Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-22-2003, 09:00 AM   #201
wade moore
lolzcat
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: williamsburg, va
I guess starting Cascini was an OK decision, eh? What are the end of season stats on those two and the two RBs?
__________________
Text Sports Network - Bringing you statistical information for several FOF MP leagues in one convenient site

Quote:
Originally Posted by Subby
Maybe I am just getting old though, but I am learning to not let perfect be the enemy of the very good...
wade moore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 09:01 AM   #202
oykib
College Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Oops... about Coghill. I guess you can call me Oykib from Sorry Falls.

BTW, how the hell did Sanderson get Player of the Game in both of your games versus Pensacola. He was awful in the first one and I'm generous in saying he was mediocre in the second. And both games his team got blown out! WTF!
oykib is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 09:06 AM   #203
primelord
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
A pretty amazing regular season overall. Not only did we finish the season 16-0, but Hawk Mountain finished the season 16-0 also.

We scored 467 points which was #1 in the league. And we only gave up 185 points which is also #1 in the league.

Code:
Category Value Rank Year 1997 --- Record 16-0 --- Winning Pct. 1.000 --- Little_Rock Team Rank Rushes 535 2 Rush_Yards 2294 1 Yards_Per_Carry 4.28 5 Pass_Attempts 462 30 Completions 323 18 Passing_Yards 3791 12 Yards_Per_Att 8.20 1 3rd_Down 45.8 4 Points_PG 29.1 1 Turnovers 15 4(T) Turnover_Marg +9 6(T) Opponents Team Rank Rushes 350 1 Rushing_yards 1327 1 Yards_Per_Car 3.79 6 Pass_Attempts 562 28 Completions 288 2 Passing_Yards 3441 10 Yards_Per_Att 6.12 3 3rd_Down 33.6 2(T) Points_PG 11.5 1 Turnovers 24 15(T)
__________________
.
primelord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 09:18 AM   #204
primelord
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
QB Numbers:

Code:
Name GP GS Att Cmp Pct Yards Avg TD Int Rate Coghill 9 9 261 187 71.6 2275 8.71 22 1 124.5 Cascini 9 7 200 136 68.0 1516 7.58 14 6 101.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 18 16 461 323 70.1 3791 8.22 36 7 114.4

RB Numbers:

Code:
Name GP GS Att Yards Avg Lg TD Targ Ctch Yards TD Lucas 16 16 297 1308 4.4 44 9 68 51 382 4 Biggs 16 0 183 805 4.3 40 4 29 24 158 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total 32 16 480 2113 4.4 -- 13 97 75 540 5
primelord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 09:24 AM   #205
Bee
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
Quote:
Originally posted by oykib
Oops... about Coghill. I guess you can call me Oykib from Sorry Falls.

BTW, how the hell did Sanderson get Player of the Game in both of your games versus Pensacola. He was awful in the first one and I'm generous in saying he was mediocre in the second. And both games his team got blown out! WTF!


The POTG has always seemed poorly implemented to me. I often disagree with the selection. It's not a critical part of the game, but perhaps Jim will address it at some point.
Bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 09:54 AM   #206
primelord
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Defensive Numbers

Code:
# Name Tckls Assts Sack PsBlks Hurr Rply Pply TkPct PrPct 23 Mercado 14 5 1 0 0 75 139 8.9 0.7 27 Reeg 19 0 1 0 0 20 97 16.2 1.0 36 Lincoln 60 20 1 1 2 293 529 9.7 0.8 42 Carlson 34 4 3 1 0 64 204 14.2 2.0 44 Nichols 20 1 0 0 0 25 51 27.6 0.0 45 Houston 49 14 1 0 1 301 536 7.5 0.4 48 Bridgeman 66 24 1 0 1 248 450 12.9 0.4 49 Maffett 67 13 3 0 1 311 555 9.2 0.7 51 Artis 48 14 3 2 6 251 360 10.1 3.1 54 Becker 13 2 1 0 0 56 102 9.5 1.0 59 John 74 12 2.5 0 2 252 442 12.4 1.0 65 Gray 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0.0 0.0 75 Castillo 27 18 3 1 4 225 242 9.6 3.3 76 Walton 15 7 9 4 7 102 222 6.8 9.0 77 Hitchcock 4 0 1.5 0 1 10 32 9.5 7.8 78 Finley 38 6 7.5 2 13 204 319 8.4 7.1 90 Wellman 100 46 1 0 1 293 466 19.2 0.4 92 Schenk 15 7 5.5 1 2 124 275 5.5 3.1 93 Brewer 22 7 7.5 7 12 163 410 5.1 6.5 94 Johnston 11 12 4.5 1 13 132 357 4.7 5.2 96 Howen 22 12 5 1 5 210 269 7.1 4.1 97 Ellis 5 5 0 1 1 82 122 4.9 1.6

Code:
# Name Caught Defensd Int Pplys +/- 23 Mercado 9 4 0 139 -5 27 Reeg 6 2 0 97 -4 36 Lincoln 28 10 4 529 -10 42 Carlson 12 4 1 204 -6 44 Nichols 3 3 0 51 0 45 Houston 31 18 2 536 -9 48 Bridgeman 32 10 8 450 -6 49 Maffett 43 17 4 555 -18 51 Artis 25 4 0 360 -21 54 Becker 10 1 0 102 -9 59 John 40 10 0 442 -30 65 Gray 0 0 0 3 0 75 Castillo 2 0 0 242 -2 76 Walton 1 1 0 222 0 77 Hitchcock 0 0 0 32 0 78 Finley 4 0 0 319 -4 90 Wellman 35 10 0 466 -25 92 Schenk 0 1 0 275 1 93 Brewer 3 0 0 410 -3 94 Johnston 0 0 0 357 0 96 Howen 2 0 0 269 -2 97 Ellis 2 0 0 122 -2
__________________
.
primelord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 10:00 AM   #207
wade moore
lolzcat
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: williamsburg, va
Wow... I didn't realize that Cog was having THAT stellar of a year.. 22:1 ?!?!?!?! does he qualify for career QB Rating numbers with his attempts? If so, that's what.. 4 years in a row that he has topped himself? He is absurd.. but then you look at Cascini.. and he was over 100.. wow...
__________________
Text Sports Network - Bringing you statistical information for several FOF MP leagues in one convenient site

Quote:
Originally Posted by Subby
Maybe I am just getting old though, but I am learning to not let perfect be the enemy of the very good...
wade moore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 10:00 AM   #208
primelord
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Manhattan (10-7) at Little Rock (16-0)(-9)

Code:
Box Score: Manhattan at Little Rock Little Rock, TX. Conference Semifinals, 1997 Attendance: 67,100 (69,500). Weather: 68 degrees, fair. 2Q: 08:56 MAN - Sherman Sampson 4 pass from Hunter Cushenbery. 2Q: 08:56 MAN - Ryan Wilke extra point. 2Q: 03:41 LTR - Cole Murray 32 field goal. 2Q: 00:00 LTR - Cole Murray 20 field goal. 4Q: 12:47 LTR - Cole Murray 24 field goal. 4Q: 03:59 LTR - Chad Colford 3 pass from Otis Coghill. 4Q: 03:59 LTR - Cole Murray extra point. 4Q: 01:19 LTR - Jamal Lucas 1 run. 4Q: 01:19 LTR - Cole Murray extra point. 4Q: 00:30 MAN - Sherman Sampson 53 pass from Hunter Cushenbery. 4Q: 00:30 MAN - Hunter Cushenbery pass to Nathan Downs for conversion Game MVP: LTR 5 Otis Coghill Manhattan 0 7 0 8 - 15 Little Rock 0 6 0 17 - 23 Team Statistics MAN LTR First Downs 12 23 Total Rushes 30 33 Rushing Yards 115 189 Yards Per Carry 3.8 5.7 Pass Attempts 25 30 Completions 11 20 Passing Yards 179 283 Yards Per Attempt 7.1 9.4 Sacked 2 4 Yards Lost 13 22 Interceptions 1 0 Fumbles/Lost 0/0 1/1 Total Plays 55 63 Total Yards 294 472 Yards Per Play 5.3 7.4 3rd Down Plays 7/15 5/12 Avg. YTG on 3rd 6.1 7.3 4th Down Plays 0/1 0/0 Penalties 4 5 Penalty Yards 35 29 Avg. Drive Start OWN 24 OWN 33 Time Of Possession 26:51 33:09 Manhattan Individual Statistics Rushing Att Yards Avg Long TD 31 Rachmaninoff 21 63 3.0 12 0 25 Armagost 4 37 9.2 21 0 17 Cushenbery 4 14 3.5 5 0 46 Nixon 1 1 1.0 1 0 Passing Att Comp Yards Yd/Att Long TD Int Sckd 17 Cushenbery 25 11 179 7.1 53 2 1 2 Receiving Catch Yards Avg YAC Long TD 1 Sampson 7 120 17.1 10 53 2 25 Armagost 1 4 4.0 5 4 0 31 Rachmaninoff 1 20 20.0 19 20 0 81 Burton 1 6 6.0 0 6 0 83 Paulk 1 29 29.0 14 29 0 Punt Returns Att Yards Avg TD 31 Rachmaninoff 2 9 4.5 0 Kick Returns Att Yards Avg TD 44 Edmond 2 53 26.5 0 46 Nixon 1 24 24.0 0 Punting Punts Yards Avg Long In20 3 Minnis 7 301 43.0 57 4 Kicking FG FGA Long PAT Att 9 Wilke 0 0 0 1 1 Defense Tackle Assist Sack Int IntYds IntTD 93 Jacobs 9 2 0.0 0 0 0 37 Bronson 7 0 0.0 0 0 0 54 Brooks 6 1 1.0 0 0 0 76 Duffy 6 3 0.0 0 0 0 41 Yardley 6 2 0.0 0 0 0 57 Francis 5 2 0.0 0 0 0 77 Ancheta 4 2 1.0 0 0 0 44 Edmond 4 3 0.0 0 0 0 92 Wayne 3 5 1.0 0 0 0 28 Major 3 0 0.0 0 0 0 27 Brooks 2 4 0.0 0 0 0 84 Dresow 2 0 0.0 0 0 0 91 Hitchcock 1 1 1.0 0 0 0 1 Sampson 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 46 Nixon 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous Fumb FForc Recov MiscTD KeyRBlk SckAlwd 64 Wetzel 0 0 0 0 2 1 69 Kurasch 0 0 0 0 1 1 78 Cook 0 0 0 0 4 0 72 Briggs 0 0 0 0 1 0 27 Brooks 0 1 0 0 0 0 77 Ancheta 0 0 1 0 0 0 Little Rock Individual Statistics Rushing Att Yards Avg Long TD 32 Lucas 24 92 3.8 16 1 33 Biggs 6 75 12.5 28 0 5 Coghill 3 22 7.3 10 0 Passing Att Comp Yards Yd/Att Long TD Int Sckd 5 Coghill 30 20 283 9.4 43 1 0 4 Receiving Catch Yards Avg YAC Long TD 84 Dockery 7 103 14.7 28 21 0 19 Hill 6 115 19.1 33 43 0 32 Lucas 3 32 10.6 8 17 0 80 Hatcher 2 12 6.0 4 8 0 40 Colford 1 3 3.0 0 3 1 82 Thornton 1 18 18.0 1 18 0 Punt Returns Att Yards Avg TD 33 Biggs 2 8 4.0 0 Kick Returns Att Yards Avg TD 32 Lucas 2 44 22.0 0 Punting Punts Yards Avg Long In20 18 Messina 5 197 39.4 47 2 Kicking FG FGA Long PAT Att 9 Murray 3 3 32 2 2 Defense Tackle Assist Sack Int IntYds IntTD 78 Finley 6 0 1.0 0 0 0 90 Wellman 6 4 0.0 1 0 0 59 John 6 1 0.0 0 0 0 75 Castillo 5 0 0.5 0 0 0 49 Maffett 4 0 0.0 0 0 0 45 Houston 4 0 0.0 0 0 0 76 Walton 2 2 0.5 0 0 0 36 Lincoln 2 2 0.0 0 0 0 27 Reeg 2 1 0.0 0 0 0 35 Crawford 2 0 0.0 0 0 0 48 Bridgeman 1 1 0.0 0 0 0 92 Schenk 1 1 0.0 0 0 0 51 Artis 1 1 0.0 0 0 0 94 Johnston 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 44 Nichols 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 80 Hatcher 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 84 Dockery 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous Fumb FForc Recov MiscTD KeyRBlk SckAlwd 52 Tobias 0 0 0 0 3 2 73 Lofton 0 0 0 0 3 2 66 Lofton 0 0 0 0 2 0 71 Ballard 0 0 0 0 2 0 70 McGee 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 Coghill 1 0 0 0 0 0 40 Colford 0 0 0 0 1 0 Manhattan Drive Chart Quar Began Poss From Plays Yards Result 1 15:00 3:35 OWN 30 5 19 Punt 1 8:38 1:51 OWN 36 3 4 Punt 1 3:41 2:22 OWN 21 6 14 Punt 2 12:53 3:57 OWN 43 7 57 Touchdown 2 3:41 2:02 OWN 21 4 27 Punt 3 12:11 5:23 OWN 14 10 39 Interception 3 4:47 2:34 OWN 19 6 19 Punt 4 12:47 2:26 OWN 20 3 3 Punt 4 3:59 1:00 OWN 20 3 -1 Punt 4 2:18 0:52 OWN 6 4 -5 Downs 4 1:19 0:49 OWN 40 3 60 Touchdown Little Rock Drive Chart Quar Began Poss From Plays Yards Result 1 11:25 2:47 OWN 15 5 10 Punt 1 6:47 3:06 OWN 18 4 16 Punt 1 1:19 3:26 OWN 18 6 11 Punt 2 8:56 5:15 OWN 29 10 56 Field Goal 2 1:39 1:39 OWN 13 6 84 Field Goal 3 15:00 2:49 OWN 29 5 32 Punt 3 6:48 2:01 OWN 40 4 41 Fumble 3 2:13 4:26 OWN 12 10 81 Field Goal 4 10:21 6:22 OWN 20 13 80 Touchdown 4 2:59 0:41 OWN 49 3 9 Punt 4 1:26 0:07 OPP 1 1 1 Touchdown 4 0:30 0:30 OPP 45 3 35 Game Manhattan Red Zone Profile Visits TDs FGs 1 1 0 Little Rock Red Zone Profile Visits TDs FGs 5 1 3 Manhattan Rushing Breakdown Direction Rush Yards Ave Left 6 29 4.8 Middle 22 87 3.9 Right 2 -1 -0.5 None 0 0 0.0 Run Blocking KeyBlks BlkOpps RunPlays 78 Cook 4 11 27 64 Wetzel 2 3 27 69 Kurasch 1 4 24 72 Briggs 1 2 27 56 Pierce 0 4 27 25 Armagost 0 2 23 84 Dresow 0 1 25 45 Upshaw 0 0 3 70 Nettles 0 0 3 87 Montgomery 0 0 2 Manhattan Passing Breakdown Distance Pass Comp Yards Ave Screen 2 2 24 12.0 Short (0-8 Yds) 9 6 38 4.2 Medium (9-18 Yds) 4 1 29 7.2 Long (19+ Yds) 10 2 88 8.8 Passing Attempt Comp BdThrw Dropd Defnsd Blockd Hurried Intrcpt 17 Cushenbery 25 11 0 2 4 1 6 1 Receiving Target Caught Dropd Yards PassPlay 1 Sampson 11 7 1 120 24 83 Paulk 5 1 0 29 23 25 Armagost 3 1 0 4 11 84 Dresow 2 0 0 0 16 81 Burton 2 1 0 6 16 31 Rachmaninoff 1 1 0 20 16 86 Downs 1 0 1 0 8 Pass Block SckAlwd PassPlay 78 Cook 0 25 56 Pierce 0 25 72 Briggs 0 25 69 Kurasch 1 25 64 Wetzel 1 25 25 Armagost 0 11 45 Upshaw 0 2 Pass Rush Sacks PsBlks Hurries PassPlay 92 Wayne 1.0 1 0 30 77 Ancheta 1.0 0 0 30 91 Hitchcock 1.0 0 0 29 54 Brooks 1.0 0 0 25 41 Yardley 0.0 0 0 30 44 Edmond 0.0 0 0 30 76 Duffy 0.0 0 0 30 37 Bronson 0.0 0 0 30 27 Brooks 0.0 0 0 30 93 Jacobs 0.0 0 0 29 57 Francis 0.0 0 0 19 28 Major 0.0 0 0 11 24 Owens 0.0 0 0 5 73 Spencer 0.0 0 0 1 50 Rosen 0.0 0 0 1 Pass Defense Caught Defnsd Intrcpt PassPlay 37 Bronson 4 0 0 30 44 Edmond 3 3 0 30 93 Jacobs 3 0 0 29 54 Brooks 3 0 0 25 41 Yardley 2 0 0 30 27 Brooks 1 2 0 30 57 Francis 1 1 0 19 76 Duffy 1 0 0 30 28 Major 1 0 0 11 24 Owens 1 0 0 5 77 Ancheta 0 0 0 30 92 Wayne 0 0 0 30 91 Hitchcock 0 0 0 29 73 Spencer 0 0 0 1 50 Rosen 0 0 0 1 Defense Tackles Assists RunPlay PassPlay 93 Jacobs 9 2 30 29 37 Bronson 7 0 30 30 76 Duffy 6 3 30 30 41 Yardley 6 2 30 30 54 Brooks 6 1 28 25 57 Francis 5 2 22 19 44 Edmond 4 3 30 30 77 Ancheta 4 2 30 30 92 Wayne 3 5 30 30 28 Major 3 0 8 11 27 Brooks 2 4 30 30 91 Hitchcock 1 1 29 29 24 Owens 0 0 2 5 73 Spencer 0 0 1 1 50 Rosen 0 0 0 1 Little Rock Rushing Breakdown Direction Rush Yards Ave Left 10 28 2.8 Middle 17 115 6.7 Right 6 46 7.6 None 0 0 0.0 Run Blocking KeyBlks BlkOpps RunPlays 73 Lofton 3 10 30 52 Tobias 3 6 30 66 Lofton 2 5 30 71 Ballard 2 4 30 70 McGee 2 3 30 40 Colford 1 1 23 80 Hatcher 0 1 28 82 Thornton 0 0 7 Little Rock Passing Breakdown Distance Pass Comp Yards Ave Screen 0 0 0 0.0 Short (0-8 Yds) 10 7 43 4.3 Medium (9-18 Yds) 16 12 197 12.3 Long (19+ Yds) 4 1 43 10.7 Passing Attempt Comp BdThrw Dropd Defnsd Blockd Hurried Intrcpt 5 Coghill 30 20 1 2 6 1 0 0 Receiving Target Caught Dropd Yards PassPlay 19 Hill 11 6 0 115 30 84 Dockery 10 7 1 103 29 80 Hatcher 3 2 0 12 25 32 Lucas 3 3 0 32 20 33 Biggs 1 0 1 0 10 40 Colford 1 1 0 3 14 82 Thornton 1 1 0 18 4 Pass Block SckAlwd PassPlay 66 Lofton 0 30 73 Lofton 2 30 71 Ballard 0 30 70 McGee 0 30 52 Tobias 2 30 40 Colford 0 14 Pass Rush Sacks PsBlks Hurries PassPlay 78 Finley 1.0 1 1 25 76 Walton 0.5 0 3 25 75 Castillo 0.5 0 0 13 92 Schenk 0.0 0 2 25 48 Bridgeman 0.0 0 0 25 49 Maffett 0.0 0 0 25 36 Lincoln 0.0 0 0 25 45 Houston 0.0 0 0 25 59 John 0.0 0 0 23 90 Wellman 0.0 0 0 18 42 Carlson 0.0 0 0 14 94 Johnston 0.0 0 0 12 51 Artis 0.0 0 0 11 27 Reeg 0.0 0 0 7 44 Nichols 0.0 0 0 2 Pass Defense Caught Defnsd Intrcpt PassPlay 49 Maffett 3 0 0 25 59 John 3 0 0 23 44 Nichols 2 0 0 2 90 Wellman 1 0 1 18 45 Houston 1 0 0 25 76 Walton 1 0 0 25 36 Lincoln 0 1 0 25 92 Schenk 0 1 0 25 51 Artis 0 1 0 11 27 Reeg 0 1 0 7 48 Bridgeman 0 0 0 25 78 Finley 0 0 0 25 42 Carlson 0 0 0 14 75 Castillo 0 0 0 13 94 Johnston 0 0 0 12 Defense Tackles Assists RunPlay PassPlay 90 Wellman 6 4 25 18 59 John 6 1 27 23 78 Finley 6 0 27 25 75 Castillo 5 0 21 13 49 Maffett 4 0 27 25 45 Houston 4 0 27 25 36 Lincoln 2 2 27 25 76 Walton 2 2 27 25 27 Reeg 2 1 2 7 48 Bridgeman 1 1 27 25 92 Schenk 1 1 27 25 51 Artis 1 1 22 11 94 Johnston 1 0 6 12 44 Nichols 1 0 0 2 42 Carlson 0 0 5 14

Injuries

Otis Coghill, QB - Broken Toe, Questionable, full strength in 1998.

Ben Howen, LDE - Pulled Groin, Probable, full strength in about 1 week.


Well damn it! What do we want to do? DO we let Coghill play through the pain or do we play Cascini?
__________________
.
primelord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 10:03 AM   #209
wade moore
lolzcat
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: williamsburg, va
I just looked at the defense also.. is that the most team sacks we've ever had?
__________________
Text Sports Network - Bringing you statistical information for several FOF MP leagues in one convenient site

Quote:
Originally Posted by Subby
Maybe I am just getting old though, but I am learning to not let perfect be the enemy of the very good...
wade moore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 10:08 AM   #210
Anrhydeddu
Resident Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Cascini will do fine. But how does the game treat a QB with a broken toe? Does it treat it as if it were a shoulder/hand injury and thus can't throw (in other words, the type of injury is just fluff)?

Last edited by Anrhydeddu : 04-22-2003 at 10:09 AM.
Anrhydeddu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 10:14 AM   #211
primelord
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
It's my understanding (I could be wrong) that the injuries are related to the players skills. So for example a broken toe shouldn't have much affect on Cogs throwing, but he may not be as mobile etc. A broken toe would be much more serious for say one of our RB's.

However I geuss my main concern would be leaving him in and getting him more injured. I would hate to see Cogs ratings be destroyed. And given our past history, and the fact that he just signed a giant deal it seems possible that would happen.
__________________
.
primelord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 11:12 AM   #212
wade moore
lolzcat
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: williamsburg, va
I'm quite torn here.. but for the future of our team, it seems that a guy who went 7-0 and had a 101 qb rating for us this year might be better than a guy with a broken toe... ???

I'm not sure here, but my gut is telling me we roll with Cascini..
__________________
Text Sports Network - Bringing you statistical information for several FOF MP leagues in one convenient site

Quote:
Originally Posted by Subby
Maybe I am just getting old though, but I am learning to not let perfect be the enemy of the very good...
wade moore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 11:42 AM   #213
primelord
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Niagra Falls (13-4) at Little Rock (17-0)(-7)

The Cadcini's have it! We will roll with Cascini as teh starter and make Cog the backup in case Cascini goes down.

Code:
Box Score: Niagara Falls at Little Rock Little Rock, TX. Conference Finals, 1997 Attendance: 67,100 (69,500). Weather: 68 degrees, fair. 1Q: 04:01 NIA - Donovan Groh 29 field goal. 1Q: 01:52 LTR - Juan Hatcher 39 pass from Jesse Cascini. 1Q: 01:52 LTR - Cole Murray extra point. 2Q: 08:50 LTR - Donnell Thornton 4 pass from Jesse Cascini. 2Q: 08:50 LTR - Cole Murray extra point. 2Q: 06:47 LTR - Jamal Lucas 1 pass from Jesse Cascini. 2Q: 06:47 LTR - Cole Murray extra point. 2Q: 01:54 NIA - Skip Devine 8 pass from Corwin Hodges. 2Q: 01:54 NIA - Donovan Groh extra point. 2Q: 00:00 LTR - Cole Murray 57 field goal. 3Q: 10:28 LTR - Karl Dockery 43 pass from Jesse Cascini. 3Q: 10:28 LTR - Cole Murray extra point. 4Q: 12:50 NIA - Donovan Groh 38 field goal. 4Q: 08:22 NIA - Sean Deaver 1 run. 4Q: 08:22 NIA - Sean Deaver run for conversion failed. 4Q: 02:26 LTR - Cole Murray 35 field goal. 4Q: 01:43 LTR - Jamal Lucas 22 run. 4Q: 01:43 LTR - Cole Murray extra point. Game MVP: NIA 17 Corwin Hodges Niagara Falls 3 7 0 9 - 19 Little Rock 7 17 7 10 - 41 Team Statistics NIA LTR First Downs 23 16 Total Rushes 29 23 Rushing Yards 117 114 Yards Per Carry 4.0 4.9 Pass Attempts 44 23 Completions 21 14 Passing Yards 287 170 Yards Per Attempt 6.5 7.3 Sacked 3 4 Yards Lost 20 23 Interceptions 2 2 Fumbles/Lost 1/0 1/0 Total Plays 73 46 Total Yards 404 284 Yards Per Play 5.5 6.1 3rd Down Plays 6/17 4/10 Avg. YTG on 3rd 7.2 8.5 4th Down Plays 1/1 0/0 Penalties 5 4 Penalty Yards 29 17 Avg. Drive Start OWN 20 OWN 46 Time Of Possession 35:50 24:10 Niagara Falls Individual Statistics Rushing Att Yards Avg Long TD 37 Devine 21 81 3.8 14 0 17 Hodges 4 32 8.0 11 0 45 Deaver 4 4 1.0 3 1 Passing Att Comp Yards Yd/Att Long TD Int Sckd 17 Hodges 34 15 221 6.5 38 1 2 3 7 Morton 10 6 66 6.6 19 0 0 0 Receiving Catch Yards Avg YAC Long TD 85 Londerville 7 115 16.4 18 38 0 37 Devine 5 47 9.4 2 16 1 80 Rodgers 3 61 20.3 9 26 0 46 Shelton 1 5 5.0 0 5 0 82 Hale 1 9 9.0 0 9 0 40 Cobb 1 15 15.0 1 15 0 88 Derrick 1 14 14.0 2 14 0 89 Parra 1 17 17.0 1 17 0 86 Diaz 1 4 4.0 0 4 0 Punt Returns Att Yards Avg TD 80 Rodgers 3 0 0.0 0 Kick Returns Att Yards Avg TD 45 Deaver 5 67 13.4 0 35 Franklin 1 11 11.0 0 Punting Punts Yards Avg Long In20 6 Truppa 7 274 39.1 48 0 Kicking FG FGA Long PAT Att 8 Groh 2 2 38 1 1 Defense Tackle Assist Sack Int IntYds IntTD 57 Southward 6 1 1.0 0 0 0 54 Becker 5 1 1.0 0 0 0 26 Wimberly 5 1 0.0 0 0 0 96 Kuiper 4 1 1.5 0 0 0 29 Williams 4 0 0.0 0 0 0 42 Lowe 3 2 0.0 1 13 0 99 Bernard 3 0 0.0 0 0 0 92 Brady 2 2 0.5 0 0 0 31 Taylor 2 2 0.0 1 0 0 80 Rodgers 2 0 0.0 0 0 0 43 Ficken 2 0 0.0 0 0 0 51 Quinn 1 2 0.0 0 0 0 34 Keyes 1 1 0.0 0 0 0 37 Devine 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 17 Hodges 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 64 Baxter 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 70 Anderson 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 98 Chauvlier 0 1 0.0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous Fumb FForc Recov MiscTD KeyRBlk SckAlwd 71 Huffman 0 0 0 0 1 1 64 Baxter 0 0 0 0 4 0 72 Paton 0 0 0 0 1 1 46 Shelton 0 0 0 0 0 1 76 Boone 0 0 0 0 2 0 50 Hardy 0 0 0 0 1 0 26 Wimberly 0 1 0 0 0 0 80 Rodgers 1 0 0 0 0 0 34 Keyes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Little Rock Individual Statistics Rushing Att Yards Avg Long TD 32 Lucas 17 92 5.4 22 1 33 Biggs 6 22 3.6 18 0 Passing Att Comp Yards Yd/Att Long TD Int Sckd 6 Cascini 23 14 170 7.3 43 4 2 4 Receiving Catch Yards Avg YAC Long TD 33 Biggs 3 16 5.3 7 7 0 84 Dockery 3 63 21.0 34 43 1 19 Hill 2 17 8.5 1 11 0 40 Colford 2 18 9.0 0 11 0 80 Hatcher 2 51 25.5 15 39 1 32 Lucas 1 1 1.0 1 1 1 82 Thornton 1 4 4.0 0 4 1 Punt Returns Att Yards Avg TD 33 Biggs 2 23 11.5 0 Kick Returns Att Yards Avg TD 32 Lucas 4 117 29.2 0 Punting Punts Yards Avg Long In20 18 Messina 5 226 45.2 55 1 Kicking FG FGA Long PAT Att 9 Murray 2 2 57 5 5 Defense Tackle Assist Sack Int IntYds IntTD 59 John 11 1 0.0 0 0 0 90 Wellman 8 4 0.0 0 0 0 48 Bridgeman 6 1 0.0 0 0 0 42 Carlson 4 2 1.0 0 0 0 78 Finley 4 1 1.0 0 0 0 49 Maffett 3 3 0.0 2 28 0 45 Houston 3 2 0.0 0 0 0 36 Lincoln 3 1 0.0 0 0 0 27 Reeg 3 0 0.0 0 0 0 75 Castillo 2 0 0.0 0 0 0 35 Crawford 2 0 0.0 0 0 0 66 Lofton 2 0 0.0 0 0 0 25 Brock 2 0 0.0 0 0 0 51 Artis 2 0 0.0 0 0 0 94 Johnston 1 0 1.0 0 0 0 92 Schenk 1 2 0.0 0 0 0 76 Walton 1 1 0.0 0 0 0 19 Hill 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 87 Morrell 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 84 Dockery 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 32 Lucas 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous Fumb FForc Recov MiscTD KeyRBlk SckAlwd 52 Tobias 0 0 0 0 2 0 70 McGee 0 0 0 0 0 1 71 Ballard 0 0 0 0 2 1 66 Lofton 0 1 0 0 1 2 6 Cascini 1 0 1 0 0 0 80 Hatcher 0 0 0 0 1 0 73 Lofton 0 0 0 0 1 0 Niagara Falls Drive Chart Quar Began Poss From Plays Yards Result 1 15:00 3:11 OWN 2 3 4 Punt 1 9:45 5:44 OWN 20 11 68 Field Goal 1 1:52 1:39 OWN 15 3 4 Punt 2 14:48 1:19 OWN 8 3 9 Punt 2 8:50 1:57 OWN 18 3 -5 Interception 2 6:47 4:53 OWN 16 11 84 Touchdown 3 13:41 2:20 OWN 33 3 -3 Punt 3 10:28 1:39 OWN 21 3 7 Punt 3 7:11 1:33 OWN 32 4 27 Punt 3 4:01 6:11 OWN 24 13 55 Field Goal 4 12:13 3:51 OWN 48 9 52 Touchdown 4 6:32 0:51 OWN 9 3 4 Punt 4 2:26 0:26 OWN 20 1 -10 Interception 4 1:43 1:43 OWN 21 6 69 Game Little Rock Drive Chart Quar Began Poss From Plays Yards Result 1 11:49 2:04 OWN 47 4 13 Punt 1 4:01 2:09 OWN 37 5 63 Touchdown 1 0:13 0:25 OWN 45 2 7 Interception 2 13:29 4:39 OWN 47 10 53 Touchdown 2 6:53 0:06 OPP 1 1 1 Touchdown 2 1:54 1:54 OWN 37 5 23 Field Goal 3 15:00 1:19 OWN 20 3 1 Punt 3 11:21 0:53 OWN 39 2 61 Touchdown 3 8:49 1:38 OWN 35 3 -14 Punt 3 5:38 1:37 OWN 20 3 1 Punt 4 12:50 0:37 OWN 32 2 0 Interception 4 8:22 1:50 OWN 46 3 7 Punt 4 5:41 3:15 OPP 36 6 18 Field Goal 4 2:00 0:17 OPP 22 1 22 Touchdown Niagara Falls Red Zone Profile Visits TDs FGs 4 2 2 Little Rock Red Zone Profile Visits TDs FGs 2 1 1 Niagara Falls Rushing Breakdown Direction Rush Yards Ave Left 11 36 3.2 Middle 11 51 4.6 Right 7 30 4.2 None 0 0 0.0 Run Blocking KeyBlks BlkOpps RunPlays 64 Baxter 4 7 24 76 Boone 2 10 25 71 Huffman 1 3 21 50 Hardy 1 2 25 72 Paton 1 2 25 89 Parra 0 1 23 46 Shelton 0 0 18 88 Derrick 0 0 5 52 Lane 0 0 4 40 Cobb 0 0 1 66 Hibbs 0 0 1 Niagara Falls Passing Breakdown Distance Pass Comp Yards Ave Screen 3 0 0 0.0 Short (0-8 Yds) 11 8 56 5.0 Medium (9-18 Yds) 19 10 142 7.4 Long (19+ Yds) 11 3 89 8.0 Passing Attempt Comp BdThrw Dropd Defnsd Blockd Hurried Intrcpt 17 Hodges 34 15 0 0 10 3 4 2 7 Morton 10 6 0 1 1 0 2 0 Receiving Target Caught Dropd Yards PassPlay 85 Londerville 12 7 1 115 42 37 Devine 10 5 0 47 32 80 Rodgers 7 3 0 61 39 86 Diaz 5 1 0 4 21 46 Shelton 3 1 0 5 20 89 Parra 3 1 0 17 30 88 Derrick 2 1 0 14 11 82 Hale 1 1 0 9 12 40 Cobb 1 1 0 15 2 Pass Block SckAlwd PassPlay 76 Boone 0 44 50 Hardy 0 40 72 Paton 1 40 71 Huffman 1 39 64 Baxter 0 38 46 Shelton 1 20 52 Lane 0 7 66 Hibbs 0 7 69 Gunther 0 5 40 Cobb 0 2 Pass Rush Sacks PsBlks Hurries PassPlay 96 Kuiper 1.5 0 0 10 57 Southward 1.0 0 0 23 54 Becker 1.0 0 0 19 92 Brady 0.5 0 2 20 98 Chauvlier 0.0 0 1 21 26 Wimberly 0.0 0 0 23 99 Bernard 0.0 0 0 23 42 Lowe 0.0 0 0 23 31 Taylor 0.0 0 0 23 34 Keyes 0.0 0 0 23 51 Quinn 0.0 0 0 14 95 Perron 0.0 0 0 10 29 Williams 0.0 0 0 9 70 Anderson 0.0 0 0 6 43 Ficken 0.0 0 0 4 78 Austin 0.0 0 0 2 Pass Defense Caught Defnsd Intrcpt PassPlay 54 Becker 3 0 0 19 26 Wimberly 2 1 0 23 57 Southward 2 1 0 23 29 Williams 2 0 0 9 42 Lowe 1 1 1 23 31 Taylor 1 0 1 23 92 Brady 1 0 0 20 51 Quinn 1 0 0 14 96 Kuiper 1 0 0 10 99 Bernard 0 0 0 23 34 Keyes 0 0 0 23 98 Chauvlier 0 0 0 21 95 Perron 0 0 0 10 70 Anderson 0 0 0 6 43 Ficken 0 0 0 4 78 Austin 0 0 0 2 Defense Tackles Assists RunPlay PassPlay 57 Southward 6 1 23 23 26 Wimberly 5 1 23 23 54 Becker 5 1 20 19 96 Kuiper 4 1 11 10 29 Williams 4 0 8 9 42 Lowe 3 2 23 23 99 Bernard 3 0 23 23 31 Taylor 2 2 23 23 92 Brady 2 2 15 20 43 Ficken 2 0 3 4 51 Quinn 1 2 15 14 34 Keyes 1 1 23 23 70 Anderson 1 0 5 6 98 Chauvlier 0 1 22 21 95 Perron 0 0 12 10 78 Austin 0 0 4 2 Little Rock Rushing Breakdown Direction Rush Yards Ave Left 5 35 7.0 Middle 13 38 2.9 Right 5 41 8.2 None 0 0 0.0 Run Blocking KeyBlks BlkOpps RunPlays 52 Tobias 2 6 23 71 Ballard 2 4 23 73 Lofton 1 6 23 66 Lofton 1 3 23 80 Hatcher 1 1 20 40 Colford 0 2 16 70 McGee 0 1 23 82 Thornton 0 0 1 Little Rock Passing Breakdown Distance Pass Comp Yards Ave Screen 1 0 0 0.0 Short (0-8 Yds) 10 8 41 4.1 Medium (9-18 Yds) 8 5 90 11.2 Long (19+ Yds) 4 1 39 9.7 Passing Attempt Comp BdThrw Dropd Defnsd Blockd Hurried Intrcpt 6 Cascini 23 14 0 1 3 0 3 2 Receiving Target Caught Dropd Yards PassPlay 84 Dockery 5 3 0 63 21 19 Hill 4 2 0 17 23 33 Biggs 4 3 0 16 7 32 Lucas 4 1 0 1 16 80 Hatcher 3 2 1 51 17 40 Colford 2 2 0 18 12 82 Thornton 1 1 0 4 2 Pass Block SckAlwd PassPlay 66 Lofton 2 23 73 Lofton 0 23 71 Ballard 1 23 70 McGee 1 23 52 Tobias 0 23 40 Colford 0 12 Pass Rush Sacks PsBlks Hurries PassPlay 78 Finley 1.0 3 2 39 94 Johnston 1.0 0 1 24 42 Carlson 1.0 0 0 18 76 Walton 0.0 0 1 43 59 John 0.0 0 1 39 90 Wellman 0.0 0 1 35 49 Maffett 0.0 0 0 44 92 Schenk 0.0 0 0 44 45 Houston 0.0 0 0 41 48 Bridgeman 0.0 0 0 40 36 Lincoln 0.0 0 0 40 51 Artis 0.0 0 0 26 75 Castillo 0.0 0 0 20 27 Reeg 0.0 0 0 9 23 Mercado 0.0 0 0 8 44 Nichols 0.0 0 0 5 93 Brewer 0.0 0 0 4 54 Becker 0.0 0 0 3 96 Howen 0.0 0 0 2 Pass Defense Caught Defnsd Intrcpt PassPlay 59 John 6 2 0 39 45 Houston 3 1 0 41 48 Bridgeman 3 1 0 40 49 Maffett 2 4 2 44 36 Lincoln 2 1 0 40 90 Wellman 2 1 0 35 27 Reeg 2 0 0 9 42 Carlson 1 1 0 18 92 Schenk 0 0 0 44 76 Walton 0 0 0 43 78 Finley 0 0 0 39 51 Artis 0 0 0 26 94 Johnston 0 0 0 24 75 Castillo 0 0 0 20 23 Mercado 0 0 0 8 44 Nichols 0 0 0 5 93 Brewer 0 0 0 4 54 Becker 0 0 0 3 96 Howen 0 0 0 2 Defense Tackles Assists RunPlay PassPlay 59 John 11 1 25 39 90 Wellman 8 4 23 35 48 Bridgeman 6 1 24 40 42 Carlson 4 2 7 18 78 Finley 4 1 25 39 49 Maffett 3 3 25 44 45 Houston 3 2 25 41 36 Lincoln 3 1 25 40 27 Reeg 3 0 2 9 51 Artis 2 0 18 26 75 Castillo 2 0 23 20 92 Schenk 1 2 25 44 76 Walton 1 1 25 43 94 Johnston 1 0 2 24 23 Mercado 0 0 1 8 44 Nichols 0 0 0 5 93 Brewer 0 0 0 4 54 Becker 0 0 0 3 96 Howen 0 0 0 2

Injuries

Riddick Finley, RDE - Knee Tendinitis, Probable, full strength in 1998.

Otis Coghill, QB - Broken Toe, Probable, full strength in 1998.

Ben Howen, LDE - Pulled Groin, Probable, full strength in 1998.

Matthew Morrell, FL - Broken Nose, Probable, full strength in 1998.
__________________
.
primelord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 11:44 AM   #214
primelord
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Ok now that Coghill is up to probable my vote says we start him in the championship game. I think Cog should be on the field when we complete our perfect season.

But I will pause and make sure everyone else feels that way too.
__________________
.
primelord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 11:46 AM   #215
wade moore
lolzcat
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: williamsburg, va
Hmm... Cascini "struggled" a little bit and Cog is at probable.. and it is the Super Bowl.. I gotta think realistic here and your guy is in the for the Super Bowl if at all possible... so, my vote is for Cog..
__________________
Text Sports Network - Bringing you statistical information for several FOF MP leagues in one convenient site

Quote:
Originally Posted by Subby
Maybe I am just getting old though, but I am learning to not let perfect be the enemy of the very good...
wade moore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 12:14 PM   #216
Doug5984
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Louisiana
Quote:
Originally posted by wade moore
Hmm... Cascini "struggled" a little bit and Cog is at probable.. and it is the Super Bowl.. I gotta think realistic here and your guy is in the for the Super Bowl if at all possible... so, my vote is for Cog..


agreed, Cog should get the start.
Doug5984 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 12:17 PM   #217
primelord
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Champaign (13-5) at Little Rock (18-0)(-5)

Code:
Box Score: Champaign vs Little Rock Muncie (IN), IN. Front Office Championship, 1997 Attendance: 60,300 (60,300). Weather: 24 degrees, snow. 1Q: 13:35 LTR - Jamal Lucas 16 run. 1Q: 13:35 LTR - Cole Murray extra point. 1Q: 10:22 LTR - Jamal Lucas 4 run. 1Q: 10:22 LTR - Cole Murray extra point. 2Q: 10:12 LTR - Cole Murray 19 field goal. 2Q: 05:50 CHA - Kent Joyner 4 fumble return. 2Q: 05:50 CHA - Reggie Hoffman extra point. 2Q: 04:22 LTR - Karl Dockery 38 pass from Otis Coghill. 2Q: 04:22 LTR - Cole Murray extra point. 4Q: 07:32 LTR - Cole Murray 30 field goal. Game MVP: LTR 32 Jamal Lucas Champaign 0 7 0 0 - 7 Little Rock 14 10 0 3 - 27 Team Statistics CHA LTR First Downs 18 13 Total Rushes 24 37 Rushing Yards 69 190 Yards Per Carry 2.8 5.1 Pass Attempts 47 19 Completions 23 12 Passing Yards 235 153 Yards Per Attempt 5.0 8.0 Sacked 2 3 Yards Lost 12 19 Interceptions 2 1 Fumbles/Lost 1/0 3/2 Total Plays 71 56 Total Yards 304 343 Yards Per Play 4.2 6.1 3rd Down Plays 5/17 2/12 Avg. YTG on 3rd 8.4 8.1 4th Down Plays 0/1 0/0 Penalties 4 9 Penalty Yards 20 45 Avg. Drive Start OWN 27 OWN 43 Time Of Possession 30:15 29:45 Champaign Individual Statistics Rushing Att Yards Avg Long TD 42 Kolsrud 22 61 2.7 18 0 2 Gerard 2 8 4.0 5 0 Passing Att Comp Yards Yd/Att Long TD Int Sckd 2 Gerard 47 23 235 5.0 34 0 2 2 Receiving Catch Yards Avg YAC Long TD 80 Joyner 7 90 12.8 4 32 0 42 Kolsrud 5 22 4.4 4 9 0 88 Carson 4 79 19.7 18 34 0 36 Miller 2 4 2.0 7 5 0 84 Donovan 2 24 12.0 0 15 0 89 Horinek 2 14 7.0 0 14 0 20 Malone 1 2 2.0 0 2 0 Punt Returns Att Yards Avg TD 21 Owens 3 -3 -1.0 0 Kick Returns Att Yards Avg TD 47 Mayes 4 66 16.5 0 84 Donovan 1 11 11.0 0 Punting Punts Yards Avg Long In20 19 Browning 9 336 37.3 47 1 Kicking FG FGA Long PAT Att 13 Hoffman 0 3 0 1 1 Defense Tackle Assist Sack Int IntYds IntTD 38 Whiting 8 3 0.0 0 0 0 47 Mayes 6 3 0.0 0 0 0 50 Sotelo 6 2 0.0 0 0 0 95 Van Pelt 5 2 1.5 0 0 0 99 Burkhardt 4 0 1.0 0 0 0 91 Stewart 4 1 0.0 0 0 0 32 Friesz 3 1 0.0 0 0 0 90 Baker 2 2 0.0 0 0 0 30 Harrison 2 1 0.0 1 26 0 92 Humphries 2 1 0.0 0 0 0 36 Miller 2 0 0.0 0 0 0 28 Killings 2 0 0.0 0 0 0 93 Gresham 1 1 0.5 0 0 0 59 Mosby 1 2 0.0 0 0 0 51 Emanski 1 1 0.0 0 0 0 76 Waldteufel 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 21 Owens 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 42 Kolsrud 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 61 Samuels 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 63 Barclay 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 57 de Leon 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 79 Perreault 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 81 Powers 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 55 Houghton 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 34 Dimry 0 1 0.0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous Fumb FForc Recov MiscTD KeyRBlk SckAlwd 65 Harvey 0 0 0 0 1 1 61 Samuels 0 0 0 0 3 1 36 Miller 1 1 0 0 0 0 90 Baker 0 1 1 0 0 0 57 de Leon 0 0 0 0 2 0 80 Joyner 0 0 1 1 0 0 50 Sotelo 0 0 1 0 0 0 20 Malone 0 0 0 0 1 0 51 Emanski 0 1 0 0 0 0 Little Rock Individual Statistics Rushing Att Yards Avg Long TD 32 Lucas 23 148 6.4 59 2 33 Biggs 10 33 3.3 12 0 5 Coghill 2 6 3.0 7 0 84 Dockery 1 1 1.0 1 0 38 Kahn 1 2 2.0 2 0 Passing Att Comp Yards Yd/Att Long TD Int Sckd 5 Coghill 19 12 153 8.0 47 1 1 3 Receiving Catch Yards Avg YAC Long TD 32 Lucas 4 68 17.0 2 47 0 19 Hill 3 29 9.6 9 13 0 40 Colford 2 9 4.5 7 13 0 84 Dockery 2 40 20.0 0 38 1 80 Hatcher 1 7 7.0 1 7 0 Punt Returns Att Yards Avg TD 33 Biggs 5 43 8.6 0 87 Morrell 1 9 9.0 0 Kick Returns Att Yards Avg TD 32 Lucas 2 100 50.0 0 Punting Punts Yards Avg Long In20 18 Messina 7 287 41.0 46 2 Kicking FG FGA Long PAT Att 9 Murray 2 2 30 3 3 Defense Tackle Assist Sack Int IntYds IntTD 90 Wellman 6 2 0.0 0 0 0 49 Maffett 6 0 0.0 1 44 0 48 Bridgeman 5 5 0.0 1 8 0 45 Houston 5 4 0.0 0 0 0 42 Carlson 4 1 1.0 0 0 0 59 John 4 4 0.5 0 0 0 36 Lincoln 4 1 0.0 0 0 0 75 Castillo 3 1 0.0 0 0 0 51 Artis 3 0 0.0 0 0 0 78 Finley 2 0 0.5 0 0 0 44 Nichols 2 0 0.0 0 0 0 27 Reeg 2 0 0.0 0 0 0 89 Sims 2 0 0.0 0 0 0 76 Walton 2 0 0.0 0 0 0 92 Schenk 1 1 0.0 0 0 0 87 Morrell 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 18 Messina 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 84 Dockery 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 73 Lofton 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 82 Thornton 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 52 Tobias 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous Fumb FForc Recov MiscTD KeyRBlk SckAlwd 70 McGee 0 0 0 0 2 1 71 Ballard 0 0 0 0 2 1 73 Lofton 0 0 0 0 2 1 52 Tobias 0 0 0 0 3 0 66 Lofton 0 0 0 0 2 0 33 Biggs 2 0 0 0 0 0 94 Johnston 0 0 1 0 0 0 32 Lucas 1 0 0 0 0 0 51 Artis 0 1 0 0 0 0 Champaign Drive Chart Quar Began Poss From Plays Yards Result 1 13:35 1:34 OWN 21 3 -2 Punt 1 10:22 1:44 OWN 23 3 8 Punt 1 5:11 2:12 OPP 45 4 26 Missed FG 2 14:50 2:01 OWN 23 5 16 Punt 2 10:12 4:22 OWN 25 9 75 Touchdown 2 4:22 1:10 OWN 12 3 0 Punt 2 1:22 1:20 OWN 20 5 49 Missed FG 3 15:00 4:45 OWN 29 9 24 Punt 3 9:37 0:18 OPP 22 2 0 Interception 3 8:24 1:48 OWN 20 3 2 Punt 3 3:51 1:48 OWN 13 4 29 Punt 3 0:48 3:41 OPP 48 8 30 Missed FG 4 9:55 0:50 OWN 17 2 3 Interception 4 7:32 1:22 OWN 20 3 6 Punt 4 3:19 1:05 OWN 20 3 3 Punt 4 1:36 1:16 OWN 6 7 37 Downs Little Rock Drive Chart Quar Began Poss From Plays Yards Result 1 15:00 1:25 OPP 20 2 20 Touchdown 1 12:01 1:39 OWN 49 3 51 Touchdown 1 8:38 3:27 OWN 40 6 8 Interception 1 2:59 3:09 OWN 26 6 5 Punt 2 12:49 2:37 OWN 34 5 64 Field Goal 2 5:50 1:28 OWN 42 2 58 Touchdown 2 3:12 1:50 OWN 48 3 9 Punt 2 0:02 0:02 OWN 38 1 0 Half 3 10:15 0:38 OWN 15 2 7 Fumble 3 9:19 0:55 OPP 46 3 2 Punt 3 6:36 2:45 OWN 45 5 15 Punt 3 2:03 1:15 OWN 25 3 23 Fumble 4 12:07 2:12 OWN 25 3 9 Punt 4 9:05 1:33 OPP 30 4 17 Field Goal 4 6:10 2:51 OWN 48 6 15 Punt 4 2:14 0:38 OWN 45 3 5 Punt 4 0:20 0:20 OPP 43 2 1 Game Champaign Red Zone Profile Visits TDs FGs 3 1 0 Little Rock Red Zone Profile Visits TDs FGs 4 2 2 Champaign Rushing Breakdown Direction Rush Yards Ave Left 7 13 1.8 Middle 7 47 6.7 Right 10 9 0.9 None 0 0 0.0 Run Blocking KeyBlks BlkOpps RunPlays 61 Samuels 3 6 21 57 de Leon 2 4 22 65 Harvey 1 3 21 20 Malone 1 1 4 63 Barclay 0 4 21 76 Waldteufel 0 2 21 36 Miller 0 1 11 89 Horinek 0 0 18 56 Rayburn 0 1 1 87 Salinas 0 0 4 82 Hipp 0 0 2 69 Bookwalter 0 0 1 68 Akers 0 0 1 77 Sinclair 0 0 1 Champaign Passing Breakdown Distance Pass Comp Yards Ave Screen 3 2 8 2.6 Short (0-8 Yds) 8 7 14 1.7 Medium (9-18 Yds) 21 10 101 4.8 Long (19+ Yds) 15 4 112 7.4 Passing Attempt Comp BdThrw Dropd Defnsd Blockd Hurried Intrcpt 2 Gerard 47 23 2 0 12 1 7 2 Receiving Target Caught Dropd Yards PassPlay 80 Joyner 19 7 0 90 43 88 Carson 8 4 0 79 39 42 Kolsrud 6 5 0 22 43 36 Miller 4 2 0 4 23 84 Donovan 4 2 0 24 29 89 Horinek 2 2 0 14 21 21 Owens 1 0 0 0 5 20 Malone 1 1 0 2 4 81 Powers 1 0 0 0 10 87 Salinas 1 0 0 0 12 Pass Block SckAlwd PassPlay 57 de Leon 0 47 76 Waldteufel 0 43 63 Barclay 0 42 61 Samuels 1 41 65 Harvey 1 41 36 Miller 0 23 69 Bookwalter 0 6 68 Akers 0 6 56 Rayburn 0 5 20 Malone 0 4 77 Sinclair 0 4 Pass Rush Sacks PsBlks Hurries PassPlay 95 Van Pelt 1.5 1 1 19 99 Burkhardt 1.0 0 1 8 93 Gresham 0.5 0 0 19 47 Mayes 0.0 0 0 19 38 Whiting 0.0 0 0 19 50 Sotelo 0.0 0 0 19 32 Friesz 0.0 0 0 19 30 Harrison 0.0 0 0 19 91 Stewart 0.0 0 0 16 59 Mosby 0.0 0 0 14 34 Dimry 0.0 0 0 12 90 Baker 0.0 0 0 8 92 Humphries 0.0 0 0 5 28 Killings 0.0 0 0 5 79 Perreault 0.0 0 0 3 55 Houghton 0.0 0 0 3 51 Emanski 0.0 0 0 2 Pass Defense Caught Defnsd Intrcpt PassPlay 38 Whiting 3 1 0 19 50 Sotelo 2 1 0 19 47 Mayes 2 0 0 19 32 Friesz 1 1 0 19 30 Harrison 1 0 1 19 95 Van Pelt 1 0 0 19 99 Burkhardt 1 0 0 8 92 Humphries 1 0 0 5 93 Gresham 0 0 0 19 91 Stewart 0 0 0 16 59 Mosby 0 0 0 14 34 Dimry 0 0 0 12 90 Baker 0 0 0 8 28 Killings 0 0 0 5 79 Perreault 0 0 0 3 55 Houghton 0 0 0 3 51 Emanski 0 0 0 2 Defense Tackles Assists RunPlay PassPlay 38 Whiting 8 3 32 19 47 Mayes 6 3 31 19 50 Sotelo 6 2 31 19 95 Van Pelt 5 2 33 19 91 Stewart 4 1 32 16 99 Burkhardt 4 0 6 8 32 Friesz 3 1 32 19 90 Baker 2 2 18 8 30 Harrison 2 1 32 19 92 Humphries 2 1 16 5 28 Killings 2 0 10 5 59 Mosby 1 2 30 14 93 Gresham 1 1 35 19 51 Emanski 1 1 10 2 79 Perreault 1 0 13 3 55 Houghton 1 0 9 3 34 Dimry 0 1 15 12 31 Burnette 0 0 4 0 23 Marrow 0 0 4 0 72 Rice 0 0 3 0 Little Rock Rushing Breakdown Direction Rush Yards Ave Left 7 21 3.0 Middle 21 139 6.6 Right 8 31 3.8 None 1 -1 -1.0 Run Blocking KeyBlks BlkOpps RunPlays 52 Tobias 3 7 35 73 Lofton 2 11 34 71 Ballard 2 6 33 70 McGee 2 4 34 66 Lofton 2 4 33 40 Colford 0 2 28 80 Hatcher 0 1 32 82 Thornton 0 0 15 63 Wooldridge 0 0 4 58 Ancheta 0 0 4 56 Hironaka 0 0 2 55 Jones 0 0 1 Little Rock Passing Breakdown Distance Pass Comp Yards Ave Screen 2 2 -2 -1.0 Short (0-8 Yds) 7 5 38 5.4 Medium (9-18 Yds) 6 3 32 5.3 Long (19+ Yds) 4 2 85 21.2 Passing Attempt Comp BdThrw Dropd Defnsd Blockd Hurried Intrcpt 5 Coghill 19 12 0 0 3 1 2 1 Receiving Target Caught Dropd Yards PassPlay 84 Dockery 6 2 0 40 17 32 Lucas 5 4 0 68 14 19 Hill 4 3 0 29 19 40 Colford 2 2 0 9 14 80 Hatcher 2 1 0 7 17 Pass Block SckAlwd PassPlay 66 Lofton 0 19 73 Lofton 1 19 71 Ballard 1 19 70 McGee 1 19 52 Tobias 0 19 40 Colford 0 14 Pass Rush Sacks PsBlks Hurries PassPlay 42 Carlson 1.0 0 0 25 78 Finley 0.5 0 2 47 59 John 0.5 0 0 40 75 Castillo 0.0 1 0 19 76 Walton 0.0 0 1 47 92 Schenk 0.0 0 1 47 49 Maffett 0.0 0 1 45 48 Bridgeman 0.0 0 0 47 36 Lincoln 0.0 0 0 43 45 Houston 0.0 0 0 42 94 Johnston 0.0 0 1 28 90 Wellman 0.0 0 0 37 51 Artis 0.0 0 0 22 27 Reeg 0.0 0 1 10 44 Nichols 0.0 0 0 7 23 Mercado 0.0 0 0 7 54 Becker 0.0 0 0 4 Pass Defense Caught Defnsd Intrcpt PassPlay 45 Houston 4 3 0 42 49 Maffett 4 1 1 45 48 Bridgeman 3 2 1 47 90 Wellman 2 3 0 37 36 Lincoln 2 2 0 43 59 John 2 0 0 40 51 Artis 2 0 0 22 44 Nichols 2 0 0 7 92 Schenk 1 0 0 47 27 Reeg 1 0 0 10 42 Carlson 0 1 0 25 78 Finley 0 0 0 47 76 Walton 0 0 0 47 94 Johnston 0 0 0 28 75 Castillo 0 0 0 19 23 Mercado 0 0 0 7 54 Becker 0 0 0 4 Defense Tackles Assists RunPlay PassPlay 90 Wellman 6 2 19 37 49 Maffett 6 0 22 45 48 Bridgeman 5 5 21 47 45 Houston 5 4 22 42 59 John 4 4 21 40 36 Lincoln 4 1 21 43 42 Carlson 4 1 8 25 75 Castillo 3 1 18 19 51 Artis 3 0 14 22 78 Finley 2 0 22 47 76 Walton 2 0 21 47 27 Reeg 2 0 3 10 44 Nichols 2 0 1 7 92 Schenk 1 1 22 47 94 Johnston 0 0 4 28 23 Mercado 0 0 2 7 54 Becker 0 0 0 4 93 Brewer 0 0 1 0

Move over Miami! There is another undefeated team in football history!!!!
__________________
.
primelord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 12:21 PM   #218
primelord
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Updated File #1
primelord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 12:21 PM   #219
primelord
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Updated File #2
primelord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 12:25 PM   #220
wade moore
lolzcat
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: williamsburg, va
Time for us all to retire .
__________________
Text Sports Network - Bringing you statistical information for several FOF MP leagues in one convenient site

Quote:
Originally Posted by Subby
Maybe I am just getting old though, but I am learning to not let perfect be the enemy of the very good...
wade moore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 12:34 PM   #221
Anrhydeddu
Resident Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
I do think you guys need to play this differently, just to offer variety. This season's read was quite boring with the only tensions being to luck out on a perfect season (not a big deal to me) and to decide whether to start superstar QB #1 or superstar QB #2.
Anrhydeddu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 12:43 PM   #222
Bee
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
Quote:
Originally posted by Anrhydeddu
I do think you guys need to play this differently, just to offer variety. This season's read was quite boring with the only tensions being to luck out on a perfect season (not a big deal to me) and to decide whether to start superstar QB #1 or superstar QB #2.


Yep I agree. There's not much interest for me right now in working on the dynasty when we are so much better than the other teams. I really thought the "fan favorite" rule would help to equalize things, but it just didn't do nearly enough.

Even if we can figure out some additional rules to implement, with the talent we have right now I don't see us having any problems being the best team in the league for the foreseeable future.

Perhaps we can implement a rule that anyone under contract after a Championship season gets either a new contract offer or released?
Bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 12:45 PM   #223
primelord
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Quote:
Originally posted by Anrhydeddu
I do think you guys need to play this differently, just to offer variety. This season's read was quite boring with the only tensions being to luck out on a perfect season (not a big deal to me) and to decide whether to start superstar QB #1 or superstar QB #2.


Heh despite his numbers Cascini is hardly a super star QB. Hell looking at his ratings he isn;t even an average QB.
primelord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 12:56 PM   #224
Anrhydeddu
Resident Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Quote:
despite his numbers

But that is all that matters, is it not? How many teams could he start for and be a significant improvement over what they have currently?
Anrhydeddu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 01:00 PM   #225
primelord
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Quote:
Originally posted by Anrhydeddu
But that is all that matters, is it not? How many teams could he start for and be a significant improvement over what they have currently?


According to our scout there are 8 teams that don't have a better QB than Cascini. That doesn't seem that unrealistic to me. Cascini's numbers were a product of the talent we have around him. Now I realize you think that is a problem too and I am not arguing that. ia m just saying we weren't trying to decide between which super star QB's to play. The only reason there was a decision to be made is Cascini is a significant drop off from Coghill.
primelord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 04:12 PM   #226
primelord
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Are we running out of steam here? Overall people just don't seem as excited this season as we have in the past.
__________________
.
primelord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2003, 08:01 PM   #227
cthomer5000
Strategy Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
I think there was a lot less to react to this season. We stayed relatively injury free, and a perfect season gives you little to complain about.

Great job by everyone assembling the team, but now it's time we try to crank up the challenge level. I think we should try to iron out new rules regarding player happiness and/or position leaders before we begin next 1998,
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by albionmoonlight View Post
This is like watching a car wreck. But one where, every so often, someone walks over and punches the driver in the face as he struggles to free himself from the wreckage.
cthomer5000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2003, 07:48 AM   #228
QuikSand
lolzcat
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Personally, I think the place to make new restrictions (and I agree we need them) is with free agents. Despite our supposedly tough rules (forcing ourselves to only put out offers at the very beginning of free agency) we are routinely finding that nearly every single player we seek signs with us. Over all these seasons, how many guys have we actually lost out on? Just a few superstar players. But all the rank-and-file roster fillers that we think are good bargains are going unpursued by the CPU teams - and we get the free run of the lot.

Where did we get our so-called Superstar QB #2? Right off the free agent pile, and for peanuts. How have we been able to maintain our DL depth, even while letting quality guys go and suffering injury after injury - we fill in from the free agent pile, because the computer teams are nitwits when it comes to spotting capable talent.

I'm open to listening to suggestions on team chemistry and so forth, but to me- this is the obvious place to go. I think we should come up with a severe limit on how much we can use free agency for this team. Perhaps we should not use it at all. Regardless, I think limiting our abilty to fill any roster void with a quality cheap free agent would be a meaningful restriction - it would force us to consider some more overpriced contracts, but it would leave the decision-making in our hands.

As has been mentioned before, the thing I personally dislike about rules that force your hand (i.e. "you must re-sign this player, because he has a rating of XX in the YY area") is that this leaves you removed from the decision-making. If we can come up with something that involves perosnalities and such without completely handing over the roster management - I can support that. But I don't want all our decision-making to become hard programmed functions of our rules, and we simply become passengers.
QuikSand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2003, 09:18 AM   #229
primelord
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
I am not very good at coming up with house rules, but I will throw something out there. Maybe we change the rule that says we are allowed to slap the franchise tag on a player to say we must place the franchise tag on one of our players every year. That means every year we will be forced to either work out a long term deal and probably invest some pretty good money into one of our departing players or be forced to use it over and over again on guy or risk losing him.

And we could maybe even say if we tag a guy and he won;t work out a long term deal with us we have to keep using it on him even if we don;t want him anymore. It would add some strategy because we would be forced to think carefully about who we tag, because once they are tagged they are with us for the long haul whether it be a long term deal we work out with them or us being forced to keep slapping the tag on them. Just a thought.
__________________
.
primelord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2003, 09:31 AM   #230
cthomer5000
Strategy Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
I think we should have to get rid of all players who are either "demanding trade" or "angry" (that's if I'm recalling correctly that angry follows disgruntled.

In real life these are the locker-room cancer types that you feel you're better off without.

EDIT: these players would have to be cut or traded in the off-season.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by albionmoonlight View Post
This is like watching a car wreck. But one where, every so often, someone walks over and punches the driver in the face as he struggles to free himself from the wreckage.

Last edited by cthomer5000 : 04-23-2003 at 09:33 AM.
cthomer5000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2003, 09:40 AM   #231
primelord
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
ct,

The problem with that is right now we only have one guy on the entire team that isn't content. And most of the time players only get that way when they aren't being played so it probably wouldn't hurt us much anyway.

We could maybe add a rule that says all conflicts on the team have to be resolved. So if a player has a conflict with anotehr player either he has to be released or traded or the other player has to be released or traded. That might make for some interesting desicions. For example right now our backup QB super star Jesse Cascini has a conflict with our starting TE Juan Hatcher. That would be a difficult call on who to move etc.
__________________
.
primelord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2003, 09:47 AM   #232
Anrhydeddu
Resident Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
I think primelord's and homer's suggestions are not in the line of what QS is thinking. Earlier I had asked, how are you able to get superstars at key positions and great depth and place restrictions on limiting that. QS knows better than I exactly how you were able to do and his suggestions focus on not being able to grab good talent cheaply, as well as signing anyone we wish - without reducing decision making which is critical to this groupthink. To me, the tag only effects one player and what homer is suggesting doesn't prevent you from getting good/great players - you just trade one batch for another, the AI is not going to stop you.

Short of building a team solely through the draft and URFA which significantly reduces decision making, I think the focus should be on 1) limiting the number of offers in week 1 of FA and 2) restricting yourself on the types of players you subsequentally grab in URFA. For example, there was no way you should have been able to cheaply grab the so-called superstar QB #2. But there have to be a criteria on who you can sign and cannot sign without getting too technical or silly. Maybe it's Years Pro or some other attribute(s). Not allowing yourself to grab good players cheaply/easily is what will be the difference.
Anrhydeddu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2003, 10:01 AM   #233
cthomer5000
Strategy Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
Quote:
Originally posted by Anrhydeddu
I think primelord's and homer's suggestions are not in the line of what QS is thinking.


There's no denying that, but they aren't mutually exclusive either.

I think on some level we should implement houserules that mirror reality (getting rid of malcontents, resolving locker-room conflicts) while also adding rules that will make our acquisition of talent more difficult (what QS and you are seeking). Certainly our premier source of cheap "fill-in" talent is the free agent pool. We'll need to change something there.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by albionmoonlight View Post
This is like watching a car wreck. But one where, every so often, someone walks over and punches the driver in the face as he struggles to free himself from the wreckage.
cthomer5000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2003, 01:16 PM   #234
wade moore
lolzcat
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: williamsburg, va
I have some thoughts on this, just been very busy, I'll try to post them up tonight..
__________________
Text Sports Network - Bringing you statistical information for several FOF MP leagues in one convenient site

Quote:
Originally Posted by Subby
Maybe I am just getting old though, but I am learning to not let perfect be the enemy of the very good...
wade moore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2003, 08:32 PM   #235
oykib
College Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
You could have the personality conflict thing, but give yourself aa year. When you combine that with the fan favorite rules it could really give you some headaches. You could also ay that in non-fave conficts with the position leader, the one other thatn the leader has to go.
oykib is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2003, 05:58 AM   #236
Bee
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
Quote:
Originally posted by QuikSand
Personally, I think the place to make new restrictions (and I agree we need them) is with free agents. Despite our supposedly tough rules (forcing ourselves to only put out offers at the very beginning of free agency) we are routinely finding that nearly every single player we seek signs with us. Over all these seasons, how many guys have we actually lost out on? Just a few superstar players. But all the rank-and-file roster fillers that we think are good bargains are going unpursued by the CPU teams - and we get the free run of the lot.

Where did we get our so-called Superstar QB #2? Right off the free agent pile, and for peanuts. How have we been able to maintain our DL depth, even while letting quality guys go and suffering injury after injury - we fill in from the free agent pile, because the computer teams are nitwits when it comes to spotting capable talent.

I'm open to listening to suggestions on team chemistry and so forth, but to me- this is the obvious place to go. I think we should come up with a severe limit on how much we can use free agency for this team. Perhaps we should not use it at all. Regardless, I think limiting our abilty to fill any roster void with a quality cheap free agent would be a meaningful restriction - it would force us to consider some more overpriced contracts, but it would leave the decision-making in our hands.

As has been mentioned before, the thing I personally dislike about rules that force your hand (i.e. "you must re-sign this player, because he has a rating of XX in the YY area") is that this leaves you removed from the decision-making. If we can come up with something that involves perosnalities and such without completely handing over the roster management - I can support that. But I don't want all our decision-making to become hard programmed functions of our rules, and we simply become passengers.


I think this is a very valid point. I'll go ahead and make a suggestion and see what you think.

What if we limit our negotiations in free agency to one player at a time (including ours)? So week 1, we pick player X and make an offer. We can't make any other offers until he signs. If he signs in week 6, then we make another offer to another player at that time. That forces us to prioritize the free agents and we risk losing multiple free agents. I think it's critical we would include our own free agents in this as well to increase the challenge.

We could also include a rule that we can only sign URFAs after the 20 week process. I think currently we have signed a couple of our own players after the free agency period was over to fill in gaps (usually they were restricted free agents).

Last edited by Bee : 04-24-2003 at 06:02 AM.
Bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2003, 06:52 AM   #237
QuikSand
lolzcat
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
I'd go even stricter. I personally woudl be in favor of a rule where we can never use the FA market, but if there's not support for that, perhaps a rule where we can only acquire one or two free agent players per season.

I think one of the subtle differences with our team is that we have 10-15 decent quality players at any time, who signed with us for piffle deals just because we're smarter than the CPU teams. Cut that out or back, and we'll have to think a lot harder about re-signing some of our marginal players... since our only other option would be to replace then with rookies.

A much tougher rule on free agents would have ripple effects throughout the game, I think. We'd be looking at re-signing our own players more not because our rule forces us to, but because practically speaking we'd have fewer good options. We'd also have to make toughher decisions about depth on the team - we'd surely have to go without quality depth at some places, eventually.
QuikSand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2003, 06:53 AM   #238
QuikSand
lolzcat
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Personally, I am likely to be away from this afternoon until sometime Saturday. My inclination is to let this discussion settle, and only then get the next season started. So, let's keep talking... I'll plan to launch the next season on Saturday some time, and we'll go from there with some new house rules of some sort.
QuikSand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2003, 07:12 AM   #239
Bee
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
I've played without using free agency at all in the past and still found the challenge lacking. What I found was that I could still dominate relatively easily through draft picks, the occasional URFA breakout player and resigning my own players.

What I was angling for with my suggested rule was to increase the likelihood of losing our own free agents, not only limit the pursuit of other free agents. Every year it seems we have 3 or 4 guys that we resign from our team. Doing that under the new rule would generally eat through the first 10 weeks of free agency and also risk the loss of 1 or more of those free agents if one of the guys take a long time to decide.

Perhaps what we could do would be limit the pursuit of new free agents through week 10? That would give us the choice of bringing in a new guy and risk losing a couple of our own top free agents or retaining our own guys and not pick up any new guys?
Bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2003, 10:44 AM   #240
QuikSand
lolzcat
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Quote:
Originally posted by Bee
I've played without using free agency at all in the past and still found the challenge lacking. What I found was that I could still dominate relatively easily through draft picks, the occasional URFA breakout player and resigning my own players.


Hmm, that's disappointing. Perhaps with that and our existing rules about re-signing fan faves, and perhaps something even tougher in that regard, we might make a game out of this thing yet.

Quote:
Perhaps what we could do would be limit the pursuit of new free agents through week 10? That would give us the choice of bringing in a new guy and risk losing a couple of our own top free agents or retaining our own guys and not pick up any new guys?


I don't follow you here, I'm afraid. What do you mean by "limit the pursuit of new free agents through week 10?" We already say that we can only put in offers prior to week 1... do you mean restruct the number of offers we can make?

Along similar lines - maybe we should make all our re-signings before week one of free agency, when the demands are highest. That would have the effect of reducing our flexibility a little more. We do benefit by sitting out guys who are restricted, watching their demands drop as the FA process goes on (when that really doesn't make any sense, when you think about it).

Last edited by QuikSand : 04-24-2003 at 10:47 AM.
QuikSand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2003, 10:47 AM   #241
QuikSand
lolzcat
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
One more thing to add to the list of considerations: we have made out pretty well by trading. I might be inclined to tighten up our rules there a good deal more.

I'd consider this:

-the only trades we can make are draft day trades involving only draft picks

...and if necessary, broaden to include this:

-we may accept a trade offered to us if it passes the standard fairness test (modify it, then see if it gets accepted)
QuikSand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2003, 10:54 AM   #242
DukeRulesMAB
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alexandria, VA
As a casual observer, I agree you've done well on trades, but it seems like you've done exceptionally well on draft day trades. Several times, you've gotten top 10 picks by trading low firsts and scraps for some terrible team's first the next season. That has put several top talents into your team through the draft when you were picking in the very end of the round. Might be something to look at; perhaps limiting draft day deals to trading up and trading down instead of trading out.
__________________
FOBL: Where anyone not in IAP

FOFL: I may be the commish, but it's still pretty good.
DukeRulesMAB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2003, 10:58 AM   #243
Bee
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
Quote:
Originally posted by QuikSand

I don't follow you here, I'm afraid. What do you mean by "limit the pursuit of new free agents through week 10?" We already say that we can only put in offers prior to week 1... do you mean restruct the number of offers we can make?

Along similar lines - maybe we should make all our re-signings before week one of free agency, when the demands are highest. That would have the effect of reducing our flexibility a little more. We do benefit by sitting out guys who are restricted, watching their demands drop as the FA process goes on (when that really doesn't make any sense, when you think about it).


What I'm talking about is signing guys one at a time during the 20 step free agent process. That would be the only time we can sign anyone other than rookies. That would also include our free agents. For example, we have 10 free agents. We want to resign 3 of them and there are 2 more guys we are interested in. We pick one of our guys to pursue first. We make him an offer in week 1, but no offers to any of the other guys we want to keep or pursue. Once he signs, we can make our second offer to the next guy if he is still available. At the end of week 10, we can only pursue our own free agents. After week 20, anyone not signed can't be offered a contract.

That would increase our chances of losing our own free agents and it would reduce our ability to raid the free agent market. But it wouldn't take away some of the decision making that we would go through. If anything I think it might add some more "tough decisions" into the process. If we have a starting RB and starting DE we want to keep, who do we go after first and who do we risk exposing to the free agent market? If there's someone who's a better deal in free agency, do we go after them and risk losing our guys while he decides if he will accept our contract?

I've never tried this before, but it looks like it could be challenging especially if a player or two takes a long time in deciding to sign.
Bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2003, 10:59 AM   #244
Bee
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
Quote:
Originally posted by DukeRulesMAB
As a casual observer, I agree you've done well on trades, but it seems like you've done exceptionally well on draft day trades. Several times, you've gotten top 10 picks by trading low firsts and scraps for some terrible team's first the next season. That has put several top talents into your team through the draft when you were picking in the very end of the round. Might be something to look at; perhaps limiting draft day deals to trading up and trading down instead of trading out.


Good point. Perhaps limiting us to only trading for picks that are for the current year and not future picks.
Bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2003, 01:45 PM   #245
wade moore
lolzcat
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: williamsburg, va
Bump, this will not die ..

I actually like Bee's idea.. It seems to have the most effect while retaining the most decision making.. we have to prioritize who we sign and how much we can afford... we would definately lose key guys on our team, and have a much more difficult time picking up those cheap skill players in free agency...
__________________
Text Sports Network - Bringing you statistical information for several FOF MP leagues in one convenient site

Quote:
Originally Posted by Subby
Maybe I am just getting old though, but I am learning to not let perfect be the enemy of the very good...
wade moore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2003, 02:22 PM   #246
Wolfpack
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
Just a lurker's thought: How about setting a minimum salary for the cheap free agents? Say 10% over what they're asking? Perhaps incorporate their talent into the equation, saying that player A with X talent gets a higher "minimum" deal than player B who has X-Y talent. The last thing I think you need to do is to build in so many "Tuesday under a full moon when the dog's barking in the backyard" conditions that you're too busy checking rules rather than making decisions.

Then again, I'm not familiar at all with FOF4 so I could be way off base on such an idea. The one hole I can think of with this is if "good" players ask for the same money as "bad" players, which is why I suggested incorporating talent level somehow. Just a thought.
Wolfpack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2003, 01:14 PM   #247
QuikSand
lolzcat
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Okay, Bee's idea sounds pretty good to me, too. How do we fit that in with our current rules that require us to re-sign players, even when we wouldn't have wanted to? Certainly we don't want things to get easier for us in that regard (at least I don't think so).

Bee, anyone - what do you think? Keep the required offer for the mandated players, and then everything else is "one at a time" under your system?

And where do we stop? I don't like the prospect of getting players late in the FA period - there are just too mane bargains there, and that's theoretically what we're trying to slow down.

Open to the idea... looking to help flesh it out some more.
QuikSand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2003, 11:37 AM   #248
Bee
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
Quote:
Originally posted by QuikSand
Okay, Bee's idea sounds pretty good to me, too. How do we fit that in with our current rules that require us to re-sign players, even when we wouldn't have wanted to? Certainly we don't want things to get easier for us in that regard (at least I don't think so).

Bee, anyone - what do you think? Keep the required offer for the mandated players, and then everything else is "one at a time" under your system?

And where do we stop? I don't like the prospect of getting players late in the FA period - there are just too mane bargains there, and that's theoretically what we're trying to slow down.

Open to the idea... looking to help flesh it out some more.


Here's my suggestion (please feel free to adjust it how you see fit):

I say we continue to offer our fan favorites contracts in week 1. We can't sign anyone else until they've all signed (either with us or with someone else). After that we can only sign 1 guy a week. Only make offers to free agents outside our team before week 10 (if our fan favorites haven't signed by then, we can't bring anyone new in). We also have to sign our "restricted" free agents during the 20 week process and they will count as the free agent for that week. Anyone unsigned after the 20 step free agency can't be offered a contract (even restricted free agents).

We might want to adjust the last week we can sign "outside" free agents if week 10 allows too much access to those players. Maybe revise it to week 7 or 8?
Bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2003, 05:11 PM   #249
QuikSand
lolzcat
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Sign one guy a week... meaning make one olffer per week (from within or without), or does that mean we only pursue one guy at a time? Sorry if I'm not comprehending well... just want to get it.
QuikSand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2003, 08:19 PM   #250
Anrhydeddu
Resident Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Bee, I like the way you think, you guys are on the right track.

QS, I read that, as its most restrictive, that you can only pursue on player at a time and no other player until he signs with you or someone else.
Anrhydeddu is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.