Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-14-2008, 07:27 PM   #201
Eaglesfan27
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Jersey
Way to drop the ball, TO.
__________________
Retired GM of the eNFL 2007 Super Bowl Champion Philadelphia Eagles (19-0 record.)
GM of the WOOF 2006 Doggie Bowl Champion Atlantic City Gamblers.
GM of the IHOF 2019 and 2022 IHOF Bowl Champion Asheville Axemen.
Eaglesfan27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 07:27 PM   #202
Jas_lov
College Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Owens drops the ball and the crowd boos. They've had it with him.
Jas_lov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 07:29 PM   #203
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
man, they were all over TO.
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 07:30 PM   #204
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by molson View Post
I did some quick skimming, there may be a pass/run distinction.

To run the ball in, obviously the ball has to cross the plane.

For a pass, it's more complicated. Obviously you can catch a ball in the back of the end zone, even if you reach out of bounds to get it. The ball NEVER has to cross the plane in that example. The ball can travel completely to the side of the endzone, but if the player catches it while both feet are in, it's a TD. I don't see why that would be any different in the front of the end zone.

That is wrong. The plane of the end zone extends technically indefinitely. The ball has to break that plane at some point for a touchdown. If the play is at the back of the end zone, or side somewher for that matter, that ball HAS to have already broken that plane to get there.
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 07:31 PM   #205
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
That was a great start.
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 07:37 PM   #206
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
what a terrible running into the kicker call there
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 07:38 PM   #207
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
He stepped on his toe!
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 07:38 PM   #208
Radii
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lathum View Post
what a terrible running into the kicker call there

I don't understand why you accept that penalty? Its very unlikely to get better field position on another kick.

Last edited by Radii : 12-14-2008 at 07:39 PM.
Radii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 07:39 PM   #209
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
Did I miss something or shouldn't there have been fair catch interference there too? Last I knew you couldn't grab the returner after he fair catches the punt.
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 07:39 PM   #210
Dr. Sak
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Stuck in Yinzerville, PA
(Insert obligatory Sidney Crosby diving joke)
Dr. Sak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 07:39 PM   #211
sabotai
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Satellite of Love
Senior moment for the guys calling the game. "I don't understand why the Giants wouldn't decline the penalty." Huh? The penalty was ON the Giants.

Last edited by sabotai : 12-14-2008 at 07:40 PM.
sabotai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 07:41 PM   #212
Radii
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by sabotai View Post
Senior moment for the guys calling the game. "I don't understand why the Giants wouldn't decline the penalty." Huh? The penalty was ON the Giants.


oops. I got suckered into that myself. I blame madden.
Radii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 07:42 PM   #213
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by sabotai View Post
Senior moment for the guys calling the game. "I don't understand why the Giants wouldn't decline the penalty." Huh? The penalty was ON the Giants.

After the refs in the Steelers game nothing would surprise me.
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 07:45 PM   #214
sabotai
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Satellite of Love
Quote:
Originally Posted by EagleFan View Post
After the refs in the Steelers game nothing would surprise me.

Heh. "Running into the kicker, on the Giants. The Giants have declined the penalty. 1st down."

In other news, horrible P.I. call on Dallas.
sabotai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 08:07 PM   #215
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
Romo questionable to return.
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 08:09 PM   #216
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
Is that why Owens was smiling on the sideline?
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 08:24 PM   #217
Suburban Rhythm
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Quote:
Originally Posted by EagleFan View Post
After the refs in the Steelers game nothing would surprise me.

Exactly...that was an awful personal foul call on Jeff Reed. Was that possible the first ever personal foul called on a kicker in NFL history?
__________________
"Do you guys play fast tempos with odd time signatures?"
"Yeah"
"Cool!!"
Suburban Rhythm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 08:35 PM   #218
larrymcg421
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Georgia
I laugh every time I see Witten catch a pass now.
__________________
Top 10 Songs of the Year 1955-Present (1976 Added)

Franchise Portfolio Draft Winner
Fictional Character Draft Winner
Television Family Draft Winner
Build Your Own Hollywood Studio Draft Winner
larrymcg421 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 08:38 PM   #219
miami_fan
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Land O Lakes FL
Quote:
Originally Posted by larrymcg421 View Post
I laugh every time I see Witten catch a pass now.

I am waiting for the side by side view of what Witten and Owens are doing to on each play
__________________
"The blind soldier fought for me in this war. The least I can do now is fight for him. I have eyes. He hasn’t. I have a voice on the radio, he hasn’t. I was born a white man. And until a colored man is a full citizen, like me, I haven’t the leisure to enjoy the freedom that colored man risked his life to maintain for me. I don’t own what I have until he owns an equal share of it. Until somebody beats me and blinds me, I am in his debt."- Orson Welles August 11, 1946
miami_fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 08:45 PM   #220
Hurst2112
College Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Minneapolis
NFL Video Galleries

about 4:46 into the video.

Somebody explain to me (if the ball did 'touch the chalk') why it wouldn't be a TD?
Hurst2112 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 08:54 PM   #221
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
I'm actualy happy the Giants are only down by 4. The running game has been brutal which in turn has killed the pessing game. Smith has looked pretty good but a couple of dropped passes has hurt. As long as they keep preassure on Romo I think we have a good shot, sooner or later Romo is gonna fick up royally
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 08:57 PM   #222
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hurst2112 View Post
NFL Video Galleries

about 4:46 into the video.

Somebody explain to me (if the ball did 'touch the chalk') why it wouldn't be a TD?

But it DIDN'T "touch the chalk"
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 09:00 PM   #223
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
Collonsworth is an idiot. The replay the shows the ball hitting the yellow line but that yellow line was drawn on theplaying field side of the goal line. The ball would have needed to cross that yellow line to reach the actual goal line and it didn't.
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 09:00 PM   #224
Hurst2112
College Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Minneapolis
Quote:
Originally Posted by EagleFan View Post
But it DIDN'T "touch the chalk"

halftime show of Sunday night's game showed a still of the play. it certainly did.
Hurst2112 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 09:01 PM   #225
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
Yeah it doesn't look like it touched it by much, but I say it did.
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 09:02 PM   #226
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
double dola: Then they show the "overhead" view to try to make his point. The problem is that the overhead view was not from above the goal line but from about the 20 or 25 (or farther) so of course it looked like it was inside the line on that angle.
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 09:03 PM   #227
Hurst2112
College Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Minneapolis
Quote:
Originally Posted by EagleFan View Post
Collonsworth is an idiot. The replay the shows the ball hitting the yellow line but that yellow line was drawn on theplaying field side of the goal line. The ball would have needed to cross that yellow line to reach the actual goal line and it didn't.

I guess I'll have to wait and see tomorrow. To me, it was a fair play. Though I'm a little biased.

Besides, Steelers would have tied it with a FG and beat them, AGAIN, in OT.
Hurst2112 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 09:03 PM   #228
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hurst2112 View Post
halftime show of Sunday night's game showed a still of the play. it certainly did.

That yellow line they showed was not the goal line, it had to cross that line to be in and it didn't. They had the yellow line inside the field of play.
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 09:04 PM   #229
Hurst2112
College Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Minneapolis
Quote:
Originally Posted by EagleFan View Post
double dola: Then they show the "overhead" view to try to make his point. The problem is that the overhead view was not from above the goal line but from about the 20 or 25 (or farther) so of course it looked like it was inside the line on that angle.

i was referring to the sideline angle. I saw the tip of the ball cross the white line...just the tip of the ball 'broke the chalk'. That's what I saw but I wasn't reffin'.
Hurst2112 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 09:04 PM   #230
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hurst2112 View Post
I guess I'll have to wait and see tomorrow. To me, it was a fair play. Though I'm a little biased.

Besides, Steelers would have tied it with a FG and beat them, AGAIN, in OT.

Of course, they shouldn't have even had a field goal earlier in the game when that drive was extended by another lousy spot of the ball.
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 09:09 PM   #231
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hurst2112 View Post
i was referring to the sideline angle. I saw the tip of the ball cross the white line...just the tip of the ball 'broke the chalk'. That's what I saw but I wasn't reffin'.

There was no way that could be seen in the replay. That also wasn't the reason the refs said it was a TD. Has ther been a statement issued by the refs about that? I believe they misruled on it by loking at the feet and not the ball, why else would the ref have even mentioned the receiver's feet with no mention of the ball broke the plane. There has never been a replay result in which the ball crossing the plane was the issue and that has NOT been mentioned in the outcome by the ref.
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 09:09 PM   #232
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
ugh
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 09:10 PM   #233
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
ugh? Did I miss something (have been back and forth between Survivor and this)?
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 09:12 PM   #234
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
eli threw a pick. A bad pick
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 09:16 PM   #235
henry296
College Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
This is from the ESPN story on the Steelers game.

Later, referee Walt Coleman said, "He had two feet down. When he gained control of the ball, the ball was breaking the plane."
__________________
"It's a great day for hockey" - "Badger" Bob Johnson
henry296 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 09:27 PM   #236
larrymcg421
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Georgia
Another Witten catch.
__________________
Top 10 Songs of the Year 1955-Present (1976 Added)

Franchise Portfolio Draft Winner
Fictional Character Draft Winner
Television Family Draft Winner
Build Your Own Hollywood Studio Draft Winner
larrymcg421 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 09:31 PM   #237
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by henry296 View Post
This is from the ESPN story on the Steelers game.

Later, referee Walt Coleman said, "He had two feet down. When he gained control of the ball, the ball was breaking the plane."

Again, what did two feet down have to do with anything? There is no way he could see if that ball was over the plane in the replay to be able to over-rule the call on the field. He is just trying to cover his ass when he realized that he looked at the wrong thing (feet instead of ball).
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 09:34 PM   #238
henry296
College Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Doesn't he have to have 2 feet down with possession to make it a catch.
If he has possession with the ball over the line, but still in the air, that isn't a TD.

I do agree there does not appear to be evidence to change the call... if it had been ruled I TD on the field I'd say the same thing.
__________________
"It's a great day for hockey" - "Badger" Bob Johnson
henry296 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 09:38 PM   #239
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by henry296 View Post
Doesn't he have to have 2 feet down with possession to make it a catch.
If he has possession with the ball over the line, but still in the air, that isn't a TD.

I do agree there does not appear to be evidence to change the call... if it had been ruled I TD on the field I'd say the same thing.

It was in the middle of the field, 2 feet down means nothing. If it's the catch they are judging it would be that he controlled it to the ground. If it's the TD they are judging it's did the ball break the plane. 2 feet down has nothing to do with that play.
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 09:43 PM   #240
henry296
College Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
It still has to be a legal catch to be a TD.
__________________
"It's a great day for hockey" - "Badger" Bob Johnson
henry296 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 09:45 PM   #241
JonInMiddleGA
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
Two feet, one foot, three feet, whatever.

From the video here, looks like a touchdown to me. (catch occurs at about 4:49 of the clip).
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis
JonInMiddleGA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 09:46 PM   #242
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
The Giants dont look like a championship caliber team right now
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 10:00 PM   #243
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by henry296 View Post
It still has to be a legal catch to be a TD.

That's true. But to be a legal catch what was needed is control maintained through hitting the ground as he was going to the ground in the act of making a catch. Two feet down mean nothing there, it was the middle of the field. The review was not about it being a legal catch, it was about it being a touchdown and there was not enough evidence to overturn the call no matter what the original call was (TD or stopped short).

What gets me on this call is that it wasn't the first screwed up replay call in the game. The earlier spot challenge should have been overturned as it's easy to see the player only gets to the 29 1/2 and not the 30.

Just my opinion but I think the ref screwed up when he looked at the replay and now the league is in cover your ass mode as it would seem infinitely worse if the ref came out and said he actually looked to see if his feet were down as opposed to what he should have been looking at.

I don't really care who won that game, just hate seeing games decided by screwed up calls. Hell, this isn't the first time the Steelers benefited from an incorrect TD call, they got a Super Bowl win thanks to one.
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 10:02 PM   #244
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
Hopefully this saftey jumpstarts the offense.
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 10:06 PM   #245
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
Horrible no call there. Toomer got slammed WAY before the ball got there, should have been PI the whole way
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 10:06 PM   #246
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
How was that play not pass interference? The 1st down play.
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 10:09 PM   #247
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by EagleFan View Post
How was that play not pass interference? The 1st down play.

I know, I am fuming about that. The defender basicly threw his shoulder into Toomer and knocked him over, giving him no chance to catch the ball.
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 10:12 PM   #248
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lathum View Post
I know, I am fuming about that. The defender basicly threw his shoulder into Toomer and knocked him over, giving him no chance to catch the ball.

I rewound a few times to see "was it uncatchable?" "no" "did he hit him as the ball arrived?" "no, before".
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 10:15 PM   #249
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
ugh, second and 20 and they give up a 17 yard running play. The Cowgirls are begging to give this game away and the Giants can't capitalize
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 10:20 PM   #250
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
I am disgusted right now.

There is no shame losing to a division opponent on the road, but the Cowgirls weren't impressive and the Giants still couldn't win.
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 AM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.