02-26-2008, 09:51 PM | #1 | ||
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
Cord Blood banking
has anyone done this with their new born?
what have you heard about it good & bad? the wife and I are thinking about doing this with our twins and wanted some more info/advice than what we've found on the net. thanks |
||
02-26-2008, 09:53 PM | #2 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Quote:
If the cost associated with storing the blood doesnt put an unnecessary financial burden on your family then I say why the hell not do it. Even if there is only a .01% chance that the stored blood will someday have an impact on the health on your children then its worth it. |
|
02-26-2008, 11:36 PM | #3 | |
Hokie, Hokie, Hokie, Hi
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Kennesaw, GA
|
Quote:
We did it with our three and a half month old for that very reason. |
|
02-27-2008, 06:24 AM | #4 |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
We did it as well. There's nothing but good that can come from it assuming you're able to pay for it. It's honestly the best health investment you'll ever make.
|
02-27-2008, 07:18 AM | #5 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
|
If you choose not to do it privately, most (all?) states allow you to donate it. You will not personally have any access to it anymore, but it will go into the bank in case it can provide a match for someone else in the future. Better than allowing it to be discarded.
|
02-27-2008, 07:47 AM | #6 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
|
I've never even heard of this. What is it?
SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out! Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!" Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!" |
02-27-2008, 07:53 AM | #7 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
|
|
02-27-2008, 07:56 AM | #8 |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
|
02-27-2008, 08:09 AM | #9 |
Hokie, Hokie, Hokie, Hi
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Kennesaw, GA
|
It's the process of collecting and storing umbilical cord blood after the birth. Why umbilical cord blood? Because it's one of the richest source of stem cells that can be used to treat a variety of diseases and ailments. The thought process is also that with future advances in medicine, the list of treatments for not only the donor, but also the donor's family members, will increase exponentially.
Here's the wiki on umbilical cord blood and here's the company we used: Cryo Cell |
02-27-2008, 08:17 AM | #10 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
thanks guys this helps a lot
we didn't do this with our first child (just couldn't afford it then) but we can now and from what I'm reading the benefits to our first child along with other family on even just a 50% match far out weight the cost if it is needed. Is this the same type of information you had heard as well. RE: 50% match and being able to help your other children along with even possibly yourself or spouse? |
02-27-2008, 08:30 AM | #11 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
Yes, that's the information we were given as well. We have several doctors in our family and they all highly recommended it. There are obviously some concerns that it may not match or that you may never need it, but it's a gamble that can be very beneficial in the long run. After the inital cost, it's only around $125 a year. That's worth the cost IMO. |
|
12-18-2008, 01:50 PM | #12 |
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jun 2001
|
What are the initial costs on this? My wife wants to do this, but she's saying the one she found is about $50 a month, which seems high.
|
12-18-2008, 01:56 PM | #14 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
It's very expensive. We decided against it because the cost and % chance of it being unusable (i.e. it doesn't survive storage in a useful form) didn't outweigh the miniscule chance you'd actually use it.
However, this is an intensely personal decision. For some, the vanishingly small chance you'd need to use it is worth all the cost in the world. We did, however, donate ours. |
12-18-2008, 02:10 PM | #15 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Jersey
|
I'll definitely be doing it if/when we have kids for the reason that Phalid said.
__________________
Retired GM of the eNFL 2007 Super Bowl Champion Philadelphia Eagles (19-0 record.) GM of the WOOF 2006 Doggie Bowl Champion Atlantic City Gamblers. GM of the IHOF 2019 and 2022 IHOF Bowl Champion Asheville Axemen. Last edited by Eaglesfan27 : 12-18-2008 at 02:10 PM. |
12-18-2008, 02:13 PM | #16 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
|
Does cord blood deleverage? For example, if I put 1000 units of cord blood in a shoebox, will I find out later that it was only actually 100 units? Can I hope for a counterbalance?
__________________
"Breakfast? Breakfast schmekfast, look at the score for God's sake. It's only the second period and I'm winning 12-2. Breakfasts come and go, Rene, but Hartford, the Whale, they only beat Vancouver maybe once or twice in a lifetime." |
12-18-2008, 02:13 PM | #17 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
|
Dola
In a more serious manner, this sounds interesting and I'm going to be doing some research of my own thanks to this thread.
__________________
"Breakfast? Breakfast schmekfast, look at the score for God's sake. It's only the second period and I'm winning 12-2. Breakfasts come and go, Rene, but Hartford, the Whale, they only beat Vancouver maybe once or twice in a lifetime." |
12-18-2008, 02:15 PM | #18 | ||
Roster Filler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cicero
|
Quote:
Despite the fact that its never actually been useful? All of the potential benefits in the brochure are hypothetical at best, science fiction at worst. Quote:
To get nothing for that money? It is, unequivocally, a scam.
__________________
http://www.nateandellie.net Now featuring twice the babies for the same low price! |
||
12-18-2008, 02:30 PM | #19 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Jersey
|
Very strong statement despite the fact that stem cells have some convincing science in their favor that they will be useful in the future. Is it a guarantee? No, but I'm willing to take that chance for my kids. |
12-18-2008, 03:00 PM | #20 |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
If you give me $250, I'll guarantee that there's a chance that I'll pay your kids college tuition.
__________________
... |
12-18-2008, 03:33 PM | #21 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
what is this "kids" you all speak of?
i worry not about such things. |
12-18-2008, 03:38 PM | #22 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
Quote:
man - you're missing out. we're all having kids just so we can harvest them for their stem cells.
__________________
... |
|
12-18-2008, 03:43 PM | #23 |
Bounty Hunter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
Is anybody willing to spill what the initial cost is? I want to do this to some ants.
__________________
No, I am not Batman, and I will not repair your food processor. |
12-18-2008, 03:49 PM | #24 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: sans pants
|
__________________
Superman was flying around and saw Wonder Woman getting a tan in the nude on her balcony. Superman said I going to hit that real fast. So he flys down toward Wonder Woman to hit it and their is a loud scream. The Invincible Man scream what just hit me in the ass!!!!! I do shit, I take pictures, I write about it: chrisshue.com |
12-18-2008, 04:08 PM | #25 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Jersey
|
Quote:
It varies widely based on geography and other factors, but I've heard it varies anywhere from 700 to 2500 for the initial cost. The annual fee after the initial cost is anywhere from 100-200/year. |
|
12-18-2008, 04:10 PM | #26 | |
Roster Filler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cicero
|
Quote:
Sure, but there is no evidence that the potential benefits of stem cells in question need to come from the same human. In fact, the very nature of stem cells suggests quite the opposite. Besides the fact that any realizable treatments requiring stem cells are quite unlikely in your children's lifetime, especially if they are treatments requiring stem cells from the same human. There won't be people sick enough to participate in clinical trials and with stem cells identifiable as theirs until your children are well into adulthood.
__________________
http://www.nateandellie.net Now featuring twice the babies for the same low price! |
|
12-18-2008, 06:01 PM | #27 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Astoria, NY, USA
|
Quote:
that is why we didn't do it. my thinking is if in the future we have enough medical advances to be able to make even a miniscule use out of cord blood cells we most likely will have made advances in medicine to treat the same ailments via some other method. if it was just a one time cost i would've given it more consideration (i think it was an upfront cost of $500-$750, something like that), but the fact that it involves a yearly fee over $100 a year made it easy to say no. i don't mock anyone who does this, just like i wouldn't mock anyone who buys a bottle of snake oil from a salesman - ultimately people want something to believe in and want to feel they're doing everything in their power to protect their families so you can't knock someone's intention. everyone needs to do what they think is best for them and their families, and if this hooey allows them to sleep easier at nite then all the better. if someone could guarantee we'd be able to make use out of these cord cells then it's a no-brainer. the only thing you need to know about cord blood is if someone were to say to you "i can sell you this special helmet that will protect you in the extremely unlikely chance you get struck by lightning, all you need to do is pay me $500 for the helmet and $125 a year to allow you to keep this helmet", it comes down to whether or not you think the extremely miniscule odds you'll get struck by lightning is worth the price of the lightning protector helmet. that's all there is to this discussion. boils down to if you have the discretionary income to invest in theoretical "what-if" scenarios. Last edited by Anthony : 12-18-2008 at 06:10 PM. |
|
12-18-2008, 08:09 PM | #28 |
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jun 2001
|
Here's what my friend Chris, who is an ER doctor in Chicago, and the smartest person I've known personally, said:
The big advantage would be if they came up with some advances in stem cell research which might be used to cure or treat illness. Thanks to George W. and the republicans there has been limited work on this so far. So any useful implementation is many years into the future, and may never come to light. Topped with the fact that there is no guarantee how long cells in cryo storage will remain viable, and that to be useful for the majority of the population that won't have stored cells, stem cell research will likely have to be coupled with a harvest technique from bone marrow or embryos to be used for practical widespread treatment. Any downside except cost, not really. Any upside? Probably not in the next 20 years. Last edited by Kodos : 12-18-2008 at 08:12 PM. |
12-18-2008, 10:16 PM | #29 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Astoria, NY, USA
|
that was gonna be another of my points: knowing that a small percentage of the population are saving the cord blood cells and essentially the rest of the population isn't, its likely that research would focus primarily on stem cells from more readily available sources. i can't imagine all the time and money would be spent on research that would benefit only a small percent of people who save the cord blood.
|
12-19-2008, 03:35 AM | #30 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toledo - Spain
|
In Spain laws are different, you can store the cord blood and in fact is done, the same way you can donate blood or any organ, but it won't be stored for your family usage, but anonymous stored in a public national bank for research or the use of any person that needs it. It's thought that way to not to allow rich people to have any advantage over the rest of Spanish population, as our public health system states.
Spain is said to be ranked one of the top 3 countries (maybe even #1) on donations (blood, organs, etc) and maybe it is thanks to this anonymous system were nobody has a privilege over the rest. There was some controversy about it like a year ago, when the press made public that our prince secretly stored his child cord blood in an USA bank for their own private usage against Spanish laws, that was really hypocrite from him. They made all kind of excuses about the "king's heritage" needed to be continued and his kids healthy to be guaranteed, but IMHO it doesn't make any sense in the 21th century. Of course those are my thoughts as a non monarchic guy that thinks that all monarchies are outdated and have no sense in our current society were we can elect our president but have an imposed king based on heritage from centuries ago (i leave it here to not to go more offtopic).
__________________
|
12-19-2008, 05:56 AM | #31 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Parañaque, Philippines
|
Quote:
Except a cloned-baby army with laserbeams shooting out of their eyes!
__________________
Come and see. |
|
12-19-2008, 08:24 AM | #32 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
|
I seem to remember my pre-natal instructor talking about how it's good to leave the cord attached to the baby for a couple minutes after birth because there is food and stuff still being sent from the placenta which is beneficial to the baby. In the little bit I've read, it sounds like your baby doesn't get this extra nutrition if you store the cord blood, and some feel that can be detrimental. Anyone have (informed) thoughts on that?
__________________
"Breakfast? Breakfast schmekfast, look at the score for God's sake. It's only the second period and I'm winning 12-2. Breakfasts come and go, Rene, but Hartford, the Whale, they only beat Vancouver maybe once or twice in a lifetime." |
12-19-2008, 08:30 AM | #33 |
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jun 2001
|
I know the Wikipedia article that was linked earlier in the thread talked about that.
|
12-19-2008, 12:17 PM | #34 |
Bounty Hunter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
I ain't payin' that much to play with ants. Screw 'em.
__________________
No, I am not Batman, and I will not repair your food processor. |
12-20-2008, 11:30 AM | #35 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Astoria, NY, USA
|
its just one of those things that they spring on parents. when you're going to have a baby its natural to have this ultra-protective mindset where you just want to do everything that's in the best interest for your newborn, and this is one of those things that i think medicine tries to capitalize on.
case in point, 3 years ago we bought a puppy (labrodor retriever). now, he was expensive on his own (somewhere over $700 i believe). but it didn't stop there. then they got us to buy all this other stuff (which in hindsight is how they make their real $). we bought this thing called "karo syrup" which would give your puppy a boost of energy/kick if he was feeling sluggish. an energy boost for a fucking puppy?? seemed logical at the time. and this was just for a puppy, multiply that by 1,000 for having a newborn. so storing cord blood cells is one of those things that on paper makes sense but when you stop to think of it you see ther isn't much practicality to it. that money could go towards college education - at least that has a more tangible benefit to it and is an investment into your child that'll pay actual dividends. |
12-20-2008, 12:28 PM | #36 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Great Northwest
|
Quote:
Honestly 3 more minutes of nutrition after the baby has been getting the same nutrition the last 9 months, sounds like hogwash. I say you just eat the cord like our predecessors did! |
|
12-20-2008, 03:56 PM | #37 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
|
Quote:
And, really, can you really put a price on that? SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out! Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!" Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!" |
|
12-22-2008, 12:42 PM | #38 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
since I was the original poster and asked this question as we were having twins. I thought I should update it somewhat.
We did not do the cord blood banking. 1) cost, yes it's the "potential" cost of your childs life vs. the cost of set up and storage so this is the #1 decision you need to make. We asked my wifes dr. at the time his thoughts and gathered as much info as we could about it. 2) we don't have any life threatening illness that runs in our families or anyone that could benefit from it right away so it made us favor even more to not do it. There is a storage facility in AZ so our initinal cost wasn't going to be as high as some, but one thing is don't contact a company direct to get more info. They will hound you for months on end to "sign you up". Get what info you can from sources outside the company if possible. |
12-22-2008, 12:50 PM | #39 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Edinburg,TX
|
I plan on eating the cord once I chew through it to free my kid.
__________________
You Stole Fizzy Lifting drinks! You bumped into the ceiling which now has to be washed and steralized, so you get NOTHING! You lose! |
12-22-2008, 12:56 PM | #40 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
This is a good point. My wife's family has a history of Parkinson's Disease. That was an important factor into why we did do cord banking. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|