The question to ask is would you be ok with ISIS, Al-Qaeda, or a large, organized Muslim group that said things the same way, or behaved the same. If you find variation in your response then perhaps you've found the line.

So I think this is the only chess move left for Trump, right?
Order January 20th removed from all calendars so we just move straight to the 21st and there's never another inauguration.

Any group that has shown a preponderance of violence and incites violence should be "monitored & controlled", no question.

But there is a grey area IMO. Let's take Congresswoman Greene as a use case. Do you believe this is appropriate?

Twitter Suspends Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's Account : Insurrection At The Capitol: Live Updates : NPR

Twitter, Facebook, etc...have a right to let whomever they want on their platform. They aren't government controlled entities. They have a TOS for a reason.

Whats the issue here?

You don't want to get banned don't act like a douche. It really isn't that difficult.

Plus that helps her. It's much better for her base that she was suspended and feeds in to her narrative. She doth not protest too much.

NEW: The FBI is investigating a claim that a PA woman who rioted at the Capitol on Jan. 6 stole a laptop from Speaker Pelosi's office and intended to sell it to the Russians.

The FBI says she appears to have fled. More about this bizarre case: https://t.co/mJwjcShEDi

— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) January 18, 2021

Russia has infiltrated the MAGA right from the top all the way to the bottom.

If the GOP does not purge Trump/MAGA from the party, we're going to have Putin giving the keynote address at the GOP convention within ten years.

This is a really bad criteria for being banned or not.

I think social media companies can do a better job at communicating their rules and be more consistent in enforcing those rules, but, in general, we should acknowledge that most of the time the uneven enforcement comes from being too lenient not too strict. Green has gotten away with breaking the written rules for months and now finally has been told enough is enough.

Criteria for posting at online forum FOFC

Help For New Users Who Can't Post, and General Posting Guidelines - Front Office Football Central


SI

Has anyone checked that computer shop where "Hunter Biden's" "laptop" allegedly was?

SI

It's not so different from the arguments that I had with people in the FB group that I started for our HOA. The argument was, that the Board owned the group (technically I did, I could have killed it anytime, as the founder, and sole moderator for a long time), and therefore the Board could choose what to allow, by setting rules, and enforcing them. If the rule says don't be a dick, and you act like one, and you get suspended, there's no issue there at all.

They cried and whined that it's censorship, and the same people said, their voice wasn't being heard, and I countered that there is nothing in the documents regarding the legality of their 'right' to have a voice in the FB group, or it pertaining to the legal communication requirements on how to petition the Board, or be heard within the association, therefore their rights as owners were not in jeopardy at all. They chose not to pursue any of the documented avenues to be heard, only to complain about the process that saw them punished. I can't feel badly about them at all, nor do I feel badly about someone complaining about social media.

They are still allowed to write editorials, stand on soap boxes, create their own websites where they are free to say whatever they would like. They can write to congressmen, and they are not in danger of having the government arrest them as dissidents. Their arguments are exceptionally overblown.

Then why have a TOS at all? Follow Parlertakes on twitter if you want to see what happens when social media goes unchecked.

I'm just on Parler for the hard core porn now that Pornhub had to scrub their site.

Because Parler is where the real heroes for all of us are; and I think we know who that is.

The "asshat" rule was put in place after years of running this place, and finally coming to the realization that it was 100% impossible to try to outline every type of douchebaggery that could lead to a person needing to be tossed. No matter how big or small the internet venue, there is going to be some subjectivity in these decision. It's just the nature of the beast.

And the douchebags will always try to find a way around codified rules that are still douchebaggy.

SI

Precisely.

It exists everywhere on the net. I mean some places moderate some dont
But threatening poeople has always been a quick way to get suspended. THis is not a difficult nor NEW concept to grasp. It's just that before they were for some reason letting politicians slide probably out of fear and that it was new territory and now finally the damn broke and it really did become life or death.

You. Can't. Plot. Violence. Or. Terrorism. Online. And keep. Your. Accounts.

Appreciate everyone's comments on free speech regardless of whether I agree or not.

It seems pretty open and shut case for vast majority of you. But like some leadership in Germany, France, and EU, I view this as more complex.

I guess we're all just simpleton's living in your complex world.

That did not occur to me but interesting thought.

Isn’t it just the same as freedom of speech - you’re legally free to say anything you want, wherever you want, as long as it doesn’t propose, encourage or glorify breaking the law? That’s pretty universal in democratic countries right?

By default, if you propose, encourage or glorify breaking the law, you’re gonna get your account suspended and likely arrested if they can find you.

Can we get an ADL definition of 'Asshat', please?

It's any wonder we manage to even turn on computers in the morning at all, what with all the complicated letters and doohickeys

SI

where's the douchekey again?

No problem agreeing with this in concept. The concern is who makes the decisions because I contend there are "degrees" & "grey areas". To me, there's no concern about banning Trump, there is concern about others.

See below quotes.

Donald Trump's Twitter Ban Concerns World Leaders, Officials

In the past this would be a david koresh in a warehouse koolaiding his followers and fbi storming that place with a big shootout. Now there is no warehouse. it's a cyberwarehouse and this is invading that.

I know you are playing devil's advocate but this isn't a bunch of nerds calling each other noobs here.

I am glad you are trying to define terms but like I told SI ...

The amusing thing about those European statements on Twitter banning of Trump is that those countries have far more stringent laws against hate speech. Germany criminalizes hate speech (even on social media). France has similar. Both ban Holocaust denial. They just think the government should be the one banning speech.

In my experience, a lot of Europeans are shocked at what Americans are allowed to say without government sanction.

Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk

FREE SPEECH!! Right Edward!!

This is not okay. pic.twitter.com/Fc59SFXCqo

— Parlertakes���� (@parlertakes) January 18, 2021

I didn't think about the banning of "holocaust denial". It's understandable and (I think) approximates the Trump ban.

So yeah, "they just think the government should be the one banning speech" is a pretty good response. It does seem to be the pot calling the kettle black.

FWIW, note the Newsweek article also quotes others from Mexico, Brazil and (the soon to be disappeared) Alexey Navalny.

I have long believed we only exists in your dreams, and I fear the great awakening to pee.

Let me ponder on that as I float in the Matrix.

I was just coming to post similar thoughts. Here is the definition and punishment for Volksverhetzung which translates to "incitement to hatred"

Boebert is supposedly the one that gave the "recon" or "tours". She denies the tour. I have to believe there are CCTV in the Capitol that can resolve this pretty quickly (if not already).

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/18/polit...urs/index.html

They are going to look stupid if she is right. She is going to get the boot if she is lying.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

I suspect she’s telling the truth and it was her family she was spotted with. She has to know if she did do it would be easy to confirm.

Not really. I mean multiple people saw this happen...so an explanation is definitely needed. Her doing shit like this without telling everyone is really bad anyway.

I agree this is most likely.

But I’m willing to say there is a small chance she is lying.

Good to know the laptop is secured. If she really did try sell it to Russia, we should throw the book at her.

https://6abc.com/nancy-pelosi-riley-...vania/9780340/

Nothing shows how much you love the USA like trying to sell sensitive information to Russia

I don't even believe it really. I mean I believe how stupid these people are that they would say "I'm gonna sell their shit to Russia hyukhyukhyuk" and even pretend they know what they are doing but really it's so stupid....I'm sure she has a russian steamfriend that she's played games with but this is so stupid.

I mean yes just make this person disappear and everyone who was there. These people are just so stupid hayseed dumbfuck with extra stupid

Who knew that Burn After Reading would be a tale of prophecy?

MyPillow is being kicked out of Bed Bath and Beyond.

Our BB&B shut down a few months ago. But glad crazy people are being held accountable for their rantings.

Kohls as well

I know there was great concern about Josh Hawley's voice being censored after Simon & Schuster dropped his book following the riots at the Capitol. His book has been picked up by Regnery Publishing. On a related note, Regnery Publishing has a worldwide agreement with... Simon & Schuster.

Cancel Culture indeed:rolleyes:

And Wayfair

Now I wonder how often the Russian embassy in D.C. has to deal with people trying to sell them staplers and souvenir pens people find around D.C. offices and landmarks.

Turns out that the free market works just fine.

I'll believe it if/when he votes to impeach, but McConnell appears to want to take the opportunity to dump Trump and put that ugly 4-year stand behind the GOP.

Also, Pence and others skipping the departure ceremony.