Home
Feature Article
Console Exclusive Content: Our Inevitable Demise

There is precedence for console exclusive content. Namco had an additional character in every version of Soul Calibur II and is continuing on in that fashion with one of its iterations (Soul Calibur IV). Fight Night Round 3 was given ‘Get In the Ring’ mode for the PS3 as incentive for people who owned the game previously on 360 and now perhaps wanted to repurchase it for the new system. There is also word that Grand Theft Auto IV will have additional episodic content exclusive to the Xbox 360 (content that should arrive this Fall).

As fellow videogamers, we all have to deal with this reality. It’s like going on and on about how pitchers from the dead-ball era would throw until their shoulders fell off; no matter how much we complain, pitch counts are not about to go anywhere. The reason for this is the same reason exclusive content is here to stay; there’s too much money involved.

That is why it shouldn’t be any surprise to see a company like Take-Two elevating this trend to the next level with Top Spin 3. Granting the PS3 exclusive rights to Rafael Nadal, they have succeeded in aiding Sony while not only hurting the consumer, but themselves as well. Think about the person who takes the game home wanting to recreate Federer vs Nadal on the grass at Wimbledon or the clay at the French Open. These match ups have been a shining part of the sport of tennis for the past few years. If he or she only owns an Xbox 360 or Wii, they will be stuck reenacting Federer vs Roddick and we all know how that match concludes. This may turn off many potential buyers and also might lead to a negative stigma attaching itself to 2K Sports.

Having Nadal removed from a tennis game is like having Peyton and Eli removed from a version of Madden, or Triple H removed from an edition of Smackdown vs Raw. Better yet, what if Nintendo Wii had exclusive rights to Tiger Woods for Tiger Woods PGA Tour ’09? Sounds ridiculous huh?

That’s because it is!

This entire movement of withholding a character or feature to only one version of a game is not only unacceptable, it’s down right mind boggling, especially if the other consoles are not compensated by some means. Soul Calibur IV for example will have one exclusive character on the 360 (Yoda) and one on the PS3 (Darth Vader).

The only way to do something about it is to not buy the game at all. People are not going to do this, though, because the sad truth is that in this day and age the variety of games based on one sport are becoming as rare as a Dallas Cowboy playoff victory (I know T.O. it’s not fair!).

Noles_ACC wrote a good article, Life Before Sports Gaming Darwinism, that spoke about the golden days when sports gamers had options and options led to innovation. Survival of the fittest used to rule the land and the gamers were, "…the police, jury, and executioner all in one." Yea that’s right, I quoted Judge Dredd.

This is why it’s time to settle in and get used to exclusive content. Our options are becoming limited and instead of owning all 3 systems as a luxury, it’s becoming a necessity. Sony and Microsoft have plenty of money to start a bidding war with each other and some people forget that Nintendo owns the most popular console on the market, and I’m not talking about the Wii. The Nintendo DS trumps all! So Nintendo is not hurting in the financial department either.

Competing over multi-platform games will lead these companies to do whatever they can to gain an edge, even if the gaming population suffers as a result. If 2k Sports is any sign of what’s to come, it shows that instead of the Big 3 paying for additional add-on content, they may soon be purchasing exclusive core game content. That reality is one we hope to never see develop. The extent of this situation may yet be unknown but one thing that is for sure is the forums better get ready for the spam wars to heat up over who owns the most 1337 console.


Member Comments
# 1 ajwines64 @ 05/08/08 06:16 PM
It seems to of really started with EA buying the nfl license. It sucks for all of us.
 
# 2 vgsportsBert @ 05/08/08 07:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajwines64
It seems to of really started with EA buying the nfl license. It sucks for all of us.
Not to be an EA apologist or anything, but the NFL is the one that decided they wanted to only work with one game company. It wasn't the evil EA monopoly trying to push everybody out of the market. I'm sure EA had to pay through the nose for the license, probably much more than before it became exclusive.

The NFL and NFLPA didn't want to have to work with multiple companies. By going to one developer, they could handle all the data flow, face caps, etc. all at one time.
 
# 3 CMH @ 05/08/08 09:06 PM
Lets not turn this into another NFL/EA thing. It doesn't have everything to do with this article.

I'm a tennis fan. Only casual but I enjoy watching it when I make the time. I'm interested in purchasing Top Spin 3. I'm getting it for the PS3. When I found out that Nadal was only available on that version it was a no-brainer for me. Luckily, for me, the 360 doesn't have exclusive rights to Federer. That would be the worst situation for a gamer.

It's still pretty bad, however, when you are forced into purchasing either a console or a version of a game because it's the only one with additional content.

I doubt this will end anytime soon, though. It'll just get worse until gamers are forced between choosing one or the other. Imagine the next role-playing game that excludes a certain city from the 360 but offers exclusive rights to special magika? That's terrible.
 
# 4 mercalnd @ 05/09/08 09:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by YankeePride
Lets not turn this into another NFL/EA thing. It doesn't have everything to do with this article.
Yep. Console exclusive content existed before the NFL deal and in fact the NFL deal is not even an example of console exclusive content. I was surprised ot see this brought up here.
 
# 5 aukevin @ 05/09/08 11:23 AM
The Soul Calibur exclusives don't bother me because both systems are getting a unique character, both of which are cool. The problem will be when one system gets content that the other system doesn't have a comparable equal of.
 
# 6 CMH @ 05/10/08 02:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mercalnd
Yep. Console exclusive content existed before the NFL deal and in fact the NFL deal is not even an example of console exclusive content. I was surprised ot see this brought up here.
Exactly. The deal is not console exclusive. I should have said it has nothing to do with this article. But I said "doesn't have everything to do..." because I can understand some of the arguments that it's a small branch of excluding gamer options.

Though, I guess I could argue that what exclusive content is really doing is giving the gamer too many options. We'd like options in our games but we don't want the option of choosing between consoles because one offers more than the other.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aukevin
The Soul Calibur exclusives don't bother me because both systems are getting a unique character, both of which are cool. The problem will be when one system gets content that the other system doesn't have a comparable equal of.

That's fair. But it's still unfortunate that you won't get the chance to play with the other character the competing console has exclusive rights to.

The Top Spin 3 issue is exactly the problem like you mentioned. Not having Nadal available in the 360 is a huge issue. We're talking about arguably the second best tennis player in the world.
 

Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.