After watching NHL 15's gameplay trailer, do you think it was a good idea for NHL to take an extra year to develop for the PlayStation 4 and Xbox One?
Phil Varckette: Absolutely.
The last thing the new consoles needed last year was a rush job of a game that left a bad taste in gamers mouths for a year. EA couldn't afford to dig themselves out another hole, see NBA Live.
Taking time to get it right is something you don't see in sports games anymore, so this decision definitely speaks volumes about how EA wants to be perceived by the community. At least in this case. I feel like we will all feel this way when the game drops and we see what was essentially a two-year development cycle in action.
Glenn Wigmore: Visually speaking, it was absolutely worth the wait. The level of detail present on the players, arenas and crowds is really something to behold, and I loved the camera work and presentation of the newest trailer. From the gameplay I was able to check out at E3, it was also worth the extra development time in order to get things right on the ice.
All that said, a lot of this good will could be undone if EA Vancouver doesn't include the modes that people have come to enjoy the most. As of this writing, we still don't know about the fate of EASHL, OTP, HUT or GM Connected. Honestly, we don't even know about the career mode (Live the Life) and where it stands. I'm sure we'll know more soon, but the omission of some of these modes would be a massive blunder that would really damage the hype generated by this game's outstanding presentation and gameplay upgrades.
Jayson Young: Considering that the NHL series has the smallest development team of Electronic Arts' annualized sports titles, it's understandable that they couldn't get an Xbox One/PlayStation 4 edition ready for last season.
But if the Reddit rumors are true, and key online modes like GM Connected and the EA Sports Hockey League have not survived the console transition, then I cannot envision the next-gen version capturing a large audience this fall, regardless of its graphics, physics and presentation improvements.
Caley Roark: I'm not the world's biggest (or most knowledgeable) hockey fan, but I have enjoyed this series on an almost annual basis.
However, at first glance, I'm not overwhelmed. I think the jerseys look a little "plastic-y" and the lighting, while good, doesn't seem to be a drastic improvement over last-gen versions. I do like the creative camera angles, especially those that mirror those used in actual broadcasts.
To answer the original question, I'd rather have a game that's plays well over a game that looks good. If the extra year delivers on gameplay, then it was certainly worth it.
Dustin Toms: Taking a full year to fully grasp a new system's limits sounds like a great idea, and it shows with the graphics in the new gameplay trailer. But last season's sports titles still looked pretty damn good despite having games release at, or near, the next-gen launch. I'm still not sure why NHL opted to wait, especially if the rumors Jayson mentioned turn out to be true.
With a lack of EASHL and Connected GM overshadowing things right now, won't a lot of hockey nuts just stick with the 360 and PS3 versions? Graphics are great, and I'm one to fall in love with whichever game looks better, but a hockey fan base is far too loyal to judge a book by its cover. The next three weeks are going to be huge for EA's NHL series.