|
View Poll Results: How is Obama doing? (poll started 6/6) | |||
Great - above my expectations | 18 | 6.87% | |
Good - met most of my expectations | 66 | 25.19% | |
Average - so so, disappointed a little | 64 | 24.43% | |
Bad - sold us out | 101 | 38.55% | |
Trout - don't know yet | 13 | 4.96% | |
Voters: 262. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
11-06-2011, 12:27 AM | #16151 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
But it's incredibly realistic.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
11-06-2011, 12:30 AM | #16152 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
That's not inherently a bad thing, depending upon the contribution of those lower levels to the eco-system. Unless of course you just want them there for aesthetic purposes, in which case you have to be able to afford that luxury AND be willing to forego other non-necessities to fund them.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
11-06-2011, 12:31 AM | #16153 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
Believing otherwise is astonishingly naive thinking.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
|
11-06-2011, 12:35 AM | #16154 |
Death Herald
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Le stelle la notte sono grandi e luminose nel cuore profondo del Texas
|
Yes, a company should do anything at all possible to make money for their investors. In a vacuum, that makes sense. In the real world, that is why there are things like safety regulations, environmental regulations, and financial oversight.
__________________
Thinkin' of a master plan 'Cuz ain't nuthin' but sweat inside my hand So I dig into my pocket, all my money is spent So I dig deeper but still comin' up with lint |
11-06-2011, 12:36 AM | #16155 | |
Death Herald
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Le stelle la notte sono grandi e luminose nel cuore profondo del Texas
|
Quote:
But if there are no servants available, that silver isn't going to polish itself. Or grow the arugula. Or make the limos.
__________________
Thinkin' of a master plan 'Cuz ain't nuthin' but sweat inside my hand So I dig into my pocket, all my money is spent So I dig deeper but still comin' up with lint |
|
11-06-2011, 12:42 AM | #16156 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
If supply exceeds the demand ...
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
|
11-06-2011, 12:44 AM | #16157 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
Each of which I firmly believe are overly restrictive, to the point of being unreasonably punitive & downright petty to the point of being a detriment to productivity & should be scaled back considerably with all immediate haste.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
|
11-06-2011, 01:05 AM | #16158 | |
Death Herald
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Le stelle la notte sono grandi e luminose nel cuore profondo del Texas
|
Quote:
Wow. Both lazy AND naive. Congrats.
__________________
Thinkin' of a master plan 'Cuz ain't nuthin' but sweat inside my hand So I dig into my pocket, all my money is spent So I dig deeper but still comin' up with lint |
|
11-06-2011, 01:09 AM | #16159 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Just painfully realistic and honest to a fault.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
11-06-2011, 01:11 AM | #16160 |
Death Herald
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Le stelle la notte sono grandi e luminose nel cuore profondo del Texas
|
Yet you continue to castigate Ron Paul, when he would strive to create your non regulated dream world.
__________________
Thinkin' of a master plan 'Cuz ain't nuthin' but sweat inside my hand So I dig into my pocket, all my money is spent So I dig deeper but still comin' up with lint |
11-06-2011, 01:13 AM | #16161 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
You're confusing legitimate & positive deregulation with anarchy (or at least reasonable & justifiable regulation, which Paul typically lacks). Not the same thing.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
|
11-06-2011, 01:17 AM | #16162 |
Death Herald
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Le stelle la notte sono grandi e luminose nel cuore profondo del Texas
|
You yourself said "Each of which I firmly believe are overly restrictive, to the point of being unreasonably punitive & downright petty to the point of being a detriment to productivity & should be scaled back considerably with all immediate haste."
There is no possible way that all current regulations are not either legitimate or positive, thus reinforcing my claim of laziness and/or naivete.
__________________
Thinkin' of a master plan 'Cuz ain't nuthin' but sweat inside my hand So I dig into my pocket, all my money is spent So I dig deeper but still comin' up with lint Last edited by cartman : 11-06-2011 at 01:18 AM. |
11-06-2011, 06:05 AM | #16163 | |||
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Quote:
And yes, some level of consolidation with these companies always occurs. I'll give you an anecdotal line I heard one time from a regional director I met a while back when I was first starting in the industry. He said..."I have 2 books in the bottom drawer of my desk. 1 is a playbook for centralizing operations to gain efficiency...the other is a playbook for decentralizing to gain accountability. I pull 1 or the other out every 5 years." The point is that companies centralize & decentralize all the time based on market conditions. But adding incentive to centralize everything (more rapidly than its organic path) is a big contributor to the problems we see with "nobody is hiring because there is no work to be done". Our legislation has pulled out the need to do any "work" to offer a product to communities & as such...no need for those job functions or roles. I'm not advocating protectionism in job functions, but accountability was there and now it is not. Quote:
I'm being facetious obviously, but that is what I mean by the "monster" that is corp-America. It doesn't even take the 1% to make such decisions...the decisions are self-evident across the entire management teams that have any insight into the finances. I actually work for some outstanding people that are much more progressive than myself. But reducing costs when you have to reduce your prices because there are less customers with less money isn't a problem my execs can solve with their charity. Quote:
I agree the stock market is a con. 401k has been a nice economic activity driver for a number of years now but just like all bubbles created by baby boomers (not all purposely, mind you...but sheer numbers) it will also pop some day. The only incentive is how much of your money is matched by your employer...I know I sure as hell wouldn't be putting my money there if I wasn't getting a nice match from my employer as I simply don't have the time or inclination to play the game. What I take exception with is the notion that "shareholders" don't deserve to be given priority in preserving their investment. That is why their money is there in the first place & why people are entrusted to watch after it...because it is not their obligation to invest, its their choice. You & I are both shareholders in many companies I'd imagine & I would not appreciate some CEO running his company to bankruptcy, losing all my money into a black hole, but telling me "well, we kept em working a little too long on doing nothing despite having no sales & not accepting a salary myself for a year". Not acceptable obviously. You are seeing society as this place where everybody "should" be looking after each other equally. Guess what? Not everybody shares that view to begin with even if you & I agree in principle...and that view goes across ALL income ranges. The common denominator historically is equal rights, not equal results. But I will agree that equal results is a more desirable outcome (or flatter)...I just disagree that focusing more authority to centralized government makes that happen. And the risk of a more centralized government becoming well, what we already think it is an Oligarchy is much higher. |
|||
11-06-2011, 06:06 AM | #16164 |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Dola,
Holy s--t thats a long post. Thats what happens after some coffee. |
11-06-2011, 06:16 AM | #16165 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Quote:
Naturally they need parameters to work within but to me, Jon's point is valid in the sense that the more regulation & adherence to standards that are needed...the larger & larger companies become. Not always to maximize profit, but to be more influential in that regulation process. And the more piles of regulation documents you stack up on the desk of a 20-person company to adhere to...the less able they are to compete and more willing they are to sell off to the "big guys" because these, in and of themselves, are barriers to market entrance where you need a LOT of capital to even think about getting in. This is the fundamental problem people like myself have with regulation & overreach of the federal government. You are creating a system where only somebody AS BIG as the government can adhere to...the government. And we wonder why faceless corporations lay us off? Because we are just numbers...we don't work for "Bill" any more...Bill is just some manager now that got put out of business by a faceless conglomerate. But you won't solve any of that with more regulation. Last edited by SteveMax58 : 11-06-2011 at 06:22 AM. |
|
11-06-2011, 06:37 AM | #16166 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
Almost every small business is going to be far more burdened by state and local regulations than by federal. Everything from licensing to zoning to permitting happens at levels lower than the federal government. For example, very few small businesses run into any problems with EPA regulations.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
11-06-2011, 06:56 AM | #16167 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Quote:
But my example should probably be more like 50-100 person companies rather than 20. I'm talking small(er) businesses such as the traditional regional type businesses like grocers, an internet access provider, certain types of manufacturing, etc. But that's the beauty of local regulation...if its too cumbersome, it will give at some point because local communities will demand it. Perhaps not as quickly as you'd like but it will. |
|
11-06-2011, 07:06 AM | #16168 |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Just to add...I'd say there are a lot of local barriers to entry as well. But lets have those localities be more accountable for getting some of those barriers reduced or streamlined rather than adding more from a federal level, or taking complete control away.
|
11-06-2011, 07:14 AM | #16169 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
What businesses aren't starting because of EPA regulations? I don't think that's a significant barrier to employment.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
11-06-2011, 08:13 AM | #16170 | |
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NJ
|
Quote:
Perhaps increased growth and productivity shouldn't be the only goal for society--especially, you know, when it comes at the cost of destroying it. |
|
11-06-2011, 08:21 AM | #16171 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Quote:
You gave the EPA as an example of why the federal government is less restrictive than a local government & I said they would be the type of regulation arm to prevent a business from ever conceptualizing. But there are many other factors that have nothing to do with the EPA so I'm not sure there's a valid answer to your question which presumes opposition to any government = opposition to any standards. |
|
11-06-2011, 09:19 AM | #16172 |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lynchburg, VA
|
One example is the CPSIA. A lot of small businesses were hurt or even forced to shut down because of the cost of compliance. They just couldn't afford to submit their products to a lab for destructive testing. Large corporations? They were granted a waiver to allow them to do their testing internally.
|
11-06-2011, 10:00 AM | #16173 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
|
Quote:
Oil and gas drilling here in Colorado (and to some extent recently, hydrofracking in many parts of the country) seem to go through wild swings of not getting permitted from the state and feds. I'll have to look up what caused the massive decline, and shutting of businesses (new and old) of that industry here in Colorado in the 1980s(?) that caused significant unemployment and the ripple effect of devastating the real estate market (and jobs). |
|
11-06-2011, 10:07 AM | #16174 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
Do you have specific examples? I'm not saying regulation can't hurt businesses, but the kinds of regulations that come from the federal government are generally not as important to small businesses as are state and local regulations. Even the energy examples Buc gave are largely about state regulations (at least here in NY and PA). Gutting federal regulations will benefit big business without doing much of anything for small business. One thing I'd do for small business is severely reduce the license requirements for most professions. That alone would do more to reduce entry barriers than anything with the EPA, and it's state and local controlled so in theory it should be easier to do than changing the federal government.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
11-06-2011, 10:15 AM | #16175 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
|
If I recall from working with our Environmental Services department, many of the state regulations and permits were mandated by the feds, following the feds rules and guidelines. While most of the reportings are submitted to the State EPA, they act as a clearhouse for the feds.
|
11-06-2011, 10:24 AM | #16176 |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
|
11-06-2011, 11:12 AM | #16177 | |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lynchburg, VA
|
Quote:
There's a list of citations from news articles at the Wikipedia link. You can also check out the Handmade Toy Alliance web site for more info. I'm not sure why you would say that federal regulations aren't important to small businesses. They are still subject to the regulations, and because they don't have economies of scale, the relative cost of regulation is much higher. In addition, a lot of regulations are written by lobbyists for large industries. They have a vested interest in making barriers to entry as large as possible. |
|
11-06-2011, 11:41 AM | #16178 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
Which is why I said "scaled back considerably" instead of "eliminated entirely". Seems entirely sufficient for the purposes of this thread (or any other internet thread for that matter). If you're looking for an itemized laundry list try someone with a great deal more time & patience than I've got. If I end up with the authority to eliminate any with the stroke of a pen/keyboard then I'll have a great deal more enthusiasm for being thorough.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
|
11-06-2011, 07:31 PM | #16179 | ||
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
I don't remember her being so hawkish (or at least in public).
Rice: U.S. Should Do Everything Possible To Bring Down Iran's Government | Fox News Quote:
Ron Paul is a little too isolationist for my liking. Quote:
|
||
11-06-2011, 09:19 PM | #16180 |
"Dutch"
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Tampa, FL
|
I wouldn't consider Ron Paul an expert on foreign affairs. Rice on the other hand, has some credibility and experience...and has attended all the same briefings that Presidents have attended. I'm sure she's not just talking out of her ass.
|
11-08-2011, 07:36 AM | #16181 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
French President Nicolas Sarkozy called Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a "liar" in remarks to US President Barack Obama overheard by journalists.
"I can't stand him any more, he's a liar," Mr Sarkozy said in French. "You may be sick of him, but me, I have to deal with him every day," Mr Obama replied. The exchange at the G20 summit was quoted by a French website, Arret sur Images, and confirmed by other media. The remarks - during a private conversation - were overheard by a few journalists last week but were not initially reported, the BBC's Christian Fraser in Paris says. BBC News - Sarkozy called Israeli PM Netanyahu 'liar' Love it! Nice, candid remarks that you never hear from men who are guarded as hell when talking about each other publicly. And although some will try, I don't see it as a comment that can really hurt Obama. |
11-08-2011, 07:43 AM | #16182 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
You're probably right. No one who gives a damn about Israel would vote for the miserable SOB anyway.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
|
11-08-2011, 09:53 PM | #16183 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
Whew, one battle (of many) won.
Appeals court upholds Obama health care law - politics - More politics - msnbc.com Quote:
|
|
11-09-2011, 01:23 PM | #16184 | |
This guy has posted so much, his fingers are about to fall off.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: In Absentia
|
Quote:
Um, yeah. You know you got your ass kicked when CNN can't even get your name right as a candidate for governor. It's David Williams.
__________________
M's pitcher Miguel Batista: "Now, I feel like I've had everything. I've talked pitching with Sandy Koufax, had Kenny G play for me. Maybe if I could have an interview with God, then I'd be served. I'd be complete." |
|
11-09-2011, 01:50 PM | #16185 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: The State of Insanity
|
Sounds like the D's did well in the year before elections (the Ohio anti-unions vote going down 60-40, Maine same day registration, Mississippi definition of "personhood"m and the recall of the author of Arizona's tough immigration law).
Sounds like the Republican/Tea Party wave has peaked and is starting to recede... The fact is that the current top two candidates in the Presidential race are either a notorious flip-flopper who actually did a mandatory health care law when he was governor of what R's consider the most liberal state in the Union, or a political neophyte with a catch phrase (Nine Nine Nine!), and harassment charges being brought up more and more every day.. there may not be much drawing power at the top of the ticket.
__________________
Check out Foz's New Video Game Site, An 8-bit Mind in an 8GB world! http://an8bitmind.com |
11-09-2011, 03:23 PM | #16186 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Apr 2005
|
Quote:
Eh, it's going to get decided by the Supreme Court. |
|
11-09-2011, 03:28 PM | #16187 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
This is true - but it's nice "cover" for the Supremes when conservative-leaning Federal appeals courts uphold it (not that they really "need" cover, but you know what I mean).
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
11-09-2011, 03:29 PM | #16188 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Yep. Which is why I haven't gotten too high on any previous victories nor particularly discouraged by this setback. They're all just steps toward the inevitable final one.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
11-09-2011, 09:12 PM | #16189 | |
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NJ
|
Quote:
Adds to the number of prominent and well-respected conservative appellate judges that have upheld the law (including a former Scalia clerk). I'd be pretty surprised if it is ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. At best they'll adopt one of the lines of reasoning that allow them to punt on jurisdictional grounds and decide the constitutionality later (as one of the conservative judges on the D.C. Circuit did). Last edited by lcjjdnh : 11-09-2011 at 09:12 PM. |
|
11-10-2011, 10:32 PM | #16190 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
I don't remember Obama admin really talking about the crisis in Europe and how we may be able to "help". I get we don't have alot of disposable income right now but I think we could have helped by paying into whatever Euro pool was established.
Certainly in our interest - Greece and Italy can cause real problems for Europe and by extension, the US. Express.co.uk - Home of the Daily and Sunday Express | UK News :: Death of the euro Quote:
|
|
11-11-2011, 06:27 AM | #16191 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
They don't need our money. They can print as many euros as they want. They have just decided that the pain from a euro breakup is preferable.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
11-11-2011, 07:40 AM | #16192 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
|
Quote:
Also the members of the EU don't really consider themselves "countrymen" like the United States. Sure we might have people that say they hate people from Texas or California but in the end of the day most people consider everyone living in the 50 states Americans. I would guess most Germans see bailing out the Greeks as nothing more than WWII war reparations. |
|
11-11-2011, 07:42 AM | #16193 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
|
Quote:
And Portaugal and Spain and Ireland... This is just like the war in the Middle East, certainly all of these things are in our interest. Where does the money come from is all I want to know? |
|
11-11-2011, 08:17 AM | #16194 | |
"Dutch"
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Tampa, FL
|
Quote:
The EU is not a country. |
|
11-11-2011, 08:46 AM | #16195 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
|
|
11-11-2011, 09:43 AM | #16196 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
My mind still boggles at how anyone thought the Euro wasn't doomed to failure from the start.
edit to add: But I'll admit that it survived quite a bit longer than I ever expected.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis Last edited by JonInMiddleGA : 11-11-2011 at 09:43 AM. |
11-12-2011, 05:41 AM | #16197 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
T-12
First Read - Obama phones supercommittee leaders ahead of weekend talks Quote:
|
|
11-12-2011, 09:32 PM | #16198 | ||
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
Gingrich is definitely out for me. Not that I disagree but to state it that way is too "cowboyish".
Iran dominates GOP contenders' debate - Politics - msnbc.com Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Edward64 : 11-12-2011 at 09:36 PM. |
||
11-13-2011, 07:37 AM | #16199 |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
I think the Repubs are making a gigantic mistake by attacking Obama's foreign policy. 2 reasons for that really...
1) There is no practical improvement with regards to Iran that isn't already being done or tried. ..whether that be covertly (i.e. virus in the nuclear labs cooperating with Israel) or in the public (i.e. economic sanctions & isolation). Perhaps some small technocratic improvements in existing sanctions but certainly none of the Repubs can possibly sell us on uniting a coalition better than Obama to do that...can they? You can ratchet up the rhetoric if that makes you feel better about the situation but that will only serve to fuel escalation to a point where neither side can back down gracefully when it comes to actual combat. 2) Following on (1)...the American public (imho) is not even remotely interested in combat with Iran. They are much more interested in hearing about how they (and their neighbors) will get back to work. So do what you must as President...but don't try to sell the public on a new war, or the same old rhetoric. It's just not that critical to most people. And of course, how do you answer the question of "funding a new liberation war" without raising taxes on the wealthy. No good can come of this political strategy at all, imo. Not to mention...I think you can make a much better argument that Iran will eventually succumb to the same Arab spring movements we've seen elsewhere. Certainly there was an initial wave crushed already, but that doesn't mean we won't see people rise up again. It will need a stable & democratic Iraq, same in Libya, same in Egypt...but there is at least a chance it can happen gracefully with influence rather than force. You couldn't say the same thing 10+ years ago with any sort of confidence, but I think you can now. |
11-13-2011, 11:13 AM | #16200 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
Meet the new boss Same as the old boss
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 24 (0 members and 24 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|