Home
Feature Article
Three Toughest Associations in NBA 2K13
NBA 2K13 is looking great every time we see it, and we all know which teams will be easy to play with this year (Heat, Lakers, Thunder, Bulls, etc). But which teams will be the toughest to use? We'll list the three teams, why we think they will be so hard to use in NBA 2K13, and what you can do to improve them. Wheeling and dealing with trades is a hint.



Charlotte Bobcats

This one is the most obvious. They had the worst winning percentage in NBA history last year, so don't expect their players ratings to be that high in this year's game. Yes, they are a young team, but in NBA 2K13, they will be a team to try and avoid. Gerald Henderson seems to improve with each iteration, and Michael Kidd-Gilchrist will be fun to play as for Bobcats fans. However, they don't have a go-to player. Ben Gordon? I don't think so. Tyrus Thomas? Yeah...no. When people go into the Association mode, or even online, they want that one player who can turn the game around for them or break it wide open. The Bobcats simply will not have that in NBA 2K13. How do you fix that? Go through the rosters of other teams and try to trade for a player that won't require you to trade away too many of Charlotte's young talent, but one that can help you immediately win games. If you play against human players (online, local) more than you play the CPU, like previously mentioned, it's best to avoid playing as the Bobcats this year.


Cleveland Cavaliers

The oldest player on the Cavs is Luke Walton at age 32. So why are they on this list? To be as concise as possible: no star power. Sure, Kyrie Irving will be a solid PG for fans of Cleveland and using him in online play might be fun for a few games, but not a single player on their team can shut down an opposing player with their defense or score the necessary points required to win a game. Our suggestion? Trade for a player that will help Kyrie Irving, possibly an athletic power forward who can can do well at the pick & roll (for readers, this is indeed my favorite play). Tyler Zeller might be great at that for some, but leaving him at center and signing or trading for a more athletic power forward will help the Cavs in NBA 2K13 tremendously. When taking the Cavs online, I would start Tyler Zeller over Anderson Varejao. Varejao has always been a good bench player in the NBA 2K series. This might shock some people, but I think Jeremy Pargo would be great at SG to compliment Kyrie Irving. Daniel Gibson is a decent player and spot-up shooter, but Jeremy Pargo looks like the better all-around player.


Sacramento Kings

This last team on this list was between the Kings and Wizards. I had to go with the Kings seeing as how the Wizards have a much improved team with the addition of Bradley Beal to go alongside John Wall. Add in Nene, Trevor Ariza and Emeka Okafor, and you have a team that any fan of the NBA 2K franchise would love to play with.

As for the Kings, they have potential. But going up against the likes of the Clippers and Lakers during the season will be tough for people playing as the Kings. Sacramento on paper does seem like a great fit to start an Association with, but not so fast: their young players might be difficult to play with in NBA 2K13. First, move Tyreke Evans to SG if he is listed as a SF. Next, put Jimmer Fredette in at starting PG (Aaron Brooks on the bench). Jimmer might not have great ball handling, but with his shooting, you are sure to have the defense on top of him every time he dribbles up the court. With Fredette at PG, Tyreke Evans at SG, Marcus Thornton at SF, rookie Thomas Robinson at PF and DeMarcus Cousins at C, you should have a team that could potentially be a little easier to use. Signing a decent player at that position might be your best bet, but you can go game-by-game before making that decision.

Think there is a team that will be tougher to use in NBA 2K13? Let us know in the comments below.

 


NBA 2K13 Videos
Member Comments
# 1 Rensational14 @ 09/14/12 02:10 PM
The Orlando Magic. The have a bad bad bad team this year
 
# 2 heyyyyyyymacarena @ 09/14/12 02:14 PM
kings are going to be good
 
# 3 RocketTMac1 @ 09/14/12 02:23 PM
Orlando anyone?
 
# 4 MEL12170 @ 09/14/12 02:23 PM
Orlando is going to be tuff to rebuild. I was thinking about using the Bobcats, then Orlando trade Howard and got back nothing.
 
# 5 RocketTMac1 @ 09/14/12 02:26 PM
As long as Association doesn't change like Madden's franchise and you can still manage all teams
 
# 6 JasonMartin @ 09/14/12 02:30 PM
How are the Bulls easy to play with when Rose is injured? It's going to be hard as hell. It's still a game so I can own the CPU even with the bobcats but IRl it's something else. The Bulls will struggle.


Teams that are easy/fun to play with that replace the Bulls are the Spurs/Indiana/...

Lakers/OKC/Heat are the cheese teams.
 
# 7 nova91 @ 09/14/12 02:35 PM
I always chose the Bobcats, you can parlay a couple players in packages to get 1st and 2nd round picks while signing some decent FAs and be able to build a team that is a championship contender within 3-4 years if you draft, sign and trade right.
 
# 8 Gramps91 @ 09/14/12 02:35 PM
Yea, magic have almost nothing going for them anymore. Plus I'm really looking forward to being the Bobcats and using Kidd-Gilchrist
 
# 9 Marino @ 09/14/12 02:38 PM
Come on now Chris, we have a new logo.



Spoiler
 
# 10 hoi514 @ 09/14/12 02:40 PM
no teams are tough in association mode because you can always find a way to make a trade. Whether you have player with bad contracts or players who you know are not getting any better, just send a package and collect some draft picks.. that's what I always do. After one season or two, my team would turn around. It just happens that I sometimes end up with 6-7 1st around picks and many 2nd round pick, I try to send a package of picks to teams in exchange for better picks.. unreal.. but it always work. AI can't do nothing about it.
 
# 11 andeee @ 09/14/12 02:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonMartin
How are the Bulls easy to play with when Rose is injured? It's going to be hard as hell. It's still a game so I can own the CPU even with the bobcats but IRl it's something else. The Bulls will struggle.


Teams that are easy/fun to play with that replace the Bulls are the Spurs/Indiana/...

Lakers/OKC/Heat are the cheese teams.
Because assuming that you're playing the normal Association mode, Rose won't be injured.
 
# 12 Guard-ian @ 09/14/12 02:45 PM
Orlando and Houston should be candidates to be in that list instead of Cavs and Kings... Also Detroit and Utah can be suspicious.

Kings players used to be pretty useful in past 2k games and Cavs will have a star in Irving from this year on...

Cheers! ;-)
 
# 13 Belly_of_a_Whale @ 09/14/12 02:48 PM
Yeah, I would actually put Orlando second on this list. They have a lot of draft picks coming, so rebuilding may be easier than it will be for the Bobcats. However, I'd be excited to play some lockdown D with MKG and Biyombo.

The Bulls would actually be an interesting choice, as you'd have to go a year without Rose. It could be a struggle at first.

The Suns might also struggle with their assortment of mix-match almost-star players, but the rebuilding wouldn't be nearly as much fun without the young potential and draft picks like Charlotte, Orlando and Cleveland.
 
# 14 Belly_of_a_Whale @ 09/14/12 02:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guard-ian
Orlando and Houston should be candidates to be in that list instead of Cavs and Kings... Also Detroit and Utah can be suspicious.

Kings players used to be pretty useful in past 2k games and Cavs will have a star in Irving from this year on...

Cheers! ;-)
Oh, yeah, Detroit should be interesting with the two young twin towers developing.
 
# 15 Da Amba Lamps @ 09/14/12 03:04 PM
I forgot about drummond, I might just take detroit out for a test drive as my first association, knight, monroe, drummond is one hell of a foundation to start with.
 
# 16 BRxSKINSx @ 09/14/12 03:08 PM
Raptors.....? Are they gonna be good....?
 
# 17 Plush oNe @ 09/14/12 03:23 PM
There's a difference between teams that will be tough to play with and teams that will be tough to use in Association with. Since this is about Association, I actually think the three teams you mentioned are three of the EASIEST teams to use.

Miami, Lakers, Bulls and etc will be some of the hardest. Reason being, they're all over the cap, and have older twilight stage vets with less than 3 years left on all their contracts -- with the exception of the Thunder because they have all good to great young players at every position and all of them are locked up for many years to come. They also have the Bird rights of Harden so he would be easy to re-sign (if he doesn't get re-signed sometime by the game release anyway).

Teams like the Cavs, Cats, and Kings have good solid young players who can become future stars (some even superstars), and LOADS of cap room to take a run at players like CP3, Dwight Howard, Andrew Bynum, and Josh Smith among many other formidable role players. You can build a great team in 1 year for the next 8 years with these bottom 3. Or, you can have fun for 2 or 3 years with the teams you have. I'm choosing the former.
 
# 18 boomhauertjs @ 09/14/12 03:23 PM
No mention of Dion Waiters for Cavs?
 
# 19 Rdub33 @ 09/14/12 03:28 PM
Kings were one of the best association teams last year due to trade able parts and cousins and tyreke potential... I wouldn't touch the magic with a 10 foot magic wand!
 
# 20 Hunkerdown @ 09/14/12 03:38 PM
My Hawks without JJ.
 

« Previous123Next »

Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.