![]() |
![]() |
#101 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
Just as an FYI at the rate we are going I can just about garauntee that bug will not be fixed by the time we hit the 2002 season. Lets just make sure we have lots of 2nd and 3rd round picks when we import the TCY draft
![]()
__________________
. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#102 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
|
I'd like to propose a new house rule...We can't have any draft picks in 2002.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#103 | |
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
Quote:
I was actually seriously considering proposing the same thing. Maybe we should limit ourselves to 1 first round draft pick and trade everything else for future picks. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#104 | |
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
Quote:
I might have stumbled upon an ILB bug too, so you can draft 3 or 4 starting ILB's in the 6th or 7th round! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#105 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
Quote:
A bug in the game in general or just with TCY imports? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#106 | |
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
Quote:
TCY imports. I posted it in the bug thread on the other page, but the computer teams took 30+ OLB's before the first inside linebacker was selected. They were taking bums before first-round talents, even when ILB was their top need. I need to run a few more drafts to make sure it is a bug and not some weird one-time affair. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#107 | |
lolzcat
Join Date: May 2001
Location: williamsburg, va
|
what would be the odds of jim hacking some sort of corrected 2002 draft file that could be distributed? Like... generating one from WITHIN fof or something?
__________________
Text Sports Network - Bringing you statistical information for several FOF MP leagues in one convenient site Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#108 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
Quote:
Heh I can ask, but I wouldn't hold your breath. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#109 | |
Resident Curmudgeon
Join Date: Oct 2002
|
Quote:
Thank you and yes, I have read every single word so far (glossing over the stats though). Reading this dynasty has been the highlight of my day. As much as I am critical of FOF4 and the direction it took, the way you guys are playing it and most importantly, the critical decision-making process makes it worthwhile. Btw, in our sim last night with the OOTP5 GroupThink, we went through a similar process when we lost one of our key SP in May. We had our pitching coach, minors coordinator and bean counter (me), along with our GM all on AIM evaluating and agreeing on the best course of action. Being in a chat was a different dynamic than what goes on here, but the decision-making process was still the same, and just as fun. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#110 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
I'm with Anrhydeddu on critical thinking process - that is the key. We'rte making some tough decisions, even if the amount of variance in our end result isn't as much as I'd like - I still feel like when we make a mistake, we feel it.
We'll continue the draft momentarily... drum roll, please. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#111 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Here is the draft, up to our next pick. I'll post the update files, and we can talk in earnest about where to go from here.
Well done so far, gents. I like the way this has turned out, actually. - - - Code:
Last edited by QuikSand : 04-04-2003 at 01:25 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#112 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Here is the first file:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#113 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Second file attached
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#114 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
I really like WLB James Becker at this pick. I think we are going to need someone to replace Harden next season and he seems to have the skills to do so. He is too small to move positions so if we take him he is stuck as being a WLB, but that is what Harden plays anyway so I think that pick makes a lot of sense here.
__________________
. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#115 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
I sense another "difference in philosophy" in our midst...
I am stuned that DE Adrian Brewer is still here, and would consider him pretty seriously. But, I think we may need to think about imediate needs more than overall value, and perhaps OLB is a more pressing need. Even at OLB, I prefer Gabe Rosian to Becker. I'm pliable here, though. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#116 |
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
I won't have game access until this evening, but things are turning out very well. I think we definitely need to go defense here, so wherever the best marriage of talent & need can be found, let's get it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#117 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
|
Since my dream of getting C Coles is gone, I'm ok with going with another defensive player.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#118 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
Here are a couple of thoughts...
To be honest I assumed Brewer would be gone by this point too so I forgot all about him. He does have that Kent Wolfe look about him which is very intriguing and even if he isn't a major breakout his pass rushing skills look like they should be above average anyway. However we should keep in mind that he is already idolized by the fans. So if we bring him in it's probably for the long haul and big $$$'s down the road. If he breaks out like Kent Wolfe did that isn't so bad. If he develops to his current potential (which shoulod be solid, but not spectacular) then I am not sure if we want that kind of cash tied up in him, and if he busts like Howard Hammond did well.... ![]() If we go OLB I like Gabe Rosian too, but I would still prefer we took James Becker. He just looks better than Rosian to me. But I wouldn't be crushed if we took Rosian instead. So where does that leave us? We have capable DE's now. But Brewer does look like he could be one of those monster break outs. We don't have much depth at OLB now and it is likely Harden will be leaving after this season. To be honest I am kind of leaning towards Brewer because I just love the upside potential. But I want Quik to agree that way I can blame him when we are shackled long term to a scrub if he busts. ![]() ![]()
__________________
. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#119 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
primelord,
Conceptually, we're pretty close here. I honestly don't know how good DE Brewer might be, but he does have "that look." Indeed, "that look" is essentially where we seem to differ. My problem with LB Becker lies in the intangibles that I have discussed elsewhere. I smell in him a modest bust - and so, when you speak of him being the "safe pick" I would simply suggest that he has all the signs of not being safe at all, but indeed being a disappointment waiting to happen. I don't think Becker is a major bust, but I don't think he will ever develop to a rating of 76 in run defense, but rather his upside there is more like 55, maybe 60. Similarly, I think all his green ratings are overstated, as tipped off by his "static" ratings (as I have frequently referenced). On the board I think we have three defensive players who all show the signs of being solid, if not breakouts. One is DE Brewer, who currently looks like he could be an adequate player, with pretty good pass rushing skills. The others I see are two outside linebackers, Rosian and the somewhat less impressive Gary Lane. Thing is, we almost certainly get only one bite at this apple. After this pick, we wait until the end of round 6 to select again, where we won't see players of this quality, to be sure. That's why as optimistic I might be about DE Brewer (and I am), I might be inclined to go with a linebacker here - because our current roster is getting more than a bit thin there, as we have lost LB Alan Martinez already, and have four out of five of our current linebackers out of contract after this season. I think Rosian is the guy to take, but I've said my piece- and will yield to the will of our coordinator and any other level of consensus that emerges from the participants. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#120 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
Well I will say on advantage to Rosian is his size gives us more options with him. We can essentially just plug him into any starting LB spot if we need him. Where as Becker's size limits him to only the WLB position. Again I will point out simply because we usually forget to check that Rosian is a Fan Favorite. So we may be stuck with him whether we want him or not if we take him.
I am starting to hate the idea of passing over Brewer at this point though. Let me throw something out there. Could we explore the possibility of trading for the next pick so we could take both Brewer and Rosian? I would just really hate to see Brewer just develop into a monster and no we passed on him.
__________________
. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#121 | |
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
Quote:
We're already down a 2nd rounder next year, so we should definitely be careful about giving up any more future draft picks. I think i'd be in favor of just selecting 1 and moving on. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#122 |
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
well, ive got the team names under control, but still not the cities. So here is one more file request. Can someone who has the correct city names please post
frfoot.fcy from the universe directory? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#123 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
What about a second rounder two years from now?
__________________
. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#124 | |
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
Quote:
As long as you believe in this guy, I think we should do anything within reason. Since we're in the 3rd round now, how about a proposal like this to whoever has the next pick: 1998 3rd rounder 1997 4th or 5th rounder I think at that price we could easily justify the move. edit: clarified and added thoughts.
__________________
Last edited by cthomer5000 : 04-04-2003 at 06:31 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#125 |
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
better yet. How about proposing a 1998 3rd rounder and this years 6th and/or 7th rounder? That way we can pick up guys who have the ability to have an impact at minimal expense, and not have to mire around in the bummy portion of the draft...
It probably won't take all that much to swing a deal for the next pick, we'd be offering fair value.
__________________
Last edited by cthomer5000 : 04-04-2003 at 06:30 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#126 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Okay, I love it when a plan comes together. We trade our 5th round pick next year, plus our 3rd round pick in 1998, to get Norfolk's pick right after ours, This gives us two players that we want here, and will let us have an intriguing side-by-side experiment as the years go on.
From the input we've gotten, I think we take DE Brewer and LB Becker here, and we'll see how we do with them. Since LB Rosian is already a fan fave, under our rules I see that as a big demerit, even though that doesn't seem realistic. (I'm a big believer in "set your rules, then play all-out within them") So we go from there: Code:
Last edited by QuikSand : 04-04-2003 at 07:04 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#127 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
We only have one pick left, but I couldn't find a real standout, so I'm sharing the files... here's the first:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#128 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Here's the second file.
I may be out a while, so if there is a consensus, please go on ahead... I have no strong feelings on this stuff from here on out. Feel free to move on to training camp, if anyone gets the whim. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#129 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Corey, here's your city file:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#130 | |
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
Quote:
Quik, you are a scholar and a gentleman. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#131 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
I'm here to help.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#132 |
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
For what it's worth we have 2 picks left, a 6th and 7th rounder.
guys who look worth a shot to me (haven't completed looking at everyone) CENTER Lonnie Ancheta - well liked Adam Nash Antonio Scherer GUARD LG Perry Dillon LG Jake Nickell we can also make a long-term upgrade at kicker if we want to.
__________________
Last edited by cthomer5000 : 04-04-2003 at 07:22 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#133 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
I don't see very much on defense that interests me. Wade what do you think of RB Tom Murray? Not a star by any means, but seems like he would make a capable backup were our new stud to go down with injury.
Or maybe a guy like C Charlie Wiggins
__________________
. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#134 | |
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
Quote:
Wiggins looks like he could be a bust, those 66/66/67 ratings... at RB Murray looks decent to me, What about fellow RB Butch Burk, think there's a chance for some sort of breakout there? here's everyone I would consider drafting or signing after the draft: Code:
__________________
Last edited by cthomer5000 : 04-04-2003 at 08:15 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#135 | |
lolzcat
Join Date: May 2001
Location: williamsburg, va
|
Tom Murray would be a nice pickup, but he may get so mired in the guys we have that he might never see a play..
Wiggins looks nice, but I think Ancheta is a safer bet, Wiggins sure seems to have a ton of green.. Dillon wouldn't be a bad pickup, but I think I like the C's better than him.. I kind of like the idea of picking up a K.. Mario Shields seems to be the best, but if we're playing to maximize our rules, he is a fan favorite.. so it's possible that we'd be better picking up Cole Murray... He could be a great long term addition to our team, particuraly with a Kicker who is pretty poor.. at this point, this seems to actually be the most significant contributor we could pick up here..
__________________
Text Sports Network - Bringing you statistical information for several FOF MP leagues in one convenient site Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#136 |
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
I agree with basically everything you said wade. I prefer the centers over the guards as well, but included the guards because we currently need a 4th one. We currently have 2 centers under contract.
I could justify either going kicker now and seeing what's left, or taking an O-lineman now and seeing if one of the kickers is there in round 7. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#137 |
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
well, I'm heading out for the night, feel free to move on without me.
If you want to do me a favor try to pick up as many of the guys I targeted as undrafted free agents. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#138 | |
Resident Curmudgeon
Join Date: Oct 2002
|
Quote:
Does this really make any difference in the game or is this one of those 'pretend that it does to add realism' thing? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#139 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
A,
Just like in FOF2001 there are weight restrictions on switching positions. Becker only weighs 214 lbs so unless we want him to play safety or corner he can't switch to a different LB position. Wade if I get a confirmation on who you want to go with here I will make the pickups.
__________________
. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#140 |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
I think that you should aim for an idolized crappy running back with your 7th rounder or undrafted FA. There is always the chance that he could be better liked than Crawford. And if you're going to cut Crawford, this would be the year to do it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#141 | |
lolzcat
Join Date: May 2001
Location: williamsburg, va
|
My vote is for K Cole Murray..
__________________
Text Sports Network - Bringing you statistical information for several FOF MP leagues in one convenient site Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#142 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
I like Butch Burks better than Tom Murray at RB, personally. oykib's idea is a good one, but since Crawford's popularity is at 98, it's a real longshot to make it work. It might, however, be possible by getting an URFA - where we can sort by popularity before signing a player. Something to consider - very clever, oykib.
I could also be quite hapy with K Cole Murray here - he looks very solid. Maybe QB Omar Conley has some breakout potential... probably not a guy to draft, but perhaps a worthwhile URFA pickup? If he breaks out, the upside is very high. Among the OL being discussed, I think C Ancheta is the most promising, Plenty of sure busts on the list of yours being thrown around, though. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#143 | ||
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
Quote:
so our list of finalist seems to be: C Ancheta RB Burks K Cole Murray QB Conley which will still be there in round 7? Quote:
i thought so, I just don't have the FOF4 scouting experience you guys do. This is the most I've played the game since buying it.
__________________
Last edited by cthomer5000 : 04-05-2003 at 08:46 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#144 |
Resident Curmudgeon
Join Date: Oct 2002
|
primelord, a clarification please. Are you saying the game prevents you from switching undersized players?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#145 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
|
Quote:
yes it does. A player's size determines which positions he can be moved to, so for example a 220 lb WLB can only be mvoed to safety or cornerback - not SLB or ILB. Once you move him, it's also likely he can't be moved back to WLB because of his size. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#146 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
I htink QB Conley will be there after the draft... and I wouldn't really advocate picking him here - I'd just suggest we take him as a roster filler, and keep an eye for a possible jump in ratings during training camp. If it happens, then he needs to make the team, and probably be re-signed for next year.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#147 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Here is the conclusion of the draft:
Code:
We manage to get C Lonnie Ancheta and RB Tom Murray in the after-draft URFA pickups, which gives us some flexibility. I'm going to continue filling in the roster, and will post revised game files shortly. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#148 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
After my first round of URFA signings, we work out a new deal with WR Matthew Morrell - he will clearly be the centerpiece of our air game for the next few years, a nice step up for the former fifth round selection.
We now have a logjam at flanker - and probably need to move someone over to play split end (to start). Usually, the youngest guy makes sense, but I don't know if we want to mess with Morrell, who has developed very quickly. Maybe Perea - move him over, take some hit, and have Hill get a fair amount of playing time at split end this year? With Morrell re-signed, and 52 players on the roster, we now have just about $5.6 million remaining in cap room - just enough to fill in, and maybe re-sign one or two more of our own players. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#149 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
By the way... when you get the game update, have a quick look at DE Russel Austin. Did this guy have some weird kinf of hug breakout since we signed him to a contract? I don't remember him looking anywhere near this good when he was in teh FA pool. Weird, man, weird.
Look at this guy in your current game before you open the new files... maybe we can isolate when this boom happened. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#150 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
First updated file:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|