09-23-2003, 11:16 AM | #151 |
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
|
One other thought. Last year QS picked up a number of undrafted rookies to fill the roster. How many are we going to be able to pick up given our cap limitations? I know QS did some analysis pre-FA, but what about now? I'd hate to draft some late round sleepers only to have to cut them because we didn't get the required # of DE's, or some such scenario.
__________________
Ability is what you're capable of doing. Motivation determines what you do. Attitude determines how well you do it. - Lou Holtz |
09-23-2003, 11:25 AM | #152 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
|
Quote:
I noticed this guy as well. Could be a good Goalline or short-yardage type guy. Not much in the way of pass blocking, but a minor monster for the run.
__________________
Ability is what you're capable of doing. Motivation determines what you do. Attitude determines how well you do it. - Lou Holtz Last edited by Buzzbee : 09-23-2003 at 11:25 AM. |
|
09-23-2003, 11:30 AM | #153 | |
Lethargic Hooligan
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: hello kitty found my wallet at a big tent revival and returned it with all the cash missing
|
Quote:
ah, but we cant situation slot OL.
__________________
donkey, donkey, walk a little faster |
|
09-23-2003, 11:32 AM | #154 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
|
The discussion here looks good. I am always looking for LB and secondary depth, so that is my preference. I vote for picking the linebacker. I am, however, happy with however you want to finish the draft.
Also to clarify--we get Shon for this year. We probably will not have him next year. |
09-23-2003, 11:42 AM | #155 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
|
Quote:
[sour grapes] Oh well. I like C - Muarice Cajigal better anyway. [/sour grapes]
__________________
Ability is what you're capable of doing. Motivation determines what you do. Attitude determines how well you do it. - Lou Holtz |
|
09-23-2003, 01:23 PM | #156 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Here's the shortened versionof the current roster, by request. (Players who are almost certainly not coming back have been omitted for your convenience... the "CNTRCT" column tells you how long each player is signed for, just in case that's something you're looking for.
Code:
And I'm sorry for my misstatement about LB Shon-- I meant to type "out of contract after this year" and left out the word "after," which certainly made it very misleading. We're just peachy at LB for this season, but next year we are fairly likely to lose two starters. Last edited by QuikSand : 09-23-2003 at 01:23 PM. |
09-23-2003, 01:33 PM | #157 | |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Quote:
I somehow missed him first time around, but I like him, too. At 300 lbs, he might even make a smooth transition to another OL slot. (Boy, we could use him at tackle) |
|
09-23-2003, 02:26 PM | #158 |
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
|
In looking at our "likely" roster, it seems evident to me that we need some bodies on the D-Line. Did we lose a lot here? I know we had good DE who was injured (can't remember his name) that looks like is gone, but what about DT? We've got 4 on the D-Line?!? Sucks that it was a weak draft in this area. Any run stopping DT's or pass rushing fiends at DE that might slip a round or two...or three?
We were great at stopping the run last year. HOW?
__________________
Ability is what you're capable of doing. Motivation determines what you do. Attitude determines how well you do it. - Lou Holtz |
09-23-2003, 02:28 PM | #159 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Yes, we will need to sign a kicker and punter this season. During the draft might make sense, if we can get a guy well above replacement value.
K Neil Arellano seems to be the best of his lot, with excellent kicking power and hang time, and adequate kicking accuracy. He's a former Orangeman, also - a plus. I see several punters here who look pretty interchangeable. Maybe a late round pick, but certainly not anything before they start to go off the board. |
09-23-2003, 02:33 PM | #160 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Buzzbee - you're absolutely right, DL is a spot where we really could have used an immediate contributor from the draft.
There's really not much at all on the DL in this draft - only at the very top. DT Desmond Foley might turn out to be a passable reserve in time, as might DE Henry Fletcher. But I don't think those guys are our best options at the moment. We signed DE Philip Beecroft as an insurance policy to play DE. But based on this draft, I don't see any way we can let him go. My best guess is that a later draft pick at LB who can switch to DE will be our best play for a roster-filler for this year. |
09-23-2003, 02:36 PM | #161 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
|
We did great at stopping the run because our D coordinator is an absolute STUD.
|
09-23-2003, 02:39 PM | #162 |
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
|
Ok, to avoid the paralysis by analysis, I vote for LB Boyd, C Cajigal, or FS Wahl.
One concern that I noticed with Cajigal from my previous post. Very High leadership at 85. If we ever get rid of Johns, we might be forced to start Cajigal. I'm thinking Boyd might be the best pick since we are obviously going to need some help on the D-Line.
__________________
Ability is what you're capable of doing. Motivation determines what you do. Attitude determines how well you do it. - Lou Holtz |
09-23-2003, 02:44 PM | #163 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
|
Quote:
Well, yeah, but other than that....
__________________
Ability is what you're capable of doing. Motivation determines what you do. Attitude determines how well you do it. - Lou Holtz |
|
09-23-2003, 03:37 PM | #164 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Code:
Stepping in with a semi-execituve deicision, and we will take LB Boyd here. Yes, he was my choice - I'll live with the consequences. His ability to help out at DE int he near term is tough to overlook, especially with the rags out there at that position. I was hoping that C Cajigal would slide to us in round four - but no dice there, he went very shortly after our third pick. So, we are on the clock again. (I'm assuming that the list of selected players' names will suffice, rather than posting files again) Any thoughts? |
09-23-2003, 03:40 PM | #165 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
By the way, all indication are that both LBs Middleton and Boyd will comfortably slide into OLD positions. Do we have any thoughts where we want these guys slotted going into their first training camp? I'm assuming that we'll use both in outside spots (giving them flexibility to play at DE if needed) but if albionmoonlight has input on who might be better for weak/strong, that woudl be helpful.
But we can pencil one or both in to play an outside spot for this year and beyond, as needed. |
09-23-2003, 03:43 PM | #166 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Here's a thought, for what it's worth. RB R.J. Harden, at 215 lbs, might be a decent candidate to slide over to play wideout. Were we to move him there, he ould have an affinity with TE Julio Diana, our positional leader. Harden has some pretty respectable receiving skills already - he might turn out to be a better receiver than what we could get in the 5th or 6th round by drafting directly from that position. Just a minor consideration... I think he's among the best RBs out there, too, incidentally, but the switch to WR would give him a positional affinity.
|
09-23-2003, 03:45 PM | #167 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Hmmm... with LB Percy Rapp still on the board (and possibly the "best player available") is it possible that LB is just another position (like RB) where quality guys just fall too far in the draft?
I'm not suggesting we take him (he's way too small to move positions, I think) - but it's getting me to think that LB is one of those psots where you can regularly get usable guys in later rounds (along with RB, FB and C in particular). Last edited by QuikSand : 09-23-2003 at 03:45 PM. |
09-23-2003, 03:55 PM | #168 |
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
|
It is odd that seemingly quality LB's are dropping to the later rounds. I wonder if that is a product of our scouts limitations (seeing LB's as better than they really are), possibly a lack of need among a lot of other teams (current roster depth), or perhaps a deep draft at LB. My guess is that it is a combination of the first two. I don't remember a lot of LB's falling to later rounds last year.
In regard to our next pick, dare we start the run on K's? 4th round may be where they start to go, especially since they are more of a value now. Although I am ok with picking up RB Harden. Any decent offensive linemen or backup safeties?
__________________
Ability is what you're capable of doing. Motivation determines what you do. Attitude determines how well you do it. - Lou Holtz |
09-23-2003, 04:06 PM | #169 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
I see much more talent at CB than at safety. CB Jamal Dreyer is 200 lbs, possibly big enough to switch seamlessly - and could be a decent reserve safety (great ballhawk, might become decent zone defender).
We do need another tackle for this roster - an while I don't think he's really special, T Frank Grolsko would be a good affinity guy and is more ready-to-play than most of the other "projects" in this draft. Might not be urgent (he's only the 9th-rated T left on the overall board) but he might be a good fit for us. Plus, I have had a little luck with guys like him who have good "off ratings" (he's great with "blocking strength" but fairly limited with his other ratings). |
09-23-2003, 04:07 PM | #170 | |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Quote:
Excellent point - our scout might be the root cause here, at least in part. |
|
09-23-2003, 04:10 PM | #171 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
|
Quote:
Not opposed to switching him to WR. One observation though, in looking at our receiving corp, TE Diana is the receiving leader only by a little if I remember correctly. A jump in leadership by someone like K-Carr could undermine the "switch" strategy if the primary motivation is to gain affinity. Closer scrutiny on Diana as positional leader may be warranted.
__________________
Ability is what you're capable of doing. Motivation determines what you do. Attitude determines how well you do it. - Lou Holtz |
|
09-23-2003, 04:14 PM | #172 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
|
In our defense last year, the WLB tended to rush the passer most of the time, while the SLB bearly rushed at all (mainly because Mills (starting SLB) could not rush the passer at all). In order to compensate for the SLB's inability to rush, I had our stud MLB Daniels rushing ~20% of the time.
Ideally, as we are looking to convert our MLBs to OLBs, I would like you to convert the one with the best pass rushing skill to SLB. If he can get on the field as a starting SLB, then we might be able to rush him more and not rush Daniels as much (I think that Daniels will operate better as a tackling machine up the middle. He has never been a big pass rusher in his career--including the year that he won DPOY). Shon, from the WLB spot, will still be the primary rusher. Also--I do not have the file in front of me, but perhaps this is the year we may want to switch to a 3-4? I know that our DL depth problem has more to do with DE, which will not be helped directly by a switch to a 3-4, but would it make sense to use one of our DTs as a DE and play a 3-4? If that is a possibility, we should consider it before we convert all of our MLBs. FWIW, after last year's performance stopping the run, I am not as high on switching to a 3-4 as I was at the beginning of GT3. Personally, I would like to stay with what we had last year (plus a good nickel back) and see if we can build on our success. However, I wanted to throw the idea out to see if it could solve some of our depth problems. |
09-23-2003, 04:20 PM | #173 |
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
|
In regard to CB/S, if there is a CB who looks like they might convert to S, then that may be the way to go, since it doesn't sound like there is much left at S.
Likewise on the OL, are there any C's that might convert to G or T? The "convert" strategy may be our best bet to fill in the required "numbers". Also, any thought to a K or P this early? Once one goes, there tends to be a small run, which might deplete, if there isn't any depth. I hope we can hold out 'til next round, but fear the decent ones may have been tapped by our next pick.
__________________
Ability is what you're capable of doing. Motivation determines what you do. Attitude determines how well you do it. - Lou Holtz |
09-23-2003, 05:00 PM | #174 |
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
|
Also, thanks for the input Albion, I was beginning to think this was becoming the QuikBee show. I look forward to Fritz getting power. It's a lot more fun with more people's input.
__________________
Ability is what you're capable of doing. Motivation determines what you do. Attitude determines how well you do it. - Lou Holtz |
09-23-2003, 08:40 PM | #175 |
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
|
Now that I'm at home, I have reviewed the talent, or lack thereof, and suggest either going with Harden at RB or a K or P. There really aren't any standout players other than at LB, and I'd really hate to pick 3 successive LB's.
Upon further inspection, there are a couple of C's that might warrant a little bit of attention, since we do need some O-Linemen. However, I would lean toward RB or K/P. C - Terry Marsh - Aquarius - Affinity with OL leader Johns. Some red and fair amount of potential for Pass and Run blocking. Only problem, now that I look at it is Very High Leadership (96) which would at some point put him in line to be a position leader. Never Mind. C- Tyrus Heiden - Capricorn (neutral) Better blocking strength than Marsh, but less upside potential as well. Leadership (78) could make him a little less attractive. Fan Favorite c - Carlton Duffy - Capricorn (neutral) Very similar to Marsh, just a little less blocking potential. Low leadership (30)
__________________
Ability is what you're capable of doing. Motivation determines what you do. Attitude determines how well you do it. - Lou Holtz Last edited by Buzzbee : 09-23-2003 at 08:41 PM. |
09-24-2003, 07:48 AM | #176 | |
Lethargic Hooligan
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: hello kitty found my wallet at a big tent revival and returned it with all the cash missing
|
Quote:
I would not be shocked if I was without power through the weekend. --- I would like to see us take the best T available rather than a good RB right now. We are short at OL depth, and even a poor player will get a few contract years to improve if we draft him.
__________________
donkey, donkey, walk a little faster |
|
09-24-2003, 08:38 AM | #177 | |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Quote:
I don't know the term for this... it's almost like a "Tom Swift" statement, isn't it? |
|
09-24-2003, 09:01 AM | #178 |
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
|
I'm not opposed to taking a T. The way RB's have gone, it's possible that we can pick up a decent RB in a later round.
Opinions: Based on what is left on the board, do you guys think it will be better to take a true T, or perhaps convert a C?
__________________
Ability is what you're capable of doing. Motivation determines what you do. Attitude determines how well you do it. - Lou Holtz |
09-24-2003, 09:08 AM | #179 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
|
FOF4 seems pretty good at allowing common-sense conversions. Is C to T common sense? I would be inclined to pick a big center and try to switch him to tackle, but perhaps we should make sure that the game lets you do that without too much of a penalty.
|
09-24-2003, 09:43 AM | #180 | |
Lethargic Hooligan
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: hello kitty found my wallet at a big tent revival and returned it with all the cash missing
|
Quote:
boooooooooo ------------- As far as converting players go, there are often DT/DE types that conver to OT. I don't know how well the skills translate though.
__________________
donkey, donkey, walk a little faster |
|
09-24-2003, 10:39 AM | #181 | |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Quote:
From where I sit, the best T available is the guy Grolsko I mentioned above... and he is 9th on the list of available tackles. So, I think we can get him in another round or two and still accomplish the spirit of what Fritz is requesting here. I'm thinking that the press is on to get a kicker who can help us, and the best guy left is far better than anyone else out there... so I pull the trigger and select Neil Arellano with our 4th round pick. Code:
Based on our discussion here, I felt pretty comfortable going ahead with the later round picks. The best tackle Grolsko was still there in round five, so we grab him there. In round six, RB Harden was still around, so that looked like a value pick. And in round seven, the "best player available" in round four was still on the board - so that seemed fairly straightforward, too. We end up with a LB-heavy draft, but it's a spot where we might get some dividends quickly, as we needed bodies along the defensive front. Code:
I also grab a few more roster-filler players from the undrafted rookie free agent pool - recall that we will need a number of these guys to stick around just to fill up our roster for the season: DT Scott Sutter P Van Saldana LB Otis Mitchell C Leroy Russell RB Dennis Rivers * DT Mario Preston LB Damon Drake P Clay Nomellini S Richard Bradley QB Alan Crane * italics – player fills required roster spot * - player has identified affinity with position leader Okay – with that, I’ll distribute an updated set of files, and we can discuss any further moves we want to make before we go into training camp. I may well have missed some promising pick-ups (there are tons of usable RBs left in the undrafted pool) so please do give a look for useful fill-ins—recall, it was at this point that we picked up LB Sammie Gilespie for last season, who turned out to be a fairly valuable contributor. |
|
09-24-2003, 10:39 AM | #182 |
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
|
From what I've seen there are two aspects of converting. The first is how well the SKILLS translate. This corresponds to the green bars. The second is how well the EXPERIENCE translates. This corresponds to the red bars. When you convert, FOF will tell you about what percentage of the SKILLS will be lost. It mentions that experience will be lost, but doesn't give you an idea.
This of course doesn't tell us squat about how well a draftee will convert, but I just thought I'd share some of my thimblefull of knowledge.
__________________
Ability is what you're capable of doing. Motivation determines what you do. Attitude determines how well you do it. - Lou Holtz |
09-24-2003, 10:41 AM | #183 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
File update #1 of 2
|
09-24-2003, 10:42 AM | #184 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
File update #2 of 2
|
09-24-2003, 10:47 AM | #185 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
I went ahead and re-signed C Carlton Cicci, to bring our roster up to 55 players. We are about $1.6m over our self-imposed cap, so we will have to make some reductions—apparently either three rookies or a rookie and a slightly more costly veteran. But in either case, we will be at least close to a full roster, and still within our means. (The estimated costs for our rookie players was a bit overstated, as usual)
Code:
|
09-24-2003, 10:49 AM | #186 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Hmmmm... looks lik we're stil short at DE. I'll check to see if any of these scrap heap LBs ar beefy enough to switch over. (This is going to be trouble all year, I fear)
Too bad - no Lbs are heavy enough to switch to DL, so I have signed DE J.B. Floyd, a very modest talent who does have an affinity, at least. The DL is going to be very shaky this season, I fear. Last edited by QuikSand : 09-24-2003 at 10:52 AM. |
09-24-2003, 10:50 AM | #187 |
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
|
Very interesting. In the last 4 rounds we got the players we wanted, that fit in our system. It almost feels like we could have drafted them in any order and still acquired them. Oh well, I'll take it.
Note: In a brief review, only 2 K and 2 P were taken in the entire draft.
__________________
Ability is what you're capable of doing. Motivation determines what you do. Attitude determines how well you do it. - Lou Holtz |
09-24-2003, 10:52 AM | #188 |
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
|
With the signing of Cicci, you can cut Perry Lewis and save about $920,000.
__________________
Ability is what you're capable of doing. Motivation determines what you do. Attitude determines how well you do it. - Lou Holtz |
09-24-2003, 11:05 AM | #189 | |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Quote:
Should be prominent on or list of consderations - I'd recommend we give each some PT in preseason, and treat this like an audition... but in my mind, it's Cicci's job to lose. (We are talking about a backup job, anyway) |
|
09-24-2003, 11:22 AM | #190 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Assuming no gigantic surprises during training camp, I think I will recommend that LB Buddy Middleton (whose future is almost certainly at OLB) become our starter at DE for this season. He seems to have better overall DE skills than anyone we have who is truly slotted in that position per se. Middleton will not formally move to the DE slot, but if we move him to OLB, he will be able to slide in as a DE in the depth chart, effecting the same thing for all intents and purposes. We will have enough actual LBs to provide plenty of legitimate depth at those positions, for certain.
As someone mentioned before, the alternative seems to be to switch to the 3-4 this year. If we did so, I think we'd have to decide whether it made more sense to still use Middleton as our starter at DE, or whether we wanted to slide DT Ellis Peters over to play DE, and use Middleton as an OLB. Either one would probably work okay. Last edited by QuikSand : 09-24-2003 at 11:25 AM. |
09-24-2003, 11:27 AM | #191 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
One more comment at DE: Geoff Emerson is still hanging around, asking for about $970,000 to play this year. He was a full-time starter for us two seasons ago (before we rolled him back last season) and has an affinity with Cedric Martin to boot. If we can afford him, it might make sense to ink him to a new deal, rather than go with a basically useless rookie. Emerson is no star, but he has a shade more going for him than the faceless URFA guy I picked up to fill the roster hole.
|
09-24-2003, 11:29 AM | #192 |
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
|
I'm not opposed. I believe that Middleton SHOULD retain the bulk of his GREEN ratings and shouldn't lose too terribly much of his RED, since there is some commonality between ILB and OLB. I think this will, as QS said, give us much greater flexiblity with Middleton since he will be able to play inside, outside, or DE.
__________________
Ability is what you're capable of doing. Motivation determines what you do. Attitude determines how well you do it. - Lou Holtz |
09-24-2003, 11:34 AM | #193 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
|
Quote:
Do you think he'll be around after training camp? Might we pick up Emerson, or some other DE that didn't make the cut, a little cheaper after camp?
__________________
Ability is what you're capable of doing. Motivation determines what you do. Attitude determines how well you do it. - Lou Holtz |
|
09-24-2003, 12:02 PM | #194 | |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Quote:
I think his request is at least close to minimum salary. As a 3rd year player, I don't think his demands can drop much below the $970,000 he seeks... rookie are making $580,000 and I think a 2nd year player makes a minimum of $750,000... if Emerson is asking for more than the minimum, it'sjust by a shade. Plus, we'd gain some cohesion beenfit by having him remain listead as continuously on the roster for the whole time, rather than released and then re-signed after training camp. A fairly minor issue, but that's probably where we are in making these decisions. |
|
09-24-2003, 12:06 PM | #195 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
A possibe candidate for a cut might be LB Riddick Chilton - a guy we signed as an "insurance policy" at LB, but now projects to be in the mess with all these potentially promising rookies. If the rookie grop come through camp okay, we'd probably use Chilton sparingly - and at $1,580,000 in salary, he'd help clear out some space.
|
09-24-2003, 12:41 PM | #196 |
Lethargic Hooligan
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: hello kitty found my wallet at a big tent revival and returned it with all the cash missing
|
We could cut TE Bernard Wayne and pick a rookie TE like Terry Jenkins or Dale McFerrin. That would get us half a mil.
I like G Marco Trask and Tommie Sadowski as well as T Ed Chanoine and Malcolm Dancy for training camp. If we end up with one of them it may allow us to release a more costly OL.
__________________
donkey, donkey, walk a little faster |
09-24-2003, 01:07 PM | #197 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
|
I'll look at the file tonight and chime on some potential D cuts.
I agree with keeping the team continuity. I think it fits with the chemistry theme of this team. |
09-24-2003, 01:36 PM | #198 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Let's recall - we really don't need to make a whole lot of cuts to this roster. We're at 56 players, and if we end up releasing one veteran (like whoever loses the derby to be bthe backup center) then we probably get under our cap just by cutting two of the current rookies. So, we probably don't need to be scouring the roster looking for an abundance of cuts - just FYI (in case I have led us astray with my prevous comments).
|
09-24-2003, 01:42 PM | #199 |
Lethargic Hooligan
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: hello kitty found my wallet at a big tent revival and returned it with all the cash missing
|
We are very short handed on the O line, wit hthe exception centers. Can management find a way to get the guys I listed above under contract for camp?
__________________
donkey, donkey, walk a little faster |
09-24-2003, 01:42 PM | #200 |
Lethargic Hooligan
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: hello kitty found my wallet at a big tent revival and returned it with all the cash missing
|
dola - and/or bring G otis and T reese back?
__________________
donkey, donkey, walk a little faster Last edited by Fritz : 09-24-2003 at 01:43 PM. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|