Werewolf: Hunt for Necromancers - GAME OVER! Post #3469 - Page 49

Fouts · 06-23-2006, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anxiety

Why, I thought you were going to keep Necs at bay all by yourself?

-Anxiety

I'm talking about the next lynch.

kingfc22 · 06-23-2006, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrith

Because the prophecy is the only only _ONLY_ hidden role in the game. THERE ARE NO OTHER ROLES THAT WE DO NOT KNOW ALL THE DETAILS ABOUT. Lathum has to be the prophecy or be a totally lying bastard. Possibly both.

And at this point. I am in favor of lynching the prophecy since he is more than likely the one responsible for killing our seer. And IMO that means he is not playing on our side.

Even if Fouts is the mummy, it's not like the necs have found each other yet because they have still yet to kill anybody and I have yet to detect on any syncronized movements. And we could just lynch him tomorrow if we still think he is the mummy.

dubb93 · 06-23-2006, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49

Dubb: Blade could have done 1 scan in the scenario that Lathum is presenting, on n1, and then Lathum, on n4, finishes the work which then causes Fouts to appear today. It all works out timeline wise.

3 nights no scan BEFORE he can be raised. I'm pretty sure Hoops was clear on that.

Barkeep49 · 06-23-2006, 06:28 PM

I think Schmidty has seen how many posts there are in the thread.

saldana · 06-23-2006, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrith

Because the prophecy is the only only _ONLY_ hidden role in the game. THERE ARE NO OTHER ROLES THAT WE DO NOT KNOW ALL THE DETAILS ABOUT. Lathum has to be the prophecy or be a totally lying bastard. Possibly both.

and if he is the prophecy, why didnt he say that, unless he has his own winning condition, in which case, he, and by association fouts, is not on our side, so either way, the value of killing him keeps increasing.

Barkeep49 · 06-23-2006, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dubb93

3 nights no scan BEFORE he can be raised. I'm pretty sure Hoops was clear on that.

You're correct and I am wrong.

Abe Sargent · 06-23-2006, 06:31 PM

Fouts, you really need to get in on the next game from the beginning!

-Anxiety

Fouts · 06-23-2006, 06:32 PM

Here are some facts (since I arrived);

dubb claims to be a soothsayer, scans lathum, says he is good.

lathum claims to have summoned the avatar, is sure Alan is a necro

fouts claims to be an avatar

random people (led by Alan T, saldana, and tyrith) want to kill anyone claiming to be anything, even if it is likely to be the truth.

Now dispute it with facts.

Barkeep49 · 06-23-2006, 06:33 PM

How can dubb trust his scan when the scan says Lathum is an Egyptian without a role and Lathum claims to be an Egyptian with a role.

st.cronin · 06-23-2006, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dubb93

If we are right and Lathum is the head nec, voting him assures that someone gets killed tonight. We CAN NOT STOP THE MUMMY. I never thought I would say that, but for once it may be true.

BEST.POST.EVER.

Fouts · 06-23-2006, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anxiety

Fouts, you really need to get in on the next game from the beginning!

-Anxiety

I put too much energy into the game, and get bummed when people don't listen. The truth can be handed to people on a silver platter and they will say they don't believe it.

st.cronin · 06-23-2006, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade6119

so cronin, how are you today?

fine, thanks, and you?

kingfc22 · 06-23-2006, 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49

How can dubb trust his scan when the scan says Lathum is an Egyptian without a role and Lathum claims to be an Egyptian with a role.

And there lies the problem.

Blade6119 · 06-23-2006, 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin

fine, thanks, and you?

To be honest, im feeling a little stiff...i swear, dying is not fun...you know what i mean man?

Fouts · 06-23-2006, 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49

How can dubb trust his scan when the scan says Lathum is an Egyptian without a role and Lathum claims to be an Egyptian with a role.

That is for the GM to figure out. I don't think he scanned the whole post. What do you expect me to believe? I am an Avatar and he summoned me. How can a bad guy do that?

dubb93 · 06-23-2006, 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade6119

To be honest, im feeling a little stiff...i swear, dying is not fun...you know what i mean man?

I assume someone out there must have the power to bring you back, although reading the rules, it gets confusing on the subject.

Qwikshot · 06-23-2006, 06:36 PM

Okay...I'm not moving off Fouts, for one reason and one reason only...

There hasn't been a night kill attributed to the baddies...I don't think they're as large in number as we thought. I think they're still trying to find each other...

The botched attacks were lone assassins, and one lost his knife, so I'm guessing he may have lost the ability to attack further.

The disease attack on Blade shows the desperation, the head nec went blindly after a veteren player.

The mummy is the most logical choice because we assume there is one seer, it's not that all of us are baddies, it just seems so blatantly obvious that Fouts is the mummy because of the evidence.

So we got a pissing match for pro and con of keeping Fouts, but if Fouts is a mummy, we know someone will die tonight because the mummy will kill someone.

If Fouts isn't the mummy, then I will take that gamble because, it still means that the baddies are splintered.

Doesn't it strike anyone odd the number of nights now without a successful kill, I wake up and worry every morning and grow more and more alarmed...maybe Bek, bullet and just the head baddie...we may be better off than we think?

But I'm not moving off Fouts, it seems too obvious who and what he is, and what his intentions are.

Fouts · 06-23-2006, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum

lol,

I;m telling you ALanT is the way to go. Maybe once you see fouts is the avatar you will believe me.

This is the post that has me believing that Alan T is the necro. Whether he is a necro or not, after you lynch myself or lathum, you will lynch Alan.

Qwikshot · 06-23-2006, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade6119

To be honest, im feeling a little stiff...i swear, dying is not fun...you know what i mean man?

Admit it, you got a hardon for werewolves...

saldana · 06-23-2006, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade6119

To be honest, im feeling a little stiff...i swear, dying is not fun...you know what i mean man?

stop reading the Hot or Not threads

dubb93 · 06-23-2006, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fouts

This is the post that has me believing that Alan T is the necro. Whether he is a necro or not, after you lynch myself or lathum, you will lynch Alan.

Even if Blade did raise you he had to take 3 full nights off before he raised you. Listening to Lathum, we'd be led to believe in his 3 off nights he scanned Lathum, Bullet, and Alan. Not fucking likely.

Fouts · 06-23-2006, 06:38 PM

How did Pass die?

Barkeep49 · 06-23-2006, 06:38 PM

Qwik: I actually the somewaht the reverese of one of your statements. If Fouts is NOT the Mummy, it likely means that with so few attacks the bad guys have mostly found each other.

Barkeep49 · 06-23-2006, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fouts

How did Pass die?

Coffee Warlord, the fanatic, killed him.

dubb93 · 06-23-2006, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fouts

How did Pass die?

Coffee killed him and then hung himself.

Qwikshot · 06-23-2006, 06:39 PM

I'm out for the night...I won't be back till after lynch call...enjoy your weekend.

saldana · 06-23-2006, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fouts

How did Pass die?

he was killed by Coffe Warlord, who was the fanatic (assasin), who then had to kill himself for killing another egyptian

Qwikshot · 06-23-2006, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fouts

How did Pass die?

murdered by fanatic, Coffee.

dubb93 · 06-23-2006, 06:40 PM

he was killed by Coffe Warlord, who was the fanatic (assasin), who then had to kill himself for killing another egyptian because the rules say that if he killed an egyptian he must kill himself.

dubb93 · 06-23-2006, 06:41 PM

Do we need this expanded any more?

Qwikshot · 06-23-2006, 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49

Qwik: I actually the somewaht the reverese of one of your statements. If Fouts is NOT the Mummy, it likely means that with so few attacks the bad guys have mostly found each other.

Really, what are they waiting for? That's my only hope, is that hoops made them a small group...to buy us enough time to start locating them...I think it was a coup to get bek and bullet so quick...

st.cronin · 06-23-2006, 06:41 PM

This game is on a pace to fly past the Maximum Football thread in terms of replies.

saldana · 06-23-2006, 06:42 PM

one other thing to consider, although some people dont like to bring past games into current games.....lathum is easily in the top 3 for fake role reveals...he as jammed it up our collective villager asses several times in the past with convoluted stories about roles that no one has ever heard of.

kingfc22 · 06-23-2006, 06:42 PM

So we have a tie with 3 voters not in.

dubb93 · 06-23-2006, 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saldana

one other thing to consider, although some people dont like to bring past games into current games.....lathum is easily in the top 3 for fake role reveals...he as jammed it up our collective villager asses several times in the past with convoluted stories about roles that no one has ever heard of.

.......only to later get it jammed up his collective ass.

Blade6119 · 06-23-2006, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dubb93

.......only to later get it jammed up his collective ass.

Can we please refrain from all this talk about jamming things up dudes asses? thanks

saldana · 06-23-2006, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin

This game is on a pace to fly past the Maximum Football thread in terms of replies.

it should easily become the highest posted WW game

Barkeep49 · 06-23-2006, 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kingfc22

So we have a tie with 3 voters not in.

Including the person with the tie breaker.

saldana · 06-23-2006, 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade6119

Can we please refrain from all this talk about jamming things up dudes asses? thanks

why, this game is about necrophiliacs, after all.

Barkeep49 · 06-23-2006, 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saldana

it should easily become the highest posted WW game

Which would make it 2nd or 3rd all time depending on whether it could beat the hockey thread.

Blade6119 · 06-23-2006, 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saldana

it should easily become the highest posted WW game

#7 thread all time for FOFC already

SnDvls · 06-23-2006, 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49

People on fouts: Why stay on him? Hasn't the cost benefit analysis changed sufficiently as to make sense to test Lathum?

Lathum and Fouts have linked themselves to each other. If Lathum is good so is Fouts. If Fouts is bad so is Lathum. Since Lathum, if good, has no further way of helping us, and Fouts if good, does, doesn't it make sense to lynch him as if they are both bad Lynching Lathum isn't such a bad thing and then we get to lynch Fouts tomorrow.

in some senses yes, but a 3 night kill tonight vs a 2 night kill is not so good and gets the necros back in the game. If you kill fouts and he's bad we can get Lathum tomorrow and only suffer 2 kills. If we let fouts live we suffer 4 kills in 2 nights vs 3...all of this assumes the disease was used.

saldana · 06-23-2006, 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade6119

#7 thread all time for FOFC already

yeah, and about to pass my Harry Potter game

Fouts · 06-23-2006, 06:48 PM

So the next 3 voters options are; avatar, summoner or throw away vote.

While this looks like a great day for the necros, some people have lumped themselves together. After one of us dies, you will be under the microscope.

Fouts · 06-23-2006, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49

As of 2399

Fouts - Qwikshot (1887), SnDvls (1893), Chubby (1928), Schmidty (1937), Dubb (2213)

Alan T - Lathum (1912), Fouts (2247)

Dubb - Vince (2244)

Lathum - Saldana (2267), Tyrith (2297), Anxiety(2343), Barkeep (2345), king (2358)

Not voted - Path, , Alan T, Tanglewood

Think about this. The necro's won't choose to kill me over another player when they know I die in 3 days no matter what.

saldana · 06-23-2006, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SnDvls

in some senses yes, but a 3 night kill tonight vs a 2 night kill is not so good and gets the necros back in the game. If you kill fouts and he's bad we can get Lathum tomorrow and only suffer 2 kills. If we let fouts live we suffer 4 kills in 2 nights vs 3...all of this assumes the disease was used.

this is correct, BUT, if we kill lathum tonight, we get 3 nights of protections from fouts, any one of which could result in a necro running into him and getting his dead loving ass killed in the process.

Abe Sargent · 06-23-2006, 06:52 PM

Yes, the child molester is hot.

Oh, wait a second....

-Anxiety

kingfc22 · 06-23-2006, 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fouts

Think about this. The necro's won't choose to kill me over another player when they know I die in 3 days no matter what.

Why not? If you are the avatar then we get 3 days of protection with an EG and an avatar. They have yet to make a night kill and going up against 2 bodyguards at once and a Favored by the Gods would be more than enough reason to vote for you.

Fouts · 06-23-2006, 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kingfc22

Why not? If you are the avatar then we get 3 days of protection with an EG and an avatar. They have yet to make a night kill and going up against 2 bodyguards at once and a Favored by the Gods would be more than enough reason to vote for you.

But, why is it ok to kill somebody on the side of good? Lathum has said Alan is a necro. Nobody has come out and said I am a mummy or Lathum is the head nec. You guys are all saying kill one of the good guys is ok, while leaving a bad guy alive. I don't understand it.

SnDvls · 06-23-2006, 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saldana

this is correct, BUT, if we kill lathum tonight, we get 3 nights of protections from fouts, any one of which could result in a necro running into him and getting his dead loving ass killed in the process.

only if fouts is good. see if fouts is bad we know lathum is bad and the necros do to so they can all meet up tonight. (guess 4 left now). so we kill lathum. leave fouts to kill and probally 2 more kills tonight. Tomorrow the remaining 4 necros gang up as we hang fouts. that's again a 2 night kill.

this is the necros attempt to all finally get together. no matter what they either scan lathum and all have communication.

06-23-2006, 06:31 PM	#2407
Abe Sargent Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Catonsville, MD	Fouts, you really need to get in on the next game from the beginning! -Anxiety __________________ Check out my two current weekly Magic columns! https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent

06-23-2006, 06:36 PM	#2417
Qwikshot Pro Starter Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: ...down the gravity well	Okay...I'm not moving off Fouts, for one reason and one reason only... There hasn't been a night kill attributed to the baddies...I don't think they're as large in number as we thought. I think they're still trying to find each other... The botched attacks were lone assassins, and one lost his knife, so I'm guessing he may have lost the ability to attack further. The disease attack on Blade shows the desperation, the head nec went blindly after a veteren player. The mummy is the most logical choice because we assume there is one seer, it's not that all of us are baddies, it just seems so blatantly obvious that Fouts is the mummy because of the evidence. So we got a pissing match for pro and con of keeping Fouts, but if Fouts is a mummy, we know someone will die tonight because the mummy will kill someone. If Fouts isn't the mummy, then I will take that gamble because, it still means that the baddies are splintered. Doesn't it strike anyone odd the number of nights now without a successful kill, I wake up and worry every morning and grow more and more alarmed...maybe Bek, bullet and just the head baddie...we may be better off than we think? But I'm not moving off Fouts, it seems too obvious who and what he is, and what his intentions are. __________________ "General Woundwort's body was never found. It could be that he still lives his fierce life somewhere else, but from that day on, mother rabbits would tell their kittens that if they did not do as they were told, the General would get them. Such was Woundwort's monument, and perhaps it would not have displeased him." Watership Down, Richard Adams

06-23-2006, 06:39 PM	#2426
Qwikshot Pro Starter Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: ...down the gravity well	I'm out for the night...I won't be back till after lynch call...enjoy your weekend. __________________ "General Woundwort's body was never found. It could be that he still lives his fierce life somewhere else, but from that day on, mother rabbits would tell their kittens that if they did not do as they were told, the General would get them. Such was Woundwort's monument, and perhaps it would not have displeased him." Watership Down, Richard Adams

06-23-2006, 06:41 PM	#2432
st.cronin General Manager Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: New Mexico	This game is on a pace to fly past the Maximum Football thread in terms of replies. __________________ co-commish: bb-bbcf.net knives out

06-23-2006, 06:42 PM	#2434
kingfc22 Head Coach Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Morgan Hill, CA	So we have a tie with 3 voters not in. __________________ Fan of SF Giants, 49ers, Sharks, Arsenal

06-23-2006, 06:28 PM	#2404
Barkeep49 Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Not too far away	I think Schmidty has seen how many posts there are in the thread.

06-23-2006, 06:32 PM	#2408
Fouts College Starter Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: California	Here are some facts (since I arrived); dubb claims to be a soothsayer, scans lathum, says he is good. lathum claims to have summoned the avatar, is sure Alan is a necro fouts claims to be an avatar random people (led by Alan T, saldana, and tyrith) want to kill anyone claiming to be anything, even if it is likely to be the truth. Now dispute it with facts.

06-23-2006, 06:33 PM	#2409
Barkeep49 Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Not too far away	How can dubb trust his scan when the scan says Lathum is an Egyptian without a role and Lathum claims to be an Egyptian with a role.

06-23-2006, 06:38 PM	#2422
Fouts College Starter Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: California	How did Pass die?

06-23-2006, 06:38 PM	#2423
Barkeep49 Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Not too far away	Qwik: I actually the somewaht the reverese of one of your statements. If Fouts is NOT the Mummy, it likely means that with so few attacks the bad guys have mostly found each other.

06-23-2006, 06:42 PM	#2433
saldana Pro Starter Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Bethlehem, Pa	one other thing to consider, although some people dont like to bring past games into current games.....lathum is easily in the top 3 for fake role reveals...he as jammed it up our collective villager asses several times in the past with convoluted stories about roles that no one has ever heard of.

06-23-2006, 06:48 PM	#2444
Fouts College Starter Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: California	So the next 3 voters options are; avatar, summoner or throw away vote. While this looks like a great day for the necros, some people have lumped themselves together. After one of us dies, you will be under the microscope.

06-23-2006, 06:52 PM	#2447
Abe Sargent Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Catonsville, MD	Yes, the child molester is hot. Oh, wait a second.... -Anxiety __________________ Check out my two current weekly Magic columns! https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)