Home
Feature Article
Summer Storms: The NCAA Release Story

Summer is usually a time for relaxation in the sports world. Summer lacks any real dramatic sports news. At most, all you can hope for is some kind of off-the-field NFL scandal or hot topic -- and this year has not let us down, thank you Brett Favre and the Packers organization. Still if you love sports -- and since you are here you most likely do -- and play sports video games, you know that summer means a new beginning for the next season’s titles.

With the recent hype surrounding the resurgence of EA Sports and Tiburon’s football titles there was no doubt the forums of MaddenMania and Operation Sports would be popping come release time for NCAA Football 09. This is usually the case every release, but recent lackluster products have left people skeptical. Add in the fact that fans seem to hold the football monopolizing Electronic Arts to a higher standard when it comes to the hopes of what will be in a football game, and you never really know what to expect.

A wide array of emotions have engulfed forum members, leaving some looking for answers and pushing panic buttons already -- not even one week after release of the game.


Well if you happened to venture anywhere near the forums in the past few weeks you would have been in for quite the soap opera. A wide array of emotions have engulfed forum members, leaving some looking for answers and pushing panic buttons already -- not even one week after release of the game.

The onslaught started shortly before the public release, as it usually does. I have been around these boards for about eight releases now, and this part is like clockwork. The air is chock-full of angst as people pray to find a place that will sell a copy a few days early, making the F5 button work overtime on all the threads that may have the inside scoop on where your best bets are.

Then you have the lucky few that manage to land the game, and either get tarred and feathered or treated like heroes. In a rare change-up this year I did not see anyone attempt the old-lying-about-having-the-game-early trick. Sure there were plenty of skeptics that wanted photo, video and government certification providing proof that a person obtained the game, but not one really lied.

When someone does find the game the rest of us need to hear impressions from them of course -- even though this year we had several community leaders telling us all about the game from their experiences, not to mention a guy or two with a beta copy taking all the media you can handle. (Thank you Steve). Still it seems to be Average Joe that forum goers hold in highest regard when it comes to unbiased information.

Still when the forums got wind of some game issues via the few that had landed a copy of the retail game, all bets were off.


And the great part about all of this pre-release angst deals with something you learn in the first week of a college marketing class: bad news travels faster than good news. This is really what highlights this year’s NCAA Football 09 release.

Word was already out there that several issues, perhaps ranging from minor to game destroying depending on what's important to the gamer, were in this year's version of the game. This info had come from community days, and the month’s time we all were able to spend playing the early demo. Still when the forums got wind of some game issues via the few that had landed a copy of the retail game, all bets were off.

Over the next few days, and those leading up to the actual release day, if you visited the forums you may have heard the sky was falling, down was up, and Atlantis had risen. This tends to happen every year, but seemed particularly outrageous this release.

It shouldn’t come as a surprise though, reactions like these tend to happen when you mostly focus on the negatives.


Perhaps just another college learned lesson was rearing its head: the fact that people who dislike something are more vocal than people who actually care about it. Because if you were on the boards during all the impressions, or should I say complaints, then it became a little trying. Several die hards proclaimed the game was busted and that they wouldn’t be purchasing this year -- mind you this was still before the game was even officially released. Glitch after glitch began to surface, and as more and more people received their games, the question was how could this be going bad again after things looked so bright and promising?

It shouldn’t come as a surprise though, reactions like these tend to happen when you mostly focus on the negatives. And with the masses getting the product and reporting on just the bad functions, overlooking any possibility of fun or happiness with the game, the forums became a bit of a downer to read.

But then just as quickly, a strange silence fell over the boards on July 15. This of course would come as a result of release day. Like the eye of the hurricane, it was the middle of a crazy week and the boards were dormant for the most part in regards to new posts. Thousands of people were online, but only a few were even posting. Why? Because everyone was playing the game of course.

After the eye of the storm passed, the other problem became abundantly clear: the evil roster glitch. And if you want to see panic, then look no further than a bunch of guys that are without real-life named rosters during NCAA release week.

Something that is free and provided by ordinary people has become the biggest part of the game to many, and when it was found that the game would freeze, and created names would not work properly, well that is when things really hit the fan. The online community mourned as it appeared they would have to wait longer before they could play their beloved game, even though they technically had the prize in their hands.

But as the week went on and as the dust started to settle, people spent a little more time playing the game. Now reports of people actually having fun with the game are starting to pop up, and threads of gamers posting their best experiences and great games are prevalent. Work is being done to help each other overcome the problems, and slider and music customization help is a hot topic. This game may just have hope yet. Still it has been an eventful week or two in the online community with forums everywhere taking some twists and turns to say the least.

So with the cleanup after the storm taking place now, does normalcy peek out from behind the storm clouds? Only time will tell. But with big brother Madden’s release just a few short weeks away, I know we'll have to gear up to go through it all again, because after all, it is release season!


NCAA Football 09 Videos
Member Comments
# 81 ChaseB @ 07/25/08 12:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spanky
If you didn't like those articles, I'm guessing you won't be thrilled with the next two OS articles on EA:

"Why Rosters are Irrelevant to the True Gamer''

and,

"The March Madness Series: Why it's Gotten a Bum Rap.''
OK I can admit that I actually laughed a bit just then.
 
# 82 Rules @ 07/25/08 12:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 867-5309
Just pointing out the hypocrisy where I see it. Don't take it personally. Trying to get you to see that others might have the same enjoyment with this as you did with TW, even with all the flaws and all. Using some of your own statements, not everyone lives and dies with sliders (myself included) and not everyone uses Online dynasty.
That's fine........look for the Golf section to point out your issues. I am doing the same here in the NCAA forum.
 
# 83 ChaseB @ 07/25/08 12:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PlyrzNumber1
When people speak of "slanted motives, or bias" it isn't that we necessarily assume EA is cutting checks and padding the pocketbooks of the decision makers here, at least, directly.

Having EA here increases links, traffic, and the sites credibility in the eyes of a less-niche audience. Given the amount of Ads on this site, one would assume anytime there's a spike in traffic, there's going to be a boost in revenue.

I can see why there would be incentive to keep EA and their Devs/Reps happy.
Good to know. All I can say is we don't have any sneaky motives. Do we like to see traffic rise? Yes. Would we do it if it meant selling out the site's credibility? No, because then there was no point in doing this stuff in the first place.
 
# 84 DIESEL @ 07/25/08 12:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaseB
But if you realize that certain stories are opinion pieces, then in a way I don't see the issue.
I've got no problems with opinion pieces as long as I see a balance. To this point the OS NCAA 09 coverage has been pretty positive, while the forum is telling a completely different story.
 
# 85 Rules @ 07/25/08 12:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 867-5309
Really?

You actually took the time to add that in? After I took your reasons for still enjoying TW08 and flipped it around to show you being even more hypocritical, in regards to other people liking NCAA09?

Really?
 
# 86 ASB37 @ 07/25/08 12:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DIESEL
I've got no problems with opinion pieces as long as I see a balance. To this point the OS NCAA 09 coverage has been pretty positive, while the forum is telling a completely different story.
I gotta agree whole heartedly here. If i was a new visitor coming to OS in a google search or something and i never entered the forum and only read the front page information available on OS i would think NCAA was "the show" of football games.
 
# 87 ChaseB @ 07/25/08 12:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DIESEL
I've got no problems with opinion pieces as long as I see a balance. To this point the OS NCAA 09 coverage has been pretty positive, while the forum is telling a completely different story.
OK, but like I said, I can't force people to write negative pieces. However, in the future we'll definitely be more aware and try not to just push out piece after piece (which in this case seemed to be more positive than negative) just for the sake of content.
 
# 88 Rules @ 07/25/08 12:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaseB
OK, but like I said, I can't force people to write negative pieces. However, in the future we'll definitely be more aware and try not to just push out piece after piece (which in this case seemed to be more positive than negative) just for the sake of content.
I think it is more important to have respectable forum members who know their games especially if it is not an area of expertise for you or your staff of writers. Each forum pretty much has a go to guy who many of us trust and tell it like they see it. If you need names, please let us know!
 
# 89 muggins @ 07/25/08 12:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaseB
OK, but like I said, I can't force people to write negative pieces. However, in the future we'll definitely be more aware and try not to just push out piece after piece (which in this case seemed to be more positive than negative) just for the sake of content.
You might add in "try not to mock the readership" in there as well.
 
# 90 maddcatt @ 07/25/08 12:25 AM
Hey think about this way guys !!

I really think EA has a hard job to do by trying to make the perfect game everybody wants !! and also a game that appeals to both players who like realistic sim play and arcade play.

This is what I think EA did a good job of doing this year because when you play someone who plays a game of football the way it's suppose to played it really makes all the difference in the world as far as getting it to play like a nice realistic game of NCAA football.

However with all you do can do with quick hikes and hurry-up offenses, you can easily turn this game into an arcade fest also.

So it's just a matter of how you and your opponent play the game really.
 
# 91 ChaseB @ 07/25/08 12:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rules
I think it is more important to have respectable forum members who know their games especially if it is not an area of expertise for you or your staff of writers. Each forum pretty much has a go to guy who many of us trust and tell it like they see it. If you need names, please let us know!
We already did that a while ago, and asked people to step forward if they wanted to write for the site.

I think as we add more to the site we'll have opportunities for guest writers and that type of thing though, which I think would be great.

This didn't happen because we lacked an "expert" or anything though, just an oversight in the editorial department.
 
# 92 Rules @ 07/25/08 12:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by maddcatt
Hey think about this way guys !!

I really think EA has a hard job to do by trying to make the perfect game everybody wants !! and also a game that appeals to both players who like realistic sim play and arcade play.

This is what I think EA did a good job of doing this year because when you play someone who plays a game of football the way it's suppose to played it really makes all the difference in the world as far as getting it to play like a nice realistic game of NCAA football.

However with all you do can do with quick hikes and hurry-up offenses, you can easily turn this game into an arcade fest also.

So it's just a matter of how you and your opponent play the game really.
I've been watching the demo and videos of Madden 09 this year. Though it is still too early to call as I have not played the actual game, I am hoping that they are on to something with the Madden IQ Test. I am wondering how the different difficulty settings for each user will balance the game when playing head to head. If it works out, then NCAA just needs to incorporate it for next year.
 
# 93 Rules @ 07/25/08 12:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaseB
We already did that a while ago, and asked people to step forward if they wanted to write for the site.

I think as we add more to the site we'll have opportunities for guest writers and that type of thing though, which I think would be great.

This didn't happen because we lacked an "expert" or anything though, just an oversight in the editorial department.
I'm not saying have them write as that is your area of expertise. I am just suggesting to run it by them before posting it as they will know the overall forum pulse as well as the game in itself.
 
# 94 auburntigersfan @ 07/25/08 12:37 AM
I must be in an extreme minority because I absolutely love this game and only small online issues are taking away from my experience.
 
# 95 ehh @ 07/25/08 12:39 AM
Thanks for hanging in there through this whole thread, Chase. It's not easy to deal with hundreds of people taking shots at you and the staff. I appreciate your honesty and straight-forwardness, it's refreshing to see non-BS answers.
 
# 96 GoVols1985 @ 07/25/08 12:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by auburntigersfan
I must be in an extreme minority because I absolutely love this game and only small online issues are taking away from my experience.
I'm right there with you man.
 
# 97 ChaseB @ 07/25/08 12:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rules
I'm not saying have them write as that is your area of expertise. I am just suggesting to run it by them before posting it as they will know the overall forum pulse as well as the game in itself.
Oh alright. I don't think we can do that really, but people could always PM me some names so I'm aware at least.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ehh
Thanks for hanging in there through this whole thread, Chase. It's not easy to deal with hundreds of people taking shots at you and the staff. I appreciate your honesty and straight-forwardness, it's refreshing to see non-BS answers.
We got to do right by you guys, otherwise there's no point in doing this thing. Plus I wasn't aware of all the anger, so it was for my own edumacation. I'm not a hard person to get a hold of either way, whether it be AIM, OS, PSN, XBL, or even via Friend Codes.
 
# 98 thmst30 @ 07/25/08 12:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by auburntigersfan
I must be in an extreme minority because I absolutely love this game and only small online issues are taking away from my experience.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoVols1985
I'm right there with you man.
Your both damn idiots.







JK
 
# 99 ChaseB @ 07/25/08 01:01 AM
So I'll bring something else in here. Looking through the past NCAA articles, I just noticed that Carlos wrote this one while I was away at E3: http://www.operationsports.com/feature.php?id=593

Are you guys cool with the general style/content of this article (grammar issues aside).
 
# 100 Seahawk76 @ 07/25/08 01:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaseB
So I'll bring something else in here. Looking through the past NCAA articles, I just noticed that Carlos wrote this one while I was away at E3: http://www.operationsports.com/feature.php?id=593

Are you guys cool with the general style/content of this article (grammar issues aside).
That article is fine, as far as I'm concerned. It dealt honestly with some of the flaws and bugs in the game that may bother some people more than others.

When a game is released with serious bugs and gameplay flaws I just don't think OS should be running puff pieces, glib outhouse psychoanalysis of negative posters, or engaging in rampant overmoderation of negative posts (I'm looking your direction countryboy).
 


Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.