12-14-2007, 11:32 AM | #301 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
Quote:
You are missing the point. This is ONLY a PR problem. That's all it's ever been. Do I care about the cheaters ruining the games? Sure. But I think leagues can only do so much. There is no test for HGH. Players are going to cycle through. All you can do is catch the guys you can and put a good PR spin on it. The NFL got it. Baseball didn't. This isn't only about the union either. Selig could have made this an issue at multiple points over the years. The PR on this spins in the leagues favor. The players union would have been shredded in the court of public opinion and if they hadn't done anything and this came out, the players would be getting shredded right now. It doesn't matter whcih league has more users. It matters what the league does to try to control it. If a guy comes out in ten years and says "I beat the NFL's system" he's going to be looked at as a cheater and a scumbag. The NFL won't be blamed because they'll say "look at all the things we tried to do, we can't be everywhere all the time" I have no sympathy for the MLB in this one. Owners, players, anyone. |
|
12-14-2007, 11:33 AM | #302 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Umm ... yeah, he's in there. Quote:
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
|
12-14-2007, 11:34 AM | #303 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Astoria, NY, USA
|
i wish someone would ask Clemens' attorney:
"if McNamee's (Clemens' trainer) allegations are false, are you going to bring a libel or defamation of character suit against him? because, you know, that's what people do when lies are said." i knew Clemens was juicing, and i knew it 2 seasons ago. i knew there was a reason why he would "retire" then come back during the middle of the season. it was so he could juice during the offseason then give his body time to eradicate any trace of it. Clemens is more of a moron than Canseco or Bonds - when he initially retired from the Yankees had he just stayed retired he would likely have flown under the radar. but no, he had to keep on coming back. got too greedy and that was his undoing. i'll be happy if he is prevented from going to the HoF. moreso him than Bonds. |
12-14-2007, 11:42 AM | #304 | |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Quote:
If Clemens and Bonds should be kept out of the hall of fame, everyone who played a game at any point between 1995 and now should be ineligible. Everyone who played during the 60s and 70s should be ineligible (amphetimines). Everyone was doing them. There was no real competitive advantage. |
|
12-14-2007, 11:53 AM | #305 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Astoria, NY, USA
|
Quote:
well, obviously there was, or else everyone would have hit 40+ HRs and every pitcher would have struck out 300+ batters. and if doing roids extends the amount of time you have in the league, letting you remain in baseball for years after when most others have faded and allowing you to break records because of your artificial longevity - there's a competitive advantage. amphetimines aren't performance enhancers, in the sense that if you can hit 20 HR's with out them you're gonna hit 40 HR's with them. they helped you bounce back for the next game and helped keep your energy levels up through the course of a long season. but they didn't make power pitchers out of weak arms and they didn't turn singles hitters into Willie Mays. |
|
12-14-2007, 11:56 AM | #306 | |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Quote:
When you've got drugs making the pitchesr AND batters better, the stats should stat about the same. It was on BOTH sides. |
|
12-14-2007, 11:59 AM | #307 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
|
Quote:
Baseball attempted to implement steroid testing as far back as '84, the players were for it then, but the Union itself shot it down. You don't seem to understand exactly how powerful the MLBPA was in the '80s and '90s. Baseball didn't have revenue sharing so the small market clubs would have been destroyed by an extended work stopage and the Union knew it. Thats why the union fought absolutely everything and every time there was any time of work stoppage the owners went crawling back to the players. Selig also doesn't have the power that commissioners in other sports have since he isn't a real commissioner. He represents the weakest group of owners in all of sports. They have a history of backing down from the player's union since it was formed. Steroids didn't become an issue with baseball fans until Bonds hit 73 and even then most fans were in awe of Bonds' season as it happened. Before that baseball had McGwire taking andro during a the homerun chase and the public didn't care. No one would have shredded the union for being against steroid testing then. Tony LaRussa and a lot of Cardinal fans actually ripped the guy that wrote the story about McGwire having Andro in his locker because "he was being nosy". A lot of the stuff the player's union did is in the Mitchell report and the fans don't care. All they are about is names and its a shame. There's some great info in the report. There's details about baseball's attempts to implement steroid testing at multiple times and fighting with the union over it. There's quotes from Donald Fehr saying baseball doesn't need strict drug testing like the Olympics because Olympic athletes don't depend on their sport for their livelihood the way baseball players do. Hell, there's details about Gene Orza tipping off players to tests. Also, the point of my original post was that it is mostly a PR problem. The NFL probably has more users than baseball and always has. They just actually PR'd their steroid problem better than MLB. However, its not like MLB completely turned their back on steroids and that is what I was also pointing out. Their attempts to to implement testing go back further than the NFL and switch Union reps between the two sports and I guarantee the NFL is sitting in MLB's shoes right now. |
|
12-14-2007, 12:28 PM | #308 | |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
I keep hearing this statement, or the same essence:
Quote:
Isn't the truth of the matter that there is no urine test for HGH, and since the MLB program calls only for urine testing, they shrug their shoulders and say that it's not something that they can test for. But isn't it also true that there *is* in fact a blood test for HGH? I don't know about its reliability or ability to discern original versus synthetic or imported HGH, but I'm pretty sure that some sort of test does exist. Whether it is approved for use by a certain labor union or collectively bargained contract is another question. |
|
12-14-2007, 12:30 PM | #309 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2001
|
literally there is a test for HGH but I don't think it's realistic to blood test players.
I think the spirit is there in no feasible test for HGH.
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales |
12-14-2007, 12:30 PM | #310 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Mexico
|
There is a blood test for hgh, and from what I'm told it is as reliable as any other steroid test.
|
12-14-2007, 12:30 PM | #311 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
|
Quote:
There is a blood test for HGH and Selig took it to the player's union to discuss and Fehr has attempted to discredit the test as inaccurate and also stated that he "refuses to allow his players to become pin cushions" while also adding that some players are deathly afraid of needles. |
|
12-14-2007, 12:31 PM | #312 |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The DMV
|
I don't think you could pin this entirely on the player's union. The ownership did not particularly care about this issue either. Most of the drug testing proposals you mentioned were simply throwaway positions, meant primarily to enhance the ownership's overall bargaining position (i.e. drug testing was a meaningless chip that the owners could give up, so that they could keep their "chips" on issues that truly mattered to the owners).
Reportedly, Mitchell faced a lot of resistance from several MLB front offices during his investigation. That seems pretty telling to me--the ownership shouldn't exactly be sainted here. |
12-14-2007, 12:31 PM | #313 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Mexico
|
|
12-14-2007, 12:40 PM | #314 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Backwoods, SC
|
ok my knowledge of HGH is nowhere near as comprehensive as several other common roids or IGF, but it is my understanding that HGH is detectable for only 5-7 days after a cycle is stopped (cycles range from 5 days to 10 weeks) and it is a "culture" test that requires 21 days to incubate (I have no idea why, just what I have beeen told by testers)
Sooooo... Since all leagues require a retest in the event of a positive... BTW Reggie Jackson WAS CAUGHT AND ARRESTED for possession of steroids. Lyle Alzado killed himself with his abuse in the late 70s (I know different sport) with HGH. lets not pretend like steroids were invented in 94. I wouldnt be too shocked to learn that Aaron, Mantle, Ryan or any other generation of stars was using anabolics |
12-14-2007, 12:48 PM | #315 | ||
Favored Bitch #2
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Here
|
My bad, I missed that part then....
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
12-14-2007, 12:50 PM | #316 | |||
Favored Bitch #2
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Here
|
Quote:
LOL. That is hilarious. Guys like Carl Pavano could pitch one great game and be headed to the HOF. Of course, he probably took 'roids too......
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
12-14-2007, 12:52 PM | #317 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2001
|
Ricky Vaughn had to be on roids to throw that hard.
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales |
12-14-2007, 12:53 PM | #318 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
When you get into "my word against yours", as you almost do in steroid discussions, it's always important to consider the source. What's their credibility? What do they have to gain? What do they have to lose?
The guy who named Clemens and Pettite isn't exactly a saint, so that hurts. But he was also speaking to Mitchell under an agreement with federal law enforcement officials. He had immunity if he told the truth, but could go to jail if he said anything that wasn't true. So on the one hand, you have a guy who faced jail time if he lied, but apparently he just went ahead and made up a detailed story about Clemens using steroid because.... well, we don't know why he would do that, maybe just because he's a jerk. On the other hand you have Clemens, who stands to lose his reputation, millions of dollars and potentially a spot in the Hall of Fame, saying he didn't do it. Hmm....
__________________
Down Goes Brown: Toronto Maple Leafs Humor and Analysis |
12-14-2007, 12:53 PM | #319 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
|
Quote:
I agree, what I'm getting at is Selig actually has attempted to get steroid testing in on his own at multiple times and implemented it in the minors without public pressure or a congressional hearing. What it comes down to is the individual owner's inability to plan ahead and the player's union seeing everything the owner's present during collective bargaining as an attempt to steal power away from them. The NFL handled things better because they can actually work with their union. Give baseball that same union and they would have probably had testing in after the 1984 talks, 1994 at the latest. Give the NFL the MLBPA to work with and the NFL would be dealing with baseball's issues right now. Did the owners do everything they could? No. Would they be in this situation if they weren't dealing with Gene Orza and Donald Fehr? Hell no. |
|
12-14-2007, 01:01 PM | #320 | ||
Favored Bitch #2
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Here
|
Ultimately, this situation is a result of what mirrors society as a whole: money. The bottom line is what matters now, has always mattered in the past, and will always matter in the future. The owners knew what was going on but didn't care because these players were making money for their team. The players obviously did these things to make more money with bloated stats. The commissioner knew what was going on, but once again, money talks and you-know-what walks. The players union of course swept this under the rug and "encouraged" Selig to do the same because of: you guessed it, money $$$$$$. Everyone was getting paid, so nobody cared about the ramifications. Well, now the proverbial %#@* is hitting the fan, and they all look like the liars, cheaters, and moneygrubbers that we always knew they were.
I feel kinda bad for the 5-10% of players that actually did nothing wrong through all of this.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by RomaGoth : 12-14-2007 at 01:02 PM. |
||
12-14-2007, 01:04 PM | #321 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
That said, Randy Johnson's career doesn't strike me as one that necessarily screams "juicer". Yes, he had tremendous performances into his late 30's and into his early 40's. But he didn't magically start throwing the ball harder in the early '90's - the abilities that propelled him to greatness were always present: the high 90's fastball, the wicked slider, a deceptive delivery and his height and length that meant his 97 MPH fastball arrived at the plate quicker than anyone else's due to it having a shorter path getting there. What transformed Johnson's career in 1993 was a long talk with Nolan Ryan and a changed approach on the mound - he dramatically cut his walk rate and his strikeout rate jumped, because he started trusting his stuff more, throwing more strikes and taking a more intelligent approach in attacking hitters. That trend started in '93, and by '95 or so he'd refined his approach to near perfection, and his subsequent seasons were basically repeats of that season. The aberrations from that point were due to injury ('96, '03) and a combination of bad luck and his head being messed-up over contract issues ('98). Does that mean that he didn't at some point in there also start juicing to counteract the effects of aging, or to recover from injury or fatigue quicker? Not at all. But unlike someone like Joel Pineiro (who is widely considered locally to have been a juicer) who gained a significant bump in velocity, Johnson always had the fastball, and I don't recall ever hearing that his velocity jumped in his later years - in fact it clearly started to fade a bit, and he relied more and more on his slider and developed a forkball/changeup to add to his repertoire. I think you can look at his career progression and find a plausible explanation that doesn't include performance-enhancers. |
|
12-14-2007, 01:07 PM | #322 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
I think this is true, but was it so unreasonable? What's more important to the game, fixing the steroid issue or trying to restore competitive balance (granted, they didn't really accomplish either). What if the owners said, "players, we'll give you everything you want, but we want a legitimate steroids program". Maybe a deal gets done. But would you want to be a fan of that MLB? The early hard-line in the last strike was the oppositte - "players, help us fix the payroll disparity and we'll give you most of what you want otherwise". Eventually, of course, the owners caved. Last edited by molson : 12-14-2007 at 01:09 PM. |
|
12-14-2007, 01:09 PM | #323 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
|
Yeah, although there has to be a belief of "anyone can be on steroids, we just don't know," Randy Johnson is probably one of the few "stars" that never popped into my mind. I think he's clean.
|
12-14-2007, 01:40 PM | #324 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The DMV
|
Quote:
I'm not disagreeing with you here. My point was that the owners' motivations on the steroid issue should be interpreted as a short-term tactic in the context of bargaining and negotiation, rather than any idealistic desire to "clean up the game" long-term or whatever. |
|
12-14-2007, 01:54 PM | #325 | ||
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Quote:
I agree. Let's be realistic here. Manny would have injected the oral treatments, drank the injected treatments, put "The Cream" on his glove and "The Clear" on his shoes and wonder why the hell nothing was happening. Quote:
Why? Plenty of regular people get regular blood tests. Diabetics, for one. Anyone on statin therapy drugs, for another. |
||
12-14-2007, 01:56 PM | #326 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
No need for the , I had to go back & doublecheck to make sure myself. There were so many names flying around yesterday between the "leaked" list that wasn't accurate & the actual list at the end of the day, it was hard for a lot of people, including me to keep up with who was mentioned when. The only reason I was pretty sure about Brown was because I was watching for his name in the report because of his Georgia Tech background.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
12-14-2007, 01:56 PM | #327 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2001
|
Quote:
it's realistic for individuals yes. for the whole of major league baseball this seems a bit unrealistic. you can yes though.
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales |
|
12-14-2007, 01:56 PM | #328 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
|
For those that haven't seen it yet, Shysterball is in the midst of analyzing and commenting on the Mitchell report. Some good stuff in there and definitely worth the read:
Shysterball fisks the Mitchell report |
12-14-2007, 01:59 PM | #329 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
|
12-14-2007, 02:10 PM | #330 | |||
Favored Bitch #2
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Here
|
Quote:
OMG Funny Stuff that is. From what I have seen of him (which is as little as possible since I loathe the Dead Sox), he 1) does not seem the cheating type because of his apparent "I don't care if we win or lose, there is always next year" attitude; and 2) his numbers have been pretty steady throughout his career. I mean, c'mon - his fielding is still horrible, so wouldn't 'roids and/or HGH help to alleviate that a little?
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
12-14-2007, 02:11 PM | #331 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2001
|
kind of and in the fact that it's something unlikely to be collectively bargained
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales |
12-14-2007, 02:41 PM | #332 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Well, I disagree with you there. I don't think it would be all that difficult, logistically, especially with the amount of money MLB has at its disposal. Quote:
Now that I'll agree with. |
|
12-14-2007, 04:36 PM | #333 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
Sucks about Clemens, because he was one of my favorite pitchers to watch play, but Ankiel hurts worse.... I really rooted for his comeback
__________________
2006 Golden Scribe Nominee 2006 Golden Scribe Winner Best Non-Sport Dynasty: May Our Reign Be Green and Golden (CK Dynasty) Rookie Writer of the Year Dynasty of the Year: May Our Reign Be Green and Golden (CK Dynasty) |
12-14-2007, 04:46 PM | #334 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Surfside Beach,SC USA
|
Don't have links for you but just saw on ESPN that David Justice has denied the accusations in the Mitchell Report-only saw the tail end of the report-sounds like he asked about it and chickened out when he heard it involved needles.
FP Santangelo has come forward to say that he did indeed use HGH over a two year period, but denies using anything else. |
12-14-2007, 06:31 PM | #335 | ||
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Surfside Beach,SC USA
|
Quote:
Quote:
Can correct myself concerning Justice. Was approached by Clemens trainer (when Justice was a Yankee?) who told him about steroids or HGH that would help him recover from an injury. Justice claims he had never heard of the stuff until that trainer told him about it. The trainer put some in his locker for him to take a look at Justice said, but when he saw it involved needles he wanted nothing to do with it. Says if it was a pill he probably would have taken it though. Also said to look at his stats the year after this conversation with the trainer happened-they weren't good so he couldn't have been on steroids. |
||
12-14-2007, 06:56 PM | #336 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Land O Lakes FL
|
Quote:
Because steroids is a guarantee to improve his stats, right?
__________________
"The blind soldier fought for me in this war. The least I can do now is fight for him. I have eyes. He hasn’t. I have a voice on the radio, he hasn’t. I was born a white man. And until a colored man is a full citizen, like me, I haven’t the leisure to enjoy the freedom that colored man risked his life to maintain for me. I don’t own what I have until he owns an equal share of it. Until somebody beats me and blinds me, I am in his debt."- Orson Welles August 11, 1946 |
|
12-14-2007, 08:01 PM | #337 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
|
So if everyone had to pick a year as the last "clean" year, what would it be? Let's say "clean" is stuff being used by less than 20% of the players or what would amount to about 5 players per team.
|
12-14-2007, 08:05 PM | #338 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Surfside Beach,SC USA
|
|
12-14-2007, 08:30 PM | #339 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
|
12-14-2007, 08:35 PM | #340 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Davis, CA
|
Quote:
I think the perception that the NFL has made more of an effort to control it is probably a bunch of false advertising on its part more than anything else. I have few doubts that the NFL is just as guilty, if not more so, of looking the other way, all the while spouting the nonsense that it took care of the problem in 1987. |
|
12-14-2007, 08:57 PM | #341 |
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
What's worse. Baseball in the steroid era or major league baseball pre-1947?
__________________
Current Dynasty:The Zenith of Professional Basketball Careers (FBPB/FBCB) FBCB / FPB3 Mods |
12-14-2007, 09:17 PM | #342 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Land O Lakes FL
|
HOF voters speak on Clemens
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3155168
Quote:
__________________
"The blind soldier fought for me in this war. The least I can do now is fight for him. I have eyes. He hasn’t. I have a voice on the radio, he hasn’t. I was born a white man. And until a colored man is a full citizen, like me, I haven’t the leisure to enjoy the freedom that colored man risked his life to maintain for me. I don’t own what I have until he owns an equal share of it. Until somebody beats me and blinds me, I am in his debt."- Orson Welles August 11, 1946 |
|
12-14-2007, 09:23 PM | #343 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TX
|
Quote:
i predict 2040. when players start getting genetically enhanced without the need for roids or hgh |
|
12-14-2007, 09:59 PM | #344 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
|
Quote:
It's not like there aren't legal supplements. There are lots of ways to bulk up that aren't against the rules so just because a player gets bigger doesn't mean they were 'roiding up. If they put it on all at once, over a winter, that looks quite insinuating. But, for instance, Frank Thomas was always big. It's not like he came into the league as a beanpole. SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out! Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!" Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!" |
|
12-14-2007, 10:18 PM | #345 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
|
Quote:
In the end, I just can't put nearly as much on the owners as on the players and to suggest it seems ludicrious to me. One party actively participated in the crime while the other stood by and tacitly watched it. It's a completely different level of participation and should be judged as such. Did the owners benefit from it? Yes. Did they actively encourage it? No. Were they the ones doing it? No. So all this nonsense about parties being *equally* to blame is academically lazy, at best. SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out! Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!" Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!" |
|
12-14-2007, 10:35 PM | #346 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Land O Lakes FL
|
Quote:
How sure are you that the owners did not actively encourage it?
__________________
"The blind soldier fought for me in this war. The least I can do now is fight for him. I have eyes. He hasn’t. I have a voice on the radio, he hasn’t. I was born a white man. And until a colored man is a full citizen, like me, I haven’t the leisure to enjoy the freedom that colored man risked his life to maintain for me. I don’t own what I have until he owns an equal share of it. Until somebody beats me and blinds me, I am in his debt."- Orson Welles August 11, 1946 |
|
12-14-2007, 10:44 PM | #347 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
|
Quote:
what worse. baseball now or baseball to the groin |
|
12-14-2007, 10:56 PM | #348 | |||
Favored Bitch #2
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Here
|
Quote:
How many people do you know or have you met that have actually gotten bigger as they get older? The only ones I know that fit that description took something....and well, it wasn't legal.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
12-14-2007, 10:59 PM | #349 | |||
Favored Bitch #2
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Here
|
Quote:
To not lay equal blame on both the owners and the players is just naive. Why would the owners NOT encourage it? They had everything to gain by doing so, and nothing to lose. The players took all the risk and got the reward, the owners took no risk by encouraging yet still got the reward as well. It was a win-win situation for the owners. Take a look at some of the notes in the Mitchell report taken by the Dodgers. The proof is in the pudding.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
12-14-2007, 11:03 PM | #350 | |
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Quote:
I know quite a few folks who have never taken anything illegal, who use legal supplements and work out, who have gotten bigger as they've gotten older. I don't know where this mythology of people not getting bigger as they age -- and we're not talking 40 to 50 or 60, but 20s into their 30s...it's not that unprecedented or even that unusual. Not saying pro athletes fit this mold, but...if I've seen it from folks who don't have close to the financial wherewithal of pro athletes, I'm sure it's doable among those who have the money to get world class everything. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|