Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-19-2006, 10:08 AM   #1
tucker rocky
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Of no particular interest
USA vs Sweden

...in men's olympic hockey.

tucker rocky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 10:24 AM   #2
Joe
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minneapolis
what about it?
Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 10:26 AM   #3
Bearcat729
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
And here I thought this was about the Womens Curling match earlier today....
Bearcat729 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 10:28 AM   #4
tucker rocky
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Of no particular interest
1-0 Sweden, at the moment.
Lots of action, though missed ops for US.
tucker rocky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 10:34 AM   #5
tucker rocky
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Of no particular interest
Tied 1-1.
tucker rocky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 10:38 AM   #6
Coder
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Good game. Quick turnarounds, nice shooting, wide open defense on both ends. Alfredsson looks good, nice backhand.
__________________
IFL - Vermont Mountaineers

~ I am an idiot, walking a tight rope of fortunate things ~
Coder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 10:39 AM   #7
tucker rocky
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Of no particular interest
Basically an NHL match, but olympic format.
tucker rocky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 11:18 AM   #8
tucker rocky
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Of no particular interest
USA now on a 5 on 3 PP.
tucker rocky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 11:20 AM   #9
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
I'm rooting for everyone in this game. I love Lundqvist (Ranger fan), and I'm an American. Honestly, I think I'm rooting harder for Sweden.
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 11:22 AM   #10
ice4277
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkley, MI: The Hotbed of FOFC!
Score on a frigging 5 on 3 just once in this tourney please.
ice4277 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 11:33 AM   #11
tucker rocky
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Of no particular interest
Ought to be an interesting 3rd period.
tucker rocky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 11:38 AM   #12
Coder
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Terrible powerplay by the US... Swedish commentators are not happy with the referee.. saying he's inconsistant.
__________________
IFL - Vermont Mountaineers

~ I am an idiot, walking a tight rope of fortunate things ~
Coder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 11:55 AM   #13
Coder
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
35-16 in faceoffs... and 2-1 in the game. Nice goal.
__________________
IFL - Vermont Mountaineers

~ I am an idiot, walking a tight rope of fortunate things ~
Coder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 12:00 PM   #14
Coder
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
7-0 shots in the third period.. what are the US players doing out there? Eating hot dogs?
__________________
IFL - Vermont Mountaineers

~ I am an idiot, walking a tight rope of fortunate things ~
Coder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 12:01 PM   #15
tucker rocky
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Of no particular interest
Another wasted PP by USA.
tucker rocky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 12:16 PM   #16
Coder
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Zetterberg has been good defensively, but leaving a lot to be desired offensively. That goes for the entire Swedish team by the way.
__________________
IFL - Vermont Mountaineers

~ I am an idiot, walking a tight rope of fortunate things ~
Coder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 12:19 PM   #17
Coder
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Chelios looked old there.. helmet off, sitting on the bench with 12 seconds left of the game..
__________________
IFL - Vermont Mountaineers

~ I am an idiot, walking a tight rope of fortunate things ~
Coder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 12:19 PM   #18
mauchow
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
oh, well
mauchow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 12:20 PM   #19
Coder
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Best period was first, by far.. second and third looked slow, tighter defense, not at all as entertaining as the first one.
__________________
IFL - Vermont Mountaineers

~ I am an idiot, walking a tight rope of fortunate things ~
Coder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 12:30 PM   #20
miked
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The Dirty
I thought most of these guys retired a while ago...
miked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 12:36 PM   #21
Tekneek
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: USA
So, US is most likely through to the next round. Even if they lose to Russia and Latvia wins, the goal differential is very much in their favor. A poor showing overall by the US team, IMO.
Tekneek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 12:43 PM   #22
MizzouRah
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Troy, Mo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tekneek
So, US is most likely through to the next round. Even if they lose to Russia and Latvia wins, the goal differential is very much in their favor. A poor showing overall by the US team, IMO.

Pretty much my thoughts on the USA men's hockey team.
MizzouRah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 12:46 PM   #23
mooreadamc
Mascot
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Canada
Their result was expected though. They have alot of older players and alot of great young players coming up (Juniors and College). I think the middle ground is lacking quite a bit with the exception of a guy like Erik Cole and Rick Dipietro.

Last edited by mooreadamc : 02-19-2006 at 12:47 PM.
mooreadamc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 12:52 PM   #24
ice4277
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkley, MI: The Hotbed of FOFC!
They just don't have anybody who looks capable of putting the puck in the back of the net, and the goaltending is not strong enough to pull off a victory on its own.

At this point, I don't see them getting past the quarterfinals.
ice4277 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 01:17 PM   #25
DeToxRox
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
The USA simply put was not expected to medal and if they somehow did, it'd have been miraculous.

They missed the boat not taking Ryan Miller, the best USA goalie out there right now. There, unfortunatley, was problem one.

Problem two is all the most highly touted USA talent is not in the NHL right now; Robbie Schremp, Bobby Ryan, Phil Kessel, Jack Johnson, Erik Johnson, etc. While there are pieces in place, the USA's best chance this year was to treat it as a developmental year and add a guy like Scremp or Jack Johnson to the team, much like Russia did with Evgeni Malkin.

The United States in 2010 will have one of the tournaments younger teams, with some guys with experience back such as Gomez, Gionata, Leopold, Liles, DiPietro, Cole, etc. The only difference is they'll be loaded with young, unproven Olympic talent.

Their best best now is to load up their World Cup team for 2008 with the young kids, and let them gain international experience, and hope it carries over to the 2010 games, because Canada could have one of the scarier teams ever assembled by then (Crosby and Staal come to mind as guys who'll be there). If they don't, and they keep clinging on to guys who haven't won Gold, they're just setting themselves up for more failure.

It's all about developing the program now.

And since I'm bored, my predicted 2010 USA Team would probably look like this ..

GOALIES

Ryan Miller
Rick DiPietro
Al Montoya

DEFENSE

Jordan Leopold
John-Michael Liles
Ryan Suter
Jack Johnson
Paul Martin
Mathieu Schenider
Brian Rafalski
Erik Johnson *
Ryan Whitney *

FORWARDS

Brian Gionta
Scott Gomez
Erik Cole
Dustan Brown
Phil Kessel
Robbie Schremp
Bobby Ryan
Patrick O'Sullivan
Zack Parise
Chris Drury
Ryan Malone

I threw out a lot of young kids, but if not 2010, 2014 has a good possibility of having all then showing up. Anyways, just me killing time and I am sure I'll add/subtract guys to it but for now, thats what I got.
DeToxRox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 01:29 PM   #26
Tekneek
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: USA
I agree Don Waddell made some critical mistakes with the roster. With any luck, he won't be asked back. And if Atlanta doesn't make the playoffs, he might lose that job too.
Tekneek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 01:48 PM   #27
Chubby
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Syracuse, NY
DiPietro is terrible.
Chubby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 01:53 PM   #28
RPI-Fan
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Troy, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chubby
DiPietro is terrible.

?????
__________________
Quis custodiets ipsos custodes?
RPI-Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 02:04 PM   #29
Galaxy
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeToxRoxDVHStyle
The USA simply put was not expected to medal and if they somehow did, it'd have been miraculous.

They missed the boat not taking Ryan Miller, the best USA goalie out there right now. There, unfortunatley, was problem one.

Problem two is all the most highly touted USA talent is not in the NHL right now; Robbie Schremp, Bobby Ryan, Phil Kessel, Jack Johnson, Erik Johnson, etc. While there are pieces in place, the USA's best chance this year was to treat it as a developmental year and add a guy like Scremp or Jack Johnson to the team, much like Russia did with Evgeni Malkin.

The United States in 2010 will have one of the tournaments younger teams, with some guys with experience back such as Gomez, Gionata, Leopold, Liles, DiPietro, Cole, etc. The only difference is they'll be loaded with young, unproven Olympic talent.

Their best best now is to load up their World Cup team for 2008 with the young kids, and let them gain international experience, and hope it carries over to the 2010 games, because Canada could have one of the scarier teams ever assembled by then (Crosby and Staal come to mind as guys who'll be there). If they don't, and they keep clinging on to guys who haven't won Gold, they're just setting themselves up for more failure.

It's all about developing the program now.

And since I'm bored, my predicted 2010 USA Team would probably look like this ..

GOALIES

Ryan Miller
Rick DiPietro
Al Montoya

DEFENSE

Jordan Leopold
John-Michael Liles
Ryan Suter
Jack Johnson
Paul Martin
Mathieu Schenider
Brian Rafalski
Erik Johnson *
Ryan Whitney *

FORWARDS

Brian Gionta
Scott Gomez
Erik Cole
Dustan Brown
Phil Kessel
Robbie Schremp
Bobby Ryan
Patrick O'Sullivan
Zack Parise
Chris Drury
Ryan Malone

I threw out a lot of young kids, but if not 2010, 2014 has a good possibility of having all then showing up. Anyways, just me killing time and I am sure I'll add/subtract guys to it but for now, thats what I got.

Don't forget the "World Cup of Hockey" tournament or whatever it is called between then and 2010. The problem with the Olympics is it too "thrown together". Teams might be lucky to get one day together of practice before going out and playing 5 games in 8 days, plus the playoffs. Plus, you got teams like the weaker talented Latavia, Switzerland, who have non-NHL guys rested.

Last edited by Galaxy : 02-19-2006 at 02:06 PM.
Galaxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 02:05 PM   #30
sovereignstar
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galaxy
Don't forget the "World Cup of Hockey" tournament or whatever it is called between then and 2010.

Did you actually read his post?
sovereignstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 02:07 PM   #31
Galaxy
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by sovereignstar
Did you actually read his post?

Miss it. I hit the post button before I posted everything.
Galaxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 02:20 PM   #32
DeToxRox
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galaxy
Don't forget the "World Cup of Hockey" tournament or whatever it is called between then and 2010. The problem with the Olympics is it too "thrown together". Teams might be lucky to get one day together of practice before going out and playing 5 games in 8 days, plus the playoffs. Plus, you got teams like the weaker talented Latavia, Switzerland, who have non-NHL guys rested.

Yup. The USA has to take FULL ADVANTAGE of the World Cup of Hockey. They are on verge of something special with the kids they have that could lace em up in 2010 and beyond, but not if they don't start developing that now.

It's time to bring in a guy like Mike Richter to overhaul the team. The guy was the poster boy for United States hockey, so let him work his magic. Keep someone who's been there in charge and roll with it. They need a shot to the arm and I think Richters the guy to supply it.
DeToxRox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 02:22 PM   #33
Tekneek
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeToxRoxDVHStyle
It's time to bring in a guy like Mike Richter to overhaul the team. The guy was the poster boy for United States hockey, so let him work his magic. Keep someone who's been there in charge and roll with it. They need a shot to the arm and I think Richters the guy to supply it.

Why Richter? I'm not entirely sold that on-the-ice performance qualifies anyone for coaching/management by default. What makes him the guy?
Tekneek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 02:31 PM   #34
DeToxRox
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tekneek
Why Richter? I'm not entirely sold that on-the-ice performance qualifies anyone for coaching/management by default. What makes him the guy?

I'm biased as a goalie, but generally goalies make the best coaches (biased I know) because they are much more in tune with the game. Richter has shown he knows what it takes to win, he's been there and he's the most recgonizable person associated with United States hockey, and he feels perhaps the most passionate about it.

Put that all together and you have a guy who's going to put everything he has into it, and that's what we need. We need an architecht of this team who is going to go take chances for the greater good of the program.
DeToxRox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 02:38 PM   #35
ice4277
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkley, MI: The Hotbed of FOFC!
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeToxRoxDVHStyle
We need an architecht of this team who is going to go take chances for the greater good of the program.

Well, I think part of the problem may be that, if you try to take a chance, and it fails, you've got four years before you can make up for it. I think most guys in that situation are going to go for the safer choices, like they did this year with some of the older guys.
ice4277 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 02:45 PM   #36
Simms
FOBL Commish
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Team Radii
Things may change between now and then, obviously, but according to the league and the Players Association, there are no plans at the moment to have a World Cup in 2008.
__________________
FOBL Commissioner
34 Productions Web Design
Simms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 02:47 PM   #37
Simms
FOBL Commish
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Team Radii
Linkage for those who may doubt me.

http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=155254&hubname=nhl
__________________
FOBL Commissioner
34 Productions Web Design
Simms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 02:48 PM   #38
Draft Dodger
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Keene, NH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simms
Things may change between now and then, obviously, but according to the league and the Players Association, there are no plans at the moment to have a World Cup in 2008.

thank you. I was wondering when someone was going to point that out.
__________________
Mile High Hockey
Draft Dodger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 02:49 PM   #39
DeToxRox
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
A shame. I had heard grumblngs about that but just brushed them off. If that is the case however, they'll have to use these young kids in the World Championships. They aren't on NHL clubs, so they need not worry about missing the playoffs. It'll give them experience, just not against the top players.
DeToxRox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 02:51 PM   #40
Draft Dodger
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Keene, NH
so, who won the game?
__________________
Mile High Hockey
Draft Dodger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 02:57 PM   #41
Tekneek
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: USA
World Cup in 96...Next World Cup in 2004... We aren't due for another one until 2012, right?
Tekneek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 02:57 PM   #42
Tekneek
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Draft Dodger
so, who won the game?

Sweden 2 - USA 1
Tekneek is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.