Users Online Now: 2851  |  September 28, 2024
Sovartus's Blog
NBA 2K10 vs. NBA Live 10 
Posted on October 7, 2009 at 06:04 PM.
Well, here it is. This year’s version of Live vs. 2K

I did a full review of NBA Live already so thank you to everyone that read my blog earlier. No sense in wasting time, Lets jump right into this thing.

Presentation:

The first question I must ask is, “what kind of virtual baller are you?” Do you want the game to look like what you see on TV or do you want the game to feel real? Either way both games have something to offer. The Live crew seemed to be going for a more life-like look while 2K was trying to build upon the success they had last year with their beautiful graphics overhaul. Live did a lot of things well like the shoes, tattoos, skin textures, and arenas. 2K hit on all of these things except the skin textures in my opinion. Everyone knows that 2K won this battle. There really isn’t a question about it but you can rest assured that this is a gap that can be closed very quickly and easily. Some people put a lot of stock in this category but my thoughts are, I can’t play the graphics. In contrast to that, my boy Croz says the game has to look good even though he can play through bad graphics if he has to. People have also made a few comments about Live players looking plastic-like. I don’t really see that, it looks less like art and the players look more 3-dimensional. 2K still looks better overall. With the incredible commentary and intros they are on a whole new level. We all knew the verdict on this one so I won’t spend a lot of time here.

Advantage: 2K

Online Features:

Here is an area that I really downed Live over. They just really dropped the ball in the online league section. I like the features that they made for offline play like the Dynamic Season. I also thought that they had a good idea with making the Addidas Live Run (a 5-on-5 pick-up game with the superstars). 2K on the other hand, took it to a whole new level with the Draft Combine thing. I personally didn’t really care about making up my own player and trying to make it to the NBA, but I have heard a lot of people say that it is one of their favorite things about this year’s game. I can see why people would absolutely love it. 2K also has that incredible online league structure that is second to none. NBA Live Rewind, Live 365, and the Dynamic DNA thing is still much better than NBA Today in my opinion. I have to give that one to Live because they started this mess and it goes right into Dynamic Season. However, overall EA doesn’t do online as well as 2K.

Advantage: 2K

Game Play:

So this is the nitty-gritty. Many of you will disagree with what I’m about to break down so I will say, more power to you. Let’s look at this from a sim perspective because that’s all I’m about. I will cut to the chase and say what the main difference is between these games this year. 2K wants it to LOOK like what you would see on TV and Live is focused on what it would FEEL like if you were on the court.

The first exhibit on display is player control. After playing 2K for the last 5 years, one thing has been annoying every year, and that's sliding. My man Czar said it best in his series on the 09 games, “If 2K slides, we will not buy!” Yet there are a ton of you who forgot about this and bought anyway. Is it better this year? The answer is no. Just because they slowed the game speed down some and changed the animations didn’t change the fact that players are all over the place. There is nothing more frustrating than wanting to do something with your player and having to wait until 2K’s miniature movie plays out before you regain control of your man. I had one instance where Zach Randolph was guarding Amare Stoudamire and when Amare got the ball, Zach ran out of bounds and got sucked into the referee for a quick hug. What? Here is the video.


I can see where 2K made some improvements like the turbo meter thing. I love it. They separated the post moves and tried to fix rotations. Unfortunately for 2K it seems like it caused more problems than it fixed in my opinion. Due to 2K’s lack of control and sliding, it becomes a straight mess. Time and time again I experienced big problems with 2K’s AI being indecisive and sometimes just flat out dumb. Here are a few examples of this:

Rudy Leaves Kobe for no reason.


Rudy won’t guard his man and neither will Zach.


Zach won’t guard Pau, Rudy leaves Kobe to help.



Turnover City


2K's post moves could be a lot better if you could actually control the player better. The fact that it is an all out struggle to get a guy in position is extremely frustrating. I can’t say that I practiced for weeks but trying to initiate the back down sequence is brutal. It’s not much better in Live but from what I understand, the Live patch will bring the back to the basket button back. Out of the box, 2K isn’t sim and Live is. That says a lot about the Live crew this year. I noticed in an offline game of 2K the CPU was shooting 68% on All Star. The good thing is that you can really feel the 82games.com influence on shot distribution. I noticed the same incredible shooting percentages when I played online. I played a buddy online and was able to get to the rack at will. It wasn’t as easy as last year but still way too easy. On Live, if you get to the rack, you have earned it. Live still has a bunch of bugs to work out like players standing out of bounds at the wrong time, the online fatigue switch is backwards (so if you want fatigue to work turn it off), match ups get all mixed up sometimes, and there aren’t enough fouls/free throws. There aren’t enough fouls/free throws in 2K either. Another bad thing about Live is the on-the-fly adjustments. They have a tendency to reset when the action changes making you lose all of the adjustments you may have made. 2K copied Live in the position-specific play calling but has always lead the way in coaching on-the-fly adjustments. While 82games data is good for 2K, it isn’t touching Synergy. Live has that one sown up and I don’t know that 2K will ever be able to touch them on that simulation aspect as long as EA has that partnership. It looks like this is the year that 2K fan boys dreaded. Live is on an equal playing field as 2K. 2K is that "12" that you dated who is as fine as all outdoors but her poor attitude gives you a headache! Live is that down to earth girl that isn’t the “bad chick” that turns heads but she is cool as can be and you love to hang out with. Which one do you want? I don’t want the headache, so I will just go with the cool chick that will make me enjoy my time with her.

Advantage: Live

Dynasty/Association mode goes to 2K. It is simply deeper. When you add in the My Player mode, Live can’t even come close to the replay value.

Overall I think 2K is the “prettier” game that everyone is already familiar with. Live is the underdog now and because of the garbage they have put out in the past, some people won’t even give them a chance. While 2K makes it look real, Live makes it play real. A good way to put it is this; you can play 2K sim if you make it play sim. Live makes you play sim. If you give both a chance I’m sure you will find a game that suits your fancy. This year I prefer NBA Live 10. I don’t think anyone could play 2K and think it has better game play. The bad thing is that 2K edges Live out in so many other ways that it is hard to give Live the crown based simply on game play. So, I can’t. 2K has a better overall product, no doubt. Live has the better basketball game. So …..

Advantage: 2K.


I still like Live better because I play the game, not the bells and whistles. But it's all about your preference.
Comments
# 16 Sovartus @ Oct 7
That's a shame Shiny... really, that's a shame.
 
# 17 superstarshad @ Oct 7
Thank you/Thank you! I rented both on release day, and do not understand the fascination with 2k. I've played both titles, but live gets the edge. Like the reviewer said, "2k has a ton of replay ability, and a host of bells and whistles, but LIVE is a better on court basketball experience." The perplexing thing for me is I loaned out my rented copies to a buddy for 8 hours, and he swears 2k is more realistic than Live-with Live being arcade like. I totally disagree! I challenge any 2k baller to play LIVE first, and then play 2k, and then make a decision.
 
# 18 superstarshad @ Oct 7
Also, in regards to graphics. I prefer Live's. 2k's on the court experience is extremely busy, and I prefer Live's clean presentation. 2k players, however, looks more like their real life counterparts than LIVE.
 
# 19 jdareal21 @ Oct 8
These are my exact sentiments. While 2K is "better" in terms of just what it does, I don't feel it like I do with Live. I don't know how to describe it, other than Live just "feels" better, in almost all aspects, on the actual court where it matters
 
# 20 bigdaddy8523 @ Oct 8
I always go for the best game and for the last 4 seasons it has been 2k. But after playing the Live Demo 1st and then playing 2k's I couldn't belive what I was about to do, but I was going to Live. I ain't a fan boy but for the past 4 years 2k had the best game but since im outta work I gotta play the funnest game. That's Live 10, 2k fan's take it how u want but after playing Live 10 I feel like I had fun and with all the things going on in my life now thats what I need. 2k10 wasn't horrible but for $60 I wanted more than a Roster Update with better graphics and when I start to feel like that it's time to change, For a company to get some of my unemployment check you gotta work hard and this yr i feel like Live 10 has done that. And I have played both games (Retail Versions) if anybody wants to know the slowdown in the paint on 2k is gonna hurt them and I don't even own 2k.
 
# 21 Ao defense @ Oct 8
Put it like this live is a more easier game to play no learning curb what so ever thats why alot of people prefer live also it feels new 2k feels the same for years(if it aint broke dont fix it) In my opinion live is like that new girl at school that looks good you give her a try for a while then she get old fast. yeah and by the way if you practice and actually learns the 2k controls in and out it is so beautiful . Also you can post up when you want in 2k its a certain way you roll the left stick.
 
# 22 skipwondah33 @ Oct 8
Very solid and honest review man. Usually you only get a one-sided opinion that results into bashing but I didn't get that from yours. Thumbs up
 
# 23 Sovartus @ Oct 8
Ao defense, don't get it twisted, I know the controls of 2K very well and even wrote tutorials for the post game in the past. There was a little of a learning curve to the 2K game this year but not much. It wasn't the controls that hurt 2K this year, it was the lack of control due to the sliding and animations. If you think you can just pick up Live and there is no learning curve to it, you are sadly mistaken. There is a very big learning curve for Live 10. When I see comments like that I know it is obvious that you have not actually taken the time to learn the game. I have played both in depth. While I respect your opinion, I would encourage you to gain more knowledge about the game before you make comments like that because it doesn't look good on your part. People who know better probably read your comment and said, "He doesn't know what he is talking about." Play the game and learn it, then come back and comment.
 
# 24 Sovartus @ Oct 8
I completely feel you MJJr. If I could say that the whole thing is based on gameplay it's Live hands down but, I'm not the only person that has an opinion. Lots of people put a lot stock in the other aspects of the game and 2K has been pounding Live in those areas for a while. EA will have to step it's game up if they want to have a better product. Live is a better basketball sim, no question. I stated that in the review.
 
# 25 Ao defense @ Oct 8
One thing about me I dont speak on something that I dont know about. When I say no learning curve I haven't played a nba live game for more than 3 weeks since live 04. I pick up live I'm crushing guys who claim to play nothing but live games ,I learn everything a game can do and somethings that a tutorial dont show. Like on live if you press in the left thumbstick slightly pull back away from the goal you will post everytime as long as you are by the paint in 2k you can post by slightly rotating the thumbstick in a half circle away from ball hand post everytime near paint, and I dont know what????. I not bashing anything both are good games thats why I have them.
 
# 26 Sovartus @ Oct 8
Actually Ao Defense, that doesn't work. I went into the game to see if there was some validity to your claim and to no avail. Last year you could post on Live with the right thumb stick, not the left by pressing in on it. They took that out of the game this year and it won't be back in until after the patch is released. I was told this by Mike Wang. 2K moved to automatic post up this year and it isn't working that well IMO. So, please let me know where you got this information from.
 
# 27 Neo79 @ Oct 8
How can you enjoy a Basket Ball game where you have no control of what you are doing on the court. You might as well put the game on spectator mode. Graphics and presentation will NEVER replace gameplay. NOT NOW, NOT NEVER. LIve is def more fun to play.
 
# 28 NINJAK2 @ Oct 8
If gameplay is the only thing that matters, why even bring up the other categories? Graphics?Presentation?Dynasty?Online? to say those things are bells and whistles is borderline laughable. If gameplay was the only thing that mattered Inside Drive would still be around curb stomping Live and 2k but unfortunately all 4 of those other categories were poorly done in that title imo.

The superiority of these games is based on preference not fact imo and those enjoy either title will have to overlook the faults that are present in BOTH imo.

Still a great, well thought out review.
 
# 29 JkA3 @ Oct 8
That was a nice write up man. I would recomend a few edits...not that you missed anything, but would add to the overall punch that readers get.

Assign points for each section, and total them up in the end. Kinda like Czar does with the Battleground.

Also, I have both games, and my impressions mimic yours greatly. However, I do feel like live players look too glossy.

Again, great write up.
 
# 30 NINJAK2 @ Oct 8
I have no problem with control in 2k or Live (different people = different experiences)

This is the same MJ that complained about the crowd not reacting to Lebron's chalk toss in 2k, and net physics right? These seem like superficial complaints imo when your main focus is gameplay. Be honest MJ, if you felt Live did achieve all those superficial elements such as graphics, presentation, dynasty, etc. you would be the first to say so and commend them for it. It would add to the overall greatness of the product would it not? Now all of a sudden it doesn't matter? To each his own...Enjoy whatever game you play MJ. I will be doing the same.
 

Sovartus
20
Sovartus's Blog Categories
Sovartus's Xbox 360 Gamercard
Sovartus's PSN Gamercard
' +
Sovartus's Screenshots (0)

Sovartus does not have any albums to display.
More Sovartus's Friends
Recent Visitors
The last 10 visitor(s) to this Arena were:

Sovartus's Arena has had 44,863 visits