11-30-2009, 11:05 PM | #101 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
|
Quote:
|
|
11-30-2009, 11:12 PM | #102 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
|
Quote:
Which is also true. It's hard to really say with him. My friend while at CMU worked in the Athletic Center and said Kelly was the biggest prick ever, but obviously that is nothing new. Doesn't matter when you win though. I think X's and O's why he's perfect for ND, but I am not sure how he'll handle the media if he gets the job. I do think there won't be a middle ground though. He'll either win big or flame out in a blaze of glory. |
|
11-30-2009, 11:49 PM | #103 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
|
Quote:
You can say the same about most of the hot candidates - Gary Patterson coming from TCU has the shadow of Dennis Franchione and Chris Peterson at Boise that of Koetter and Hawkins, but admittedly as an East Coaster with less insight into the PAC-10 I'm not sold on Harbaugh any more than Tedford or Riley.I eagerly anticipate the stories saying ND had to sell out their integrity to finally be relevant again. Last edited by BishopMVP : 11-30-2009 at 11:50 PM. |
|
11-30-2009, 11:54 PM | #104 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minnesota
|
I wonder what Charlie will do now. He actually did a good job of getting recruits especially offensively. I wonder if he stays in the college ranks or heads back to the NFL as an O Cordinator.
|
12-01-2009, 12:26 AM | #105 | |
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Quote:
NFL teams are lining up at his door. He'll be back in no time. College is way too much work. Especially after you got $18m to leave one that was your alma mater. No way he's doing that shit again. |
|
12-01-2009, 12:47 AM | #106 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
He can be very picky w/ all the money he has coming his way.
He'd be smart to take a year off, get his weight and health under control (he almost died from a failed gastric bypass several years ago), and then come back. He's only 53-years old now and is connected to Parcells and Belichick. He could take a year off, serve as an offensive coordinator in the NFL for a few seasons and then probably get an NFL head coaching job. |
12-01-2009, 12:58 AM | #107 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
|
Quote:
And for the record, I have no idea why people keep talking about an $18m buyout. The $18m was approximately the amount left on the contract (6years x 3m) and the buyout was assuredly less than that. I'd also wager money that his buyout was lowered last December as part of the agreement to him coming back for 2009. |
|
12-01-2009, 01:05 AM | #108 |
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
4-5 million seems to be the tossed about numbers for his actual buyout.
|
12-01-2009, 01:09 AM | #109 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
Tedford is losing a little bit of shine with his inability to get past USC and win the conference, but he's had opportunities to go elsewhere and has thus far resisted. His family loves it in the Bay Area, he has a good recruiting base and facilities improvements appear to finally be on there way. I wouldn't rule out Tedford jumping to a higher profile job, but it probably has to happen soon, and I wouldn't be surprised if he's more inclined to go to the NFL if he ever decides to leave Cal. Stoops? I don't think he belongs in that category, and I'm more impressed with what Harbaugh has done. It took Stoops five seasons to break .500, and his team has backslid some this season. As for Harbaugh and Stanford comparing to Notre Dame and Weis - Stanford was 2 wins better than the Irish against a harder schedule. I think that's more than just "slightly better", and certainly not "superficially the same". I'd rank the Pac-10 coaches like this at the moment: 1. Carroll 2. Riley 3. Tedford Gap 4. Harbaugh 5. Kelly Gap 6. Stoops 7. Erickson 8. Neuheisel 9. Sarkisian Huge gap 10. Wulff With another good season next year, Harbaugh jumps into the top level of Pac-10 coaches with Carroll, Riley & Tedford. Kelly can make that jump as well - right now, you can't be sure how much he's riding off the coattails of Bellotti. Neuheisel and Sarkisian could make jumps up too with good seasons next year, and Stoops and Erickson are in danger of falling. Wulff is probably gone after next season. |
|
12-01-2009, 01:41 AM | #110 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
I don't know what the answer is at Washington State but it's just stunning to see the level they are recruiting at compared to the rest of the Pac-10. When you can promise unlimited playing time, a chance to be on TV and play in a major conference and don't really have strict academic standards, it's completely unexcusable to be recruiting the kind of no-names that WSU is right now. Hell, I can't remember a single recruit in SoCal over the last 3-4 years that has even mentioned WSU. Sure it's a tough job but you have to at least compete. Look at what Sarkisian has done since he's been there, Washington is actually a serious player for a lot of the upper level LA kids and are at least competing for some of the elite guys.
They actually have a local kid #8 TE in the nation this year, their next best recruit is the #31 TE in the nation. They have as many 2 star guys as 3 star guys and even a couple of 1 star guys (who usually don't even get recruited by a D1 program). Scout goes down to 250-300 usually in ranking by position and a bunch of their recruits aren't even ranked. In 2009 their best player was the #39 receiver in the country. These are the kind of kids you fill out a class with, not the kind you are getting in October and November. I really don't see a way back for them but if there is one, they have to get rid of Wulff ASAP and find a coach who has some recruiting pull. |
12-01-2009, 01:50 AM | #111 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
I wouldn't mind the Bears taking a swipe at Weis. Can't be any worse than what we have right now.
|
12-01-2009, 01:59 AM | #112 | |
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Quote:
Pullman has to be the dowdiest place to play in any of the BCS conferences. I mean, at least Waco is warm. The lack of success I think caps it off. A program like that, has to really cultivate its regional roots because if they can't afford you a chance at bowl games or anything else, a kid would rather go sit on the bench at a better school than start at one where they know they'll probably never have success. It doesn't help that Boise State is in their territory. I think the upstarts in the Pacific Northwest/Intermountain West (plus TCU) have made it harder for those second-tier BCS programs that don't have a ton of in-state talent to compete. The fact that they're disproportionately out west hurts, because at least the Yankee schools have their own weak BCS league. It's almost akin to the decision of a kid on the fringe to go top-tier FCS versus lower-level FBS because he'll get the chance to compete for a national title and if he performs really well, an outside shot at the next level and of course, the same chance to play. |
|
12-01-2009, 02:09 AM | #113 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minnesota
|
Quote:
Bill Cowler would be a great fit in Chicago IMO. He could bring back that tough defense and power running game they used to be known for. I hate the Bears as a passing team. NFC Central used to be the Black and Blue division now it is getting soft. Oops wrong thread. Ill keep it on topic from now on Last edited by jbergey22 : 12-01-2009 at 02:10 AM. |
|
12-01-2009, 02:10 AM | #114 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
I guess to be fair I should point out that there is one program in the Pac-10 that does recruit almost as badly as WSU - Oregon State. But at this point who can deny that Riley has an amazing eye for talent (and OSU typically recruits the JC's very, very well) whereas WSU's strategy just seems to be "anybody with a pulse". Plus OSU has recruited some big time guys along the way - the Rodgers brothers, Phillip last year, Simi Kuli was a JC guy but could have probably gone to any program in the country.
|
12-01-2009, 02:13 AM | #115 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
DC - great points. With the national attention that Boise has got the WAC, it's no surprise that is hurting WSU even more. It's absolutely no contest to which program a kid from Idaho or Eastern Washington would rather go to these days.
But that is even more the point really, WSU has to hire somebody to go head to head with the upstart programs. Not a nice guy like Wulff who is a solid coach, but is never going to be able to get the talent to show it. |
12-01-2009, 02:38 AM | #116 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
|
Pullman is a tough place to recruit to. You have to have a coach that has an eye for potential and can develop that potential, and can recruit to a specific system. You also have to target kids that are maybe looking to escape urban settings where they are likely to be drawn into trouble, or kids that really value small, close-knit communities. They have to be able to deal with cold weather and not a whole lot to do compared to bigger cities, as Pullman is quite isolated and not very big. It's the toughest place to recruit to in the Pac-10, and among the toughest of any BCS conference schools.
That said, WSU fans would tell you that Wulff is actually recruiting quite well, and who's to say at the moment they're wrong? I guess we'll see over the next 4-5 years. He's got a decent QB in Tuel, good WR prospects in Karstetter and Simone and some good young guys on defense like Bland. And with only a few exceptions, he's been redshirting his classes to build for the future at the expense of the present. That philosophy has also extended to them moving away from recruiting JC kids, preferring to build for the long term with H.S. kids. Also, keep in mind that in Scout.com's system, a 1-star rating simply means that a player hasn't been evaluated. The lowest rating they give to someone they've evaluated is 2-stars. I do think there's a lot to the theory that Boise State's success has hurt WSU. They are strong competition for the Inland Empire kids that WSU used to build off of. That said, some of it is simply evaluation mistakes. WSU didn't even offer Kellen Moore for example. I'm not convinced Wulff is a good enough coach to survive in the Pac-10, and I think he's going to have to ditch his no-huddle offense - it just doesn't seem to be working. When you compare him to the rest of the coaches in the Pac-10, he just doesn't seem to measure up. But to be fair, it's still early to form a full judgment on his tenure. |
12-01-2009, 02:39 AM | #117 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
|
When you consider the differences between recruiting to USC and recruiting to OSU, I think an argument can be made that Mike Riley is every bit the coach that Pete Carroll is, maybe even better.
|
12-01-2009, 03:10 AM | #118 | ||
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
12-01-2009, 10:12 AM | #119 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
|
Quote:
What worries me most about Harbaugh is the NFL. I do think he plans on doing college a little bit longer, but at the same time, he spent so much time in the NFL that I have no idea if that is what he wants or if he is content will college. While all the college to pro guys have flamed out for the most part, he seems to be the one current guy with a lot of shine on him and will assuredly be called once the season is over about openings. That is when the real fun will start. |
|
12-01-2009, 02:31 PM | #120 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Edmond, OK
|
Quote:
Seriously...? Ah, come on man. You know I can't let this one slide. Just check the number of Big 12 Championships of Stoops vs. Brown. Even if Texas gets one this year, which they certainly will, it's not even close. And just because OU had a bad season this year with injuries like I've never seen before, don't expect them not to return to previous form. All indications are that this recruiting class will be one of their best. |
|
12-01-2009, 02:45 PM | #121 |
High School JV
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Jersey
|
I can't believe how classless Bowden is being saying he wants his last game to be in Florida. The team doesn't deserve the Champs or Gator Bowl. As a member of a collegiate staff, my bowl bonus is higher by a full paycheck if my school attended either of these bowl games. If I was a member of Clemson, BC or Georgia Tech, I would be pissed. I know he was forced out and that sucks but leveraging your way into a better bowl is not the way to leave.
__________________
"If the Bible has taught us nothing else, and it hasn't, it's that girls should stick to girls sports, such as hot oil wrestling and foxy boxing and such and such." |
12-01-2009, 03:07 PM | #122 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
I've said repeatedly I don't think Stoops will leave Oklahoma - I think he'll just play Notre Dame's apparent interest into a raise and/or extension. One could paint a plausible scenario for why he might leave, but I doubt it will happen. |
|
12-01-2009, 03:10 PM | #123 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
|
Apparently ND is reaching out to Mike Reiley right now. Great coach but everything I read says he's from Corvallis and loves it there. Maybe ND is a job he leaves for though.
|
12-01-2009, 03:11 PM | #124 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
what a tool. i hope they tell him to go fuck himself no way BC makes either of those bowls though - we'll be lucky to get the Emerald Bowl in SF (although if we do maybe i'd go out there for that?)
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
12-01-2009, 03:36 PM | #125 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dayton, OH
|
Quote:
Really? I have come to expect it. I am just so pleased he won't be able to catch Paterno in wins, I can't even tell you.
__________________
My listening habits |
|
12-01-2009, 03:38 PM | #126 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Edmond, OK
|
Quote:
Fair enough... I'll leave my post as directed to anyone crazy enough to think Texas has surpassed Oklahoma in the Big XII. |
|
12-01-2009, 03:44 PM | #127 | |
Death Herald
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Le stelle la notte sono grandi e luminose nel cuore profondo del Texas
|
Quote:
Wow, call me crazy to think there might be a case to be made when Texas is 4-1 against OU over the past 5 seasons. Not to mention the much better performances Texas has turned in when in BCS games. Most disinterested observers would have a hard time making a definitive case that either team is ahead of the other.
__________________
Thinkin' of a master plan 'Cuz ain't nuthin' but sweat inside my hand So I dig into my pocket, all my money is spent So I dig deeper but still comin' up with lint |
|
12-01-2009, 03:49 PM | #128 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2002
|
Looks like Gary Patterson is working on an extension with TCU. It should make the Horned Frog faithful feel a bit more secure this off-season once it's signed.
http://sports.espn.go.com/dallas/ncf...ory?id=4703348 |
12-01-2009, 03:55 PM | #129 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
|
Kelly still won't shoot down ND rumors. I think it's safe to say that if he's offered, he'll be the ND coach.
|
12-01-2009, 04:01 PM | #130 | ||
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Edmond, OK
|
Quote:
Hmm... I would swear he said Big XII. Quote:
And I'm not sure I said that. Pay attention, cartman... Last edited by Cuckoo : 12-01-2009 at 04:03 PM. |
||
12-01-2009, 04:47 PM | #131 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
|
Riley will not leave Oregon State. He's been down that road before and has no interest in repeating it.
|
12-01-2009, 04:55 PM | #132 | |
Death Herald
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Le stelle la notte sono grandi e luminose nel cuore profondo del Texas
|
Quote:
You seemed to infer that Oklahoma was ahead of Texas with this statement:
__________________
Thinkin' of a master plan 'Cuz ain't nuthin' but sweat inside my hand So I dig into my pocket, all my money is spent So I dig deeper but still comin' up with lint Last edited by cartman : 12-01-2009 at 04:55 PM. |
|
12-01-2009, 05:10 PM | #133 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
Yeah, I don't see BC getting a bowl down in Florida. Some projections have them going to the Meineke in Charlotte (vs Pitt or WVU) others figure Emerald vs Stanford. edit to add: Last year's trip to the Music City Bowl seems to limit them to those two options realistically. And since UNC went to the Meineke last year (and is projected to Nashville this year), I first thought it would be the more likely option for BC although you were just there in '06. But upon further review, I assume FSU will be considered the first choice for the bowls with the 5/6/7 ties & since it appears that the Emerald bowl tie ends after this season (they go to a WAC 1/2/3 or Army or Navy tie starting next year) I'd think they'll get the last choice meaning something like UNC - Music City ... FSU - Meineke ... BC - Emerald might be the end result
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis Last edited by JonInMiddleGA : 12-01-2009 at 05:19 PM. |
|
12-01-2009, 05:24 PM | #134 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
|
If Rutgers wins vs WVU Saturday and Cincy beats Pitt, it looks like WVU will still go to the Gator (obviously, as discussed) and Rutgers will face Miami in Charlotte. Would be a fun match-up with Schiano's history over there.
Pitt and their disgustingly-small traveling fanbase would probably head to Toronto. |
12-01-2009, 05:26 PM | #135 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
|
Quote:
Even with a Rutgers loss you may end up in the Charlotte bowl. Pitt's fanbase is that bad. They returned 5k tickets for the brawl this year. |
|
12-01-2009, 05:48 PM | #136 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
{scratches head} I'm having a tough time figuring how Miami ends up bumped down to the 5/6/7 ACC bowl tier. They're #3 by overall record, tied for #4 in conference record with BC, will be ACC #4 in the BCS at worst. I think the conference has been through enough upset, hard feelings, anger, etc at bowls trying to break the selection order in the past few years that them getting downgraded is unlikely & perhaps even moreso because it would be at the benefit of a hated rival. edit to add: Since in hindsight I realize that I shouldn't take for granted that everyone knows this, the ACC pick order is Orange-Peach-Gator-Champ Sports 1 thru 4, followed by a 5/6/7 tier that isn't specific for Music City, Meineke, and Emerald. Then comes Eagle Bank & GMAC in the event there are 8 or 9 teams bowl eligible. That changes next year incidentally, becoming Orange-Peach-Champs-Sun (ACCCG runner-up or #4)-Meineke-Music City-Independence-Eagle Bank, with a contingency to fill the Emerald if there's no one in their new deal eligible. Incident
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis Last edited by JonInMiddleGA : 12-01-2009 at 05:52 PM. |
|
12-01-2009, 05:52 PM | #137 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ashburn, VA
|
Maryland is keeping Fridge. Maryland Athletics - University of Maryland Official Athletic Site
Still not sure how I feel about that, as a season ticket holder. /tk
__________________
GO TERPS! https://www.flickr.com/photos/terpkristin https://twitter.com/terpkristin |
12-01-2009, 05:58 PM | #138 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
|
Quote:
This is the Gator's last year with BE/ACC matchup. I don't think they really care if they piss anyone off and Bowden coming out and saying he wants a Florida bowl game plus the FSU president leaking an agreement being reached puts the ACC in a really tough spot. I won't shed any tears for Miami, though. The move the ACC has been a disaster for them to this point. |
|
12-01-2009, 06:00 PM | #139 | ||
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
|
Quote:
So sad. Quote:
Like you said, FSU being bumped up significantly is how Miami gets pushed from 4th to 5th. Clemson goes to the Champs on account of bringing a bigger crowd (and maybe due to the H2H win?). Just speculation I've read, nothing locked in. |
||
12-01-2009, 06:09 PM | #140 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
I thought, the conference ultimately has to sign off on who goes where (although that may only be true 5-7 and not 2-4) so even if the Gator doesn't care about making someone mad, the ACC would/should/might. But they may not be contractually able to stop it either. And if it were another team getting screwed over to give Bowden a FL bowl I might think it was more likely but Miami? Damn, that's asking them to swallow an awful lot even if I do wish they had never been added to the conference in the first place. And if FSU leaked it (which I'm pretty sure is a conference rule violation) then they at least ought to get their hand spanked for it as hard as the conference rules allow.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis Last edited by JonInMiddleGA : 12-01-2009 at 06:10 PM. |
|
12-01-2009, 06:15 PM | #141 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
And lest I look too dumb, I didn't know about the Gator leak until it was mentioned in this thread.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
12-01-2009, 06:19 PM | #142 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
|
Quote:
My understanding of the ACC rules is that at 6-6 FSU can't bypass any team with more than 1 win in conference play without permission. The ACC title game winner obviously goes to the BCS, the 2nd pick will likely be Va Tech, with FSU at 4-4 in conference play that only leaves the loser of Clemson and Georgia Tech as the team they need permission to jump. Miami gets screwed, but it's a situation where they really aren't going to have say in the matter. Here's a blog post on ESPN where they quote a conference spokesman. FSU to Gator Bowl? - ACC Blog - ESPN |
|
12-01-2009, 06:53 PM | #143 |
Bonafide Seminole Fan
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Miami
|
I am not much of a fan of Bobby Bowden these days(In time I will reflect and gain my love for him) but some of the comments made are shitty. If Bowden wants to play in Florida and a bowl other then the Gator picks them(like the Champs) then how is that wrong?
__________________
Subby's favorite woman hater. |
12-01-2009, 08:27 PM | #144 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
|
|
12-01-2009, 08:38 PM | #145 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
|
Reading a few sites, and Butch Davis is popping up quite a bit for ND. I doubt it but it'd be interesting. Great recruiter, but never been a big fan of his coaching.
Last edited by DeToxRox : 12-01-2009 at 08:42 PM. |
12-01-2009, 08:42 PM | #146 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
|
Looks like you were right, as now the most in-touch Rutgers writer is saying Rutgers will go to the Meineke win-or-lose vs WVU unless Pitt beats Cincy.
So Pitt will either be going to a BCS game or Birmingham, Alabama. Ouch. |
12-01-2009, 09:00 PM | #147 | ||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
Okay, so 1 to the Orange (GT/CLEM), 2 to the Peach (VT), 3 to the Gator, 4 to the Champ Sports So from the spokesman, the only way FSU can go to the Gator Bowl is if GT or Clemson agree to be bypassed? BUT Quote:
So on losses that count we've got GT - 1 VT & CLEM - 2 BC & Miami - 3 FSU & UNC - 4 So if Clemson loses the ACCCG & agrees to give away the Gator Bowl to FSU with the presumption of getting the Champs, what prevents the Champs from taking Miami over them and bumping the conference runner-up all the way to the #5 bowl?
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
||
12-01-2009, 09:38 PM | #148 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
|
Wouldn't shock me at all. Davis has done well at North Carolina, but he'd have the ability to recruit better guys easier at Notre Dame. And he could elevate his reputation as a coach by succeeding at Notre Dame. He got a lot of credit for rebuilding Miami after their probation and setting the table for Coker, but he's predictably found the sledding a little tougher at Carolina.
|
12-01-2009, 09:48 PM | #149 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
Quote:
It would almost be worth losing to see Pitt fall all the way down to Toronto in "the season that they returned to prominence." Almost. If WVU and Cincy both win, I'd still love to see Rutgers to Charlotte (which is actually a pretty nice bowl trip, in my experience) and Pitt to Toronto or Birmingham. |
|
12-01-2009, 09:51 PM | #150 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
Quote:
I think he'd be a good choice if he were 5 to 10 years younger, but he is 58-years old right now. I'm not sure it makes sense from his or Notre Dame's point of view when you consider his age. He's had cancer and probably isn't a guy that will want to coach into his late 60s or 70s and he kind of already has the ball rolling at UNC. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|