|
View Poll Results: Who will (not should) be the Democratic presidential nominee in 2008? | |||
Joe Biden | 0 | 0% | |
Hillary Clinton | 62 | 35.84% | |
Christopher Dodd | 0 | 0% | |
John Edwards | 10 | 5.78% | |
Mike Gravel | 1 | 0.58% | |
Dennis Kucinich | 2 | 1.16% | |
Barack Obama | 97 | 56.07% | |
Bill Richardson | 1 | 0.58% | |
Voters: 173. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
04-24-2008, 09:24 PM | #2351 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
My only quibble is that NJ and NH should be safe Dem states regardless of the nominee. The demographics in southern NH make the more libertarian north less powerful and NJ seems to always be almost a swing state, but I imagine it will be +5 or more Dem.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
04-24-2008, 09:27 PM | #2352 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
I agree with JPhillips. NJ, especially, has been trending very Dem for a while. Used to be a swing state, but not anymore really.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
04-24-2008, 09:29 PM | #2353 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
|
I still have this feeling that California will come more into play than the past two elections.
I very much disagree with JPhillips about NH. |
04-24-2008, 09:38 PM | #2354 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
|
Quote:
Rep. Clyburn, perhaps you and others in the black community were duped by his fake sincerity into believing that Pres. Clinton actually cared about you? |
|
04-24-2008, 09:42 PM | #2355 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Personally, I do think Clinton cared about black Americans... he just felt betrayed when they flocked in massive numbers to Obama over his wife.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
04-24-2008, 10:15 PM | #2356 |
College Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Arlington, VA
|
Vic, I wouldn't say that some of those states are necessarily a lock for either candidate. OR and ME, for example, haven't been shoo-ins for recent Democratic candidates. Likewise AR, NC, TN and WV for the GOP.
But I would say that if you see caandidates having to sink some money into these "core" states once we hit the high campaign season, that a sign of trouble. |
04-24-2008, 10:23 PM | #2357 | |
Checkraising Tourists
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cocoa Beach, FL
|
Quote:
New Hampshire and New Jersey will be very competitive this year. McCain is popular in New Hampshire, which has been close the past few election cycles (Gore narrowly lost it in 2000 and Kerry narrowly won it in 2004). New Jersey is a likely Obama state, but I don't consider it a "lock" at this point. In the past, I would have automatically listed Virginia and Colorado as republican locks, and while I still think McCain will win them, I don't consider them locks this year. Likewise with Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Minnesota, which I used to automatically check off in the Democratic scorecard. They've been getting closer and closer every election cycle, and I think McCain has a chance in these states, especially in Pennsylvania. |
|
04-24-2008, 10:33 PM | #2358 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Dems in NH are also aided by a Senate race that looks very competitive. By the end of election night NH will likely have a Dem Gov. and two Dem Senators. In the past four years it's slid decidedly blue.
MN is also a Dem lock as Obama is currently up in double digits and Hillary leads by five or six. The only way it comes into play is if Pawlenty is VP. As for NJ, it was supposed to be competitive in 2000 and 2004, but it wasn't. It's a tease, but especially with the lackluster senate candidate for the Rep, I don't see it as close at all.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
04-24-2008, 10:45 PM | #2359 | |
Checkraising Tourists
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cocoa Beach, FL
|
Quote:
Oregon is a mortal lock for Obama, and he might even get close to a double digit win there. Maine will be closer, but it's safe for him. Arkansas - Solid republican state unless there's a Clinton running for president. Gore and Kerry got destroyed in this state. North Carolina - I grew up there, spent the better part of my life there, and there's no way that Obama wins in November, although he'll beat Clinton easily in the primary. Yeah, I know there's a big African American population and a higher than average percentage of college graduates (with the Research Triangle Park area), but this is still Jesse Helms country for now. Maybe in 15 or 20 years it will change over, but it's safe for McCain in November. Tennessee - No way, no how for Obama. Solid republican territory. People make a big deal about Gore losing his home state in 2000, but fact of the matter is that he barely got elected to the Senate in the 80's, and by 2000 both senators were republican, the governor was republican, and 12 out of 14 congressmen were republican. West Virginia - This used to be a democratic state years ago, but that's becoming a fading memory, and it's a red state now. There are a lot of "gun loving", "faith clinging" folks there, a lot of "Reagan Democrat" types, and a very low African American population. Bush destroyed Gore and Kerry there, and McCain should win there as well. |
|
04-24-2008, 11:07 PM | #2360 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Vic - I generally appreciate your takes and feel like you're on the mark more often than most folks, but I'm still not sure your analysis above doesn't sell voter motivation (or lack thereof) too short.
McCain got a whopping 1% of the GOP convention votes in WV, less than 1/3rd of the primary votes in TN, and is now down to arguing with the state party in NC (who would presumably know better how to appeal to their voters than he does) while Hillary is wisely on the stump there playing every moderate card she can think of, and in the Arkansas primary almost as many people voted for a candidate other than Huckabee as voted for McCain (although granted that primary is hard to take much from under the circumstances). I can't imagine any of those states ending up more than 54-46, and there's still some time between now & November. A few points of change between now & then and suddenly they're all toss ups.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
04-25-2008, 12:26 AM | #2361 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Georgia
|
Quote:
Kerry lost 54-45 and Gore lost 51-46. I wouldn't call that being destroyed. It's a winnable state for a Clinton or a candidate that isn't comatose like those two were.
__________________
Top 10 Songs of the Year 1955-Present (1976 Added) Franchise Portfolio Draft Winner Fictional Character Draft Winner Television Family Draft Winner Build Your Own Hollywood Studio Draft Winner |
|
04-25-2008, 12:44 AM | #2362 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
Quote:
I agree with you about the gun loving and, somewhat, on the faith clinging. Still, I don't think it is a red state, by any means. Both US senators, 2 of 3 members of the house, the governor, 72 of 100 state reps, and 23 of 34 state senators are Democrats. WV went for Carter in '80, Dukakis in '88, and Clinton in '92 and '96. I agree that it leans towards McCain, but I don't think it is in the mortal lock category. |
|
04-25-2008, 07:39 AM | #2363 |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
|
04-25-2008, 08:09 AM | #2364 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The Dirty
|
Quote:
I just don't get this Clinton thing where the feel everyone who supported Bill (10 years ago) should now automatically support Hillary. I saw Carville on Larry King saying that he didn't care about people supporting Obama, and he would support him should he become the nominee, but that Richardson had no excuse for supporting Obama. I think Richardson hit the nail on the head when he was talking about Clinton entitlement. Rather than persuading the voters to choose you based on policy and what you can do, they should support you because your husband did so much for them. Granted, that's not her attitude now, but that certainly is what Bill's been trumpeting on the campaign trail. And I agree with electoral-votes issue, that right now a lot of dems are saying they won't vote for the other dem candidate, but now that McCain is pushing himself more toward the right in terms of tax cuts, war, etc, people will vote party line more than is suggested now.
__________________
Commish of the United Baseball League (OOTP 6.5) |
|
04-25-2008, 08:14 AM | #2365 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Quote:
Well, I think it is because Bill is feeling unappreciated. Instead of people falling all over themselves and saying, look how good we had it under Bill, we should line up behind him... they aren't. He's feeling more and more irrelevant and is dismayed that folks aren't more loyal to him than he expected.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
|
04-25-2008, 09:28 AM | #2366 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Arlington, VA
|
Quote:
I don't disagree that this is what should happen. My point is that if these things don't happen -- for example, if McCain has to make a sizeable ad buy in TN or WV in early October -- that means that his own internal polls show that he is in serious trouble. Likewise, if Obama has to spend some time in the fall shaking hands in either Portland, he's got some problems, too. TN, by the way, has only 9 reps, 5 of which are Democrats. NC also has a majority of Dems in its House delegation, and a long history of electing Democrats to statewide offices. Both states can very easily come into play. The NC Gov and Sen races will also have some effect on the race, depending on the quality of candidates that emerge. |
|
04-25-2008, 09:36 AM | #2367 |
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
John McCain is Bob Dole 2.0
People aren't going to ignore a chance to make history. Any other candidate runs this year and maybe it's a different conversation. But I'm just not convinced, no matter how many statistics you cite or how many years you want to go back in history that a 72-year old white man is going to trump either a woman or a black guy to become President. It's seriously the old versus the new and no matter how much Hillary and Barack "fight it out" I think in the end, everyone will come together and realize that "we'd rather have one of these two, than the old guard." But again, we'll see what happens in November and then we can play that game where we go back and quote people and say "what says you now?" Should be a good time regardless...at least from the pundit game players standpoint. As for the direction of the country? That's another story. |
04-25-2008, 09:40 AM | #2368 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Quote:
Um... that's why Jesse Jackson won the Democratic nomination in 1988?
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
|
04-25-2008, 09:51 AM | #2369 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
This kind of comment still amuses me to no end. The thought that Hillary Clinton is anything but the 'old guard' struck me as very funny. Putting a skirt on a leopard doesn't change its spots. Last edited by Mizzou B-ball fan : 04-25-2008 at 09:52 AM. |
|
04-25-2008, 09:54 AM | #2370 | |
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Quote:
I'm with you. But people have short memories when they have a chance at "history." |
|
04-25-2008, 09:56 AM | #2371 |
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
|
04-25-2008, 10:00 AM | #2372 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
I think that the 'history' effect has worn off over the course of this primary season. Seeing these two bicker and backstab each other over the course of a few months on a national stage quickly reminds people that these are still just politicians at the core in a different outfit. My mom, who is 60, is a Republican who was gung-ho in January about voting for Hillary to be the first female president. Contrast that to just the other day, where she called her 'the bitch that does nothing but argue' and stated that she would vote Republican in the fall because she couldn't stand Hillary. It's amazing how quickly women voters will turn on other women in any aspect of life, including politics. |
|
04-25-2008, 10:27 AM | #2373 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Quote:
It's an absolutely silly idea to say people won't ignore a chance to make history. Almost naively idealistic. If anything, people who "make history" have to fight against old prejudices to do so (ie, JFK becoming the first, and only thus far, Catholic to be US President).
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
|
04-25-2008, 10:38 AM | #2374 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
Yes, the opression of Catholics and the Kennedy family is well documented. You have to feel sorry for them due to the barriers that they had to conquer. Last edited by Mizzou B-ball fan : 04-25-2008 at 10:38 AM. |
|
04-25-2008, 10:46 AM | #2375 | |
Grey Dog Software
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ by way of Belleville, IL
|
Quote:
As to McCain, most people already know about him and most of the initial opinions were negative. Conservatives didn't like his working with Dems in the Senate, democrats were blown away by Obama and looked at him like an old peo-war fossil. Now, conservatives are starting to warm to him (almost out of necessity) and democrats are starting to get tired of seeing their candidates fight each other in the mud. I still think it's anyone's game (and Barrack will get a nice bump in the polls when he officially wins), but the time between August and November could be harder on Obama than McCain without any "gotchas" being played. No matter what happens in that time, it will be hard for him still be able to transcend politics and be everyone to all voters. |
|
04-25-2008, 10:53 AM | #2376 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
Which was pretty pointedly played upon in the (awful & shouldn't have been done IMO) skit the WWE ran on Monday night. Obama-as-The-Rock "IT DOESN'T MATTER what you think" Actor-as-Bill (walking away sadly) to Hillary: "He's right"
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
|
04-25-2008, 11:11 AM | #2377 | |
Stadium Announcer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Burke, VA
|
Quote:
I have no idea how many people would vote to "make history", but that has to be one of the dumbest damned reasons to vote for someone and I really hope it wouldn't be a factor for the vast majority of American voters. I get, btw, that you're not suggesting it's a good thing to base your vote upon. I just hope you're wrong in your assessment of the American people. Personally, I think Obama could be the next McGovern... though he may end up being the next Jimmy Carter.
__________________
I don't want the world. I just want your half. |
|
04-25-2008, 12:47 PM | #2378 | |
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Drop Out, Obama
Quote:
|
|
04-25-2008, 02:16 PM | #2379 |
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
I saw it and just had to laugh. Last edited by Young Drachma : 04-25-2008 at 02:16 PM. |
04-25-2008, 05:04 PM | #2380 |
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
|
04-28-2008, 02:23 PM | #2381 |
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Those of you that said Rev. Wright wouldn't go away are right. Not because the media wouldn't let it die, but because the man himself decided to keep surfacing. He's looking all proud of himself and trying to sound King-like in the media over the past three days.
Wonder what affect it'll have by September. My conspiracy theory of the day is that they want Obama to lose, so that the civil rights establishment can be all self-congratulatory as if "there was no way that 'white america' was to elect a black guy." It's like a self-fulfilling prophecy. Last edited by Young Drachma : 04-28-2008 at 02:26 PM. |
04-28-2008, 02:48 PM | #2382 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Quote:
The moron even said he had been "crucified" by the media... trying to tie himself as a Christ like figure. I'm sure Obama is wishing he had ordered the code red right about know.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
|
04-28-2008, 03:48 PM | #2383 | |
Stadium Announcer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Burke, VA
|
I'd really like to read a transcript of the speech at the National Press Club today, but haven't been able to find one yet. This piece from Dana Milbank of the Washington Post suggests it really needs to be seen to be believed.
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/rough.../?hpid=artslot Quote:
__________________
I don't want the world. I just want your half. |
|
04-28-2008, 04:00 PM | #2384 | |
Stadium Announcer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Burke, VA
|
dola
Another piece from the Washington Post that had me rolling my eyes. It's a Q & A with a couple of contributors to The Root (one of them also attended Rev. Wright's church for seven years). http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...l?hpid=artslot Given that they both seem to be fans of Obama (and I'm not), it's an odd read. I really don't get the antipathy that this question provoked: Quote:
Given that Wright has said this controversy isn't just an attack on him, but an attack on "the black church", it seems that this is a question we should expect to be asked. And instead of trying to impart some sort of knowledge about black liberation theology, these two Obama supporters poo-poo the idea of a "black church" to begin with. I realize this has nothing to do with the Democrat nomination (other than the fact that we're talking about this because of Obama), but I'm really fascinated by this issue.
__________________
I don't want the world. I just want your half. |
|
04-28-2008, 04:23 PM | #2385 | |
Stadium Announcer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Burke, VA
|
double dola: Here's a link to the transcript of his speech at the National Press Club.
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/04...al-press-club/ Just skimming over the speech... I think his prepared remarks were a heckuva lot better than the Q and A afterwards. But my favorite moment had to be this: Quote:
It's brand new. That line cracked me up.
__________________
I don't want the world. I just want your half. |
|
04-28-2008, 04:26 PM | #2386 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
|
Wow, I thought Obama would have a chance to take down McCain. Wright is going to ruin his candidacy.
|
04-28-2008, 04:40 PM | #2387 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
I agree.
You almost have to believe that Wright does not want Obama to become president. |
04-28-2008, 04:57 PM | #2388 |
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
|
04-28-2008, 06:35 PM | #2389 |
Checkraising Tourists
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cocoa Beach, FL
|
This is an interesting Newsweek article from a guy I really don't like very much, Karl Rove. He does make some good points.
"Even liberal commentators who adore you warn you can't win with a McGovern coalition of college students and white-wine sippers from the party's left wing." Newsweek Article: "Dear Senator Obama..." |
04-28-2008, 06:52 PM | #2390 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
|
I was going to post the same thing. I do believe he is right on in all points, esp. #1. I like the way he ended
Quote:
|
|
04-28-2008, 09:41 PM | #2391 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Well I disagree. Rove knows damn well that there isn't a thing that Obama could do in the Senate during an election year that would help him. The only way the Republicans wouldn't attack him or filibuster it so it died and he looked ineffective is if it was so core Republican that he'd alienate his base. Whether or not he has done enough in the Senate, there's nothing he can do about that now.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
04-29-2008, 08:45 AM | #2392 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
|
Ok, I'll give you that but you have to admit that it would look good if he had done something there. What about the other points?
|
04-29-2008, 08:50 AM | #2393 |
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The Dirty
|
I think it says a lot about the way this country feels about "senate experience" and the current state of politics that a guy who is perceived as having little experience has been running ahead of people who have a "lifetime" of it. I don't see what going back and contributing to the lowest-rated congress (in approval terms) can do.
__________________
Commish of the United Baseball League (OOTP 6.5) |
04-29-2008, 08:54 AM | #2394 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Lowest rated Congress, but I bet over 90% of 'em will be re-elected. It's the other Congressmen that's the problem, not mine!!
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
04-29-2008, 09:15 AM | #2395 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
The Senate stuff is tricky. I argued a long time ago that Obama had to run in 2008 before he had a long Senate record that was easily distorted. He doesn't have a big media friendly accomplishment, but he has worked with Republicans and the Independent Democrat on a number of issues.
With Dick Lugar on securing Russian nukes and pandemic preparation With Joe Lieberman on protecting taxpayer privacy With Tom Coburn on lobbying reform and no-bid FEMA contracts and making public all government contracts With Olympia Snow on Veterans Health Care I don't know why he doesn't publicize this stuff as it would really help with both the "he didn't do anything" and "he's a crazed radical" arguments. As for the specific points, 1- I don't think it's the words of his stump specch as much as he seems to have been beaten down. The past couple of days he's sounded better and the Fox interview was very good. He can change his speech all he wants, but I think the bigger issue is getting back in control of the discussion. As long as he's constantly on the defensive it really doesn't matter what he says. 2- I don't believe there was a way to handle Wright that would have worked any better. I remember how many people were saying that Obama threw Wright under the bus for political gain. The attacks would have been there regardless. 3 and 4 I've covered. 5- I'd like to see some evidence that he lost ground because of attacks. It may be true, but I'd want some polling data to back that up. My sense is the attacks on him have been far more damaging than any attacks he's made. Again, what's hurting him is that he's on the defensive right now and he looks weak, not that he's being overly aggressive. 6- He does need to highlight his record and policies better, but the 2006 Russert interview stuff is strange to say the least. That sort of gotcha in a supposed advice column erodes his credibility. But the bigger issue is that Rove is still deeply tied to Obama's opposition. Would you really trust advice for McCain from Mark Penn or James Carville? I just don't see how following Rove's advice will help Obama secure the nomination.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
04-29-2008, 05:58 PM | #2396 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
|
JPhillips, right now, Obama's opposition is the Clintons, which Rove et al wants him to beat.
|
04-29-2008, 07:30 PM | #2397 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tennessee
|
Quote:
I think he is going off so Obama can have an opportunity to come out and denounce him like everyone is saying he should have in the first place. It's basically a photo op setup for Obama. Just guessing. |
|
04-29-2008, 08:00 PM | #2398 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
I don't think so Buc. Hillary is much more likely to leave pieces of the Bush policy in place than is Obama.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
04-29-2008, 08:12 PM | #2399 | |
Checkraising Tourists
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cocoa Beach, FL
|
Quote:
Interesting take. So, this could be Obama's "Sister Souljah moment". |
|
04-29-2008, 08:17 PM | #2400 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
Quote:
Doesn't Hillery's campaign claim Obama isn't capable of doing something like that. She is the one best able to matching the republican's dirty tricks.
__________________
“The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.” United States Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis Last edited by Surtt : 04-29-2008 at 08:18 PM. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|