![]() |
Funny that they don't seem to be worried about that in France.
|
Quote:
I think the fact that a lot of wealthy people commit these crimes too plays a role. If you go after him, the question becomes why not go after the other criminals? Being rich protects him far more than the Presidency. |
I would also argue that going after each others criminals would be good for the country. Like it would be great if Republicans took over and arrested Pelosi for insider trading. Imagine how many of these crooks would think twice about running if they were under a huge microscope.
Half of Congress is committing financial crimes constantly. Most are taking bribes. Matt Gaetz raped a minor for heavens sake |
I think the only way that happens is if the parties start eating their own more. The other party doing it just looks like payback, and you'll have even more examples of people being investigated for things they aren't even guilty of. All of which requires an electorate that actually wants the corruption gone. I don't think we really have that.
|
That's exactly what I'm talking about. I think Biden and others are seriously concerned that if Garland indicts Trump, dozens of Dems are going to be brought up on bogus charges in retaliation at the first opportunity and that any evidence of Trump's actual guilt will be overshadowed by the political optics, so he'll just be a political martyr to a third of the country regardless of how obvious his guilt is. And that's assuming he doesn't beat the charges, which is totally likely anyway.
|
Quote:
Isn't that what Republicans are going to do anyway when they take over the House? I mean word of Biden's impeachment has been passed around. There's going to be a purge one way or the other. |
I don't disagree. I'm thinking Dr. Fauci ought to have a European safe house ready.
But to that point, Biden ran on this promise of unity and he's still operating on the old-time political belief that at the end of the day, the system will work and everything will become normal again, so why rock the boat, why perpetuate the temporary madness Trump caused. The further away in the rearview mirror, the less likely it comes back. That has to be the thinking. And I think it's naive and misguided. |
It's a stark contrast when the NYC mayor says on the same day that this story was published that they are going back to aggressively prosecuting quality of life crimes like turnstile jumping.
|
(1) I do think that this is one of those situations where not going after Trump actually leads to less unity b/c you send the message that people can get away with open lawbreaking as long as they are powerful enough politicians. Which will just embolden the Trump 2.0 crowd.
(2) But I get this. The reality about most* prosecutors is that they like bottom fishing. They rack up easy convictions against poor people. In contrast, actually prosecuting Trump would be hard. He will have infinite resources to defend himself, and the prosecution would be a years-long battle in the courts and the media against a desperate sociopath who is used to fights like this and thrives off of them. You will have heavily armed MAGAs constantly threatening to kill you and your family. Half of Congress will be calling for your head. Truckers will probably get involved for some reason. Isn't it better to just brag about the 1,000 turnstile jumpers you took off the street and go to your next fundraiser? *When I say "most," I really do mean "most" and not "all." Some prosecutors are honorable people who really are in it for the right reasons and won't back down from a hard fight. That just does not seem to be the case here. |
Quote:
He clearly failed to read the room of the people that elected him. |
Quote:
Why would you need to be brought up on bogus charges when there are so many actual criminals you can choose from? There are also still judges that throw out cases for lack of evidence all the time. Juries still need to convict. I feel like giving a segment of the population immunity from the law is worse than some bad optics or whatever the excuse is to not prosecute criminals. |
Quote:
From Trump's perspective, he doesn't want just anyone, he specifically wants to target certain people. Now, certain members of the GOP, sure, their goal might be to hurt the Dems with these kinds of prosecutions to assist with winning elections and remaining in power as a political party. But Trump doesn't care about the GOP or Dems, he just cares about himself. He's going to be on a personal revenge tour. So, evidence or not, he'll only be interested in targeting certain people. |
LOL...
|
Good Luck proving that one, though if it means Donald has to testify under oath, I'm all for it.
|
This will get tossed and he knows it, but it keeps his base engaged and excited.
|
Especially since it mentions Hillary
SI |
Let me start by acknowledging that nothing will happen,
but it should be a national scandal that the wife of a SCOTUS member was texting the WH Chief of Staff and urging a coup. |
Quote:
100% I mentioned on here a couple of days ago that it's amazing how much of a pass Clarence Thomas is getting with his wife's conduct. We have a sitting SC justice whose wife is an insurrectionist and blatant Q supporter that was constantly in touch with the Trump admin. |
The people on here who are not lawyers may not get just how improper it is for a judge not to recuse himself from a case that directly involves his spouse.
And what’s really weird is that it was an unforced error. His participation in the case did not change the result. Nothing will happen because at some point in the past some liberal did something bad, so bothsides. But it is a really delegitimizing look for the supreme court. The Chief Justice should’ve stepped in. |
It is still surprising that people with that kind of access get suckered into the QAnon stuff. She was texting the Chief of Staff. She had access to the highest levels of government. Yet she was sending texts about people at Gitmo being tried by military tribunals. Her husband is on the Supreme Court.
|
Quote:
The lead attorney on this case for Trump is a high school friend that wrote a book about him and has been suspended from practicing law twice for ethics violations in Florida. You can't make this shit up. |
Quote:
I'm amazed Donald Trump has a high school friend. |
Quote:
Right? Even assuming that she and Justice Thomas never ever talked about his work, she is still texting the chief of staff at the White House. It is one thing for some random truck driver in Ohio to get Q-pilled. But she could literally ask Mark Meadows about any conspiracy theory she had a question about. Instead, she is texting it to him like she is giving him information that he might not be aware of. No one is immune. |
That’s not true
It only seems to get one group of people Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Yeah, I'd love to see a list of conspiracy theories as wacky as QAnon that are subscribed to by, say, Democratic politicians elected to national office (House, Senate, POTUS).
|
Quote:
The other hot take is because she is in contact with tbe highest levels of government, maybe it's all true... :p |
Is it possible DeSantis would do better in the general election than Trump?
I think Trump would have to give DeSantis his blessing, but if he did would Trumpers vote him or stay home? I think there are a lot of people who won't vote Trump that would vote DeSantis. |
Quote:
If Pence and DeSantis were to both run against Trump I think they could do enough damage that DeSantis could win a primary against him. There are a lot of conservatives I'm seeing on social media message boards that like Trump policies but know the baggage makes it difficult for him to win in the general. They see DeSantis as Trump without the baggage. |
Quote:
My thoughts also. If the left had a solid candidate I would say bring on Trump. Problem is they don't. |
Quote:
I think his best case scenario is that Trump is unable to run (dead, lolprison, etc). I think if that's the case, he'll get better ratings/votes than Trump because he doesn't have the negatives - all the message with less of the baggage and only a slightly toned down style. However, if he's foolish enough to go head-to-head with Trump, there's no telling how much damage Trump can inflict on him. We've seen what he's done with others he's battled with in the past. SI |
I think DeSantis is 100% going to run.
|
Quote:
I think Trump's hold on the GOP is tenuous at this point. There's no reason to attack him until his cards are on the table for 2024 because if he doesn't run then his endorsement does mean a lot. However, as soon as he decides I do think you start to see more direct attacks. A guy like Pence is unlikely to win but he can do a lot damage to a Trump campaign. DeSantis had a very strong poll at CPAC and some polling already has him in front of Trump in Florida. |
I do think there is a segment of the Trump crowd that is, to a degree, "post-Trump" at this point. The monster has outgrown its creator in some ways. Witness Trump being booed when he talked about being vaccinated.
|
|
Quote:
:+1: In addition, I think he's setting himself up to try and out-Trump Trump. I suspect what he might do is point out that while Trump may have promised a lot, he (DeSantis) has actually delivered on, say, banning CRT, banning the word "gay", tightly restricting voting rights, etc.... |
Desantis has never really faced a legitimate competitor in a race. I understand why people think he would be good (Trump minus the gaffes), but I also think he has zero charisma and has never been in a real fight before.
|
I think it is possible you are right, Rainmaker. DeSantis has no baggage right now because people barely know him outside of Florida. What happens when he is the front runner? Many a strong candidate has melted under national scrutiny. How does he react when he does get punched in the mouth with something from his past? Does he have the Trump-like Teflon? It is possible, but you can never know till it happens.
Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk |
I can see Trump not running if he thinks he'll lose in the general, but I don't see any GOPer beating him in a primary. How can DeSantis survive Trump turning him into goo the way he did Little Marco?
|
|
I'm not sure Desantis does better than Trump. I don't think the Lincoln Project, suburban Republican types are returning to the GOP for someone like Desantis, and I don't think the Trumper types are as excited for him.
|
It is an obvious point, but the GOP holy grail is someone that looks like Glen Younkin to the suburban swing moms and looks like Trump to the base.
That's really hard to do. |
Quote:
|
There's no way someone like him wins the primaries. But he can win a purple-blue state like Virginia if it's in a good situation
SI |
He's definitely gearing up for it though. If you haven't heard the new campaign song written by Johnny Van Zant ... don't. Just know it exists.
|
I feel like Desantis has almost found this weird combination of seeming like an antagonist to Trump while trying to appeal to Trump supporters at the same time.
Someone like Hawley seems best positioned to get Trump die hards, but would then get next to no votes from anybody else. |
Rudy Giuliani says his son's 'first act' as governor will be to fire DA who dropped Trump prosecution
I feel like I'm misunderstand this article. Did Giuliani want Trump to be prosecuted by New York? |
Does anyone know why Space Force has suddenly become so important for Q theories regarding Trump? I'm usually at least casually aware of the common Q theories but even google is failing me now. The past couple of days I've seen several casual references to Space Force's importance in getting Trump back in office and I have no idea how this theory goes.
|
Quote:
Does Space Force have anything else to do at the moment? |
Well, Trump is a moon unit...
|
Quote:
We've been attacked by extra terrestrials zero times since they were created so I assumed they've been busy. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.