Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-23-2005, 10:29 PM   #1
MrBug708
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Whittier
Lebron or Wade?

Go back to 2003 draft. Do you take Lebron or Wade?

MrBug708 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2005, 10:30 PM   #2
Swaggs
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Lebron.
__________________
DOWN WITH HATTRICK!!!
The RWBL
Are you reading In The Bleachers?
Swaggs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2005, 10:33 PM   #3
Schmidty
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Early, TX
Darko.
__________________
Just beat the devil out of it!!! - Bob Ross
Schmidty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2005, 10:37 PM   #4
GreenMonster
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
I think Wade has a chance to be a great player but LeBron has a chance to be special.. Lebron is 20 and played 2 years out of high school and Wade 5 now. Lebron does it all and I think his ceiling is a little higher than Wade's..
GreenMonster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2005, 10:39 PM   #5
Danny
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
While everone and their mother wanted to bone Wade these past couple weeks, I will take Lebron.
Danny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2005, 10:45 PM   #6
DaddyTorgo
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
lebron...no doubt. not even a second of hesitation. i think we need to wait 15 years or so though before we can really do this discussion justice of course. to see the impact both guys have
DaddyTorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2005, 11:00 PM   #7
duckman
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Muskogee, OK USA
Sam Bowie
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas Sowell
“One of the consequences of such notions as "entitlements" is that people who have contributed nothing to society feel that society owes them something, apparently just for being nice enough to grace us with their presence.”
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexis de Tocqueville
“Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude.”
duckman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2005, 11:05 PM   #8
Deattribution
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
This would be a better question if it were Carmelo or Wade.


Lebron slightly, just because I think he elevated his team alot but got caught in a big mess with the team changing owners,coaches,losing control of players, and losing players all together (Boozer).
Deattribution is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2005, 11:07 PM   #9
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schmidty
Darko.

lol
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2005, 11:10 PM   #10
Eaglesfan27
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Jersey
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deattribution
This would be a better question if it were Carmelo or Wade.


Lebron slightly, just because I think he elevated his team alot but got caught in a big mess with the team changing owners,coaches,losing control of players, and losing players all together (Boozer).


I think Wade wins that discussion of Wade vs Carmelo. However, I'd take Lebron over Wade.
__________________
Retired GM of the eNFL 2007 Super Bowl Champion Philadelphia Eagles (19-0 record.)
GM of the WOOF 2006 Doggie Bowl Champion Atlantic City Gamblers.
GM of the IHOF 2019 and 2022 IHOF Bowl Champion Asheville Axemen.
Eaglesfan27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2005, 11:15 PM   #11
st.cronin
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Mexico
1. Lebron
2. Wade
3. Anthony
st.cronin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2005, 11:17 PM   #12
cmp
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Lebron by far.
cmp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2005, 11:22 PM   #13
GreenMonster
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by st.cronin
1. Lebron
2. Wade
3. Anthony

I think most would agree with this order..
GreenMonster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2005, 11:25 PM   #14
Young Drachma
Dark Cloud
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBug708
Go back to 2003 draft. Do you take Lebron or Wade?

Lebron.
__________________
Current Dynasty:The Zenith of Professional Basketball Careers (FBPB/FBCB)
FBCB / FPB3 Mods
Young Drachma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2005, 11:26 PM   #15
Sharpieman
Greatly Missed. (7/11/84-06/12/05)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Palo Alto, CA
The reason you are even mentioning Wade is because he's got Shaq at his side.
__________________
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.
Sharpieman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2005, 11:28 PM   #16
Danny
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Just last week all the hype was, oh my Wade is more valuable than Shaq, Shaq needs Wade more than the other way around, Wade is the best player under 6'10 in the NBA, wade is the next Jordan. Get real. Wade led his team to a few great games over a mediocre team in disarray. I really like Wade too, and think is one of the better players in the league, but the hype form one week of games was just ridiculous heh
Danny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2005, 11:28 PM   #17
Young Drachma
Dark Cloud
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Exactly. With all his baggage, I'd take Kobe over Wade, if you gave me Shaq with either of them.

Imagine LEBRON with Shaq on his team?!?!
__________________
Current Dynasty:The Zenith of Professional Basketball Careers (FBPB/FBCB)
FBCB / FPB3 Mods
Young Drachma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2005, 11:36 PM   #18
Deattribution
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
I'd take Wade over Kobe any day of the week, Wade still has alot of room to grow, especially once he downs his defense and gets his 3pter going and he's already on par with Kobe.

Kobe has all the baggage and bad rep around him, plus he's about as good as he's gonna get, sure he has 3 rings, and I won't even go into the Kobe has Shaq debate, the only thing I will say is how many rings are those 3 rings going to win me today?

None.
Deattribution is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2005, 11:43 PM   #19
Eaglesfan27
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Jersey
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deattribution
I'd take Wade over Kobe any day of the week, Wade still has alot of room to grow, especially once he downs his defense and gets his 3pter going and he's already on par with Kobe.

Kobe has all the baggage and bad rep around him, plus he's about as good as he's gonna get, sure he has 3 rings, and I won't even go into the Kobe has Shaq debate, the only thing I will say is how many rings are those 3 rings going to win me today?

None.


I agree. You have to look at intangibles. Kobe alienates his teammates and does not make them better. Wade makes his teammates better and has done it all year, including games where he did not have Shaq.
__________________
Retired GM of the eNFL 2007 Super Bowl Champion Philadelphia Eagles (19-0 record.)
GM of the WOOF 2006 Doggie Bowl Champion Atlantic City Gamblers.
GM of the IHOF 2019 and 2022 IHOF Bowl Champion Asheville Axemen.
Eaglesfan27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2005, 11:47 PM   #20
MrBug708
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Whittier
Has anyone ever questioned the fact that Shaq has always had all star guards? Or does he make them that way?
MrBug708 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2005, 11:59 PM   #21
Danny
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eaglesfan27
I agree. You have to look at intangibles. Kobe alienates his teammates and does not make them better. Wade makes his teammates better and has done it all year, including games where he did not have Shaq.

More drivel. Kobe and Shaq won 3 rings together. There were many times where Shaq was hurt or struggling and Kobe carried the team on his back. Kobe was the guy who won them the games in the 4th quarter when Shaq was being hacked. Kobe was an awesome, awesome player. I watched every Lakers playoff game from the year Kobe got there to now. He did make his teamates better, and he did carry the team when needed and he did lead the team in the 4th quarter when it mattered.

Just because he turned into a major jackass now doesn't mean what he did in the past should be thought any less of. The Kobe you are describing is the one of right now, not the Kobe who teamed with Shaq to win 3 straight championships. People change, not always for the better.
Danny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 12:19 AM   #22
Pacersfan46
H.S. Freshman Team
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Indianapolis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharpieman
The reason you are even mentioning Wade is because he's got Shaq at his side.


Not true AT ALL.

People were talking about him last year in the playoffs when he didn't have Shaq, and almost single handedly upset the Pacers as the #8 seed playing the team with the best record in the NBA, and he did it without Shaq.
Pacersfan46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 12:28 AM   #23
Danny
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Hah, I reread my post about Wade a little above, and wow there were a lot of typing errors. Anyway, I like Wade a lot and if I had to pick between him and Kobe moving forward, I would pick Wade. But, Wade still has a lot to prove and he would be lucky to have a career as successful as the one Kobe has had up to this point.

Last edited by Danny : 05-24-2005 at 12:29 AM.
Danny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 01:06 AM   #24
Eaglesfan27
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Jersey
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny Drickman
More drivel. Kobe and Shaq won 3 rings together. There were many times where Shaq was hurt or struggling and Kobe carried the team on his back. Kobe was the guy who won them the games in the 4th quarter when Shaq was being hacked. Kobe was an awesome, awesome player. I watched every Lakers playoff game from the year Kobe got there to now. He did make his teamates better, and he did carry the team when needed and he did lead the team in the 4th quarter when it mattered.

Just because he turned into a major jackass now doesn't mean what he did in the past should be thought any less of. The Kobe you are describing is the one of right now, not the Kobe who teamed with Shaq to win 3 straight championships. People change, not always for the better.


It is not drivel. Kobe inherited two of Wade's most important role players from last year. Wade made those guys and the rest of his team into a 2nd round playoff team last year before Shaq arrived. Wade made his teammates better. Kobe made the Lakers a lottery team. Yeah, yeah, I know the West is tougher than the East, but Kobe is showing his inability to make his teammates better. Kobe is lucky he had Shaq. The only reason Kobe did well in the past is because Phil and Shaq could help ease Kobe's lack of intangibles. Of course, this is all opinion, but there certainly is circumstantial evidence that indicates this. The real test will be what Kobe does the next few years.
__________________
Retired GM of the eNFL 2007 Super Bowl Champion Philadelphia Eagles (19-0 record.)
GM of the WOOF 2006 Doggie Bowl Champion Atlantic City Gamblers.
GM of the IHOF 2019 and 2022 IHOF Bowl Champion Asheville Axemen.
Eaglesfan27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 01:15 AM   #25
korme
Go Reds
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bloodbuzz Ohio
All I'm saying is Wade is 23, Bryant only 26. Just because Kobe isn't in the spotlight right now doesn't mean he doesn't have many great years ahead of him.
korme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 01:20 AM   #26
Eaglesfan27
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Jersey
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shorty3281
All I'm saying is Wade is 23, Bryant only 26. Just because Kobe isn't in the spotlight right now doesn't mean he doesn't have many great years ahead of him.


Maybe I'll eat my words, but I'll predict that Kobe never wins another title unless he brings Phil back. Phil could actually ease over his weaknesses in dealing with others and help him win titles. I don't think anyone else has a strong enough personality to deal with Kobe's.
__________________
Retired GM of the eNFL 2007 Super Bowl Champion Philadelphia Eagles (19-0 record.)
GM of the WOOF 2006 Doggie Bowl Champion Atlantic City Gamblers.
GM of the IHOF 2019 and 2022 IHOF Bowl Champion Asheville Axemen.
Eaglesfan27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 01:41 AM   #27
Young Drachma
Dark Cloud
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eaglesfan27
Maybe I'll eat my words, but I'll predict that Kobe never wins another title unless he brings Phil back. Phil could actually ease over his weaknesses in dealing with others and help him win titles. I don't think anyone else has a strong enough personality to deal with Kobe's.

Kobe will overcome this. He'll grow. Jordan wasn't this successful at his age.
__________________
Current Dynasty:The Zenith of Professional Basketball Careers (FBPB/FBCB)
FBCB / FPB3 Mods
Young Drachma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 01:50 AM   #28
Tara
Mascot
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Rome, Italy
Lebron.
Tara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 01:56 AM   #29
JeeberD
General Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Town of Flower Mound
Lebron. Easy question...


Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBug708
Has anyone ever questioned the fact that Shaq has always had all star guards? Or does he make them that way?

Penny
__________________
UTEP Miners!!!

I solemnly swear to never cheer for TO
JeeberD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 02:19 AM   #30
Neon_Chaos
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Parañaque, Philippines
Lebron most definitely. He's a rare breed... height, athleticism, court-savvy, basketball IQ off the charts. Insane.

To put it into perspective, would you rather have in your team:
Shaq and Lebron, or Shaq and Wade?
Neon_Chaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 02:23 AM   #31
Sharpieman
Greatly Missed. (7/11/84-06/12/05)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacersfan46
Not true AT ALL.

People were talking about him last year in the playoffs when he didn't have Shaq, and almost single handedly upset the Pacers as the #8 seed playing the team with the best record in the NBA, and he did it without Shaq.
Oh please! If Shaq wasn't there the Heat would not be where they are right now. Wade is one of the better guards in the game, but put Shaq with any good guard in the league and that team will be one of the best teams in the league. You put Lebron with Shaq, oh my God, that team would be unstoppable. Once Shaq is gone, once he retires or whatever, the Heat aren't contenders for the title anymore.
__________________
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.
Sharpieman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 02:55 AM   #32
Deattribution
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharpieman
Oh please! If Shaq wasn't there the Heat would not be where they are right now.


They'd sure as hell be alot better than the Shaqless Lakers.

It's probably the most obvious observation here, but if you're a Laker fan, or a L.A altogether, you're going to be a tad bit biased towards Kobe.


Wade at the very least is on the same, or similiar level with Kobe.
Deattribution is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 02:58 AM   #33
Deattribution
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Dola

Until Kobe wins on his own, he will always be to Shaq what Pippen was to Jordan, a key player but replacable.
Deattribution is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 06:23 AM   #34
Raiders Army
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Black Hole
Neither, I don't take guys.
Raiders Army is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 06:24 AM   #35
Raiders Army
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Black Hole
Dola, or let guys take me.
Raiders Army is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 09:02 AM   #36
Warhammer
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeeberD
Lebron. Easy question...




Penny

Don't forget, Penny blew his knee out two years after Shaq left. IIRC Penny had a VERY good year the year Shaq left.
Warhammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 09:57 AM   #37
JeeberD
General Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Town of Flower Mound
Bah, give me the real Hardaway...
__________________
UTEP Miners!!!

I solemnly swear to never cheer for TO
JeeberD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 10:20 AM   #38
Danny
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eaglesfan27
It is not drivel. Kobe inherited two of Wade's most important role players from last year. Wade made those guys and the rest of his team into a 2nd round playoff team last year before Shaq arrived. Wade made his teammates better. Kobe made the Lakers a lottery team. Yeah, yeah, I know the West is tougher than the East, but Kobe is showing his inability to make his teammates better. Kobe is lucky he had Shaq. The only reason Kobe did well in the past is because Phil and Shaq could help ease Kobe's lack of intangibles. Of course, this is all opinion, but there certainly is circumstantial evidence that indicates this. The real test will be what Kobe does the next few years.

I will say this again. Shaq needed Kobe and Kobe needed Shaq. Without either one, there are 0 titles. Kobe was the best 4th quarter player in the NBA during those seasons. Without Kobe's late game and overtime ability, the Lakers wouldn't have won a single title.

Can you answer me this, did you watch all the playoff games from those seasons? And seriously, using this season's Lakers team and last season's Heat team is basically taking the worst from Kobe and ingoring everything else he has done.

Also, look at Coaching! Wade and the rest of the Heat had a great coach who is known for making the most out of teams last season in Pat Riley. The Lakers had Rudy T who is a good coach. They were learning a new system, then after 30 or so games, they get a new coach with an entirely new system to almost everyone as they go back to the Triangle. If you expect Odom, Bulter, and everyone else along with Kobe to learn and become efficient in the triangle in a mid season switch, then you are crazy. When that happened, I knew the Lakers were done.

Last edited by Danny : 05-24-2005 at 10:21 AM.
Danny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 11:24 AM   #39
Pacersfan46
H.S. Freshman Team
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Indianapolis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharpieman
Once Shaq is gone, once he retires or whatever, the Heat aren't contenders for the title anymore.


Yeah, once Shaq is gone and replaced by nobody, they won't be title contenders. Yet, the Lakers lose Shaq, and get 2 good players, and they're not even playoff contenders. Do you honestly believe without Wade, the Heat are title contenders?


Regardless, the point still stands. You just don't want to admit it. People talked about him last year as he put up one hell of a fight against the Pacers with Artest guarding him. Shaq isn't the only reason people mention Dwayne Wade.

Last edited by Pacersfan46 : 05-24-2005 at 11:31 AM.
Pacersfan46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 12:21 PM   #40
weinstein7
High School JV
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Ok, so we all (or at least most of us) agree that it's

Lebron
Dwyane
'melo

What about the rest? I figure Bosh has to be 4 (although I have to admit I've never actually seen him play), then maybe Heinrich 5. Then you've still got contributors like Ridnour, Collison, and Josh Howard, not to mention all the projects.
weinstein7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 12:38 PM   #41
Deattribution
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny Drickman
I will say this again. Shaq needed Kobe and Kobe needed Shaq. Without either one, there are 0 titles. Kobe was the best 4th quarter player in the NBA during those seasons. Without Kobe's late game and overtime ability, the Lakers wouldn't have won a single title.

Can you answer me this, did you watch all the playoff games from those seasons? And seriously, using this season's Lakers team and last season's Heat team is basically taking the worst from Kobe and ingoring everything else he has done.

Also, look at Coaching! Wade and the rest of the Heat had a great coach who is known for making the most out of teams last season in Pat Riley. The Lakers had Rudy T who is a good coach. They were learning a new system, then after 30 or so games, they get a new coach with an entirely new system to almost everyone as they go back to the Triangle. If you expect Odom, Bulter, and everyone else along with Kobe to learn and become efficient in the triangle in a mid season switch, then you are crazy. When that happened, I knew the Lakers were done.

Could you kiss the Laker's ass anymore? geesh.

if you want to talk about drivel, Pat Riley wasn't coaching the Heat when they reach the playoffs last year, the assistant, and now head coach Stan Van Gundy was. So not only was the team led by a rookie but by a rookie head coach too.

Put in any Good to great player with Shaq, with Phil Jackson coaching, and you have a 95%+ chance of winning in all three of those years still.

When Kobe takes the Laker's to the draft lottery championship again next year, get back to me.
Deattribution is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 02:29 PM   #42
Danny
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deattribution
Could you kiss the Laker's ass anymore? geesh.

if you want to talk about drivel, Pat Riley wasn't coaching the Heat when they reach the playoffs last year, the assistant, and now head coach Stan Van Gundy was. So not only was the team led by a rookie but by a rookie head coach too.

Put in any Good to great player with Shaq, with Phil Jackson coaching, and you have a 95%+ chance of winning in all three of those years still.

When Kobe takes the Laker's to the draft lottery championship again next year, get back to me.

I am wrong about the Riley comment, so I apologize for that, but either way I am done here. I should have known better to actually argue for a three time consecutive champion player and team. It's painfully obvious people either didn't watch those playoff games, have simply forgotten or the most likely, are buying into the media hype. Whatever.

I don't even like Kobe, so why bother?

On to more important things, who is hotter, Natalie Portman or Keira Knightley?

Last edited by Danny : 05-24-2005 at 02:30 PM.
Danny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 05:28 PM   #43
st.cronin
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Mexico
In a TPF or Strat or fantasy league I think Kobe over Wade is an easy choice. Kobe has more game. In real life, I'll take Wade, thank you very much.
st.cronin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 07:47 PM   #44
Eaglesfan27
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Jersey
One other factor in the Kobe vs Wade argument. Wade is playing with a hobbled Shaq who is not close to what he was during those 3 championship years. That will be important to remember in any final comparisions.


Oh yeah, Danny, I watched every Lakers Playoff game as I've always been a Shaq fan.
__________________
Retired GM of the eNFL 2007 Super Bowl Champion Philadelphia Eagles (19-0 record.)
GM of the WOOF 2006 Doggie Bowl Champion Atlantic City Gamblers.
GM of the IHOF 2019 and 2022 IHOF Bowl Champion Asheville Axemen.

Last edited by Eaglesfan27 : 05-24-2005 at 07:50 PM.
Eaglesfan27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 08:17 PM   #45
Danny
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eaglesfan27
Oh yeah, Danny, I watched every Lakers Playoff game as I've always been a Shaq fan.

Like I said, I don't want to argue this anymore. I'll just agree to disagree .
Danny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2005, 02:51 AM   #46
Sharpieman
Greatly Missed. (7/11/84-06/12/05)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacersfan46
Yeah, once Shaq is gone and replaced by nobody, they won't be title contenders. Yet, the Lakers lose Shaq, and get 2 good players, and they're not even playoff contenders. Do you honestly believe without Wade, the Heat are title contenders?


Regardless, the point still stands. You just don't want to admit it. People talked about him last year as he put up one hell of a fight against the Pacers with Artest guarding him. Shaq isn't the only reason people mention Dwayne Wade.
I just don't want to admit it? I don't care at all. I was debating whether or not I should even post in an NBA thread because the playoffs and this season have been so damn boring. I'm not denying that Wade is a very good player, but Shaq is 10000 times better. You put Shaq with McGrady, Francis, Penny (Penny!!!!!) and that team is a title contender. Shaq is a million more times important to the Heat than Wade is, same goes when Shaq with with the Lakers.
__________________
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.
Sharpieman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2005, 05:58 AM   #47
Neon_Chaos
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Parañaque, Philippines
How many rings does Shaq have without Kobe in his team? 0
How many rings does Kobe have without Shaq in his team? 0

End of discussion. Come back when Shaq wins a title with the Heat.
Neon_Chaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.