Top Six Teams in the AFC this year?

astrosfan64 · 02-06-2006, 12:15 PM

Steelers
Colts
Broncos
Patriots
Jaguars
Bengals with Palmer

I can't see you making a case for anything better then number four for the Seahawks. Pretty much no brainer that the Steelers, Colts and Broncos are better.

rkmsuf · 02-06-2006, 12:16 PM

astrosfan64 · 02-06-2006, 12:18 PM

Just wondering if anyone can remember a year where the Conferences were this lopsided.

WSUCougar · 02-06-2006, 12:20 PM

God damn, man, give it a rest.

rkmsuf · 02-06-2006, 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WSUCougar

God damn, man, give it a rest.

lol

jeff061 · 02-06-2006, 12:21 PM

I think you can make a pretty easy case of Seattle being better than the Broncos.

panerd · 02-06-2006, 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by astrosfan64

Steelers
Colts
Broncos
Patriots
Jaguars
Bengals with Palmer

I can't see you making a case for anything better then number four for the Seahawks. Pretty much no brainer that the Steelers, Colts and Broncos are better.

So sad. Look at me! Look at me!

astrosfan64 · 02-06-2006, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeff061

I think you can make a pretty easy case of Seattle being better than the Broncos.

How so? The Bronco's played in the AFC West a MUCH TOUGH DIVISION. Ahh never mind it isn't worth it.

The simple fact is Seattles highly touted offense came up REAL SHORT in the big game. 10 Points..... Denver scored more then that...

astrosfan64 · 02-06-2006, 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by panerd

So sad. Look at me! Look at me!

I agree your quote does scream that.

rkmsuf · 02-06-2006, 12:30 PM

The anti Seatlle crowd is small in numbers but quite vocal.

dubb93 · 02-06-2006, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkmsuf

The anti Seatlle crowd is small in numbers but quite vocal.

Agreed. I'm starting to wonder which Seahawk stole his first girlfriend.

RendeR · 02-06-2006, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dubb93

Agreed. I'm starting to wonder which Seahawk stole his first girlfriend.

oh come ON man, have you read his posts? He never had a GF, thats just a rediculous speculation

WSUCougar · 02-06-2006, 12:49 PM

Maybe he as the #2 QB at Milton College back in the day.

Passacaglia · 02-06-2006, 12:49 PM

Much tough?

Raiders Army · 02-06-2006, 12:49 PM

A million voices cried out and were suddenly silenced.

Huckleberry · 02-06-2006, 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by astrosfan64

How so? The Bronco's played in the AFC West a MUCH TOUGH DIVISION. Ahh never mind it isn't worth it.

The simple fact is Seattles highly touted offense came up REAL SHORT in the big game. 10 Points..... Denver scored more then that...

21 points, Denver gave more than that at home.

Seattle shows up as the 4th best team in the NFL in most computer systems, which of course account for the schedule you played.

And the 6th best team in the AFC is typically around 9th or 10th overall.

Last year was a lot more lopsided than this year.

Ryche · 02-06-2006, 02:16 PM

I think you can argue that 6 of the top 7 teams came from the AFC, but I'd put Seattle as the second or third best team. Ahead of Denver and pretty even with or just behind Pittsburgh. Seattle and Pittsburgh were pretty even yesterday, but Pittsburgh did the little things necessary to win.

Next year I think there is a very good chance the top four teams are in the AFC when you look at Indy, Pittsburgh, New England and Cincinnati. Even San Diego might have a chance to move into that group.

Travis · 02-06-2006, 02:52 PM

Depending on how Seattle's offseason goes (pretty much referring to retaining Hutch and Alexander), the addition of Hamlin (hopefully) and Sharper to the defense I think would have them retain top 4 status in the league until the prove otherwise. Having Pruitt forced into action when Manuel went down really hurt whereas (again, hopefully) next season it'd be Manuel coming in if Hamlin or Boulware are hurt. The offense is what it is so long as you keep Hutch, but the defense is only going to get better after a year of seasoning and the return of two key elements from injury. If they get any sort of upgrade through the draft or free agency, the Seahawks *should* have a very legit defense.

Swaggs · 02-06-2006, 04:42 PM

I don't think it is all that unusual. In the late 80s and early 90s, the 49ers, even though they didn't always win the Super Bowl, were always among the best teams in the NFL. And, in most seasons, any combination of the Giants, Redskins, Cowboys and/or other NFC team that had risen up for a season (Bears, Rams, etc) were considered better than the best AFC team.

Raven Hawk · 02-06-2006, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by astrosfan64

Steelers
Colts
Broncos
Patriots
Jaguars
Bengals with Palmer

I can't see you making a case for anything better then number four for the Seahawks. Pretty much no brainer that the Steelers, Colts and Broncos are better.

This is an easy case to make to put them at #2 on that list:

1. They beat the Colts.
2. They had a better record than all the other teams on that list.

cougarfreak · 02-06-2006, 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raven Hawk

This is an easy case to make to put them at #2 on that list:

1. They beat the Colts.
2. They had a better record than all the other teams on that list.

The Colts didn't play their starters. 6 games against their pathetic division gave them the better record. Hell, I'd put them 7th on the list.

Joe · 02-06-2006, 09:38 PM

Geez. This is the Michelle Wie thread(s) all over again.

JPhillips · 02-06-2006, 10:36 PM

The Seahawks are the 33rd best team in the NFL.

Thread Over.

SnowMan · 02-06-2006, 10:39 PM

1 day after the Super Bowl and Astrosfan's opinion is STILL overrated!

cthomer5000 · 02-06-2006, 10:39 PM

Personally, i think the 6 AFC playoff teams and San Diego were the top 7 teams in the league.

02-06-2006, 12:20 PM	#4
WSUCougar Rider Of Rohan Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Port Angeles, WA or Helm's Deep	God damn, man, give it a rest. __________________ It's not the years...it's the mileage.

02-06-2006, 12:21 PM	#6
jeff061 Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: MA	I think you can make a pretty easy case of Seattle being better than the Broncos. __________________

02-06-2006, 12:30 PM	#10
rkmsuf Head Coach Join Date: Dec 2001	The anti Seatlle crowd is small in numbers but quite vocal. __________________ "Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales

02-06-2006, 12:49 PM	#13
WSUCougar Rider Of Rohan Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Port Angeles, WA or Helm's Deep	Maybe he as the #2 QB at Milton College back in the day. __________________ It's not the years...it's the mileage.

02-06-2006, 02:16 PM	#17
Ryche College Benchwarmer Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Highlands Ranch, CO, USA	I think you can argue that 6 of the top 7 teams came from the AFC, but I'd put Seattle as the second or third best team. Ahead of Denver and pretty even with or just behind Pittsburgh. Seattle and Pittsburgh were pretty even yesterday, but Pittsburgh did the little things necessary to win. Next year I think there is a very good chance the top four teams are in the AFC when you look at Indy, Pittsburgh, New England and Cincinnati. Even San Diego might have a chance to move into that group. __________________ Some knots are better left untied.

02-06-2006, 12:16 PM	#2
rkmsuf Head Coach Join Date: Dec 2001	and? __________________ "Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales

02-06-2006, 12:18 PM	#3
astrosfan64 College Prospect Join Date: Oct 2004	Just wondering if anyone can remember a year where the Conferences were this lopsided.

02-06-2006, 12:49 PM	#14
Passacaglia Coordinator Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Big Ten Country	Much tough?

02-06-2006, 12:49 PM	#15
Raiders Army Coordinator Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: The Black Hole	A million voices cried out and were suddenly silenced.

02-06-2006, 02:52 PM	#18
Travis Pro Rookie Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Canada eh	Depending on how Seattle's offseason goes (pretty much referring to retaining Hutch and Alexander), the addition of Hamlin (hopefully) and Sharper to the defense I think would have them retain top 4 status in the league until the prove otherwise. Having Pruitt forced into action when Manuel went down really hurt whereas (again, hopefully) next season it'd be Manuel coming in if Hamlin or Boulware are hurt. The offense is what it is so long as you keep Hutch, but the defense is only going to get better after a year of seasoning and the return of two key elements from injury. If they get any sort of upgrade through the draft or free agency, the Seahawks should have a very legit defense.

02-06-2006, 04:42 PM	#19
Swaggs Coordinator Join Date: Oct 2000	I don't think it is all that unusual. In the late 80s and early 90s, the 49ers, even though they didn't always win the Super Bowl, were always among the best teams in the NFL. And, in most seasons, any combination of the Giants, Redskins, Cowboys and/or other NFC team that had risen up for a season (Bears, Rams, etc) were considered better than the best AFC team. __________________ DOWN WITH HATTRICK!!! The RWBL Are you reading In The Bleachers?

02-06-2006, 09:38 PM	#22
Joe Pro Starter Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Minneapolis	Geez. This is the Michelle Wie thread(s) all over again.

02-06-2006, 10:36 PM	#23
JPhillips Hall Of Famer Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Newburgh, NY	The Seahawks are the 33rd best team in the NFL. Thread Over. __________________ To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers

02-06-2006, 10:39 PM	#24
SnowMan High School Varsity Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Georgia via Alaska via Washington	1 day after the Super Bowl and Astrosfan's opinion is STILL overrated!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)