Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-19-2006, 07:32 PM   #1
Brillig
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Mountain View, California
Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip

Watch. This. Show.

Aaron Sorkin may be a occasionally recovering addict, but the man writes like no one else on television. There are some seriously high expectations for this show, and after watching the pilot, I think this one delivers, the only problem being that like Sports Night, it may just be too smart for the audience. Apparently it lost out to the CSI:Miami premiere (for the love of whatever, aren't Americans tired of that formula yet?), and I suppose Mondays aren't the best spot for a Sorkin high-wire act... still, the Sorkin-Schlamme combo grabs your attention just like the old days.

Here's hoping this one survives.

Brillig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2006, 07:37 PM   #2
Raiders Army
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Black Hole
Funny, cause I just watched it about half an hour ago. My wife thought it was kind of meh, but I liked it especially for a pilot episode. The dialogue was sharp and the acting was good. It also had a nice setup to bring Danny and Matt onboard.

Last edited by Raiders Army : 09-19-2006 at 07:37 PM.
Raiders Army is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2006, 07:41 PM   #3
Celeval
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cary, NC, USA
Very solid. We saw the pilot early on Netflix; and liked it last night as well - Mondays should be a good television night, with How I Met Your Mother, Heroes, and Studio 60.
Celeval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2006, 07:50 PM   #4
Joe
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minneapolis
I liked it as well. My only complaint is that as with many of Sorkin's characters, some were not distinctive at all and could be interchangable and a little boring.
Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2006, 08:00 PM   #5
Brillig
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Mountain View, California
I thought about asking you which characters were undistinctive, but then I realized you'd respond with "that guy... and that other guy." I can't argue with that!

It's always a problem with a new show, but I think they did a pretty good job of delineating the main characters... there are some fuzzy edges around the peripheral players, but I think the core cast were well established.
Brillig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2006, 08:12 PM   #6
Bearcat729
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
I liked it as well.

It actually made me realize what I had been missing the last few seasons of The West Wing.
__________________
Bearcat729 on XBox Live and PSN
Bearcat729 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2006, 08:20 PM   #7
Maple Leafs
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
I really enjoyed it. I'm not sold on the female lead (she's a network president at what, 35?) and some it was a little uneven, but the dialog was pretty good and the premise is interesting. I'll give it a shot for sure.
__________________
Down Goes Brown: Toronto Maple Leafs Humor and Analysis
Maple Leafs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2006, 08:27 PM   #8
Brillig
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Mountain View, California
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maple Leafs View Post
I really enjoyed it. I'm not sold on the female lead (she's a network president at what, 35?) and some it was a little uneven, but the dialog was pretty good and the premise is interesting. I'll give it a shot for sure.

Actually, there was something written up on the Amanda Peet role - to quote my local TV columnist (http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...DG2VL68U51.DTL)

Quote:
For those who will quibble with young and beautiful Peet playing an idealistic and powerful network president, it's wise to remember that the TV industry is filled with women just like her in real life and the Jordan McDeere character is allegedly based on Jamie Tarses, who ran ABC and was younger then than Peet is now.
Brillig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2006, 08:31 PM   #9
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
We just thought it was whatever. If it doesn't get better in the next few episodes I'll probably dump it. I'm a fan of Amanda Peat (sp?) but I just didn't find her believable.
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2006, 09:48 PM   #10
kcchief19
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Kansas City, MO
It met my high expectations. I've thought both Matt Perry and Brad Whitford are both underrated, and it's nice to see them in roles where they are not overshadowed by other parts of the ensemble.

I'm a little worried that the ensemble is a bit larger too large. SportsNight had six main characters, The West Wing essentially had six main leads plus typically about four supporting characters. This shows looks to be comparable in number. The difference is that The West Wing started with the six main characters and slowly eased background characters into the plot. Dule Hill and Stockard Channing weren't even in the first few episodes, and Janel Maloney didn't develop her character fully until really the second season.

As brilliant as I think Aaron Sorkin and Tommy Schlamme are, they rely way too much on the same ideas over and over again. The pilot of The West Wings and Studio 60 both shared similar plotlines, and the blast on Pat Robertson was very similar to a blast on Jerry Falwell delivered on SportsNight. I gave him a pass when he recycled lines and plots from SportsNight on The West Wing because I knew he was always behind and I figured he thought nobody saw SportsNight. I'm hoping future episodes are fresher, but I still loved it.

The TV critic for the KC Star was lukewarm on the show, but he did think Judd Hirsch should polish his mantle for his best guest starring actor for his on-air meltdown speech.
kcchief19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2006, 09:50 PM   #11
jbmagic
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Celeval View Post
Very solid. We saw the pilot early on Netflix; and liked it last night as well - Mondays should be a good television night, with How I Met Your Mother, Heroes, and Studio 60.


You can see the first episode of Hero now at Yahoo
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/tv/top/heroes.../fall06/?d=503
jbmagic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2006, 09:53 PM   #12
ISiddiqui
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
I enjoyed the pilot very much. I thought the dialogue was pretty snappy and liked Perry and Whitford as the bad boy writer/director who come back. Stephen Weber as the network exec was an inspired choice, imo. And somehow, Peet works as a President of a network.

Looking forward to future episodes.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages"
-Tennessee Williams
ISiddiqui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2006, 10:15 PM   #13
scooter
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Camano Island, WA
My wife and I really enjoyed it as well. I thought the chemistry between Perry and Whitford was excellent. I did have some trouble following who everyone was, but we did TIVO it so I'm going to go back and watch it again. Maybe next time I can figure out who's the boss (and who's the boss' boss, etc.).

I just appreciate that it's television that isn't reality, a competition, or a crime drama. We'll keep watching.
scooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2006, 10:16 PM   #14
MalcPow
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Diego
I enjoyed the first show as well, although really, couldn't they have at least used a different font for the credits and scene setups, it's quite literally exactly the same as the West Wing's. I also found the dialogue in some spots eerily similar to West Wing show's I've seen (never saw SportsNight), especially the opening scene about freedom of speech meaning that sometimes you'll be pissed off, this was basically a wholesale excerpt of the flag burning WW episode.

But again, I enjoyed it. I like the pace of a Sorkin show, and always find myself watching when one comes on. My only worry is that he's simply traded one soapbox for another, and that Studio 60 will just be new characters rehashing the same charted territory. But I'll be watching/buying dvd's either way.
MalcPow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 05:14 AM   #15
GrantDawg
World Champion Mis-speller
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Covington, Ga.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maple Leafs View Post
I really enjoyed it. I'm not sold on the female lead (she's a network president at what, 35?) and some it was a little uneven, but the dialog was pretty good and the premise is interesting. I'll give it a shot for sure.


I hope that isn't the consensus, because I loved Peet's character. I thought she was immediately likable, and easy to root for. I figured she would be some kind of uber-bitch. I'm glad they went another direction because that has been over-done.

I loved the first episode. I didn't want it to end.

Last edited by GrantDawg : 09-20-2006 at 05:15 AM.
GrantDawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 07:13 AM   #16
Draft Dodger
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Keene, NH
Much better than I thought it was going to be. I also was kind of meh on Peet's character and I was really looking forward to Sarah Paulson after just watching her in Deadwood, but she just seemed a bit off. Just the first episode though - once things get rolling, I think it's going to be very enjoyable.
__________________
Mile High Hockey
Draft Dodger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 07:23 AM   #17
Ksyrup
This guy has posted so much, his fingers are about to fall off.
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: In Absentia
Much like that Friends knock-off The Class, I refuse to watch this show simply because I've been subjected to so many commercials for it that I hope it fails. Not that this is the kind of show I'd watch anyway, but I couldn't turn the channel quickly enough after DoND ended.

As far as the comment above about CSI, we still enjoy the original, although it's no longer "must see" every week. But the spin-offs (Miami and NY), we've never even considered watching. Miami I assume is because David Caruso is a dickhead who can't act, but I can only assume we don't watch the other just because it's overkill. But apparently not everyone thinks that way.
__________________
M's pitcher Miguel Batista: "Now, I feel like I've had everything. I've talked pitching with Sandy Koufax, had Kenny G play for me. Maybe if I could have an interview with God, then I'd be served. I'd be complete."

Last edited by Ksyrup : 09-20-2006 at 07:23 AM.
Ksyrup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 07:34 AM   #18
wade moore
lolzcat
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: williamsburg, va
I'm not reading this thread because I TiVO'd it and haven't watched. But just the fact that the guy who played Josh on West Wing is in it was enough for me to at least grab the pilot and check it out.
__________________
Text Sports Network - Bringing you statistical information for several FOF MP leagues in one convenient site

Quote:
Originally Posted by Subby
Maybe I am just getting old though, but I am learning to not let perfect be the enemy of the very good...
wade moore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 08:06 AM   #19
Raiders Army
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Black Hole
I was confused a little as to Amanda Peet's character. She's the president of NBS? And who is the guy that she brought into her office to talk about hiring Danny and Matt?
Raiders Army is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 08:33 AM   #20
Brillig
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Mountain View, California
I don't know if Heroes will be that good a show or not... I'll have to wait and see, I suppose. That said, it has to be a better lead-in in terms of audience character than Deal or No Deal. The downside is if the show tanks, it won't be a lead-in at all.

Your Studio 60 character cheat sheet:

the corporates
Steven Weber, "Jack Rudolph", the big boss
Amanda Peet, "Jordan McDeere", NBS president, works for Jack

in charge at Studio 60
Bradley Whitford, "Danny Tripp"
Matthew Perry, "Matt Albie"

the talent at Studio 60
Sarah Paulson, "Harriet Hayes"
D.L. Hughley, "Simon Stiles"
Nathan Corddry, "Tom Jeter" <- practically MIA in the first episode

backstage at Studio 60
Timothy Busfield, "Cal Shanley", executive producer
Brillig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 08:41 AM   #21
Barkeep49
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiders Army View Post
I was confused a little as to Amanda Peet's character. She's the president of NBS? And who is the guy that she brought into her office to talk about hiring Danny and Matt?

NBS is clearly based off of NBC. At NBC you have the Network President and a Chairman of the Network besides the owner of the network (GE at NBC; Ed Asner at NBS). So Amanda Peete is in-charge except that she's not.

Also Brillig: Timothy Busfield's character, Cal, is the show's director not executive producer.
Barkeep49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 08:43 AM   #22
Passacaglia
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Big Ten Country
I didn't watch. Seeing Matthew Perry and Amanda Peet in the same commercial brought back horrible memories of The Whole Nine Yards.
Passacaglia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 10:31 AM   #23
molson
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
The hardest thing about writing fiction is making different characters' dialogue sound distinctive. Sorkin absolutely sucks at this, and I just can’t get past it in any of his shows, even though he’s otherwise talented.
molson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 10:37 AM   #24
Honolulu_Blue
Hockey Boy
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Quote:
Originally Posted by Passacaglia View Post
I didn't watch. Seeing Matthew Perry and Amanda Peet in the same commercial brought back horrible memories of The Whole Nine Yards.

If you actually paid to see that movie then that's just some cinematic karma that you're going to have to live with for a long, long time...

I'm sorry.
__________________
Steve Yzerman: 1,755 points in 1,514 regular season games. 185 points in 196 postseason games. A First-Team All-Star, Conn Smythe Trophy winner, Selke Trophy winner, Masterton Trophy winner, member of the Hockey Hall of Fame, Olympic gold medallist, and a three-time Stanley Cup Champion. Longest serving captain of one team in the history of the NHL (19 seasons).
Honolulu_Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 10:40 AM   #25
Toddzilla
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Burke, VA
This just makes me miss Sports Night all the more....
Toddzilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 10:42 AM   #26
BrianD
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Appleton, WI
Quote:
Originally Posted by Passacaglia View Post
I didn't watch. Seeing Matthew Perry and Amanda Peet in the same commercial brought back horrible memories of The Whole Nine Yards.

That movie didn't qualify as bad enough to be good?
BrianD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 11:12 AM   #27
cuervo72
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland
Amanda Peet naked on a staircase certainly wasn't bad...
__________________
null
cuervo72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 12:06 PM   #28
Draft Dodger
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Keene, NH
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuervo72 View Post
Amanda Peet naked on a staircase certainly wasn't bad...

I knew that's what you were going to say.
__________________
Mile High Hockey
Draft Dodger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 12:23 PM   #29
Celeval
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cary, NC, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ksyrup View Post
Much like that Friends knock-off The Class, I refuse to watch this show simply because I've been subjected to so many commercials for it that I hope it fails. Not that this is the kind of show I'd watch anyway, but I couldn't turn the channel quickly enough after Deal or No Deal ended.

... does ... not ... compute ...

Oh shite, there's another Howie Mandel commercial, mute it.
Celeval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 12:45 PM   #30
Brillig
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Mountain View, California
Quote:
Originally Posted by molson View Post
The hardest thing about writing fiction is making different characters' dialogue sound distinctive. Sorkin absolutely sucks at this, and I just can’t get past it in any of his shows, even though he’s otherwise talented.

*shrug* I'm not seeing this. Although if Sorkin uses his favorite monk line again ("I don't know exactly how to please you, Lord, but I think the fact that I want to please you, pleases you") in this one he should be slapped with a carp.

I don't see the problem with the characters though. Maybe you should have your ears checked?
Brillig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 12:52 PM   #31
Ksyrup
This guy has posted so much, his fingers are about to fall off.
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: In Absentia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Celeval View Post
... does ... not ... compute ...

Oh shite, there's another Howie Mandel commercial, mute it.

For me, the difference is that I was already watching DoND, so the commercials were more informational about when it would be on than trying to draw me in like the other two shows I mentioned. Plus, the DoND commercials were (or seemed to me) a lot shorter, because people know about the show already. The others were far more prone to lengthy (and repeated) promos about the show, with the same scenes being shown over and over (or, in the case of The Class, the same stupid spelling bee or playground commercials).
__________________
M's pitcher Miguel Batista: "Now, I feel like I've had everything. I've talked pitching with Sandy Koufax, had Kenny G play for me. Maybe if I could have an interview with God, then I'd be served. I'd be complete."
Ksyrup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 01:03 PM   #32
Pyser
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
from working in television, the first episode completely threw me off because they changed professional titles.

it took me FOREVER to figure out who perry and whitford were playing, in part because they kept referring to one as a "director".

i finally figured out that perry is the head writer of the show, and whitford is the "director"...which is really a show-runner in real television (think lorne michaels). a television director, at least for live shows, sits in the booth and calls the shots, which is what the guy who didnt pull the plug on the rant was, really...though he was more acting as a technical director, since he was working the switcher.

anyway, for a show that is supposed to be based on "realism", i couldnt figure out for the life of me why they changed real titles.
Pyser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 01:54 PM   #33
Anthony
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Astoria, NY, USA
how is that show "Heroes"?
Anthony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 02:18 PM   #34
jbmagic
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hell Atlantic View Post
how is that show "Heroes"?



Pretty Good. Goto Yahoo TV and watch the first episode now before it premeires next week.
jbmagic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 05:28 PM   #35
GrantDawg
World Champion Mis-speller
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Covington, Ga.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyser View Post
from working in television, the first episode completely threw me off because they changed professional titles.

it took me FOREVER to figure out who perry and whitford were playing, in part because they kept referring to one as a "director".

i finally figured out that perry is the head writer of the show, and whitford is the "director"...which is really a show-runner in real television (think lorne michaels). a television director, at least for live shows, sits in the booth and calls the shots, which is what the guy who didnt pull the plug on the rant was, really...though he was more acting as a technical director, since he was working the switcher.

anyway, for a show that is supposed to be based on "realism", i couldnt figure out for the life of me why they changed real titles.


What? Whitford was the "director" for Perry's movie (which Perry wrote). He was supposed to direct Perry's new movie, but couldn't because of he couldn't be bonded. They both were writers on the show originally, and they are now the Executive Producers.
GrantDawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 05:39 PM   #36
Pyser
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrantDawg View Post
What? Whitford was the "director" for Perry's movie (which Perry wrote). He was supposed to direct Perry's new movie, but couldn't because of he couldn't be bonded. They both were writers on the show originally, and they are now the Executive Producers.

that makes infinitely more sense. i thought they wanted him to direct the studio 60 show, too. thanks.
Pyser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 07:52 PM   #37
saldana
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bethlehem, Pa
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcchief19 View Post
It met my high expectations. I've thought both Matt Perry and Brad Whitford are both underrated, and it's nice to see them in roles where they are not overshadowed by other parts of the ensemble.

I'm a little worried that the ensemble is a bit larger too large. SportsNight had six main characters, The West Wing essentially had six main leads plus typically about four supporting characters. This shows looks to be comparable in number. The difference is that The West Wing started with the six main characters and slowly eased background characters into the plot. Dule Hill and Stockard Channing weren't even in the first few episodes, and Janel Maloney didn't develop her character fully until really the second season.


The TV critic for the KC Star was lukewarm on the show, but he did think Judd Hirsch should polish his mantle for his best guest starring actor for his on-air meltdown speech.

this is a little bit of an unfair comparison (studio 60 to the west wing), because the way the West Wing started and was intended, and the way it ended up are totally different things....when that show came on the air, it was supposed to be about Rob Lowe and Moira Kelley's characters, with Jed Bartlett being an ancillary character along with all the others...after it was on a few weeks and everyone remembered how bad of an actress Moira Kelly is, and realized how well Martin Sheen was testing, they shifted gears on the fly and reworked the stories and characters to expand it into the awesome show that it was.

studio 60 is starting as an ensemble show from the beginning, so i think that is why you are seeing the peripheral characters being included right away, where in the WW they came on much later...why would bartlett need an assistant when he was only supposed to be a guy that only made incidental appearances?
saldana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2006, 09:00 PM   #38
timmynausea
College Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
I liked the West Wing, but I can't stand Matthew Perry, so I've avoided this one so far.
timmynausea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 07:43 AM   #39
Butter
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dayton, OH
I think it's odd how the supposed main character of this sketch comedy show is apparently a hard core Christian selling a CD of spiritual music. Just a ham-handed way for Sorkin to browbeat us about religion ever few weeks, I guess.

Also, the whole Whitford's character being a recovering drug addict is way too much like the late John Spencer's role on West Wing.

I enjoyed the pilot overall, but I also felt Amanda Peet didn't fit into the President role very well. I'm willing to give it a few more weeks, just because I like most of the cast pretty well, esp. Perry, Whitford, Weber, and D.L. Hughley who I think could be extremely funny in this.
__________________
My listening habits
Butter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 08:07 AM   #40
ISiddiqui
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Butter_of_69 View Post
I think it's odd how the supposed main character of this sketch comedy show is apparently a hard core Christian selling a CD of spiritual music. Just a ham-handed way for Sorkin to browbeat us about religion ever few weeks, I guess.

Actually it is supposed to be based on Kristen Chenowith (sp?) who Sorkin actually dated and then released a Christian CD and went on the 700 Club... which apparently led to a falling out between them.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages"
-Tennessee Williams
ISiddiqui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 08:42 AM   #41
cschex
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by Butter_of_69 View Post
Also, the whole Whitford's character being a recovering drug addict is way too much like the late John Spencer's role on West Wing.

I'm pretty certain that Whitford is supposed to be a stand-in for Sorkin and his well-publicized drug problems the last few years. This show is very much "auto-biographical" for Sorkin and Schlamme (and Perry as well, who had his own issues with pills, I believe).
cschex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 08:53 AM   #42
Butter
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dayton, OH
Quote:
Originally Posted by cschex View Post
This show is very much "auto-biographical" for Sorkin and Schlamme (and Perry as well, who had his own issues with pills, I believe).

I'm coming to realize that a bit more after ISidd.'s post.
__________________
My listening habits
Butter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 09:41 AM   #43
Draft Dodger
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Keene, NH
Quote:
Originally Posted by ISiddiqui View Post
Actually it is supposed to be based on Kristen Chenowith (sp?) who Sorkin actually dated and then released a Christian CD and went on the 700 Club... which apparently led to a falling out between them.

I did not know that. interesting.
__________________
Mile High Hockey
Draft Dodger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 01:06 PM   #44
BrianD
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Appleton, WI
I finally got a chance to watch this show and I quite liked it. There was some real substance to the story and the characters were interesting. I love the dialog on Sorkin shows as well. There is always such a nice mix of important discussion and attention paid to meaningless details. When Perry was telling the National Anthem story and the guy asked who the Dodgers were playing...perfect.

Someone upthread made the comment that all of the characters seemed the same and nobody was distinct. I actually think this is a good thing. Characters in TV so often become stereotypes or caricatures of their initial quirks that they cease to be like real people. Sorkin's characters may not be easily distinguishable by their lines, but they seem like real people.

Having Felicity Huffman in the pilot was a nice touch as well.
BrianD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 01:07 PM   #45
BrianD
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Appleton, WI
dola,

I forgot to mention that I actually liked Peet in this role. I've never been a big fan of hers, but she had a nice combination of smarts and humor to make me believe she could be in that position.

Nice to see Matthew Perry get a chance to flex his acting muscles as well. He seems to have much ability that didn't get to shine through on Friends.
BrianD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 01:49 PM   #46
timmynausea
College Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by timmynausea View Post
I liked the West Wing, but I can't stand Matthew Perry, so I've avoided this one so far.

An hour after I said this, we ended up watching the pilot, which was rerun on Bravo last night. It was decent. Matthew Perry and Amanda Peet were much more tolerable than expected.
timmynausea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 02:26 PM   #47
Joe Canadian
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
http://blogs.defaker.com/defaker/

NBC is apparently running a fake celbrity gossip site to deal with the in-show characters.
__________________
Steve Davis (Joe Canadian)
GO LEAFS GO!!
GO FOG DEVILS GO!!
LETS GO JAYS!!
EHM 2005 DYNASTY: A New Philosophy in Toronto!
Joe Canadian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 02:50 PM   #48
Ksyrup
This guy has posted so much, his fingers are about to fall off.
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: In Absentia
FYI re the ratings...


NEW YORK -- The fall season opened Monday with two of the most anticipated series premieres of the year off to a so-so start.

NBC's "Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip" and CBS' "The Class," both of which commanded substantial financial commitments from their respective networks and received generally positive reviews, didn't quite burst out of the gate but managed to put up competitive figures in their time slots.

The Aaron Sorkin-written "Studio 60" got a good lead-in with the season premiere of the hit game show "Deal or No Deal," which averaged 15.7 million viewers and a 5.0 rating/13 share among adults 18-49 in its two-hour season premiere -- about the same as last season's Monday performance.

"Studio 60," whose ensemble cast includes Matthew Perry, Amanda Peet and Bradley Whitford, couldn't keep up the pace at 10 p.m.. The drama set behind the scenes of a late-night sketch show delivered 13.4 million viewers and a 5.0/13 in adults, according to data released Tuesday by Nielsen Media Research.

While it was up from what "Medium" did last year in the time period, it also showed a significant erosion in its last half-hour, according to preliminary ratings released Tuesday: down 15% between 10-10:30 p.m. (14.6 million vs. 12.2 million) and down 16% in the demo (5.3/13 vs. 4.6/12).
__________________
M's pitcher Miguel Batista: "Now, I feel like I've had everything. I've talked pitching with Sandy Koufax, had Kenny G play for me. Maybe if I could have an interview with God, then I'd be served. I'd be complete."
Ksyrup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 03:43 PM   #49
Ksyrup
This guy has posted so much, his fingers are about to fall off.
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: In Absentia
By the way, be sure to tune in to the October 16 show when Sting will be the musical guest, playing selections from his upcoming album of 16th Century Lute Songs!
__________________
M's pitcher Miguel Batista: "Now, I feel like I've had everything. I've talked pitching with Sandy Koufax, had Kenny G play for me. Maybe if I could have an interview with God, then I'd be served. I'd be complete."
Ksyrup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 03:49 PM   #50
Maple Leafs
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
I'm really interested in how (if?) they'll handle the actual comedy scenes. So far we've only seen bits of the "bad" comedy like the Bush opening and the cartoon, which was pretty devestatingly realistic. But at some point, if we're supposed to believe that some of these sketches are actually witty and clever and biting, we're going to have to see them, won't we? Can they pull that off? Or do they take the easy way out and just cut to shots of the audience laughing and cheering.
__________________
Down Goes Brown: Toronto Maple Leafs Humor and Analysis
Maple Leafs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:12 AM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.