07-08-2009, 09:42 PM | #301 | |
Stadium Announcer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Burke, VA
|
Quote:
I don't think either one of us is going to "win" the argument, but I am enjoying knocking down the examples you provide. I also never said it's ludicrous for ideals to drive the government, just that I wouldn't have a problem with most of the programs that you mentioned going away or undergoing enormous reforms.
__________________
I don't want the world. I just want your half. |
|
07-08-2009, 09:57 PM | #302 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PDX
|
Quote:
Well, when we're talking about how realistic the ideals behind those programs have to be, I think we're splitting hairs, more than anything else. I don't want to argue too much, because I agree with you that the ideals of some of those programs are twisted, and I agree with you that eliminating poverty entirely is a pipe dream, but I think it's unfair to say that the ideals behind the minimum wage program aren't somehow aimed at eliminating as much as possible. Whether that is a 'healthy' ideal for the government, in general, or in particular, I don't think I'm really equipped to say...but it seems like it certainly could be worse. |
|
07-08-2009, 09:59 PM | #303 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hartford
|
Quote:
Jesus I wouldn't even want to make that a month, nevermind a year. |
|
07-08-2009, 10:00 PM | #304 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PDX
|
|
07-08-2009, 10:13 PM | #305 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tennessee
|
|
07-08-2009, 11:17 PM | #306 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
There is a huge gap in rich and poor, but I also think that huge gap is often justified. Spend an evening with a head of a multi-national company and then spend one with a guy who can only get minimum wage jobs. Those people are night and day apart. It's not like all these rich people just happened to catch a lucky break one day that set them apart. It's completely different lifestyles, motivations, and actions they have taken. That isn't to say that there aren't issues in society. I do think we have a problem with heads of companies extorting money. There should be rules in place to stop someone from getting hundreds of millions in compensation when their public company is losing billions. |
|
07-08-2009, 11:20 PM | #307 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
Tax dollars may not go directly into it, but it is still a social program. You pay for it with higher prices as a consumer and lower wages and less benefits if you are skilled. When you force a company to overpay an unskilled worker, the cost needs to be made up somewhere else. |
|
07-08-2009, 11:30 PM | #308 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Georgia
|
Quote:
As I noted several times in this thread, this cost you keep talking about didn't seem to be such a burden in the mid-90s when minimum wage was raised, unemployment went down and the economy was booming. And you also ignore the potential benefit to said companies: more money being spent on their products.
__________________
Top 10 Songs of the Year 1955-Present (1976 Added) Franchise Portfolio Draft Winner Fictional Character Draft Winner Television Family Draft Winner Build Your Own Hollywood Studio Draft Winner |
|
07-08-2009, 11:30 PM | #309 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bath, ME
|
Quote:
My point is about the people in the corporoate sector who have helped run our markets and corporations into the ground. I see the rich being painted with some "hero" brush for keeping our economy thriving. Just as many of them are doing a piss poor job and making things harder for the rest of us. Most of those are making filthy amounts of money for doing a piss poor job. I am not advocating that CEOs should make as much as a cashier. I am suggesting that there is more at play in modern America than simple "relative scarcity". There's a reason why the rich are getting richer and others are not. And no, it is not envy. I have no interest in being rich. I'm not poor and I make enough and figure I can find a way to continue doing so. If someone puts all their effort into making their way up the ladder and making money, I'm all for it. Not all of us want to. But I am against a system which is rigged to help get those people more and more money at the expense of a worker's pension account or workplace safety or healthcare. |
|
07-08-2009, 11:35 PM | #310 | ||
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Georgia
|
Quote:
There's a big difference between living in poverty and living nicely. And there's still a concept in bettering yourself. What's the point of anyone showing up to work if they could live a better life through government assistance? We're going to be paying for it either way. Quote:
Not sure where this came from. I don't think anyone is arguing that all poor people should be made rich. This isn't Trading Places.
__________________
Top 10 Songs of the Year 1955-Present (1976 Added) Franchise Portfolio Draft Winner Fictional Character Draft Winner Television Family Draft Winner Build Your Own Hollywood Studio Draft Winner |
||
07-08-2009, 11:47 PM | #311 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
We also had massive welfare reform in the 90's that could have accounted for that as well. The Earned Income Credit forced more people into working. Whlie the Federal Minimum Wage was raised, many states already had higher minimum wages in effect. And the economy was booming because it was a massive bubble that eventually burst. I would say that cheap oil prices, the strong dollar, and some funky accounting helped our economy boom much more than raising the minimum wage. Nonetheless, the point is what is fair to people? Do we want a society where our unskilled workers are overpaid? Is there not some moral dilemnia in that? |
|
07-08-2009, 11:51 PM | #312 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
You aren't arguing that poor people should be made rich, but you are arguing that unskilled workers should be overpaid. And where is that motivation to better yourself if the government is going to make sure you're taken care of either way? |
|
07-08-2009, 11:51 PM | #313 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
|
Quote:
Are we near that point where we consider "unskilled" workers overpaid? SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out! Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!" Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!" |
|
07-08-2009, 11:59 PM | #314 |
General Manager
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
|
07-09-2009, 07:05 AM | #315 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tennessee
|
Quote:
It depends on how you define that. Pretty much every other country in the world's unskilled workers are obtaining a lower average wage. That probably means that ours are over paid and is pretty much why a lot of the unskilled jobs are going away in our markets. Of course that is a real world answer and does not factor in what we want versus what is realistic. The funny thing about the minimum wage is, it was put in place originally around the turn of the 20th century to cause minimum wage workers to lose jobs. I believe, the first federal minimum wage only applied to women, children and minorities. The theory behind it by the power structure at the time was that these were undesirable workers and by forcing the cost of their services up, employers would hire cheaper labor i.e. not the undesirable workers. I don't think it really ever shifted into a virtual social program until FDR. |
|
07-09-2009, 07:11 AM | #316 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
But there are lots of ways that cost can be overcome that don't include taking money from the middle class. Profits could be cut. Efficiency could be increased. Sales could be increased. New tax benefits could be found. The higher wage could even motivate the employee to work harder thereby paying for themselves in added efficiency. Why do you assume that any help to the poor means you're getting the shaft?
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
07-09-2009, 09:09 AM | #317 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
Not the unkilled workers. Anyone can do those jobs. And the evolution of wealth distribution is a lot more complicated than just the "rich are evil and screw everyone" theme you're trying to portray. The Inequality Myth - WSJ.com I don't quite understand the point that the rich "need" the poor....I mean, if all the poor in the US died tomorrow for some reason, there's a lot of collateral issues there beyond how the standard of living of the rich is impacted. But no matter the situation, in a capitalist economy, the rich tend to the be the more successfull, intelligent, driven people, and they'll tend to succeed (and their children). I know you're focussed on the random bad CEO that makes too much, but that's a small, small cross-section of the "rich" (and most of those CEOs, if you read any of their bios, rose their way through the ranks from limited means, and then ran into a buzzsaw of a bad economic situation). Last edited by molson : 07-09-2009 at 09:18 AM. |
|
07-09-2009, 09:15 AM | #318 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
The best thing about the Obama years will be that we can get answers to all these hypotheticals, this idea that it's simple to help the poor without harming the middle class, etc. It's all been in hypotheticals that couldn't be proven wrong, which has given this idealistic view a lot of bravado. But now, it's time to put up or shut up. If Obama and a Democratic Congress don't pull off these ideals, then they couldn't be accomplished without a greater harm. |
|
07-09-2009, 09:28 AM | #319 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Georgia
|
No one said it's simple. You're the ones saying it's simple, that minimum wage increase automatically harms the economy, and dismiss any evidence to the contrary.
And I don't think anyone in this thread is arguing that there shouldn't be a minimum wage, so it sounds like everyone wants unskilled workers to be "overpaid", just that we disagree on the amount. Hell, I'd probably accept the $7.25 if it was set to be adjusted for inflation, but I know the value of that wage is going to significantly decrease over time. Before the minimum wage was increased from $5.15 in 2006, the inflation value of that wage was at the lowest in 54 years. (http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0774473.html)
__________________
Top 10 Songs of the Year 1955-Present (1976 Added) Franchise Portfolio Draft Winner Fictional Character Draft Winner Television Family Draft Winner Build Your Own Hollywood Studio Draft Winner |
07-09-2009, 09:29 AM | #320 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
The rich can't make everything themselves nor can they provide a large enough demand for goods. There needs to be a balance for a capitalist economy to function well.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
07-09-2009, 09:30 AM | #321 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
That was a good time to raise minimum wage, in a booming economy (or if slightly before the booming economy, a time that had very low unemployment). But I'm completely illogical to contend that raising the cost of labor increases the demand for the labor. The unemployment rate would have been even lower without the increases, but since the rate was acceptable and declining no matter what happened, it was a good time to do it. Minimum wage has pretty much kept up with inflation, which is more than you can say for middle and lower middle class salaries over much of the same time period. Why should the unskilled, who contribute the least, gain on the lower middle class and middle class? Last edited by molson : 07-09-2009 at 09:32 AM. |
|
07-09-2009, 09:41 AM | #322 | ||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
It may be illogical, but in some circumstances it may be true. Quote:
http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/...onomic_de.html
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers Last edited by JPhillips : 07-09-2009 at 09:41 AM. |
||
07-09-2009, 09:47 AM | #323 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
That's intersting, obviously there's a happy middle ground that's optimal....If you increase minimum wage too high, too quickly, you'll have massive unemployment and hurt businesses and the middle class, and if minimum wage drags too low, you create little incentive to take those jobs for some people, the poor's labor is exploited, ect. But small, strategic increases can definitely be beneficial to the economy as a whole. I think it's basically at the right level, and should be adjusted for inflation. It times of high unemployment though, I think any increases are damaging. I GUESS others think it needs to increase more rapidly, to bring the poor to a level closer to the lower middle class and middle class. Last edited by molson : 07-09-2009 at 09:48 AM. |
|
07-09-2009, 09:50 AM | #324 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Georgia
|
Quote:
Except I show that it hasn't kept up with inflation, considering it went a full decade without being increased, and when the evil socialist Dems finally forced an increase in 2006, it was at the lowest level in over a half century. And your point on middle and lower middle class salaries doesn't match my experience. The entry level salaries at my current job almost match what I'm getting now after 5 years of annual wage increases.
__________________
Top 10 Songs of the Year 1955-Present (1976 Added) Franchise Portfolio Draft Winner Fictional Character Draft Winner Television Family Draft Winner Build Your Own Hollywood Studio Draft Winner |
|
07-09-2009, 09:54 AM | #325 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
And as we moved away from a manufacturing based economy, so was the value of those workers.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
|
07-09-2009, 09:58 AM | #326 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
Middle class salaries (relative to inflation) have also been stagnant, at best, over that decade. That's a tough thing to measure, but it's just consistent with what I've read over the years. I haven't seen numbers to contradict that. Last edited by molson : 07-09-2009 at 09:58 AM. |
|
07-09-2009, 10:06 AM | #327 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Georgia
|
And it's not just some evil socialist sympathy plan to help the poor out. I think the economy functions better when people at the bottom have more money, as they have more money to put into the economy. If income disparities between the top and bottom continue to grow, I think it not only hurts the people at the bottom, but the people at the top will wonder where did all of their customers go.
__________________
Top 10 Songs of the Year 1955-Present (1976 Added) Franchise Portfolio Draft Winner Fictional Character Draft Winner Television Family Draft Winner Build Your Own Hollywood Studio Draft Winner |
07-09-2009, 11:03 AM | #328 |
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Ancedotes and too much Thomas Sowell in this thread.
__________________
Current Dynasty:The Zenith of Professional Basketball Careers (FBPB/FBCB) FBCB / FPB3 Mods |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|