. I have always enjoyed reading about your testing of FOF and TCY, and have found it useful in the past many times. I never called for a new Moderator, and would not do so. As many people have said, no man is perfect. I thank you for listening, which is not something many people would do when they start out feeling they are 100% correct in their actions. That is a hard thing to do, as I think most of us know.

There is not much else I can say here, I think Suicane pretty much summed up a lot of my feelings in his post, so I will just say that I agree with much of what he has said there.

And ISiddiqui has beaten me to it, I think it's time for a group hug.

Anthony 12-13-2004 12:58 PM

goddamit suicane - are you a girl or a boy. what's the fucking story?

Anthony 12-13-2004 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daedalus
Sorry, Matthijs, that comment wasn't meant as a knock against you. For what it's worth, I don't think you're a moron as I consider you to be a very positive person toward everyone (at least based on what I have seen here). I simply don't share your positive sentiment toward Hell Atlantic.


don't make me have to react. i don't want to ruin the good feelings in this thread by shitting on you and your feeling of self-worth.

nevertheless, that's strike one.

MikeVic 12-13-2004 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cuervo72
Oh, Sov is gone too? In that case, Jeeber, I think it would be acceptable for you to PM some certain pics then. I don't think that could hurt anything, right?



Hey hey. I want too!!

Butter 12-13-2004 01:06 PM

I like drama as much as the next guy, but whenever any of this shit happens, I'm always about 95% lost about what ANY of it means.

So, fill in your own since I don't know what the hell is going on:

So I guess it's good that ______________________. I think that SkyDog___________________.
I love it when __________________ kicks ________________ in the __________________. That's always __________________. Oh, and Michigan sucks.

cthomer5000 12-13-2004 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samdari
Here's the thing - and this is coming from someone who thinks SD should be praised for doing such a thankless job so conscientiously, and would not want him replaced - the "my moderation decisions cannot be discussed publicly" stance is just plain wrong. He continually locks/deletes threads that criticize his decisions, meanwhile talking out of the other side of his mouth that all opinions are welcome here as long as they are stated in a civil manner. Quieting public dissention is rule #1 in the dictator's guide to keeping power. Not that I think SD is trying to truly trying to be a dictator here, but that particular policy certainly smacks of it. While I agree wholeheartedly that what Ben brings to this board as a moderator and member far outweighs the negative, I think that this policy does the board more harm than good, especially when it encourages valued members to leave.

Ben, whether you want it to be the case or not, moderation decisions are a legitimate topic of discussion. They are part of what happens in our community, and we should be able to express dissenting opinions, if we truly want an open forum.


This perfectly states my opinion. I don't want to be told we cannot discusss moderation decisions, I simply don't think that's reasonable.

Fonzie 12-13-2004 01:14 PM

I love Mad-Libs! Here's my entry:


So I guess it's good that banana. I think that SkyDog belches sometimes. I love it when coffee cup kicks cow in the Richard Simmons . That's always infected. Oh, and papercuts suck.

Edit: I don't actually hate Michigan, so I changed the last sentence.

sachmo71 12-13-2004 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fonzie
I love Mad-Libs! Here's my entry:


So I guess it's good that banana. I think that SkyDog belches sometimes. I love it when coffee cup kicks cow in the Richard Simmons . That's always infected. Oh, and papercuts suck.

Edit: I don't actually hate Michigan, so I changed the last sentence.


Mmmm...nice.

GrantDawg 12-13-2004 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cthomer5000
This perfectly states my opinion. I don't want to be told we cannot discusss moderation decisions, I simply don't think that's reasonable.

I'm in the middle on this. I don't think all discussion should be eliminated, but I also don't think EVERY decision requires discussion, and it should be limited to one or two threads and not a board-jack. I can understand limirs because this could easily become the "Skydog job" message board, which would suck. AND, unpopular decisions must be made, and whatever the decision, there are going to be people upset. Some people are not mature enough to let things go, so there has to be an end put somewhere. This time it was too far, but other times it has been just right (IMHO, of course others don't agree).

Ps. also, your first move in challenging a decision should be in private to Skydog. That will always be better with much less drama than making a thread. Of course, some people really do just want the attention.

Anthony 12-13-2004 01:20 PM

the guy apologized and made amends as much as he could. why is there still a debate going on? the case is closed and while mistakes were made on both sides of the board gravity still exists and the earth will still revolve around the sun.

scooper 12-13-2004 01:22 PM

I'll play too.

So I guess it's good that Michigan sucks. I think that SkyDog knows Michigan sucks.
I love it when Any team kicks Lloyd Carr in the Man boobs. That's always a good indication that Michigan sucks. Oh, and Michigan sucks.


We have a moderator?

Samdari 12-13-2004 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
I'm in the middle on this. I don't think all discussion should be eliminated, but I also don't think EVERY decision requires discussion, and it should be limited to one or two threads and not a board-jack. I can understand limirs because this could easily become the "Skydog job" message board, which would suck. AND, unpopular decisions must be made, and whatever the decision, there are going to be people upset. Some people are not mature enough to let things go, so there has to be an end put somewhere. This time it was too far, but other times it has been just right (IMHO, of course others don't agree).

Ps. also, your first move in challenging a decision should be in private to Skydog. That will always be better with much less drama than making a thread. Of course, some people really do just want the attention.


Keep in mind, I am not saying every moderation decision should be a group effort. I am not trying to make SkyDog actually change his decisions based on the things said in such a discussion. I know its a tough job, I would not want it, and I have never actually been truly offended at any of his moderation decisions. What I detest is the "back room justice" feel of discipline around here (I guess we disagree vehemently here). Everything handled in private and secret just rubs me the wrong way - and in fact makes this board more "SkyDog Central" than if free discussions of the moderating decisions were allowed.

Note that by "free disccussion" I am not advocating a free for all, every post a flame attitude - people should be held to the same standards of civility in threads discussing mod decisions that they are in other discussions, and risk the same penalties for crossing the line. But, I think there is nothing wrong with asking Ben to explain his reasoning behind such actions, and everyone else being allowed to criticize such decisions publicly. Clearly, the "these things are handled in private" attitude is hurting the board (in loss of good content adding members) more than it is helping at this point.

GrantDawg 12-13-2004 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samdari
What I detest is the "back room justice" feel of discipline around here (I guess we disagree vehemently here). Everything handled in private and secret just rubs me the wrong way - and in fact makes this board more "SkyDog Central" than if free discussions of the moderating decisions were allowed.


No, I dont disagree except that "everything" is done that way. Most of Skydogs decisions have been very publically done. This was more the exception than the rule. I think it is because the few times most of things done were behind the scenes sticks in people's minds more than they very public things. Human nature, I guess.

Samdari 12-13-2004 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
No, I dont disagree except that "everything" is done that way. Most of Skydogs decisions have been very publically done. This was more the exception than the rule. I think it is because the few times most of things done were behind the scenes sticks in people's minds more than they very public things. Human nature, I guess.


He has repeatedly asked that anyone wanting to comment/question on such a decision do so in IM's, and often closed threads where people wish to discuss. This is the first time I can remember any discussion of moderation not being immediately quashed.

Tigercat 12-13-2004 02:01 PM

fofc wordbank:
dola
trout
colosal squid
hornsmaniac
patriotic undies
come back more powerful than you can possibly imagine

So I guess it's good that dola. I think that SkyDog trout.
I love it when colosal squid kicks hornsmaniac in the patriotic undies. That's always come back more powerful than you can possibly imagine.

Fonzie 12-13-2004 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tigercat
fofc wordbank:
dola
trout
colosal squid
hornsmaniac
patriotic undies
come back more powerful than you can possibly imagine

So I guess it's good that dola. I think that SkyDog trout.
I love it when colosal squid kicks hornsmaniac in the patriotic undies. That's always come back more powerful than you can possibly imagine.


That's more like it.

Less yappin', more Mad-Libs! ;)

GrantDawg 12-13-2004 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samdari
He has repeatedly asked that anyone wanting to comment/question on such a decision do so in IM's, and often closed threads where people wish to discuss. This is the first time I can remember any discussion of moderation not being immediately quashed.


Then you haven't been around or don't have a good memory. I remember many of these threads, and remember why they have been limited.

Samdari 12-13-2004 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
Then you haven't been around or don't have a good memory. I remember many of these threads, and remember why they have been limited.


Well?

GrantDawg 12-13-2004 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samdari
Well?


Deep subject. Well, what? Examples? Many of these situations played out on the old board, but the dramas (very plural) around Hornsmaniac comes to mind. Not to mention that some that were having the pissies in this situation were the same people that caused such a stink then (and I'm pretty sure that at least one still doesn't believe Horns should have been banned).

Samdari 12-13-2004 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
Deep subject. Well, what? Examples? Many of these situations played out on the old board, but the dramas (very plural) around Hornsmaniac comes to mind. Not to mention that some that were having the pissies in this situation were the same people that caused such a stink then (and I'm pretty sure that at least one still doesn't believe Horns should have been banned).


Yes, I am looking for examples of threads where people discussed SkyDog's moderation decisions and did not close them with the explanation that such discussions were only acceptable via PM.

GrantDawg 12-13-2004 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samdari
Yes, I am looking for examples of threads where people discussed SkyDog's moderation decisions and did not close them with the explanation that such discussions were only acceptable via PM.


Again, Hornsmaniac dramas, the wigs dramas, threads about QOTM, ect, ect, ect. There have been many threads, many discussions, and all beaten like a dead horse.

Blackadar 12-13-2004 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg
Deep subject. Well, what? Examples? Many of these situations played out on the old board, but the dramas (very plural) around Hornsmaniac comes to mind. Not to mention that some that were having the pissies in this situation were the same people that caused such a stink then (and I'm pretty sure that at least one still doesn't believe Horns should have been banned).


Horns. Wignifty. Wignasty. Chubby. The Nazi-flag guy (drawing a blank on the name, though I shouldn't). Styx. How many more do you need?

Samdari 12-13-2004 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
Further public discussion of this matter will be looked on as just trolling for more controversy, and dealt with accordingly. If more detailed explanation is needed, all civil contacts via PM or e-mail will be responded to in kind.


This is the kind of crap I am referring to.

Orders not to comment on a particular topic. And it was posted yesterday.

kcchief19 12-13-2004 02:51 PM

Frankly, I think Ben's being too hard on himself. I understand that reasons he did what he did -- it was with the best interest of the board at heart. Perhaps leaving a "bitch session" thread open would have allowed everyone to vent their frustrations and get back to normal, perhaps not. I think Ben's only mistake was trying to clamp down completely and not let the situation run its course -- but that is 20/20 hindsight. I have no doubt he did what he thought was best.

If you don't like it, you don't like Ben's change of heart and you don't like this moderation, my suggestion is this: hit the bricks. This forum is a great place to have fun, but if you're not having fun why come here? I stopped coming here and posting for a while when political threads were non-stop and 9 out of 10 threads pissed me off. If you're not having fun and the only contribution you can make is to cause trouble, then get a life for Christmas and go do something else.

Don't take this place so seriously -- it's supposed to be fun, god damn it. :)

Ben E Lou 12-13-2004 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samdari
Well?

Ok. I'll bite.


24-hour discussion on a moderating decision, closed when completely off-topic, out of hand, and finished: http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/~fof/forums/showthread.php?t=17896&page=1&pp=50&highlight=skydog+dictator

discussion on a moderating decision, never closed: http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/~fof/forums/showthread.php?t=9578&page=3&pp=50&highlight=skydog+dictator

discussion on a moderating decision, never closed:
http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/~fof/forums/showthread.php?t=8498&highlight=skydog+dictator

discussion on a moderating decision, never closed:
http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/~fof/forums/showthread.php?t=30469&page=1&pp=50&highlight=skydog+dictator

discussion on a moderating decision, never closed:
http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/~fof/forums/showthread.php?t=24792&highlight=skydog+dictator

That's five right there, and there are actually many, many more. I just found these by searching on the words "SkyDog" and "dictator." :p

EDIT: (bad format in WYSIWYG) Do a search on "SkyDog suspension" and you'll see how many of those threads are discussion moderating decisions, and how few of them were ever closed.

I think if you do a few more searches with my name and words like "Banned," "suspension," "suspended," etc., you'll be surprised to see how many of them were never, ever closed.

Blackadar 12-13-2004 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samdari
This is the kind of crap I am referring to.

Orders not to comment on a particular topic. And it was posted yesterday.


Sam, I had to do the same thing from time to time. At some point, you have to ask people to take it offline and that it's not a subject for discussion.

I now remember the Nazi-flag: Bragg. I had to do the EXACT same thing - end all discussion - because people did not understand my reasoning for letting him stay and people kept baiting and inflaming the situation. It's done rarely, but as a moderator you do have to finally put your foot down and tell people to stfu.

Fonzie 12-13-2004 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchief19
Don't take this place so seriously -- it's supposed to be fun, god damn it. :)


Well said. And in keeping with the spirit of your post I encourage everyone to complete the Mad-Lib posted above. :p

Samdari 12-13-2004 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog
Ok. I'll bite.


24-hour discussion on a moderating decision, closed when completely off-topic, out of hand, and finished: http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/~fof/forums/showthread.php?t=17896&page=1&pp=50&highlight=skydog+dictator

discussion on a moderating decision, never closed: http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/~fof/forums/showthread.php?t=9578&page=3&pp=50&highlight=skydog+dictator

discussion on a moderating decision, never closed:
http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/~fof/forums/showthread.php?t=8498&highlight=skydog+dictator

discussion on a moderating decision, never closed:
http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/~fof/forums/showthread.php?t=30469&page=1&pp=50&highlight=skydog+dictator

discussion on a moderating decision, never closed:
http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/~fof/forums/showthread.php?t=24792&highlight=skydog+dictator

That's five right there, and there are actually many, many more. I just found these by searching on the words "SkyDog" and "dictator." :p

EDIT: (bad format in WYSIWYG) Do a search on "SkyDog suspension" and you'll see how many of those threads are discussion moderating decisions, and how few of them were ever closed.

I think if you do a few more searches with my name and words like "Banned," "suspension," "suspended," etc., you'll be surprised to see how many of them were never, ever closed.


I stand corrected on "every"

EDIT: That does not change the fact that this post very clearly spells out that you think discussion of moderating decisions (expecially those involving disciplinary action) should be done in back rooms and secret channels rather than in public forums.

One issue where you are WAY off base in that post is the statement, "When a person complains publicly about a modding decision, I only assume that they're grandstanding anyway." When a someone who was not in any way involved in some sort of controversy comes in and sees the aftermath from something as exciting as this weekend, and who is known NOT to be a troll, disagrees with a disciplinary decision, their public comments should not be seen as grandstanding.

You say that you would listen to such a person's comments if they were made privately but they are grandstanding if made publicly? That is something you simply cannot assume. It is impossible for such a person to simply have an opinion, not an agenda? Wanting it to be expressed publicly automatically makes it grandstanding, it is impossible for them simply to detest the "back room justice" vibe given off by posts such as you made above? You could not possibly be more off base than with that comment.

That said, I will leave it at that. I should not be so vehement, as the only mod decision of yours I truly have disagreed with is the closing of topics related to your decisions, and consider myself ulikely to end up in the Dark Jedi justice system. Methinks you are a bit thin skinned there, and have a very different standard of what is considered trolling when people are talking about you than when they are talking about others.

sterlingice 12-13-2004 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samdari
Well?


It's a hole in the ground that people get water out of. But that's not important now.

SI


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.