09-18-2009, 10:50 AM | #1 | |||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
NBA to "lockout refs"
Quote:
Alright, for starters, how much worse would the quality of play be if the short balding jackasses with shirts two sizes too small were gone? I think a collection of the best scab refs out there might actually improve the game? Maybe? Invariably they will reach a settlement here. But when the NBA refs union represents such a collection of assholes and unqualified douches, I'm hoping they don't. |
|||
09-18-2009, 10:56 AM | #2 | ||
Favored Bitch #2
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Here
|
The NBA has referees?
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
09-18-2009, 11:01 AM | #3 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
|
Quote:
This is where I'm at as well. Will we notice if there are replacement refs? I think it would be funny if they brought in a bunch of new refs who didn't know they had to give the vets like Kobe, LeBron, and Shaq special treatment...
__________________
-- Greg -- Author of various FOF utilities |
|
09-18-2009, 11:25 AM | #4 |
Wolverine Studios
Join Date: Oct 2003
|
Coming to a NBA arena near you this season...Travelling!
|
09-18-2009, 11:31 AM | #5 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
|
09-18-2009, 11:36 AM | #6 |
Wolverine Studios
Join Date: Oct 2003
|
I meant that the scab officials might not understand the NBA rules regarding travelling and mistakenly whistle a number of players for it. Then again I am sure Stern will make them go through a crash course to learn the finer points of calling a NBA game including new additions to the rules for the 09-10 season like the "crab dribble". |
09-18-2009, 11:46 AM | #7 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
Maybe the new guys won't blow the whistle on D12 every time he breathes on somebody. Or bet on the games.
|
09-18-2009, 12:24 PM | #8 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
|
First time LBJ gets 6 fouls the lockout will be over.
|
09-18-2009, 12:36 PM | #9 | ||
Favored Bitch #2
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Here
|
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
09-18-2009, 12:53 PM | #10 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
|
Quote:
But the NBA will have to go to the trouble of finding new company men SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out! Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!" Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!" |
|
09-18-2009, 01:15 PM | #11 |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
This was the case with baseball umpires a few years ago. The move to unify the umpires rather than have them work only one league or the other along with the failed attempt to resign en masse to put pressure on MLB were huge. The current group of umpires are much better and younger than what they used to be. Having an umpire die on the field certainly helped motivate them to stay in better shape as well, which hasn't hurt their performance one bit.
|
09-18-2009, 03:49 PM | #12 |
College Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Out of Grad School Hell :)
|
I read they make something like $250K a year. What the hell could they have to complain about?
|
09-18-2009, 03:53 PM | #13 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
|
Quote:
Well, if I read that lump-sum retirement benefits thing right, apparently they are upset that the NBA could hire a new ref, he could work for 2 years, leave, and not get a lump sum retirement payment. From the reading of it, it's all about short-timers not getting some sweetheart retirement deal? And the old-timers are annoyed at this? Really? Anyway, we saw the ruckus the players raised with the new ball, wait until Kobe and King James can no longer just throw themselves at the basket and expect a foul...
__________________
-- Greg -- Author of various FOF utilities |
|
09-18-2009, 03:56 PM | #14 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
|
Someone has GOT to make a Youtube video of the NBA's crash-training course for the replacement NBAs, with high points like:
- How not to call a travel - How not to call a foul when a star player takes a swing at someone - How to call a foul on the defense when a star player drives the basket - How to call an occasional charge to make the constant blocking calls look legit - How to call a "makeup" call at a non-critical time to make things look legit - How not to get caught placing bets with your bookie - How to cover your cell phone tracks so you don't bring down someone else if you do get caught ...
__________________
-- Greg -- Author of various FOF utilities |
09-18-2009, 05:42 PM | #15 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Maybe I don't have the keenest basketball eye, but it seems like it's impossible to call an NBA game well.
Foul/Charge/No-Call decisions seem completely random. |
09-18-2009, 07:25 PM | #16 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Land O Lakes FL
|
Quote:
The good thing will be with the scabs we no longer will have the refs to blame for a team''s loss because the scabs will be calling perfect games.
__________________
"The blind soldier fought for me in this war. The least I can do now is fight for him. I have eyes. He hasn’t. I have a voice on the radio, he hasn’t. I was born a white man. And until a colored man is a full citizen, like me, I haven’t the leisure to enjoy the freedom that colored man risked his life to maintain for me. I don’t own what I have until he owns an equal share of it. Until somebody beats me and blinds me, I am in his debt."- Orson Welles August 11, 1946 |
|
09-18-2009, 07:32 PM | #17 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
|
Travelling is usually pretty obvious though. They let these guys take 5-6 steps sometimes.
The charge thing is that it is a legitimate tactic in the NBA these days to just charge the basket and expect to get a call. I'm not talking "did he hit him or not?" things, I'm talking regular obvious blatant things that just aren't basketball to me.
__________________
-- Greg -- Author of various FOF utilities |
09-18-2009, 07:55 PM | #18 |
College Prospect
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Flower Mound, TX
|
League popularity is at an all-time high, though.
|
09-18-2009, 08:29 PM | #19 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
|
09-19-2009, 01:31 AM | #20 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
Good points from molson and miami fan, although I often find myself complaining about bad calls in the NBA it does seem like NBA referees have a more difficult job than refs/officals/umpires in the other sports and I know I probably couldn't do it well in real time without all the slow-motion replays that show me a call was bad and get me riled up.
|
09-19-2009, 08:15 AM | #21 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Land O Lakes FL
|
Quote:
Oh I love to bash a ref as much as anybody I think there is a double standard between the expectations and reactions to basketball officiating (specifically the NBA but it happens in college as well) and the officiating in other sports.
__________________
"The blind soldier fought for me in this war. The least I can do now is fight for him. I have eyes. He hasn’t. I have a voice on the radio, he hasn’t. I was born a white man. And until a colored man is a full citizen, like me, I haven’t the leisure to enjoy the freedom that colored man risked his life to maintain for me. I don’t own what I have until he owns an equal share of it. Until somebody beats me and blinds me, I am in his debt."- Orson Welles August 11, 1946 |
|
09-19-2009, 02:07 PM | #22 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
|
$3,000.00 a GAME? utter and complete bullshit that a ref makes that fucking much money. Especially as shitty as these refs do the job. Reasonable my white hairy ass. When a teacher or a cop or a firefighter has to get by on a tenth of that? HELL no. |
09-19-2009, 03:17 PM | #23 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
What should they make then? 50 bucks plus a free hot dog?
Division 1 refs in football make something like 1500 a game. I'm not going to dispute that these guys are morons, but the amount of pay they make is pretty relative to the level of the league and the amount of revenue the sport produces. |
09-19-2009, 06:37 PM | #24 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
|
I could see probably 1/5 to 1/4 of that being fine. It would allow them to make a good living, take good care of their families and all that. But 240k? Realize their travel is paid their meals are paid their uniforms and basically any costs they incur while traveling to and from the games is paid. They apparently have a pretty good retirement plan as well or they wouldn't be fighting over it so hard.
And you think they should get 240K+ a year too? For reffing at most 3 games a week for 6 months? Its a ridiculous amount of money. |
09-19-2009, 06:41 PM | #25 |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Meh, the leagues got the money so im not sure who I would rather it went to. Its not like somehow this money is going to be redistributed to the teachers and firefighters of the world
|
09-19-2009, 06:41 PM | #26 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
|
Diola-deleted(damnit) As for football refs they at least have their own jobs in the offseason. Also their job is far more physically dangerous than reffing BB. I still don't think they should be making 1500 a game though.
__________________
http://wotlabs.net/s...8/signature.png http://wotlabs.net/sig_dark/na/banichi18/signature.png Last edited by RendeR : 09-19-2009 at 06:43 PM. |
09-19-2009, 06:42 PM | #27 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
|
Quote:
I understand that, I simply can't get past the outrage I feel that something as stupid as refereeing a game should net someone such a ridiculous amount of money. |
|
09-20-2009, 08:06 AM | #28 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Syracuse, NY
|
|
09-20-2009, 10:46 AM | #29 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
I mean we're talking $9,000 a game for officials. That's a few courtside seats at most stadiums. Doesn't seem like a lot for 3 people who dramatically influence the game. If you don't pay them too, you get more Donaghy situations. |
|
09-20-2009, 11:45 AM | #30 |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Norman, OK
|
Refs get paid less in Division I, but they also get to work 6 days a week since there's really no regulation and they're all independent contractors with the schools/conferences. You get the good ones (or at least good reputations) that get the most gigs. It seems a bit better that way.
|
09-20-2009, 05:56 PM | #31 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
|
Quote:
Wow, well ya know? I want to work based on your perception of reasonable because I'd be making 8-10 time what I normally do. Responsibility? Stress? They moderate a basketball game. If they're that stressed they're DOING IT WRONG. I'll give you the travel schedule, but quite frankly I've already noted that they don't have to pay for any of that, they're covered top to bottom while on the road. Maybe I'm just confused, but I simply can't accept that funning around on a court for 3 hours (MAx since the game isn't even an hour long in playing time) and failing utterly at actually calling the game by the rules as written for the league (charging, blocvking, TRAVELING and more) should qualify anyone to make 6 figure salaries. its an insult to the working class in this country who pay the ridiculous ticket prices to go see said events. Sadly, the sheep of the world (yes by this I mean you me and everyone thats ever paid for a ticket) will probably just keep doing so. |
|
09-20-2009, 06:07 PM | #32 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
Quote:
Just to be clear... You want the NBA, a league coming off of a referee gambling scandal, to pay guys that work alongside multi-millionaires everyday and can easily determine the outcome of games that routinely have 10s to 100s of millions riding on them... $30-50K per year? |
|
09-20-2009, 06:09 PM | #33 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hartford
|
Quote:
If it so offends you then don't go. I'm not really sure why your opinion of what they make matters. It's collectively bargained and if that is what they negotiate then that's the market value of their skills. There are 57 of them in the world. That's why they make more then fireman. |
|
09-20-2009, 09:11 PM | #34 |
College Prospect
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Flower Mound, TX
|
|
09-20-2009, 09:30 PM | #35 | |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
This is just dangerously naive. First. It's not like these guys work for three hours, then go hang out at the craps tables (well... ). The three hours you see them is just the tip of the iceberg. They have meetings with teams, go over tapes, meet with league officials, go over tapes, get judged on their performance, and then go over tapes. They put in a full days work. Second. If we were talking pee-wee's you have a point about stress, but watch a pee-wee game some time and watch the stress and aggravation that those parents put the ref's through. Tell them that there's no reason for them to stress over a call. We're not talking some funning around out there, everyone involved has MILLIONS of dollars riding on you. Players, coaches, owners, sponsors, posse's, entourages, the list goes on and on. That's before you get to the tens of millions being wagered on the game. You can't really think they don't apply pressure. Serious pressure at that. Third. I've never heard of anyone complaining as hard as you are that the owners don't make enough money. They aren't paying these guys with monopoly money. If the money doesn't go to them, it's going to stay with the owners. If the salary is dropped from $250k to $75k annually The end result of what you're advocating is that the owners make an additional $10M annually. Fourth. I do believe you are confused about what reasonable means. Reasonable means that they are getting their fair share of the money generated by their efforts. Put into those terms, $250k a year is definitely reasonable and it could be argued they are getting a little shafted. It's definitely both noble and naive to wish that the blue-color working families made more money at the expense of people who don't. It's just never going to happen. Never ever. It's exactly like getting outraged the sun came up this morning. This is what it's like in the really real world. |
|
09-20-2009, 10:48 PM | #36 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
|
A) My opinion only really matters to me. Not my problem if you dislike it or disagree. just life.
B) Reasonable, to ME, is not based on a fair share of the profits, its based on the value of what you actually do. The real time and work you put into something compared to everyone else and the work THEY put into something. No, its not fair as life works right now and sitting back and being accepting of our sports stars and teh refs et-al and the money being thrown at them is, to me, simply insulting to every other person out there busting their ass for 10-20 bucks an hour. Let alone those making less, of which there are FAR more. It may be Naive to wish for something, but at least by voicing my opinions or "wishes" as you say I'm not sitting on my ass simply accepting it. Maybe it won't change anything at all, maybe its foolish, but there is certainly nothing wrong with throwing the ridiculousness of the situation out there in the light for all to see every now and again. Personally I would think it makes more sense to simply say "Yeah Ren, yer right, but thats how things are" than to have the temerity to actually try and defend the situation and claim anyone "deserves" that kind of compensation. Its just silly. |
09-20-2009, 11:03 PM | #37 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
Fine. But the value of what you do is, in significant part, determined by the scarcity of people who can also do something at the same level. And those $10-$20 hour workers (much less those below that) are usually quite easy to replace, whereas professional caliber officials (however low that standard may be in the case of the NBA) are not. Hence the additional value. It's a harsh reality that most of the rank & file in the world could be replaced by a computer, machine, or minimally trained chimp but that's still the reality. We have a surplus of people, a shortage of work for them to do, supply & demand takes over and they're ultimately paid in the neighborhood of what they're worth, often more than that due to government interference.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
|
09-20-2009, 11:07 PM | #38 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
|
Reality != whats right and good
But hey, I'm feeling positive about life. By this time tomorrow I'll probably delete everything I said and replace it with "Fuck it, pay them MORE maybe they'll stop reffing altogether!" |
09-21-2009, 07:43 AM | #39 |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Seattle
|
I'm not sure where sitting on your ass whining about it is doing a helluva a lot more than sitting on my ass accepting it.
You think it's silly to defend people making what the market says they should make. That's fine. I think it's silly to make a fuss out of ref's taking an extra $10M out of the pocket of multi-billionaire owners. Of course you think it makes more sense for people to just agree with you. The problem is, I don't agree with you. I think you are wrong. I think they are making what they should make. The old line about in a market economy, no one is overpaid comes to mind. Anyway, as you said, only your opinion matters to you, so we aren't going to get anywhere with this. Hope you keep your good vibes going. Last edited by JHandley : 09-21-2009 at 07:54 AM. |
09-21-2009, 08:12 AM | #40 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
This line of thinking is where the baseball umpires got into a lot of trouble and the NBA refs will run into the same issue if they use this logic. The various levels of basketball (NBA, WNBA, NCAA, Developmental NBA) along with overseas leagues allow for a huge talent pool when it comes to referees. Baseball umps found that out when they were replaced with umps who were just as talented if not more talented than the existing ones. NBA refs will suffer the same fate if they take their position for granted. Last edited by Mizzou B-ball fan : 09-21-2009 at 08:12 AM. |
|
09-21-2009, 08:44 AM | #41 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Stuck in Yinzerville, PA
|
Ok as most of you know I might be biased in this argument. But I'll ask you one question:
Whether it be college or pros...would you want an official that only makes as little as some of you suggested, officiating a game you are coaching where your livelihood is on the line? I know I only do D3 football right now, but we meet every Wednesday for 3 hours to watch film, go over rules, and debate philosophies. Plus I probably watch about 10 hrs of film a week (all for $200 a game). It is stressed that we HAVE to know the rules and make sure fouls are fouls because people's jobs are on the line. |
09-21-2009, 09:15 AM | #42 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
|
Quote:
Like MBBF said- there are 57 jobs in the world, but there are more than 57 qualified to do said job. So, it's kindof like any other job- there are more people than there are positions to fill. Those who get to the top kindof stay there due to seniority not due to merit, like players have to. SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out! Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!" Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!" |
|
09-21-2009, 09:21 AM | #43 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Stuck in Yinzerville, PA
|
Quote:
Don't forget politics...that plays a huge part. I guess that plays into your merit arguement. |
|
09-21-2009, 09:27 AM | #44 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
The refs are gambling here a little (I mean in the legal, negotiation sense), but to get to $250k/year or whatever they make now, they must have gambled and negotiated well in the past.
Seniority means something for an NBA ref - you don't want to just throw out new, cheaper guys all the time, its a recipe for fixed games gallore. There's a lot of value in having senior guys with long track records you can evaluate, and who have built up a comfortable living. That's a pretty small investment for the NBA. Do they "deserve" $250k - of course not - but they got it, good for them. If you're jelous, go try to be an NBA referee. Last edited by molson : 09-21-2009 at 09:27 AM. |
09-21-2009, 10:00 AM | #45 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
It does. I agree. I should state my knowledge of the baseball situation. I have a close friend who worked the minor leagues for 11 years. When the umpire situation hit the fan, he got his big chance along with many other younger umpires who were being held back by the senority system in place. He's been in the league every since and has a very good track record. He said that most people in baseball (coaches, players, owners) are much happier with the new system in place now. They feel like they get a much better game out of the umps when they get promoted based on merit rather than the old senority system that used to dominate baseball. |
|
09-21-2009, 10:21 AM | #46 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
|
Sounds like every young teacher I know in New Jersey.
Except there's is still broken. |
09-21-2009, 10:47 AM | #47 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
I still remember the back page headline from the NY Post 10 years ago when the MLB umps walked out:
"Go Ahead And Walk, You Porky Chumps" I miss the Post. |
09-21-2009, 11:24 AM | #48 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
|
Quote:
The bolded part is really all I'm saying. I find it an affront to people, but as you say, they got it. And just to be clear its not a jealousy issue. I'd love to make 250k a year, as any of us surely would, but I want to make it doing something really valuable. I don't have the skill set to DO that, so I live with making what I can at what I can do. Anyway, I'll leave it be now. I've said my piece. |
|
09-21-2009, 06:31 PM | #49 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hartford
|
Quote:
I'm just saying why they make a lot of money. I understand they can be replaced. Whoever gets the job is going to make a lot, be it these clowns, or other jackasses. |
|
09-21-2009, 06:37 PM | #50 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hartford
|
Quote:
So you'd turn down a raise to 300k doing what you do because it isn't something 'really valuable'? If the money people make is an affront why does anyone go to a movie, or watch any game, or go to a casino, or read a bestseller? Why do I have to hear constantly about asshat Jerry Jones and his stadium? Isn't that stadium an affront to people? You get paid what the market bears. These clowns may cost themselves their jobs but 250k isn't exactly a king's ransom. I probably wouldn't agree to go out on the road for more then half the year for that. I work with dozens of people who do way less then an NBA referee and make way more without spending half their year in Memphis or Oklahoma City. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|