Major League Baseball 2K10 Screenshots (IGN)

[SoxFan01605]

Quote: Originally Posted by Art1bk

Personally I think the screens look nice, and they're better then 2k9. I'm not surprise to hear certain posters complain like they are. I'm not even going to go there. For someone to say it looks the same as 2k9 just shows their agenda.

lol...why does this need to even start. Unlike some here, I admittedly don't fancy myself a graphics professional...so I may very well be missing some subtleties.()

I looked back at some early 2K9 pictures, and they looked fine. That's what's funny to me about your comment. I didn't think (aside from those horrible textures on gloves, etc that I already mentioned) 2K9 looked bad at all. So to act as though saying they look roughly the same is a slight or "agenda" is a pretty unfair generalization. If anything, it would be relatively good news, considering that one hands-on said the graphics took a hit.

If you care to point out what you find particularly better, I'd love to read it. (seriously...not being snarky here) Regardless of what either of us see or don't, it's only a handful of early pictures...I don't see why lines need to be drawn.


EDIT: and here's a picture of 2K9 (actually from a game):



Looking at this I think some of the so-called upgrades that have been listed by posters are mere over-analyzing. The detail of the colors looked a bit sharper in a couple of the 2K10 pics, that much I do see.

[jeffy777]

Quote: Originally Posted by SoxFan01605

EDIT: and here's a picture of 2K9 (actually from a game): Looking at this I think some of the so-called upgrades that have been listed by posters are mere over-analyzing. The detail of the colors looked a bit sharper in a couple of the 2K10 pics, that much I do see.

Where is that image from? It looks compressed and pixelated. I'm not trying to defend 2K, but to be honest, the actual game looks quite a bit better than that.

EDIT: here's a more accurate screenshot:

[Jamin23]

Quote: Originally Posted by jeffy777

Where is that image from? It looks compressed and pixelated. I'm not trying to defend 2K, but to be honest, the actual game looks quite a bit better than that.

That's a lower quality shot of the game from an ESPN article.

[jeffy777]

Quote: Originally Posted by Jamin23

That's a lower quality shot of the game from an ESPN article.

I remember that article, now that you mention it. The screens they took were downright horrid and didn't look like the actual game.

[SoxFan01605]

Quote: Originally Posted by jeffy777

Where is that image from? It looks compressed and pixelated. I'm not trying to defend 2K, but to be honest, the actual game looks quite a bit better than that. EDIT: here's a more accurate screenshot:

lol...that's fine. I just grabbed an early pic from the game. The point was missed, I think. I was actually saying the pic wasn't bad. Your picture is better, but I still don't see an obvious upgrade with these 2K10 pics. That was the only point of posting that pic. All these comments about grass textures, etc being fuller, more detailed, etc...I don't see it.

Again, that's not trashing the game...as I thought aside from the equipment textures and faces, the graphics were solid in 2K9. My other point was, 5 pictures isn't enough to determine the graphical state of 2K10 either way. I'll leave it alone as some people tend to be far too defensive (not you Jeffy) about this stuff. That is all!

[jeffy777]

Quote: Originally Posted by SoxFan01605

lol...that's fine. I just grabbed an early pic from the game. The point was missed, I think. I was actually saying the pic wasn't bad. Your picture is better, but I still don't see an obvious upgrade with these 2K10 pics. That was the only point of posting that pic. All these comments about grass textures, etc being fuller, more detailed, etc...I don't see it. Again, that's not trashing the game...as I thought aside from the equipment textures and faces, the graphics were solid in 2K9. My other point was, 5 pictures isn't enough to determine the graphical state of 2K10 either way. I'll leave it alone as some people tend to be far too defensive (not you Jeffy) about this stuff. That is all!

It's all good man. I just thought the screen you picked was a really bad example, but I hear ya. I acutally agree with you. The 2K10 screens don't look a whole lot different to me either.

[bigfnjoe96]

For early screens, 2k10 shots seem tighter graphically. I'm liking the way the player models look also

2k9



2k10



2k9



2k10



2k9



2k10

[backbreaker]

Quote: Originally Posted by bigfnjoe96

For early screens, 2k10 shots seem tighter graphically. I'm liking the way the player models look

I honestly can't really tell the difference, if their is one it is minute. I just hope it plays well this year.