07-07-2005, 03:14 PM | #101 |
College Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Henderson, Nevada
|
I cant help think of the irony of life: Yesterday London was on Cloud 9, Today they hit a low point. sad day, indeed.
__________________
Toujour Pret |
07-07-2005, 03:17 PM | #102 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Placerville, CA
|
It's like raaaaiiinnn........ eh, nevermind.
|
07-07-2005, 04:02 PM | #103 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
i love how people are so convinced this is Al Qaeda related. it doesn't make any sense to me that it'd be al qaeda related. If it was AQ I think it would have been a lot more effective than like, less than 100 people dead. It seems to me to be clearly G8-meeting related. Seems like the work of one or two guys wanting to draw attention the G8 summit rather than AQ.
|
07-07-2005, 04:03 PM | #104 |
College Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
|
Time magazine ran some articles on a particularly radical Muslim cleric in London running a mosque that alot of terrorist recruiting was being conducted out of. This 'cleric' was quoted as saying things like 'we won't stop until the whole world is Muslim" and such. Can't help wondering where this guy and his crowd might fit in.
Think that this is the same place that the 'shoe-bomber' was recruited out of. Last edited by Bubba Wheels : 07-07-2005 at 04:03 PM. |
07-07-2005, 04:03 PM | #105 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Here and There
|
"A group calling itself the Secret Organization of al-Qaida in Europe claimed responsibility."
That's probably why. |
07-07-2005, 04:04 PM | #106 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
I have a sneaking suspicion you might be right about that
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
|
07-07-2005, 04:05 PM | #107 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The DMV
|
Quote:
Good point about responsibility. Who is responsible for any terrorist attack isn't usually apparent right away, and the rumor mill can shift about for days--check out the Madrid train bombing thread on this board for such a phenomenon... |
|
07-07-2005, 04:07 PM | #108 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Here and There
|
Except when
"A group calling itself the Secret Organization of al-Qaida in Europe claimed responsibility." Last edited by Desnudo : 07-07-2005 at 04:08 PM. |
07-07-2005, 04:09 PM | #109 | |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Jun 2003
|
Quote:
Many times a group claims responsibility as eithor a way to get publicity or a way to hide the real group. The group that claims responsibility is often not the group that did it. Also, this "group" has never been heard of before.
__________________
wbatl1 |
|
07-07-2005, 04:12 PM | #110 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Here and There
|
Certainly possible. Except sometimes the simplest answer is the correct one. And it explains why everyone is assuming that it was AQ, which was the original point of the post. I suppose it could have been anti-globalization hippies or London punk rockers, so we'll see.
|
07-07-2005, 04:12 PM | #111 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
|
Quote:
I'll take the challenge. This fits well with what what happened in Madrid and NY, both attacks which occured at pretty much the same time in the morning (during rush). The fact that the body count wasn't higher may be similar to why the 9/11 count wasn't higher in that perhaps later terror attacks that were to occur didn't come off because the increased security made it harder to do it (they effectively shut down central London, much like we shut down the air traffic on 9/11). It could also be that the bombs were less effective than their devisers had hoped. There could be a lot of reasons why you didn't get 300 or 3,000 dead like on 3/11 or 9/11, but a low body count shouldn't preclude AQ. Also, if this were G-8 protesters, this would seem to drive people against whatever position they are pushing, not to mention very counter to the vast majority of G-8 protesters' wishes who mostly are peaceful aside from the anarchists in their ranks who love nothing more than smashing things for the sake of "rebellion" (or, IMO, an unwillingness to grow up and actually be responsible adults). I cannot say for certain this was AQ, but a lot of the circumstantials lean in that direction. It could be a splinter cell that doesn't act on AQ's say-so, but they'd obviously approve of the attack. |
|
07-07-2005, 04:13 PM | #112 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The DMV
|
Quote:
Could even be RIRA. Have they disavowed involvement yet? |
|
07-07-2005, 04:13 PM | #113 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York
|
Quote:
I put on my robe and wizard hat.
__________________
In the immortal words of a great alcoholic, "Can't we all just get along?" |
|
07-07-2005, 04:16 PM | #114 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Here and There
|
Quote:
Do they even need to? It's not 1985 anymore. |
|
07-07-2005, 04:18 PM | #115 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
|
I have to think that any IRA or IRA-like organization isn't in this for much the same reason the Basques weren't in on the Madrid bombing. It just isn't their style at all. These groups prefer to get some headlines and strike a little fear, but they don't want body counts (except for the occasional judge or prosecutor or whatnot) because body counts would drive public opinion the other way from them. It's particularly so with the IRA who are getting a lot of what they want nowadays (I believe they were to disarm and disband at one time because of Good Friday, but I don't think they've ever done it) and are gaining ground politically, so there's no need to jeopardize that. They could do it anyway and hope that people think AQ did it, but that would require some degree of luck and foresight in planning that keeps their names out of the mix and I wouldn't hold my breath on that point.
|
07-07-2005, 04:18 PM | #116 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The DMV
|
Quote:
Perhaps you should take a look at your timelines... http://www.fas.org/irp/world/para/nira.htm Agreed that it's unlikely, but they certainly have the history (Omagh) and capability. I think they are also reaching out to other groups on a mercenary basis (I believe a couple of IRA bomb makers were arrested in Columbia trying to assist the FARC)... Last edited by Klinglerware : 07-07-2005 at 04:21 PM. |
|
07-07-2005, 04:20 PM | #117 | |
FOFC's Elected Representative
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The stars at night; are big and bright
|
Quote:
.
__________________
"i have seen chris simms play 4-5 times in the pros and he's very clearly got it. he won't make a pro bowl this year, but it'll come. if you don't like me saying that, so be it, but its true. we'll just have to wait until then" imettrentgreen "looking at only ten games, and oddly using a median only, leaves me unmoved generally" - Quiksand |
|
07-07-2005, 04:21 PM | #118 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
edit: And I don't think we can credit "good response" by the London authorities to keeping the body count down. My point is that IF this was an AQ attack I would have expected (now maybe I'm giving the dirtbags too much credit), but I would have expected their planning to factor in an effective response by the London authorities and to even take advantage of that to increase their bodycount. Basically I think from what I've heard of these attacks they were sorta a "shoestring" style attack. Now if we were talking multiple buses ripped apart and serious casualties in the underground, instead of the (no offense to anyone who lost someone in the attacks) rather ineffective attacks that these seemed to be. Now if we find 10-20 unexploded devices through the rest of the transit system and it appears that this was a failure of execution not of planning, then maybe I'd think it was an actual "real AQ" operation, but until then it seems more likely it was some serious splinter-group just trading in on the AQ name to give themself legitimacy, not something directed by the "big baddies" . That make sense? Last edited by DaddyTorgo : 07-07-2005 at 04:26 PM. |
|
07-07-2005, 04:21 PM | #119 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Here and There
|
Quote:
Number of RIRA attacks in London, or England for that matter? |
|
07-07-2005, 04:21 PM | #120 |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Jun 2003
|
I would say that it is highly likely to be extremist muslims. But, that does not neccessarily make it Al-Qaida. There is said to be a separate Mulsim terrorist group in France that would like a unified europe. They could be involved.
__________________
wbatl1 |
07-07-2005, 04:23 PM | #121 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Here and There
|
Quote:
It would also ruin the whole point of the attack. |
|
07-07-2005, 04:26 PM | #122 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
|
Quote:
But if that's so, then there's no such organization as ELF for example, which operates entirely with independent cells. At some point, sympathetic aims will allow "unofficial" coalesence into a group such as ELF or an alliance like our hypothetical group and AQ. And yes, any two-bit whacko can claim AQ, but that's the nature of these things. There isn't a membership roll tacked up on a wall somewhere and they check for attendance everyday or something. Even if AQ didn't directly order the attack, it doesn't follow that they wouldn't approve of the attack. Therefore, even if these were AQ sympathizers, AQ will likely praise them in future communiques and say they're in cahoots anyway, simply because AQ would like to keep their names in the paper, even if they didn't do the deed themselves. |
|
07-07-2005, 04:28 PM | #123 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The DMV
|
Quote:
Again, it's unlikely but shouldn't be discounted. They seem plenty active in London and the UK: From the BBC (http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/war/tro...les/rira.shtml) Such was the outrage over Omagh that the Real IRA issued a statement within days saying it was suspending all "military operations". However, the suspension did not last for long and they re-emerged in February 2000. Since then they have carried out a number of attacks in Northern Ireland and Britain They gained international publicity in September 2000 when they fired an RPG rocket at British foreign intelligence HQ, MI6, in London and in March 2001 they planted a bomb outside BBC Television Centre in London. The organisation has not made a formal declaration that its cease-fire is over. In May 2001 the US State Department designated the Real IRA as a foreign terrorist organisation and froze its financial assets. In July British and Irish government sources were hinting that the Real IRA was in disarray after the arrest of several of its leading figures. This analysis proved premature. In August a bomb exploded in Ealing Broadway in west London and on 3rd November a car bomb containing about 30 kg of home-made explosives was planted in Birmingham city centre. The bomb did not fully detonate and no one was injured. Both attacks were believed to have been carried out by the Real IRA. |
|
07-07-2005, 04:34 PM | #124 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Here and There
|
I know this early it's impossible to discount a lot of things. And I'm certain that they will investigate the possibility it was IRA. I think it is far, far more likely to be the work of Muslim terrorists, especially since one has claimed credit for it.
|
07-07-2005, 04:37 PM | #125 |
College Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Burlington, VT USA
|
I'd be shocked if it was RIRA.
Whatever was responsible would not gain any favor in Europe for blowing up Europeans. |
07-07-2005, 04:53 PM | #126 |
College Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Henderson, Nevada
|
I bought an art history book ffrom the University bookstore earler and happened to pass by a coffee shop on the way and heard a bunch of kids talking about how ''It's our fault that we are being bombed, We should understand them, and How it wouldn't have happened if Kerryt was Prez....'' I just sat beind them sipping my dark black coffee and listening to their diatribe. I swear if I hear something like that happeneing again I'll throw a fit.
__________________
Toujour Pret |
07-07-2005, 05:01 PM | #127 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
The IRA & their splinter groups also tend to send out clear warnings to authorities (or try to) enough in advance of the detonation so that the body count is minimized. They want to blow shit up, especially stuff that has an important symbolic value, but they don't want big body counts. Almost without exception, every high-body-count IRA or IRA-related attack has turned out badly for them, and they admit as much.
|
07-07-2005, 05:33 PM | #128 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
|
Quote:
Hmmm...Senator is posting periods in bombing/terrorist related threads. Senator is also associated with the Department of Homeland Security in some way, I believe. He posted a period the "Orange Alert" thread. http://dynamic.gamespy.com/~fof/foru...ad.php?t=40508 Methinks he is spying on us. Terrorists beware! We've got Senator on our side!!!
__________________
Ability is what you're capable of doing. Motivation determines what you do. Attitude determines how well you do it. - Lou Holtz |
|
07-07-2005, 05:43 PM | #129 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
Be more fun to throw the art history book (in the absence of scalding hot cup of latte).
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
|
07-07-2005, 06:05 PM | #130 |
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Monroe, LA, USA
|
Al Qaeda is a very loosely structured group and there are AQ 'wannabe' groups. It could well have been radical Islamic fundamentalists who were not directly ordered by AQ to carry out the attack but who were attacking in concordance with the strategic direction of AQ. It could also have been some other group, though radical Islamists makes the most sense to me.
Radical Islam is at war with the West and wishes to destroy the West, whether we like it or not or choose to accept it or not. As for a reason, terror is used to create terror and fear and demoralize a population. The bombers could have been hoping to create a reaction similar to what happened in Spain, which as you remember bugged out shortly after the attacks. If that was the purpose, they sadly underestimated the British. Or it could have just been a way of saying that 'we're still here.' If we want to win against radical Islamist terrorists, we have to get at those who support them and train them and fund them. |
07-07-2005, 08:32 PM | #131 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
|
Unfortunately, there lies the rub. To effectively kill the funding, we'd essentially have to invade Saudi Arabia, home to most of the funding. Were it not for the pesky problems of oil blockades and, more importantly, the fact that Mecca and Medina are in Saudi Arabia, I'd say, "Go for it." However, doing so would result in gas shortages in the West and an almost guaranteed clash of civilizations around the world. No faster way of fulfilling the "Crusader" boogieman the jihadists want to paint us to be.
|
07-07-2005, 09:36 PM | #132 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Springfield, USA
|
Quote:
You are. |
|
07-07-2005, 11:20 PM | #133 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
|
No matter who is responsible, my thoughts and prayers go out to those who have been affected by this. I hope that no-one in the FOFC family has been directly affected (if it was mentioned earlier in this thread that someone was, I appologize in advance for missing that).
|
07-15-2005, 08:19 AM | #134 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
I'm impressed. In about a week, the Brits have identified the bombers and started to go after their accomplices, including the arrest (in Egypt) of an Egyptian today:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe...cks/index.html |
07-15-2005, 08:51 AM | #135 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The DMV
|
Quote:
And apparently, they managed to do it without widespread round ups (hoping a few of them will stick)... |
|
07-15-2005, 09:52 AM | #136 |
SI Games
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Melbourne, FL
|
I'm personally crossing fingers they've got the right people as releasing names that quickly shocked me a lot ...
PS> I also thought it was in particular bad-taste/dangerous to show footage of a business owned by a father of one of the suspects, I'd give its survival chances slim to none in the circumstances ... |
07-15-2005, 09:58 AM | #137 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Not Delaware - hurray!
|
Quote:
Agreed - I think one of the big breaks is when the mother of one of the bombers actually called in to say her child was missing. A huge break, but they've really responded well to it, adding new suspects each day.
__________________
She loves you, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah! She loves you, yeah! how do you know? how do you know? |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|